Methotrexate (MTX) has become the foundation disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) for RA. However, concern exists regarding its possible association with infectious complications including ...varicella zoster virus (VZV) and herpes zoster (HZ). Furthermore, no consensus exists regarding pre-MTX VZV screening or the use of VZV vaccine.
We undertook systematic literature review (SLR) investigating the relationship between the use of MTX in patients with RA and VZV and HZ infection. Additionally, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, HPA, the CDC, Rheumatology societies and WHO web sites and publications were consulted.
Thirty-five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria comprising 29 observational studies and 6 case reports. The case reports and 13 observation studies considered the association between MTX and HZ. Three of the observational studies reported a positive association although in 5 cases, patients were concurrently treated with prednisolone. Five studies concluded that there was no association between HZ and MTX. Three studies comparing the infection rates of MTX with other RA therapies found that MTX did not result in higher HZ infection rates. Three studies examining the association between HZ and MTX treatment duration failed to show a link.
No evidence exists to support an association between MTX and VZV infection in RA patients and the data regarding the role of MTX in HZ development is conflicting. The role of pre-MTX VZV screening is controversial and, as it may delay initiation of RA treatment, we suggest against VZV screening in this context.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune condition which affects approximately 1% of the adult population worldwide and is characterized by joint inflammation, with extra-articular ...features being common. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is one of the chief pro-inflammatory cytokines found in the joints and sera of patients with RA. Increased levels of IL-6 correlate with inflammation, disease activity, and radiological damage. RA treatment should focus on minimizing the signs and symptoms of disease (pain, stiffness, and swelling of the joints) and on preventing or minimizing joint damage to preserve functionality and quality of life. The benefits of early, intensive intervention are now acknowledged, with all patients with newly diagnosed, active RA being started on methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy or combination therapy. Lack of efficacy, intolerance, and/or toxicity can lead to discontinuation of this drug, and there is a need for exploring further treatment options. In the UK, patients with persistently high disease activity who have failed at least two conventional disease-modifying agents (DMARDs) including MTX may qualify for biologic therapy. Numerous trials have shown intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ), a biologic drug targeting and inhibiting IL-6, to be effective for controlling inflammation in RA, with an acceptable safety profile. Its superiority in monotherapy when compared with other biologic agents makes it the drug of choice for patients who are intolerant or have contraindications to traditional DMARDs. However, one of the drawbacks of IV TCZ is the requirement for monthly infusions, which is inherently inconvenient for the patient and associated with increased cost. Subcutaneous (SC) TCZ has now been approved following two clinical trials which showed similar efficacy and safety compared to IV TCZ, and better efficacy compared to placebo (SUMMACTA and BREVACTA trials, respectively). Respiratory infections are the most common side effects in patients receiving SC TCZ. Advantages of SC formulations include convenience and reduced cost compared with IV therapies. Overall, patients tend to have a preference for SC over IV administration of medications. Close monitoring of patients should be undertaken in all cases, paying particular attention to the full blood count, liver enzymes, and cholesterol levels.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a debilitating autoimmune disease that has traditionally been treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). In the European Union (EU), patients who fail ...to respond to traditional DMARDs may receive tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists. However, approximately one-third of patients fail TNF-α antagonists due to adverse effects or lack of efficacy, and there are limited treatment options available to these patients. As knowledge of the underlying immunopathology of RA evolves, new strategies for inhibiting the inflammatory process have emerged. It is well known that activated T cells play a key role in orchestrating the immunopathological mechanisms of RA. Inhibiting the full activation of T cells is a rational strategy in the treatment of RA and represents a novel method of inhibiting disease activity, distinct from inflammatory cytokine blockade. Here, the safety and efficacy of abatacept, a selective T-cell co-stimulation modulator recently approved in the EU, is reviewed in patients with RA who have shown an inadequate response to TNF-α antagonists. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III trial of patients with an inadequate response to TNF-α antagonism, abatacept was effective in improving the signs and symptoms of RA, as well as patient-centered outcomes, such as fatigue, disability, and other mental and physical aspects of health-related quality of life. These improvements were sustained through 2 years during the open-label, long-term extension period. In this trial, abatacept demonstrated a safety and tolerability profile similar to placebo. Taken together, these data suggest that selective co-stimulation modulation with abatacept may be a viable option for patients who are refractory to both traditional therapies and TNF-α antagonists.
Several guidelines recommended routine use of Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) to monitor disease and the response to treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In practice, it may be appropriate to ...use historical erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values in place of same-day ESR, thereby preventing unnecessary delay in adjusting intervention. We asked whether ESR blood samples taken up to 3 months prior to the clinic appointment were adequate to accurately assess RA disease activity using the DAS28. RA patients (
N
= 66) who met the inclusion criteria were assessed at baseline and ESR obtained on the day of review to calculate the DAS28 and compared with the DAS28 derived from the latest previous ESR (mean interval, 38.6 days; range, 6–99 days). Limits of agreement (LoA) were used to assess the agreement between the DAS28 pairs. The mean age of the participants was 61.5 years (range, 20–83 years), with mean disease duration of 11.0 years (range, 0.1–40 years). Comparing the DAS28 using same-day ESR versus pre-recorded historical ESR showed a small statistical difference (mean, −0.09; 95 %CI, −0.1602 to −0.017) in the DAS28 score. The calculated LoA (−0.66 and 0.48) demonstrated acceptable agreement between DAS28 pairs, with 7.6 % of patients residing outside the LoA, all of whom had a significant treatment change. Disease misclassification occurred in 9.1 % of patients who were close to disease activity boundaries. Our results indicate that differences in the DAS28 due to a previous or same-day ESR are unlikely to be clinically significant for RA patients with established disease. A decision to adjust treatment therefore may be confidently made for most patients using the most recent ESR for calculating the DAS28, provided there was no major change in treatment since the last ESR measurement.
We describe 5 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who developed pulmonary complications following infliximab therapy; 4 patients had preexisting usual interstitial pneumonia. As the ...pathophysiology of the pulmonary insult is unknown, we advise caution in the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy in patients with RA with underlying lung disease of sufficient severity to withhold methotrexate treatment.
Major advances in drug development have led to the introduction of biologic disease- modifying drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, which has resulted in unprecedented improvement in ...outcomes for many patients. These agents have been found to be effective in reducing clinical signs and symptoms, improving radiological damage, quality of life, and functionality, and have also been found to have an acceptable safety profile. Despite this, drug adherence is unknown, which has huge health care and health-economic implications. Local and national guidelines exist for the use of biologics; however, its varied use is widespread. Although this may in part reflect differences in prescribing behavior, patient preference plays a key role. In this review we will explore the factors that contribute to patient preference for, and adherence to, biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis with emphasis on the subcutaneous preparation of abatacept, a T-cell costimulatory molecule blocker. Overall, subcutaneous administration is preferred by patients and this may well improve drug adherence.
Summary The management of rheumatic conditions, including those occurring in children, has improved dramatically over the last decade following the introduction of biologic disease-modifying ...anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDS) into the therapeutic arsenal. The benefits have been realised in multiple aspects of disease including signs and symptoms, bone and cartilage destruction, disability and quality of life. Overall, bDMARDS have an acceptable safety profile in the short to medium term in adults and children, however, that following longer term use remains unclear. As these drugs target key signalling molecules and cells of the immune system, adverse events are not unanticipated. In this review we will discuss pulmonary complications of biologic therapies used in the management of rheumatic diseases in both children and adults.
PDF
