Lynne E. Bernstein
House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, CA
Contact author: Edward T. Auer, Jr., Department of Speech-Language-Hearing, University of Kansas, Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside ...Avenue, Room 3001, Lawrence, KS 66045-7555. E-mail: auer{at}ku.edu .
Purpose: L. E. Bernstein, M. E. Demorest, and P. E. Tucker (2000) demonstrated enhanced speechreading accuracy in participants with early-onset hearing loss compared with hearing participants. Here, the authors test the generalization of Bernstein et al.'s (2000) result by testing 2 new large samples of participants. The authors also investigated correlates of speechreading ability within the early-onset hearing loss group and gender differences in speechreading ability within both participant groups.
Method: One hundred twelve individuals with early-onset hearing loss and 220 individuals with normal hearing identified 30 prerecorded sentences presented 1 at a time from visible speech information alone.
Results: The speechreading accuracy of the participants with early-onset hearing loss ( M = 43.55% words correct; SD = 17.48) significantly exceeded that of the participants with normal hearing ( M = 18.57% words correct; SD = 13.18), t (330) = 14.576, p < .01. Within the early-onset hearing loss participants, speechreading ability was correlated with several subjective measures of spoken communication. Effects of gender were not reliably observed.
Conclusion: The present results are consistent with the results of Bernstein et al. (2000). The need to rely on visual speech throughout life, and particularly for the acquisition of spoken language by individuals with early-onset hearing loss, can lead to enhanced speechreading ability.
KEY WORDS: speechreading, lipreading, deafness
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, ODKLJ, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VSZLJ
The ability to recognize words in connected speech under noisy listening conditions is critical to everyday communication. Many processing levels contribute to the individual listener's ability to ...recognize words correctly against background speech, and there is clinical need for measures of individual differences at different levels. Typical listening tests of speech recognition in noise require a list of items to obtain a single threshold score. Diverse abilities measures could be obtained through mining various open-set recognition errors during multi-item tests. This study sought to demonstrate that an error mining approach using open-set responses from a clinical sentence-in-babble-noise test can be used to characterize abilities beyond signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold. A stimulus-response phoneme-to-phoneme sequence alignment software system was used to achieve automatic, accurate quantitative error scores. The method was applied to a database of responses from normal-hearing (NH) adults. Relationships between two types of response errors and words correct scores were evaluated through use of mixed models regression.
Two hundred thirty-three NH adults completed three lists of the Quick Speech in Noise test. Their individual open-set speech recognition responses were automatically phonemically transcribed and submitted to a phoneme-to-phoneme stimulus-response sequence alignment system. The computed alignments were mined for a measure of acoustic phonetic perception, a measure of response text that could not be attributed to the stimulus, and a count of words correct. The mined data were statistically analyzed to determine whether the response errors were significant factors beyond stimulus SNR in accounting for the number of words correct per response from each participant. This study addressed two hypotheses: (1) Individuals whose perceptual errors are less severe recognize more words correctly under difficult listening conditions due to babble masking and (2) Listeners who are better able to exclude incorrect speech information such as from background babble and filling in recognize more stimulus words correctly.
Statistical analyses showed that acoustic phonetic accuracy and exclusion of babble background were significant factors, beyond the stimulus sentence SNR, in accounting for the number of words a participant recognized. There was also evidence that poorer acoustic phonetic accuracy could occur along with higher words correct scores. This paradoxical result came from a subset of listeners who had also performed subjective accuracy judgments. Their results suggested that they recognized more words while also misallocating acoustic cues from the background into the stimulus, without realizing their errors. Because the Quick Speech in Noise test stimuli are locked to their own babble sample, misallocations of whole words from babble into the responses could be investigated in detail. The high rate of common misallocation errors for some sentences supported the view that the functional stimulus was the combination of the target sentence and its babble.
Individual differences among NH listeners arise both in terms of words accurately identified and errors committed during open-set recognition of sentences in babble maskers. Error mining to characterize individual listeners can be done automatically at the levels of acoustic phonetic perception and the misallocation of background babble words into open-set responses. Error mining can increase test information and the efficiency and accuracy of characterizing individual listeners.
