Introduction
Dupilumab has recently been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. Daily practice data on dupilumab treatment are scarce.
Objective
To study ...the effect of 16‐week treatment with dupilumab on clinical response and serum biomarkers in adult patients with moderate‐severe AD in daily practice.
Methods
Data were extracted from the BioDay registry, a prospective multicenter registry. Sixteen‐week clinical effectiveness of dupilumab was expressed as number of patients achieving EASI‐50 (Eczema Area and Severity Index) or EASI‐75, as well as patient‐reported outcomes measures (Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Numeric Rating Scale pruritus). Twenty‐one biomarkers were measured in patients treated with dupilumab without concomitant use of oral immunosuppressive drugs at five different time points (baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks).
Results
In total, 138 patients treated with dupilumab in daily practice were included. This cohort consisted of patients with very difficult‐to‐treat AD, including 84 (61%) patients who failed treatment on ≥2 immunosuppressive drugs. At week 16, the mean percent change in EASI score was 73%. The EASI‐50 and EASI‐75 were achieved by 114 (86%) and 82 (62%) patients after 16 weeks of treatment. The most reported side effect was conjunctivitis, occurring in 47 (34%) patients. During dupilumab treatment, disease severity‐related serum biomarkers (TARC, PARC, periostin, and IL‐22), eotaxin‐1, and eotaxin‐3 significantly decreased.
Conclusion
Treatment with dupilumab significantly improved disease severity and decreased severity‐related serum biomarkers in patients with very difficult‐to‐treat AD in a daily practice setting.
This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of 16‐weeks of dupilumab treatment in adults with AD. Dupilumab treatment significantly suppressed disease severity‐related serum biomarkers and eosinophil chemokines. By the end of the treatment, the EASI‐50 and EASI‐75 was achieved by 86% and 62% of patients, respectively.
Abbreviations: AD: Atopic dermatitis; DLQI: Dermatology life quality index; EASI: Eczema area and severity index; IGA: Investigators global assessment; NRS: Numeric rating scale; PARC: Pulmonary and activation‐regulated chemokine; POEM: Patient‐oriented eczema measure; TARC: Thymus‐ and activation‐regulated chemokine
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly heterogeneous disease, both clinically and biologically, whereas patients are still being treated according to a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Stratification of ...patients into biomarker-based endotypes is important for future development of personalized therapies.
Our aim was to confirm previously defined serum biomarker-based patient clusters in a new cohort of patients with AD.
A panel of 143 biomarkers was measured by using Luminex technology in serum samples from 146 patients with severe AD (median Eczema Area and Severity Index = 28.3; interquartile range = 25.2-35.3). Principal components analysis followed by unsupervised k-means cluster analysis of the biomarker data was used to identify patient clusters. A prediction model was built on the basis of a previous cohort to predict the 1 of the 4 previously identified clusters to which the patients of our new cohort would belong.
Cluster analysis identified 4 serum biomarker–based clusters, 3 of which (clusters B, C, and D) were comparable to the previously identified clusters. Cluster A (33.6%) could be distinguished from the other clusters as being a “skin-homing chemokines/IL-1R1–dominant” cluster, whereas cluster B (18.5%) was a “TH1/TH2/TH17-dominant” cluster, cluster C (18.5%) was a “TH2/TH22/PARC-dominant” cluster, and cluster D (29.5%) was a “TH2/eosinophil-inferior” cluster. Additionally, by using a prediction model based on our previous cohort we accurately assigned the new cohort to the 4 previously identified clusters by including only 10 selected serum biomarkers.
We confirmed that AD is heterogeneous at the immunopathologic level and identified 4 distinct biomarker-based clusters, 3 of which were comparable with previously identified clusters. Cluster membership could be predicted with a model including 10 serum biomarkers.
Increasing evidence shows that pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) differs from adult AD on a biologic level. Broad biomarker profiling across a wide range of ages of pediatric patients with AD is ...lacking.
Our aim was to identify serum biomarker profiles in children with AD aged 0 to 17 years and compare these profiles with those previously found in adults with AD.
Luminex multiplex immunoassays were used to measure 145 biomarkers in serum from 240 children with AD (aged 0-17 years). Principal components analysis followed by unsupervised k-means clustering were performed to identify patient clusters. Patients were stratified into age groups (0-4 years, 5-11 years, and 12-17 years) to assess association between age and cluster membership.
