Summary Background The benefit or harm of trabectedin discontinuation in patients with non-progressive soft-tissue sarcoma remains unclear. We report the final analysis of a phase 2 trial ...investigating the clinical benefit of continuation of trabectedin treatment until progression versus interruption of therapy after six treatment cycles in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods For this open-label, non-comparative, multicentre, phase 2 study, eligible adult patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas, who had previously received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and were able to receive trabectedin, were enrolled from 14 centres of the French Sarcoma Group. Trabectedin was administered at a dose of 1·5 mg/m2 through a central venous line as a 24-h continuous infusion every 3 weeks. After the initial six cycles of trabectedin, patients who were free from progressive disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio either to continuous treatment or therapy interruption. Randomisation was done centrally by a computer-generated system using permuted blocks of four patients, stratified by tumour grade and performance status. Patients allocated to the interruption group were allowed to restart trabectedin in case of progressive disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01303094. Results In 178 evaluable patients, 91 (51%) patients had not progressed after six cycles. Of these patients, 53 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups: 27 to the continuation group and 26 to the interruption group. Overall, patients in the two groups received a similar median number of trabectedin cycles (continuation group: 11 cycles range 6–31+ vs interruption group: 11 range 6–23+). After randomisation, progression-free survival at 6 months was 51·9% (95% CI 31·9–68·6) in the continuation group versus 23·1% (9·4–40·3) in the interruption group (p=0·0200). The occurrence of treatment-related grade 3 adverse events (four 16% of 25 patients in the continuation group vs three 14% of 21 in the interruption group) and grade 4 adverse events (one 4% vs none) was similar in both groups. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase increases (one 4% in the interruption group vs three 14% in the continuation group), neutropenia (two 8% vs two 10%), and intestinal occlusion (one 4% vs one 5%). Interpretation We do not recommend trabectedin discontinuation in patients with advanced, doxorubicin-refractory soft-tissue sarcoma who have not progressed after six cycles of treatment. Funding The French National Cancer Institute (INCa) and PharmaMar SA.
Summary Background Combining targeted treatments for renal cell carcinoma has been suggested as a possible method to improve treatment efficacy. We aimed to assess the potential synergistic or ...additive effect of the combination of bevacizumab, directed against the VEGF receptor, and temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods TORAVA was an open-label, multicentre randomised phase 2 study undertaken in 24 centres in France. Patients aged 18 years or older who had untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma were randomly assigned (2:1:1) to receive the combination of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and temsirolimus (25 mg weekly; group A), or one of the standard treatments: sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off; group B), or the combination of interferon alfa (9 mIU three times per week) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks; group C). Randomisation was done centrally and independently from other study procedures with computer-generated permuted blocks of four and eight patients stratified by participating centre and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 48 weeks (four follow-up CT scans), which was expected to be above 50% in group A. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study is ongoing for long-term overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00619268. Findings Between March 3, 2008 and May 6, 2009, 171 patients were randomly assigned: 88 to the experimental group (group A), 42 to group B, and 41 to group C. PFS at 48 weeks was 29·5% (26 of 88 patients, 95% CI 20·0–39·1) in group A, 35·7% (15 of 42, 21·2–50·2) in group B, and 61·0% (25 of 41, 46·0–75·9) in group C. Median PFS was 8·2 months (95% CI 7·0–9·6) in group A, 8·2 months (5·5–11·7) in group B, and 16·8 months (6·0–26·0) in group C. 45 (51%) of 88 patients in group A stopped treatment for reasons other than progression compared with five (12%) of 42 in group B and 15 (38%) of 40 in group C. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 68 (77%) of 88 patients in group A versus 25 (60%) of 42 in group B and 28 (70%) of 40 in group C. Serious adverse events were reported in 39 (44%) of 88, 13 (31%) of 42, and 18 (45%) of 40 patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Interpretation The toxicity of the temsirolimus and bevacizumab combination was much higher than anticipated and limited treatment continuation over time. Clinical activity was low compared with the benefit expected from sequential use of each targeted therapy. This combination cannot be recommended for first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Funding French Ministry of Health and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.