Traditionally, speech perception training paradigms have not adequately taken into account the possibility that there may be modality-specific requirements for perceptual learning with auditory-only ...(AO) versus visual-only (VO) speech stimuli. The study reported here investigated the hypothesis that there are modality-specific differences in how prior information is used by normal-hearing participants during vocoded versus VO speech training. Two different experiments, one with vocoded AO speech (Experiment 1) and one with VO, lipread, speech (Experiment 2), investigated the effects of giving different types of
information to trainees on each trial during training. The training was for four ~20 min sessions, during which participants learned to label novel visual images using novel spoken words. Participants were assigned to different types of prior information during training: Word Group trainees saw a printed version of each training word (e.g., "tethon"), and Consonant Group trainees saw only its consonants (e.g., "t_th_n"). Additional groups received no prior information (i.e., Experiment 1, AO Group; Experiment 2, VO Group) or a spoken version of the stimulus in a different modality from the training stimuli (Experiment 1, Lipread Group; Experiment 2, Vocoder Group). That is, in each experiment, there was a group that received prior information in the modality of the training stimuli from the other experiment. In both experiments, the Word Groups had difficulty retaining the novel words they attempted to learn during training. However, when the training stimuli were vocoded, the Word Group improved their phoneme identification. When the training stimuli were visual speech, the Consonant Group improved their phoneme identification and their open-set sentence lipreading. The results are considered in light of theoretical accounts of perceptual learning in relationship to perceptual modality.
In a series of studies we have been investigating how multisensory training affects unisensory perceptual learning with speech stimuli. Previously, we reported that audiovisual (AV) training with ...speech stimuli can promote auditory-only (AO) perceptual learning in normal-hearing adults but can impede learning in congenitally deaf adults with late-acquired cochlear implants. Here, impeder and promoter effects were sought in normal-hearing adults who participated in lipreading training. In Experiment 1, visual-only (VO) training on paired associations between CVCVC nonsense word videos and nonsense pictures demonstrated that VO words could be learned to a high level of accuracy even by poor lipreaders. In Experiment 2, visual-auditory (VA) training in the same paradigm but with the addition of synchronous vocoded acoustic speech impeded VO learning of the stimuli in the paired-associates paradigm. In Experiment 3, the vocoded AO stimuli were shown to be less informative than the VO speech. Experiment 4 combined vibrotactile speech stimuli with the visual stimuli during training. Vibrotactile stimuli were shown to promote visual perceptual learning. In Experiment 5, no-training controls were used to show that training with visual speech carried over to consonant identification of untrained CVCVC stimuli but not to lipreading words in sentences. Across this and previous studies, multisensory training effects depended on the functional relationship between pathways engaged during training. Two principles are proposed to account for stimulus effects: (1) Stimuli presented to the trainee's primary perceptual pathway will impede learning by a lower-rank pathway. (2) Stimuli presented to the trainee's lower rank perceptual pathway will promote learning by a higher-rank pathway. The mechanisms supporting these principles are discussed in light of multisensory reverse hierarchy theory (RHT).
The cortical processing of auditory-alone, visual-alone, and audiovisual speech information is temporally and spatially distributed, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) cannot adequately ...resolve its temporal dynamics. In order to investigate a hypothesized spatiotemporal organization for audiovisual speech processing circuits, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Stimuli were congruent audiovisual /ba/, incongruent auditory /ba/ synchronized with visual /ga/, auditory-only /ba/, and visual-only /ba/ and /ga/. Current density reconstructions (CDRs) of the ERP data were computed across the latency interval of 50–250 ms. The CDRs demonstrated complex spatiotemporal activation patterns that differed across stimulus conditions. The hypothesized circuit that was investigated here comprised initial integration of audiovisual speech by the middle superior temporal sulcus (STS), followed by recruitment of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), followed by activation of Broca’s area Miller, L.M., d’Esposito, M., 2005. Perceptual fusion and stimulus coincidence in the cross-modal integration of speech. Journal of Neuroscience 25, 5884–5893. The importance of spatiotemporally sensitive measures in evaluating processing pathways was demonstrated. Results showed, strikingly, early (<
100 ms) and simultaneous activations in areas of the supramarginal and angular gyrus (SMG/AG), the IPS, the inferior frontal gyrus, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Also, emergent left hemisphere SMG/AG activation, not predicted based on the unisensory stimulus conditions was observed at approximately 160 to 220 ms. The STS was neither the earliest nor most prominent activation site, although it is frequently considered the
sine qua non of audiovisual speech integration. As discussed here, the relatively late activity of the SMG/AG solely under audiovisual conditions is a possible candidate audiovisual speech integration response.
