A sorologia tem sido o método de escolha para o diagnóstico da toxoplasmose. Devido a isto, padronizamos um ensaio imunoenzimático (ELISA) e comparamos seus resultados com a técnica de ...imunofluorescência indireta (IFI). A técnica padronizada apresentou na pesquisa de IgG sensibilidade (S) de 96,7% e especificidade (E) de 75%, com valor de predição de positividade (VPP) de 83,3% e de negatividade (VPN) de 94,7%, com uma concordância ajustada (K) de 73,5%. A IFI apresentou S de 83,8%, E de 79,1% com VPP de 83,8 % e VPN de 79,1% com K de 63%. A concordância bruta entre os dois testes (ELISA/IFI) foi de 88,3% para pesquisa de IgG e de 81,5% para pesquisa de IgM, sendo o K de 70,8% para IgG e de 1,3% para IgM, sendo o índice de correlação (r) de 0,556 para IgG e de -0,023 para IgM. Podemos concluir que a ELISA-IgG padronizada é indicada nos processos de triagem sorológica, sendo a ELISA-IgM desaconselhada uma vez que apresentou baixos índices de concordância ajustada com a técnica de referência, sugerindo pouca confiabilidade dos resultados.
Serology has been the most popular method to diagnose toxoplasmosis. Accordingly, this study standardizes an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compares its results with the IFI technique. In the IgG detection test, the standardized technique presented a sensibility (S) of 96.77%, a specificity (SP) of 75%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.33%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.74%, and an adjusted concordance (K) of 73.50%. The IFI exhibited 83.87% for S, 79.16% for SP, 83.81% for PPV, 79.16% for NPV, and 63% for K. The rough concordance between these two tests (ELISA/IFI) was 88.35% for the IgG detection test and 81.55% for the IgM detection test. K was 70.82% and 1.31% for IgG and IgM, respectively, the correlation index (r) being 0.556 for IgG and -0.023 for IgM. We can conclude that standardized ELISA-IgG is indicated in serologic selection processes, whereas the ELISA-IgM is not recommended for presenting low values for the adjusted concordance with the reference technique, which suggests not very reliable results.
Serology has been the most popular method to diagnose toxoplasmosis. Accordingly, this study standardizes an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compares its results with the IFI technique. ...In the IgG detection test, the standardized technique presented a sensibility (S) of 96.77%, a specificity (SP) of 75%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.33%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.74%, and an adjusted concordance (K) of 73.50%. The IFI exhibited 83.87% for S, 79.16% for SP, 83.81% for PPV, 79. 16% for NPV, and 63% for K. The rough concordance between these two tests (ELISA/IFI) was 88.35% for the IgG detection test and 81.55% for the IgM detection test. K was 70.82% and 1.31% for IgG and IgM, respectively, the correlation index (r) being 0.556 for IgG and -0. 023 for IgM. We can conclude that standardized ELISA-IgG is indicated in serologic selection processes, whereas the ELISA-IgM is not recommended for presenting low values for the adjusted concordance with the reference technique, which suggests not very reliable results.
PDF
