E-resources
Peer reviewed
Open access
-
Zhang, Guangjian; Zhang, Desheng; Ge, Mingming; Petkovšek, Martin; Coutier-Delgosha, Olivier
International journal of heat and mass transfer, 11/2022, Volume: 197, Issue: CJournal Article
•We point out the inappropriate classification of combining condensation shock and collapse-induced pressure wave mechanisms in the literature.•X-ray phase contrast imaging enhances significantly the vapour-liquid interfaces enabling a more detailed visualization of the two-phase structures.•Three different types of mechanisms responsible for large cloud shedding are revealed using experimental measurements. The conventional high-speed images of cavitation with a set of X-ray phase contrast images reveal the presence of three different types of mechanisms responsible for large cloud shedding: re-entrant jet mechanism, condensation shock wave mechanism, and collapse-induced pressure wave mechanism. At higher cavitation numbers, the sheet cavity is relatively short and the cavity detachment is a consequence of a re-entrant jet pinching off the cavity from its leading edge. At lower cavitation numbers, the re-entrant jet plays a smaller role in the cavitation instabilities and the primary reason for periodic cloud shedding is the condensation shock mechanism where a void fraction discontinuity propagates upstream until collapsing the entire cavity. If the amount of shed vapour cloud reaches a certain extent, the collapse will emit a pressure wave strong enough to disturb the growing cavity, and subsequently make it detached from the wall. This is the third mechanism observed in the experiments. We point out the inappropriate classification of combining condensation shock and collapse-induced pressure wave mechanisms in the literature, since we identify pronounced differences between them: (i) the pressure increase across the condensation front is very weak (a few kPa) while the amplitude of collapse-induced pressure wave can be hundreds of kPa, (ii) the travelling velocity of the collapse-induced pressure wave within the cavity is much faster than the condensation shock, and (iii) the collapse-induced pressure wave does not result in an obvious discontinuity in void fraction when it propagates through the cavity, in contrary to the condensation shock.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.