Children aged 0 to 4 years had the highest levels of TH1 cell–skewing markers and lowest levels of TH17 cell–related markers. TH2 cell–related markers did not differ significantly between age groups. Similar to the pattern in adults, cluster analysis identified 4 distinct pediatric patient clusters (TH2 cell/retinol–dominant, skin-homing–dominant, TH1 cell/TH2 cell/TH17 cell/IL-1–dominant, and TH1 cell/IL-1/eosinophil–inferior clusters). Only the TH1 cell/TH2 cell/TH17 cell/IL-1–dominant cluster resembled 1 of the previously identified adult clusters. Although no association with age or age of onset seemed to be found, disease severity was significantly associated with the skin-homing–dominant cluster.
Four distinct patient clusters based on serum biomarker profiles could be identified in a large cohort of pediatric patients with AD, of which 1 was similar to previously identified adult clusters. The identification of endotypes driven by distinct underlying immunopathologic pathways might be useful to define pediatric patients with AD who are at risk of persistent disease and may necessitate different targeted treatment approaches.
Dupilumab, a mAb targeting IL-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα), markedly improves disease severity in patients with atopic dermatitis. However, the effect of IL-4Rα blockade on dynamics of circulating ...skin-homing T cells, which are crucial players in the pathologic mechanism of atopic dermatitis, has not been studied yet. In addition, it remains unknown whether dupilumab treatment induces long-lasting T- and B-cell polarization. Therefore, we studied the short- and long-term effects of dupilumab treatment on IL-4Rα expression and T-cell cytokine production within total and skin-homing (cutaneous lymphocyte antigen+/CCR4+) subpopulations in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Dupilumab treatment completely blocked IL-4Rα expression and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 phosphorylation in CD19+ B cells and CD4+ T cells within 2 hours of administration and through week 52. Although no change in the proportion of skin-homing T-cell subsets was found, dupilumab treatment significantly decreased the percentage of proliferating (Ki67+) and T helper type 2 and T helper type 22 cytokine–producing skin-homing CD4+ T cells at week 4. No evidence of general T helper type cell skewing following a year of dupilumab treatment was found. In summary, dupilumab treatment rapidly and stably inhibited IL-4Rα, which was accompanied by a strong early functional immunological effect specifically on skin-homing T cells without affecting overall T helper type cell skewing in the long term.
Abstract
Background
Limited data are available regarding patient-centred dosing of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice.
Objectives
To evaluate our patient-centred dupilumab dosing ...regimen in daily practice, to assess prognostic factors for successful tapering and to estimate medication-related cost savings.
Methods
This prospective multicentre study included adult patients with AD, participating in the BioDay registry, treated with dupilumab for ≥ 1.3 years. Interval prolongation was considered in the case of dupilumab standard dose for ≥ 1 year and persistent controlled AD Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≤ 7; ≥ 6 months. Primary endpoints were the mean EASI and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-pruritus after the start of tapering. Prognostic factors for successful tapering were analysed with logistic regression and a cost-savings analysis was performed.
Results
A total of 595 patients were included, of whom 401 patients mean EASI 2.5 (SD 2.3); NRS-pruritus of 2.4 (SD 1.9) at the start of tapering prolonged their dupilumab interval. In 83.3% of these patients tapering was successful; most patients used dupilumab every 3 or 4 weeks (Q3W/Q4W). A significant small increase was observed for EASI (highest mean 3.5) and NRS-pruritus (highest mean 3.2) (P < 0.001); however, scores remained low. Predicting successful tapering showed nonsignificant odds ratios for all incorporated variables. The estimated cost savings was €3 977 033.98 for 401 patients between January 2019 and June 2022.
Conclusions
This study showed successful tapering of dupilumab in 83.3% of patients with AD who attempted tapering, while maintaining controlled disease and with the majority using Q3W/Q4W. Interval prolongation can be beneficial both for the patient and from a socio-economic perspective.
Real-life data on long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis patients are limited.
To study 52-week effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in a prospective multicenter cohort ...of adult patients with treatment-refractory atopic dermatitis.
Patients treated with dupilumab and participating in the Dutch BioDay registry were included. Clinical effectiveness and safety were evaluated.
