To compare the seropositivity rate of cancer patients with noncancer controls after inactive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and evaluate the factors affecting seropositivity.
Spike IgG antibodies against ...SARS-CoV-2 were measured in blood samples of 776 cancer patients and 715 noncancer volunteers. An IgG level ≥50 AU/ml is accepted as seropositive.
The seropositivity rate was 85.2% in the patient group and 97.5% in the control group. The seropositivity rate and antibody levels were significantly lower in the patient group (p < 0.001). Age and chemotherapy were associated with lower seropositivity in cancer patients (p < 0.001).
This study highlighted the efficacy and safety of the inactivated vaccine in cancer patients.
Clinical Trials Registration:
(ClinicalTrials.gov)
Cancer patients are at high risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2 and of developing the associated disease, COVID-19, which therefore puts them in the priority group for vaccination. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of inactive SARSCoV-2 vaccination, an inactivated virus vaccine, in cancer patients. The immune response rate, defined as seropositivity, was 85.2% in the cancer patient group and 97.5% in the control group. The levels of antibodies, which are blood markers of immune response to the vaccine, were also significantly lower in the patient group, especially in those older than 60 years and receiving chemotherapy. These results highlight the importance of determining the effective vaccine type and dose in cancer patients to protect them from COVID-19 without disrupting their cancer treatment.
Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality both globally and in our country. In Turkey, we conducted a multicenter investigation into the effectiveness of second-line treatments and ...real-life data for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT04757311).
In this retrospective analysis, records from 28 centers were collected, and histopathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics were documented. Patients were categorized into groups based on their second-line biological treatments: anti-EGFR (Group A and Group B, panitumumab and cetuximab) and anti-VEGF (Group C, bevacizumab and aflibercept). They were then compared within these groups.
A total of 588 patients with documented RAS wild-type status were evaluated. The median OS was 15.7, 14.3 and 14.7 months in Group A, Group B and Group C, respectively (
= 0.764). The median PFS of the patients in second-line setting that received panitumumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab/aflibercept were 7.8, 6.6 and 7.4 months, respectively (
= 0.848).
According to the results of our real-life data study, there is no significant difference in efficiency between the combination of biological agent and chemotherapy used in the second-line treatments.
e20512 Background: Evaluation of real-world data together with data in clinical studies is very important in the evaluation of treatment algorithms. In real life, treatments are applied to the ...elderly, patients with poor performance and unusual groups with comorbidities. Determining these treatment results is important in the creation of treatment algorithms. Methods: In our country, within the scope of the Registurk-Lung observational study (NCT05254119), a total of 4250 patients without driver mutation, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were recorded between December 2021 and December 2023 in 42 centers representing the whole country. The demographic, histopathological, molecular and clinical data of the patients were recorded. The relationship between progression-free survival (PFS) time and overall survival (OS) time with these characteristics was investigated. Results: 4250 patients were evaluated. The median age was 64 (26-90) years and 15.1% of the patients were female. The proportion of patients who never smoked was 10.4 %. Histopathologically, 36.4% of the patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma. PDL-1 level was higher than 50% in 24.0% of patients and < 1 in 40.4% of patients. Only 11.8 percent of patients received single agent immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. Other patients had received only a combination of doublet chemotherapy. The PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 6.4-7.3) and OS 14.6 (95% CI: 12.3-16.8) months in the whole patient group. Compared to the group that received chemotherapy alone, PFS and overall survival were longer in the group that received chemoimmunotherapy. This difference between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p:0,001 and 0,031 respectively). Conclusions: As shown in clinical studies, immunotherapy alone or chemoimmunotherapy according to PDL-1 expression status provides a significant survival contribution compared to chemotherapy alone.
Abstract only
299
Background: The contribution of metastasectomy to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with advanced stage colorectal cancer has been ...demonstrated in clinical trials. However, clinical trials may not represent the efficacy of treatment given to the whole population in daily practice, therefore evaluation of real-life data is needed. Methods: The demographic, pathological and clinical characteristics of 1064 RAS wild type pts were recorded in 28 centers in Turkey between January 2016 and March 2019 as part of the Onco-Colon Registry Program ( NCT04757311 ). Metastasectomy was performed in 169 patients (15.9%). In this study, pts with and without metastasectomy were compared in terms of demographic, histopathological and clinical features and treatment results. Results: Median follow-up time was 24 months(mos) (1-74), median age was 59 years (30-81). 32.5% of the pts were women. The proportion of pts with primary right colon was determined to be 16.8%. Synchronous metastasis was detected in 76.3% of those who underwent metastasectomy. Isolated liver metastasectomy was performed in 85.8% of the pts. It has been shown that 21.1% of the pts have MSI-H and 23.3% have a mucinous component. Metastasectomy was performed after conversion therapy in 54.8% of pts. In the patient group who underwent metastasectomy after medical treatment, the median time between the beginning of treatment and metastasectomy was found to be 7 mos (2-34). When the patient characteristics were compared, no significant difference was found between the groups with and without metastasectomy (p > 0.05). The median PFS (mPFS) was 13.5 mos in the group that underwent metastasectomy and 9.9 mos in the group that was not performed (p < 0.0001; HR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). The median OS (mOS) was 47.3 mos in the group that underwent metastasectomy and 24.3 mos in the group without metastasectomy (p < 0.0001; HR: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.27-0.48). Conclusions: The significant contribution of metastasectomy on mPFS and mOS was shown in this reallife data based trial, where no difference was found in terms of general participation characteristics. In daily practice, prolonged mPFS and mOS emerges as pts who are followed-up radiologically at regular intervals from the beginning and who are appropriate for surgery have the chance of metastasectomy.