To assess the risk of adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA treated with tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor antibody, in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
A systematic literature search ...was conducted using the Cochrane library, PUBMED and EMBASE for all RCTs (of the use of tocilizumab for RA) until September 2009. Fixed effect meta-analyses were conducted to compare the incidence of AEs after treatment with tocilizumab 8 and 4 mg/kg in combination with MTX, and 8 mg/kg tocilizumab monotherapy, with controls. Pooled summary odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.
Six trials were analysed (four trials included 8 mg/kg tocilizumab and MTX combination therapy, three of which also assessed the 4 mg/kg dose). Three studies assessed tocilizumab monotherapy at 8 mg/kg. Pooled ORs revealed statistical significance for an increased risk of AEs in the 8 mg/kg combination group compared with controls (OR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.26, 1.86). The risk of infection was significantly higher in the 8 mg/kg combination group compared with controls (OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.07, 1.58). No increased incidence of malignancy, tuberculosis reactivation or hepatitis was seen.
Tocilizumab in combination with MTX as a treatment for RA is associated with a small but significantly increased risk of AEs, which is comparable with that of other biologics. Vigilance for untoward effects is, therefore, imperative in any patient treated with these immuno-suppressive agents.
Biologic therapies have resulted in a sea change in the management of inflammatory arthritis; however, a higher risk of opportunistic infection, particularly tuberculosis (TB), is well recognised. ...This has led to the development of TB screening guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of latent TB in patients prescribed biologic therapy in an endemic area (prevalence of TB 50/100,000) and to assess the risk of subsequent reactivation. Retrospective case note review of all patients with inflammatory arthritis ever prescribed biologic therapy between 1998 and 2014 at our centre. Two hundred ninety-nine patients (109 men, 190 women) who had ever been prescribed biologic therapy over a 16-year period were included. Mean age upon commencing the biologic therapy was 51 years. Two hundred eighteen (73 %) patients were Caucasian with remaining from ethnic minorities. Two hundred thirty-nine (80 %) prescriptions were for TNF inhibitors. Median duration of biologic therapy was 4.2 years for those who remained on treatment prior to stopping or switching therapies. During 1998–2007, 112 patients underwent clinical assessment, chest X-ray and check for BCG scar. One patient of Asian origin developed extrapulmonary TB within 6 weeks of adalimumab initiation. Following a year of anti-TB treatment, he restarted the biologic therapy with no ill effects. One hundred eighty-seven participants (who started on biologic therapy between 2008 and 2014) underwent additional interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) testing as part of a new TB screening protocol (
T
-spot test). Eighteen (10 %) had positive test with normal chest X-rays. Six patients were white, nine of Asian origin and three others. Three Caucasian patients had a borderline result. All had 3 months of isoniazid and rifampicin with simultaneous prescription of biologic agent (13 had TNF antagonist, 5 rituximab and 3 tocilizumab). No cases of active TB infection were observed. Overall prevalence of latent TB in patients with inflammatory arthritis prescribed biologic therapy in an endemic area is 10 %. The risk warrants careful screening and monitoring in all patients. Adherence to strict screening protocol reduces the risk of active TB infection irrespective of the biologic therapy employed.
Background
Non-adherence impacts negatively on patient health outcomes and has associated economic costs. Understanding drivers of treatment adherence in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases is key ...for the development of effective strategies to tackle non-adherence.
Objective
To identify factors associated with treatment non-adherence across diseases in three clinical areas: rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology.
Design
Systematic review.
Data Sources
Articles published in PubMed, Science Direct, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1980 to February 14, 2014.
Study Selection
Studies were eligible if they included patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, or psoriasis and included statistics to examine associations of factors with non-adherence.
Data Extraction
Data were extracted by the first reviewer using a standardized 23-item form and verified by a second/third reviewer. Quality assessment was carried out for each study using a 16-item quality checklist.
Results
73 studies were identified for inclusion in the review. Demographic or clinical factors were not consistently associated with non-adherence. Limited evidence was found for an association between non-adherence and treatment factors such as dosing frequency. Consistent associations with adherence were found for psychosocial factors, with the strongest evidence for the impact of the healthcare professional–patient relationship, perceptions of treatment concerns and depression, lower treatment self-efficacy and necessity beliefs, and practical barriers to treatment.
Conclusions
While examined in only a minority of studies, the strongest evidence found for non-adherence were psychosocial factors. Interventions designed to address these factors may be most effective in tackling treatment non-adherence.