Neuroplastic changes in auditory cortex as a result of lifelong perceptual experience were investigated. Adults with early-onset deafness and long-term hearing aid experience were hypothesized to ...have undergone auditory cortex plasticity due to somatosensory stimulation. Vibrations were presented on the hand of deaf and normal-hearing participants during functional MRI. Vibration stimuli were derived from speech or were a fixed frequency. Higher, more widespread activity was observed within auditory cortical regions of the deaf participants for both stimulus types. Life-long somatosensory stimulation due to hearing aid use could explain the greater activity observed with deaf participants.
It has been postulated that the brain is organized by "metamodal," sensory-independent cortical modules capable of performing tasks (e.g., word recognition) in both "standard" and novel sensory ...modalities. Still, this theory has primarily been tested in sensory-deprived individuals, with mixed evidence in neurotypical subjects, thereby limiting its support as a general principle of brain organization. Critically, current theories of metamodal processing do not specify requirements for successful metamodal processing at the level of neural representations. Specification at this level may be particularly important in neurotypical individuals, where novel sensory modalities must interface with existing representations for the standard sense. Here we hypothesized that effective metamodal engagement of a cortical area requires congruence between stimulus representations in the standard and novel sensory modalities in that region. To test this, we first used fMRI to identify bilateral auditory speech representations. We then trained 20 human participants (12 female) to recognize vibrotactile versions of auditory words using one of two auditory-to-vibrotactile algorithms. The vocoded algorithm attempted to match the encoding scheme of auditory speech while the token-based algorithm did not. Crucially, using fMRI, we found that only in the vocoded group did trained-vibrotactile stimuli recruit speech representations in the superior temporal gyrus and lead to increased coupling between them and somatosensory areas. Our results advance our understanding of brain organization by providing new insight into unlocking the metamodal potential of the brain, thereby benefitting the design of novel sensory substitution devices that aim to tap into existing processing streams in the brain.
It has been proposed that the brain is organized by "metamodal," sensory-independent modules specialized for performing certain tasks. This idea has inspired therapeutic applications, such as sensory substitution devices, for example, enabling blind individuals "to see" by transforming visual input into soundscapes. Yet, other studies have failed to demonstrate metamodal engagement. Here, we tested the hypothesis that metamodal engagement in neurotypical individuals requires matching the encoding schemes between stimuli from the novel and standard sensory modalities. We trained two groups of subjects to recognize words generated by one of two auditory-to-vibrotactile transformations. Critically, only vibrotactile stimuli that were matched to the neural encoding of auditory speech engaged auditory speech areas after training. This suggests that matching encoding schemes is critical to unlocking the brain's metamodal potential.
