In light of the accelerated global growth of digital humanities, an escalating number of inquiries and critiques have been directed towards this field. Consequently, it becomes imperative to scrutinize the rationality of digital humanities research through a philosophical lens and address prevalent criticisms. Studies underscore that positivist philosophy forms the underpinning for quantitative research within the humanities, while structuralist theory furnishes a mature framework and structural model for digital humanities research practices.Upon comprehensive examination of diverse critiques aimed at digital humanities, a consensus emerges. Scholars engaged in digital humanities research are advised to integrate quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. This integration should encompass the incorporation of diverse data sources, analytical techniques, and expressive forms. This approach facilitates the analysis and presentation of intricate, dynamic, and multifaceted phenomena within the humanities. Moreover, it is essential to merge information processing with knowledge creation to forestall the generation of spurious findings. This necessitates a concerted effort to fortify the quality assessment and management of data, as well as to identify and rectify errors and biases inherent in various datasets. Such measures collectively enhance the usability and accuracy of the data in the realm of digital humanities research.