The exact overall incidence of sarcoma and sarcoma subtypes is not known. The objective of the present population-based study was to determine this incidence in a European region (Rhone-Alpes) of six ...million inhabitants, based on a central pathological review of the cases.
From March 2005 to February 2007, pathology reports and tumor blocks were prospectively collected from the 158 pathologists of the Rhone-Alpes region. All diagnosed or suspected cases of sarcoma were collected, reviewed centrally, examined for molecular alterations and classified according to the 2002 World Health Organization classification. Of the 1287 patients screened during the study period, 748 met the criteria for inclusion in the study. The overall crude and world age-standardized incidence rates were respectively 6.2 and 4.8 per 100,000/year. Incidence rates for soft tissue, visceral and bone sarcomas were respectively 3.6, 2.0 and 0.6 per 100,000. The most frequent histological subtypes were gastrointestinal stromal tumor (18%; 1.1/100,000), unclassified sarcoma (16%; 1/100,000), liposarcoma (15%; 0.9/100,000) and leiomyosarcoma (11%; 0.7/100,000).
The observed incidence of sarcomas was higher than expected. This study is the first detailed investigation of the crude incidence of histological and molecular subtypes of sarcomas.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a rare type of cancer, they are the commonest sarcoma in the gastrointestinal tract. Molecularly targeted therapy, such as imatinib therapy, has ...revolutionized the treatment of advanced GIST and facilitates scientific research on GIST. Nevertheless, surgery remains a mainstay of treatment to obtain a permanent cure for GIST even in the era of targeted therapy. Many GIST guidelines have been published to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. We review current versions of GIST guidelines published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, by the European Society for Medical Oncology, and in Japan. All clinical practice guidelines for GIST include recommendations based on evidence as well as on expert consensus. Most of the content is very similar, as represented by the following examples: GIST is a heterogeneous disease that may have mutations in
KIT
,
PDGFRA
,
HRAS
,
NRAS
,
BRAF
,
NF1
, or the succinate dehydrogenase complex, and these subsets of tumors have several distinctive features. Although there are some minor differences among the guidelines—for example, in the dose of imatinib recommended for exon 9-mutated GIST or the efficacy of antigen retrieval via immunohistochemistry—their common objectives regarding diagnosis and treatment are not only to improve the diagnosis of GIST and the prognosis of patients but also to control medical costs. This review describes the current standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of GISTs based on the recommendations of several guidelines and expert consensus.
Quantitative lymphocyte alterations are frequent in patients with cancer, and strongly impact prognosis and survival. The development of cancers in immunosuppressed patients has demonstrated the ...contribution of different T cell populations, including CD4
cells, in the control of cancer occurrence.Whereas absolute numbers of neutrophils, platelets and red blood cells are routinely monitored in clinic following treatments, because of possible short-term complications, absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC), their subpopulations or diversity (phenotype, TCR) are rarely analyzed and never used to choose therapy or as prognostic criteria. The recent identification of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) as powerful therapeutic agents has revitalized immunotherapy of cancer in a broader group of diseases than anticipated. The status of the immune system is now recognized as an important biomarker for response to these novel treatments. Blood ALC values, along with tumor infiltration by CD8
T cells, and ICPi and ICPi-ligand expression, are likely to be a potential marker of sensitivity to anti-ICPi therapy.In this article, we review the current knowledge on the incidence and significance of lymphopenia in cancer patients, and discuss therapeutic strategies to restore lymphocyte numbers.
Background
The optimal treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma is still debated. Given histotype‐specific prospective controlled data lacking, this study retrospectively evaluated doxorubicin plus ...dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone as first‐line treatments for advanced/metastatic leiomyosarcoma treated at European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (EORTC‐STBSG) sites.
Methods
The inclusion criteria were a confirmed histological diagnosis, treatment between January 2010 and December 2015, measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and an age ≥ 18 years. The endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR). PFS was analyzed with methods for interval‐censored data. Patients were matched according to their propensity scores, which were estimated with a logistic regression model accounting for histology, grade, age, sex, performance status, tumor site, and tumor extent.