Speech perception under audiovisual (AV) conditions is well known to confer benefits to perception such as increased speed and accuracy. Here, we investigated how AV training might benefit or impede ...auditory perceptual learning of speech degraded by vocoding. In Experiments 1 and 3, participants learned paired associations between vocoded spoken nonsense words and nonsense pictures. In Experiment 1, paired-associates (PA) AV training of one group of participants was compared with audio-only (AO) training of another group. When tested under AO conditions, the AV-trained group was significantly more accurate than the AO-trained group. In addition, pre- and post-training AO forced-choice consonant identification with untrained nonsense words showed that AV-trained participants had learned significantly more than AO participants. The pattern of results pointed to their having learned at the level of the auditory phonetic features of the vocoded stimuli. Experiment 2, a no-training control with testing and re-testing on the AO consonant identification, showed that the controls were as accurate as the AO-trained participants in Experiment 1 but less accurate than the AV-trained participants. In Experiment 3, PA training alternated AV and AO conditions on a list-by-list basis within participants, and training was to criterion (92% correct). PA training with AO stimuli was reliably more effective than training with AV stimuli. We explain these discrepant results in terms of the so-called "reverse hierarchy theory" of perceptual learning and in terms of the diverse multisensory and unisensory processing resources available to speech perception. We propose that early AV speech integration can potentially impede auditory perceptual learning; but visual top-down access to relevant auditory features can promote auditory perceptual learning.
The goal of this review article is to reinvigorate interest in lipreading and lipreading training for adults with acquired hearing loss. Most adults benefit from being able to see the talker when ...speech is degraded; however, the effect size is related to their lipreading ability, which is typically poor in adults who have experienced normal hearing through most of their lives. Lipreading training has been viewed as a possible avenue for rehabilitation of adults with an acquired hearing loss, but most training approaches have not been particularly successful. Here, we describe lipreading and theoretically motivated approaches to its training, as well as examples of successful training paradigms. We discuss some extensions to auditory-only (AO) and audiovisual (AV) speech recognition.
Visual speech perception and word recognition are described. Traditional and contemporary views of training and perceptual learning are outlined. We focus on the roles of external and internal feedback and the training task in perceptual learning, and we describe results of lipreading training experiments.
Lipreading is commonly characterized as limited to viseme perception. However, evidence demonstrates subvisemic perception of visual phonetic information. Lipreading words also relies on lexical constraints, not unlike auditory spoken word recognition. Lipreading has been shown to be difficult to improve through training, but under specific feedback and task conditions, training can be successful, and learning can generalize to untrained materials, including AV sentence stimuli in noise. The results on lipreading have implications for AO and AV training and for use of acoustically processed speech in face-to-face communication.
Given its importance for speech recognition with a hearing loss, we suggest that the research and clinical communities integrate lipreading in their efforts to improve speech recognition in adults with acquired hearing loss.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VSZLJ
Audiovisual speech stimuli have been shown to produce a variety of perceptual phenomena. Enhanced detectability of acoustic speech in noise, when the talker can also be seen, is one of those ...phenomena. This study investigated whether this enhancement effect is specific to visual speech stimuli or can rely on more generic non-speech visual stimulus properties. Speech detection thresholds for an auditory /ba/ stimulus were obtained in a white noise masker. The auditory /ba/ was presented adaptively to obtain its 79.4% detection threshold under five conditions. In Experiment 1, the syllable was presented (1) auditory-only (AO) and (2) as audiovisual speech (AVS), using the original video recording. Three types of synthetic visual stimuli were also paired synchronously with the audio token: (3) A dynamic Lissajous (AVL) figure whose vertical extent was correlated with the acoustic speech envelope; (4) a dynamic rectangle (AVR) whose horizontal extent was correlated with the speech envelope; and (5) a static rectangle (AVSR) whose onset and offset were synchronous with the acoustic speech onset and offset. Ten adults with normal hearing and vision participated. The results, in terms of dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), were AVS
<
(AVL
≈
AVR
≈
ASR)
<
AO. That is, AVS was significantly easiest to detect, there was no difference among the synthesized visual stimuli, and all audiovisual conditions resulted in significantly lower thresholds than AO. To determine the advantage of the AVS stimulus, in Experiment 2, a preliminary mouth gesture was edited from the video speech token. This manipulation defeated the advantage for both the original and the edited AVS stimulus, while the audiovisual detection enhancement persisted. Overall, the results showed enhanced auditory speech detection with visual stimuli but no advantage for a fine-grained correlation between acoustic and optical speech signals.
PDF
