Abstract The prevalence of ANA and anti-ENA in the general population is not well established, especially their clinical significance in healthy subjects. We herein determined the prevalence and ...predictive value of serum ANA and anti-ENA for connective tissue diseases (CTD), cancer, and mortality. We took advantage of a randomly selected sample of the 1998 general population (Isola I) consisting of 2828 subjects (53% women, age 43 ± 13 years) from a well-defined Northern Italian area. Serum ANA and anti-ENA were tested on the 2690 samples available in 2012 (Isola II, 50% women, age 58 ± 13 years). Administrative databases were searched for CTD, cancer diagnosis, and death cases occurring between enrollment and December 31, 2013. The hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for incident cases. Serum ANA is positive in 18.1% for any titer and 6.1% for titers ≥ 1:160, 23% in subjects over 50 years and 13.1% and 6.1% for any titer and titers ≥ 1:160, respectively, in women. The HR for CTD development was significantly high for all ANA titers, with the highest for ANA ≥ 1:160 (HR 14.19, 95% CI 3.07–65.68). ANA positivity was not associated with cancer (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.75–1.43), or with mortality (HR adjusted for age and sex 1.40; 95% CI 0.94–2.09). Serum anti-ENA is positive in a minority of subjects with highest figures for anti-nucleosome (1.9%), -histone (1.6%) and -PM/Scl (1.5%). In conclusion, serum ANA prevalence in the general population is highest in senior subjects and in women, while the female predominance is significantly lower compared to overt CTD. Serum ANA is associated with an increased probability of CTD development over time, but does not influence survival or cancer risk.
The prevalence of ANA and anti-ENA in the general population is not well established, especially their clinical significance in healthy subjects. We herein determined the prevalence and predictive ...value of serum ANA and anti-ENA for connective tissue diseases (CTD), cancer, and mortality. We took advantage of a randomly selected sample of the 1998 general population (Isola I) consisting of 2828 subjects (53% women, age 43±13 years) from a well-defined Northern Italian area. Serum ANA and anti-ENA were tested on the 2690 samples available in 2012 (Isola II, 50% women, age 58±13 years). Administrative databases were searched for CTD, cancer diagnosis, and death cases occurring between enrollment and December 31, 2013. The hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for incident cases. Serum ANA is positive in 18.1% for any titer and 6.1% for titers ≥1:160, 23% in subjects over 50 years and 13.1% and 6.1% for any titer and titers ≥1:160, respectively, in women. The HR for CTD development was significantly high for all ANA titers, with the highest for ANA ≥1:160 (HR 14.19, 95% CI 3.07–65.68). ANA positivity was not associated with cancer (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.75–1.43), or with mortality (HR adjusted for age and sex 1.40; 95% CI 0.94–2.09). Serum anti-ENA is positive in a minority of subjects with highest figures for anti-nucleosome (1.9%), -histone (1.6%) and -PM/Scl (1.5%). In conclusion, serum ANA prevalence in the general population is highest in senior subjects and in women, while the female predominance is significantly lower compared to overt CTD. Serum ANA is associated with an increased probability of CTD development over time, but does not influence survival or cancer risk.
•Serum ANA is detected in 18.1% of the general population and the prevalence increases with age.•Serum ANA is associated with an increased risk of connective tissue disease over 15 years.•Serum ANA is not related to an increased risk of cancer over 15 years.•Serum ANA positivity is not associated with increased mortality over 15 years.
The spectrum of autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) includes primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis. The immunological mechanisms triggering the initiation ...and perpetuation of AILD remains unknown, while autoantigens are now recognized in most cases, and are generally nontraditional in their widespread distribution. Sensitive and specific methods for the detection of serum autoantibodies in patients affected by AILD represent a challenge for researchers and clinicians who desire to obtain an early and certain diagnosis as well as markers of disease control. To this regard, the use and interpretation of serum autoantibodies in AILD may be seen as paradigmatic for the large gaps in our knowledge based on the lack of true population-based studies. The present review article will critically discuss the available evidence on the use of autoantibody findings in the diagnosis or management of autoimmune liver disease.
Presently, there is inconclusive evidence regarding the most effective treatment for idiopathic nonhistaminergic acquired angioedema (InH-AAE). Omalizumab may, however, prove to be a promising ...option. This case report describes two patients who presented with recurrent angioedema attacks, which was refractory to antihistamine therapy. Hence, they were treated with 300 mg omalizumab, every 4 weeks, for a period of 6 months. Both patients had shown a rapid response to the treatment and achieved complete resolution of symptoms without further AE attacks throughout the entire duration of the treatment period. After omalizumab’s suspension, one patient remained symptom free for the following 6 months and the other patient had recurrence of symptoms after 2 months for which he was retreated with omalizumab and once again became symptom free. Although omalizumab seems to be effective as a prophylactic treatment for InH-AAE, the determining factors leading to the differences in time-to-relapse between patients after its suspension remain unclear. Further studies are needed in order to better determine the potential therapeutic application of omalizumab and its role in maintenance therapy.
PDF