Results
Three hundred three patients from 18 EORTC‐STBSG sites were identified. One hundred seventeen (39%) received doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, 71 (23%) received doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and 115 (38%) received doxorubicin. In the 2:1:2 propensity score–matched population (205 patients), the estimated median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval CI, 5.2‐9.7 months), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.2‐10.1 months), and 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.3‐6.0 months) with ORRs of 30.9%, 19.5%, and 25.6% for doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and doxorubicin alone, respectively. PFS was significantly longer with doxorubicin plus dacarbazine versus doxorubicin (hazard ratio HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52‐0.99). Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine was associated with longer OS (median, 36.8 months; 95% CI, 27.9‐47.2 months) in comparison with both doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (median, 21.9 months; 95% CI, 16.7‐33.4 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40‐1.06) and doxorubicin (median, 30.3 months; 95% CI, 21.0‐36.3 months; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43‐0.99). Adjusted analyses retained an effect for PFS but not for OS. None of the factors selected for multivariate analysis had a significant interaction with the received treatment for both PFS and OS.
Conclusions
This is the largest retrospective study of first‐line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma. In the propensity score–matched population, doxorubicin and dacarbazine showed favorable activity in terms of both ORR and PFS and warrants further evaluation in prospective trials.
In this propensity score‐adjusted, multi‐institutional series, doxorubicin and dacarbazine show better outcomes for the first‐line treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma and warrant further studies. This series represents a benchmark for the future development of trials for leiomyosarcoma.
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive cancer primarily diagnosed on the basis of histological criteria
. The 2015 World Health Organization classification subdivides mesothelioma tumors into ...three histological types: epithelioid, biphasic and sarcomatoid MM. MM is a highly complex and heterogeneous disease, rendering its diagnosis and histological typing difficult and leading to suboptimal patient care and decisions regarding treatment modalities
. Here we have developed a new approach-based on deep convolutional neural networks-called MesoNet to accurately predict the overall survival of mesothelioma patients from whole-slide digitized images, without any pathologist-provided locally annotated regions. We validated MesoNet on both an internal validation cohort from the French MESOBANK and an independent cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We also demonstrated that the model was more accurate in predicting patient survival than using current pathology practices. Furthermore, unlike classical black-box deep learning methods, MesoNet identified regions contributing to patient outcome prediction. Strikingly, we found that these regions are mainly located in the stroma and are histological features associated with inflammation, cellular diversity and vacuolization. These findings suggest that deep learning models can identify new features predictive of patient survival and potentially lead to new biomarker discoveries.
In a basket trial that included patients with a variety of cancers, all of which contained a
BRAF
V600 mutation, the rate of response to vemurafenib was highly variable. The histologic context ...influences the response to BRAF inhibition.
BRAF
V600 mutations occur in approximately 50% of cutaneous melanomas and result in constitutive activation of downstream signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.
1
,
2
Vemurafenib (Zelboraf, F. Hoffmann–La Roche/Genentech) is a selective oral inhibitor of the
BRAF
V600 kinase and is associated with a response rate of approximately 50% and improved survival among patients with
BRAF
V600E mutation–positive metastatic melanoma.
3
Efforts by the Cancer Genome Atlas
4
and other initiatives to characterize the genetic landscape of most tumor types have identified
BRAF
V600 mutations in nonmelanoma cancers, including colorectal cancer,
5
,
6
non–small-cell lung cancer,
7
papillary thyroid cancer,
8
diffuse gliomas, . . .
•Regorafenib inhibits a broad spectrum of kinases involved in cancer pathogenesis.•The clinical benefit of regorafenib is well established in mCRC, GIST, and HCC.•Emerging data show activity of ...regorafenib in aGEC, sarcoma, BTC, and glioblastoma.•Clinical experience has enabled dose optimization and improved patient management.•Combination studies of immuno-oncology agents with regorafenib are ongoing.