Two hundred ten atopic dermatitis patients were included. Mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index score after 16 weeks was –70.0% (standard deviation 33.2%) and further decreased to –76.6% (standard deviation 30.6%) by week 52. A greater than or equal to 75% improvement in the score was achieved by 59.9% of individuals by week 16 and by 70.3% by week 52. The most reported adverse effect was conjunctivitis (34%). Limited patients (17; 8.1%) discontinued dupilumab treatment.
Because of the lack of a control group and observational design, factors of bias may have been induced.
Treatment with dupilumab resulted in a rapid improvement in clinical outcome measures, and effectiveness further improved during the 52-week follow-up period.
Clinical trials showed that upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor, is effective for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. However, daily practice studies are limited. This ...multicentre prospective study evaluated the effectiveness of 16 weeks of upadacitinib treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients, including those with previous inadequate response to dupilumab and/or baricitinib, in daily practice. A total of 47 patients from the Dutch BioDay registry treated with upadacitinib were included. Patients were evaluated at baseline, and after 4, 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Effectiveness was assessed by clinician- and patient-reported outcome measurements. Safety was assessed by adverse events and laboratory assessments. Overall, the probabilities (95% confidence intervals) of achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index ≤ 7 and Numerical Rating Scale - pruritus ≤ 4 were 73.0% (53.7-86.3) and 69.4% (48.7-84.4), respectively. The effectiveness of upadacitinib was comparable in patients with inadequate response to dupilumab and/or baricitinib and in patients who were naïve for these treatments or who had stopped such treatments due to adverse events. Fourteen (29.8%) patients discontinued upadacitinib due to ineffectiveness, adverse events or both (8.5%, 14.9% and 6.4%, respectively). Most frequently reported adverse events were acneiform eruptions (n = 10, 21.3%), herpes simplex (n = 6, 12.8%), nausea and airway infections (both n = 4, 8.5%). In conclusion, upadacitinib is an effective treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, including those with previous inadequate response to dupilumab and/or baricitinib treatment.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Clinical trials have shown that baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, is effective for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. However, daily practice data are ...limited. Therefore, this multicentre prospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of 16-weeks' treatment with baricitinib in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in daily practice. A total of 51 patients from the BioDay registry treated with baricitinib were included and evaluated at baseline and after 4, 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Effectiveness was assessed using clinician- and patient-reported outcome measurements. Adverse events and laboratory assessments were evaluated at every visit. At week 16, the probability (95% confidence interval) of achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index ≤ 7 and numerical rating scale pruritus ≤ 4 was 29.4% (13.1-53.5) and 20.5% (8.8-40.9), respectively. No significant difference in effectiveness was found between dupilumab non-responders and responders. Twenty-two (43.2%) patients discontinued baricitinib treatment due to ineffectiveness, adverse events or both (31.4%, 9.8% and 2.0%, respectively). Most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (n = 6, 11.8%), urinary tract infection (n = 5, 9.8%) and herpes simplex infection (n = 4, 7.8%). In conclusion, baricitinib can be an effective treatment option for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, including patients with non-responsiveness on dupilumab. However, effectiveness of baricitinib is heterogeneous, which is reflected by the high discontinuation rate in this difficult-to-treat cohort.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
IMPORTANCE: Since the increased use of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice, several cases have been reported on the development of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) and lymphoid ...infiltrates. OBJECTIVE: To provide insight in the clinical and histopathologic features of patients with AD clinically suspected for CTCL during dupilumab treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective observational case series included adult (≥18 years) patients with AD treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and July 2022 at the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Relevant patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were evaluated. Skin biopsies before, during, and after treatment were collected and reassessed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (54.5% male) with a median (IQR) age of 56 (36-66) years suspected for CTCL with deterioration of symptoms during dupilumab treatment were included. Of 14 patients, 3 were retrospectively diagnosed with preexistent mycosis fungoides (MF). Eleven patients with AD were eventually diagnosed with a lymphoid reaction (LR). These patients showed MF-like symptoms; however, histopathologic findings were different, and included sprinkled distribution of small hyperchromatic lymphocytes in the upper epidermal section, a dysregulated CD4:CD8 ratio, and CD30 overexpression, without loss of CD2/CD3/CD5. The median time to clinical worsening was 4.0 months (IQR, 1.4-10.0). Posttreatment biopsies showed complete clearance of the LR in all patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that dupilumab treatment can cause a reversible and benign LR, which mimics a CTCL, though has distinctive histopathologic features.
PDF
