Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
VSE knjižnice (vzajemna bibliografsko-kataložna baza podatkov COBIB.SI)
  • Judging artistry on balance beam
    Pajek, Maja, 1974-
    The problem of a systematic bias and inconsistency of judges which may influence the final ranks of competitors is a concern in Artistic Gymnastics. Continuous monitoring of the quality of judging ... (incorporating reliability andvalidity) is a necessity. Due to relatively poor definitions of Artistry in the Code of Points (2009), judging of artistry may suffer from serious flaws in reliability and validity. We have used the balance beam artistry evaluation forms given by 5 execution judges at World Championship in Tokyo 2011 to analyze reliability and validity of artistry judging. Results of the survey have shown that artistry deductions were received by a highly variable number of competitors from separate judges in the same components of artistry.The variability of average total artistry deduction was relatively large and the average correlation coefficient in total artistry deductions between all judge pairs was relatively low: 0.6 0.06, significantly below in comparison to average correlation coefficient in total deductions from execution score, which was 0.73+-0.04, p < 0.001 for the significance of the differences in correlation coefficients. Kendallćs coefficient W revealed significant systematic over- or under-rating of judges in the components of artistry of presentation, sureness of performance and variation in rhythm, but also in total artistry deductions (W values ranged from 0.05 to 0.53, p < 0.001 for all W coefficients). We have shown that reliability and validity of artistry judging was not satisfactory in this analysis. We propose that the performance of judging artistry should be repetitively examined in present Olympic Cycle (2012-2016) and if such results are co
    Vrsta gradiva - prispevek na konferenci ; neleposlovje za odrasle
    Leto - 2015
    Jezik - angleški
    COBISS.SI-ID - 4665265