Regorafenib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) previously treated with imatinib and sunitinib, and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following progression on sorafenib. Regorafenib was initially approved for mCRC based on improved overall survival (OS) in the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 CORRECT trial, which was confirmed in an expanded population of Asian patients in the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 CONCUR trial. Approvals in GIST, and more recently in HCC, were based on the results from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 GRID and RESORCE trials, respectively. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the clinical evidence for approval of regorafenib in mCRC, GIST, and HCC, present emerging evidence of regorafenib activity in other tumor types (namely, gastroesophageal cancer, sarcomas, biliary tract cancer, and glioblastoma), and discuss trials in progress within the context of regorafenib’s mechanism of action. We describe recent advances and key lessons learned with regorafenib, including the importance of managing common drug-related toxicities using dose-optimization strategies, the search for biomarkers to predict response to treatment, and highlight some of the unaddressed questions and future directions for regorafenib across tumors.
Summary Background A non-randomised, phase 2 study showed activity and tolerability of eribulin in advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. In this phase 3 study, we aimed to compare overall ...survival in patients with advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma who received eribulin with that in patients who received dacarbazine (an active control). Methods We did this randomised, open-label, phase 3 study across 110 study sites in 22 countries. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with intermediate-grade or high-grade advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma who had received at least two previous systemic regimens for advanced disease (including an anthracycline). Using an interactive voice and web response system, an independent statistician randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive eribulin mesilate (1·4 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) or dacarbazine (850 mg/m2 , 1000 mg/m2 , or 1200 mg/m2 dose dependent on centre and clinician intravenously on day 1) every 21 days until disease progression. Randomisation was stratified by disease type, geographical region, and number of previous regimens for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma and in blocks of six. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01327885 , and is closed to recruitment, but treatment and follow-up continue. Findings Between March 10, 2011 and May 22, 2013, we randomly assigned patients to eribulin (n=228) or dacarbazine (n=224). Overall survival was significantly improved in patients assigned to eribulin compared with those assigned to dacarbazine (median 13·5 months 95% CI 10·9–15·6 vs 11·5 months 9·6–13·0; hazard ratio 0·77 95% CI 0·62–0·95; p=0·0169). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 224 (99%) of 226 patients who received eribulin and 218 (97%) of 224 who received dacarbazine. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common in patients who received eribulin (152 67%) than in those who received dacarbazine (126 56%), as were deaths (10 4% vs 3 1%); one death (in the eribulin group) was considered treatment-related by the investigators. Interpretation Overall survival was improved in patients assigned to eribulin compared with those assigned to an active control, suggesting that eribulin could be a treatment option for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. Funding Eisai.
Over 30 million COVID-19 cases have been diagnosed worldwide from late 2019. Among frail persons, cancer patients are at high risk of death from COVID-19.
The French prospective cohort ONCOVID-19 ...enrolled patients with solid or haematological tumour, receiving anticancer treatment and presenting with clinical symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. COVID-19 was confirmed through detectable SARS-CoV2 by RT-PCR (repeated twice if negative first) and/or specific CT-scan. The study aims to assess the 28-day mortality rate after the first COVID test.
From March 1st to May 21st 2020, 23 French cancer centres and hospitals enrolled 1230 cancer patients with suspicion of COVID-19, including 1162 (94.5%) matching the inclusion criteria. We identified 425 (36.6%) COVID-19 positive patients including 155 (13.3%) diagnosed with CT-scan only, while 737 (63.4%) patients were COVID-19 negative. Death at day-28 occurred in 116/425 (27.8%) COVID-19 positive patients, and in 118/737 (16.3%) COVID-19 negative patients (p < 0·0001). With a median follow-up of 2.1 (1.6-2.4) months, 310 (26.7%) deaths were reported including 143 (33.6%) in the COVID-19 positive population, and 167 (22.7%) in the COVID-19 negative patients. Male gender, age, metastatic disease, immunosuppressive treatments, lymphopenia, COVID-19 diagnosis and diabetes were independent risk factors for death.
Patients with solid and haematological cancers presenting COVID-19 symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed or not are both at high-risk of early mortality. COVID-19 is reported as the cause of death in 50% of COVID-19 positive patients with cancer.
This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04363632.
PDF
