E-resources
-
Willison, Donald, ScD; Ondrusek, Nancy, PhD; McLaughlin, John, PhD
Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 04/2015, Volume: 187, Issue: 7Journal Article
Fletcher points to streamlined ethics review processes introduced in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. There is also a Canadian solution. Public Health Ontario has developed a process wherein all studies involving human participants receive an initial risk screening to determine the required level of ethical scrutiny.2 Similar to the New Zealand protocol with 24 questions,3 the Public Health Ontario process involves a 20-item risk-screening tool, which sorts projects into one of four review levels: full ethics board review, a conventional delegated review process, an expedited delegated review process or no further review with periodic audit (manuscript currently under review).
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.