Abstract
Polypharmacy is increasingly common in rheumatology due to the complex nature of managing chronic autoimmune diseases. To date there has been limited research into the impact of polypharmacy ...on rheumatology patients. In this article we reviewed the literature to characterize the prevalence of polypharmacy and its effect on patients. In addition, we have highlighted some key drug–drug interactions to consider involving DMARDs as well as complementary and alternative medicines. There is emerging evidence demonstrating that polypharmacy contributes to adverse outcomes and alters treatment response. This association is best described in RA and is less clear in other patient cohorts. It is also unclear whether polypharmacy is directly harmful or just a surrogate marker for other factors affecting outcomes. Rheumatologists should be aware of the risk of polypharmacy as well as specific drug–drug interactions that can occur in managing chronic autoimmune disease.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in clinical practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with inadequate responses (IR) to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or ...both DMARDs and tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis).
Patients-categorised as TNFi-naive, TNFi-previous (washout) or TNFi-recent (no washout) -received open-label tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks ± DMARDs for 24 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuations were monitored. Efficacy end points included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses, 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and European League Against Rheumatism responses.
Overall, 1681 (976 TNF-naive, 298 TNFi-previous and 407 TNFi-recent) patients were treated; 5.1% discontinued treatment because of AEs. The AE rate was numerically higher in TNFi-recent (652.6/100 patient-years (PY)) and TNFi-previous (653.6/100PY) than in TNFi-naive (551.1/100PY) patients. Serious AE rates were 18.0/100PY, 28.0/100PY and 18.6/100PY; serious infection rates were 6.0/100PY, 6.8/100PY and 4.2/100PY, respectively. At week 4, 36.5% of patients achieved ACR20 response and 14.9% DAS28 remission (<2.6); at week 24, 66.9%, 46.6%, 26.4% and 56.8% achieved ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 responses and DAS28 remission, respectively. Overall, 61.6% (TNFi-naive), 48.5% (TNFi-previous) and 50.4% (TNFi-recent) patients achieved DAS28 remission.
In patients with RA who were DMARD-IR/TNFi-IR, tocilizumab ± DMARDs provided rapid and sustained efficacy without unexpected safety concerns.
Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have ...been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research was to document the incidence of diverticular disease in RA patients treated in the pre-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) era, following treatment with conventional DMARDs, and subsequent to tocilizumab therapy. We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index–Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Current Controlled Trials up to Nov. 2010. The publication titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers for relevance and quality, and the review was conducted following guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. In the pre-DMARD period of RA management, where patients were largely treated with NSAIDs and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal (GI) complications were a substantial cause of mortality with diverticulitis and colonic ulcers accounting for almost a third of GI-related deaths. In contrast, our search did not reveal any evidence of diverticular perforation in patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Eighteen cases of lower GI perforation (16 of whom had diverticulitis) have been documented in recent conference proceedings following tocilizumab treatment in clinical trials, with a lower GI perforation rate of 1.9 per 1,000 patient years (PY). This lies between the reported rate of GI perforations for corticosteroids and anti-TNF-α agents in the United Health Care database, with rates of 3.9 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 3.1–4.8) and 1.3 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 0.8–1.9), respectively. The majority of these patients were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs and/or long-term corticosteroids. Traditional DMARD therapy for RA appears not only to have modified the risk of lower GI perforation but prevented it. The risk of diverticular perforation may be slightly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab compared with conventional DMARDs or anti-TNF agents, but lower than that for corticosteroids. The mechanism of action of IL-6 antagonism in the pathophysiology of diverticular perforation has yet to be elucidated.
Abstract
Objective
To explore whether tocilizumab + tapering MTX has comparable efficacy and safety vs tocilizumab + stable MTX in adult RA patients with inadequate response to MTX.
Methods
This ...randomized, placebo-controlled non-inferiority study involved patients with severe active RA 28-joint DAS (DAS28) >5.1 who had initiated tocilizumab + MTX at the study start. Patients received open-label tocilizumab (8 mg/kg i.v. every 4 weeks) and open-label MTX. At week 24, patients achieving good/moderate EULAR response were randomized to group A (double-blind MTX taper) or group B (double-blind MTX maintenance); both arms continued open-label tocilizumab. Primary analysis was the proportion of patients maintaining good/moderate EULAR response from week 24 to 60.
Results
The study stopped early due to low recruitment, although the predetermined non-inferiority criteria were still met; 427 patients were enrolled to the open-label phase at week 0. At week 24, EULAR good/moderate response was achieved in 272 individuals (64.4%) who were randomized, 136 in each arm (36% withdrew/were not eligible). Additionally, 45.0% achieved DAS28 ⩽3.2, 33.5% achieved remission (DAS28 <2.6) and 64.2% had a DAS28 change ⩾1.2. After week 24 randomization, the proportion of patients maintaining good/moderate EULAR response to week 60 was significantly greater for MTX taper vs stable MTX (76.5 vs 65.4%; P = 0.036), and since the lower limit of the 95% CI was >0.9, the pre-determined criteria for non-inferiority was fulfilled despite reduced recruitment. Safety analysis revealed no unexpected tocilizumab safety signals.
Conclusions
Tapering MTX in patients with RA receiving tocilizumab was non-inferior to continuing stable MTX in maintaining a good/moderate EULAR response. There were no unexpected safety signals; tocilizumab and MTX therapy was generally well tolerated in both groups.
Trial registration number: EudraCT 2011-005260-20
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) plays a central role in the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tocilizumab TCZ (an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody) has been shown to be effective in the treatment ...of the condition. As up-regulation of IL-6 reduces the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, blockade of this cytokine may enhance CYP function. This may lead to reduced bioavailability of CYP-metabolized drugs. Due to the increasing use of TCZ, we undertook a systematic literature review to explore such interactions. Our search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, FDA and EMEA websites for in vitro and in vivo studies, clinical trials and reviews mentioning TCZ and CYP on the basis of the title and abstract. Appropriate articles were further screened based on full-text review to select only those reporting IL-6, TCZ and their potential interaction with CYP-metabolized drugs. Two in vitro studies showed that TCZ-reversed IL-6 induced reduction of CYP isozymes. CYP3A4 mRNA expression was most reduced by IL-6 followed by CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. This change was prevented with TCZ. Three clinical studies investigated the interaction showing simvastatin (CYP3A4 substrate) bioavailability reduced by TCZ and omeprazole bioavailability was decreased by TCZ-induced CYP2C19 activity. The bioavailability of dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 substrates) was shown to be unaffected by TCZ treatment. The observed increase in CYP isozyme activity by TCZ is of clinical relevance as the bioavailability of the CYP isozyme substrates were decreased in vivo. As CYP3A4 is the isozyme responsible for the largest proportion of drug metabolism, it is probable that the bioavailability of other drugs may be reduced by TCZ. Thus, clinicians should exercise caution when co-prescribing TCZ and CYP-metabolized drugs. More studies are required to investigate this interaction further.
Rituximab (RTX), a B-cell depleting mAb, has been reported to cause pulmonary toxicity in many patients. As the use of this biologic is increasing, we have undertaken a systematic review of the ...literature to gauge the nature and extent of non-infection-related RTX-induced lung disease.
A systematic literature review was undertaken to document all reported cases of RTX-associated interstitial lung disease (RTX-ILD), evaluating the epidemiological, clinical, radiological, histopathological, laboratory and management data from the available primary sources. The search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE up to June 2010 using the terms RTX in the advanced search option without limitations and all relevant publications reviewed manually. In addition, unpublished data from the Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency and the manufacturer (Roche) were evaluated to complement this search. Identified articles were included if they displayed a potential relationship between the administration of RTX and ILD following exclusion of other likely causes.
A total of 121 cases of potential RTX-ILD were identified from 21 clinical studies/trials, 30 case reports and 10 case series. The most common indication for RTX was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. RTX-ILD occurred more frequently in male patients and was most common during the fifth and sixth decades of life. In most cases, RTX was part of combination chemotherapy, but in 30 (24.7%) cases it was given as monotherapy. The mean and median number of cycles of RTX before disease onset was four, but cases following the first cycle or as late as the 12th cycle were also identified. The mean time of onset, from the last RTX infusion until symptom development or relevant abnormal radiological change was 30 days (range 0-158 days). Abnormal radiological findings were similar in all patients, with diffuse bilateral lung infiltrates apparent on chest radiographs and/or thoracic CT. Hypoxaemia was seen in all cases and pulmonary function tests were uniformly abnormal with a characteristic diffusion capacity deficit and restrictive ventilatory pattern. RTX-ILD was fatal in 18 cases.
ILD is a rare but potentially fatal complication of RTX therapy. This diagnosis should be considered in any patient who develops respiratory symptoms or new radiographic changes while receiving this biologic agent.
PDF