Summary Background Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is a valid therapeutic approach in renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, an investigation of the combination treatment of the ...humanised anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab with interferon alfa was warranted. Methods In a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase III trial, 649 patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma were randomised to receive interferon alfa-2a (9 MIU subcutaneously three times weekly) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks; n=327) or placebo and interferon alfa-2a (n=322). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. An interim analysis of overall survival was prespecified after 250 deaths. On the basis of new second-line therapies that became available while the trial was in progress, which could have confounded analyses of overall survival data, we agreed with regulatory agencies that the pre-planned final analysis of progression-free survival would be acceptable for regulatory submission. The protocol was amended to allow the study to be unblinded at this point. The final analysis of progression-free survival is reported here. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with centerwatch.com , number BO17705E. Findings 325 patients in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group and 316 in the placebo plus interferon alfa group received at least one dose of study treatment. At the time of unblinding, 230 progression events had occurred in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group and 275 in the control group; there were 114 deaths in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group and 137 in the control group. Median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group than it was in the control group (10·2 months vs 5·4 months; HR 0·63, 95% CI 0·52–0·75; p=0·0001). Increases in progression-free survival were seen with bevacizumab plus interferon alfa irrespective of risk group or whether reduced-dose interferon alfa was received. Deaths due to adverse events were reported in eight (2%) patients who received one or more doses of bevacizumab and seven (2%) of those who did not receive the drug. Only three deaths in the bevacizumab arm were considered by investigators to be possibly related to bevacizumab. The most commonly reported grade 3 or worse adverse events were fatigue (40 12% patients in the bevacizumab group vs 25 8% in the control group) and asthenia (34 10% vs 20 7%). Interpretation The combination of bevacizumab with interferon alfa as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma results in a significant improvement in progression-free survival, compared with interferon alfa alone.
Background There are very scarce data regarding the outcome of elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) as ...consolidation therapy in 1rst or higher complete remission (CR). Most studies evaluating the benefit of alloHSCT in ALL include both young and elderly populations. Thus, the optimal conditioning regimen still need to be determined in a frail population represented by patients over 60 years old. In addition, total body irradiation (TBI) dose is of first importance, as prior reports demonstrated its potential higher anti-leukemic effect. We here present the outcome of ALL patients older than 59 years from the Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) registry. Method This is a retrospective study. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), acute Graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) grade II-IV, chronic GvHD, neutrophil engraftment and GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). Competing risks analyses were performed to analyze NRM with competing event relapse, and aGvHD grade II-IV, chronic GvHD and neutrophil engraftment with competing events relapse and death. Univariable analyses were performed using the log-rang test for OS and PFS, while Gray's test was used for cumulative incidence (CI). Multivariable analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model including age, ALL subtype, time from diagnosis to alloHSCT, disease status at alloHSCT, donor to patient CMV status, donor to patient sex, ATG use, myeloablative conditioning (MAC), TBI use. Results A total of 316 patients ≥ 60 years old transplanted for ALL from 2012 to 2022 in 36 participating centers were included in this study. Patient's characteristics are described in Table 1. With a median follow up of 34.5 months (IQR 29.5-38.8), 3-year OS was 46% (95% CI 40-53%) (Figure 1A) with only the disease status at transplant impacting negatively OS, 53% (95% CI 46-60%) in CR1, 32% (95% CI 21-49%) in CR2, 29% (95% CI 13-63%) in advanced disease, p=0.002 and the ALL subtype, 59% (95% CI 51-68%) in Ph+ ALL, 40% (95% CI 29-54%) in Ph- ALL, 34% (95% CI 20-55%) in T-ALL, 20% (95% CI 9-42%) in other/NA, p<0.001. 3-year PFS was 41% (95% CI 35-48%) (Figure 1B) with the disease status at transplant impacting negatively, 49% (95% CI 42-57%) in CR1, 26% (95% CI 16-42%) in CR2, 22% (95% CI 9-58%) in advanced disease, p<0.001, the ALL subtype, 51% (95% CI 42-61%) in Ph+ ALL, 41% (95% CI 31-54%) in Ph- ALL, 21% (95% CI 10-41%) in T-ALL, 21% (95% CI11-43%) in other/NA, p<0.001, year of HSCT worse < 2018, p=0.007, CMV -/- worse, p=0.033, absence of TBI worse, p=0.018. 3-year NRM was 23% (95% CI 18-28%) (Figure 1C) and none of the factors impacted it. 3-year RI was 36% (95% CI 31-42%) (Figure 1D) with the disease status at transplant impacting negatively, 29% (95% CI 23-36%) in CR1, 50% (95% CI 35-63%) in CR2, 56% (95% CI 26-77%) in advanced disease, p=0.0042, the ALL subtype, 26% (95% CI 19-34%) in Ph+ ALL, 43% (95% CI 31-54%) in Ph- ALL, 57% (95% CI 38-73%) in T-ALL, 42% (95% CI 25-59%) in other/NA, p=0.0064, year of HSCT worse < 2018, p=0.0216, CMV -/- worse, p<0.001, absence of TBI worse, p=0.0069, MRD worse, p=0.0111. 3-year GRFS was 30% (95% CI 25-37%) with the disease status at transplant impacting negatively, 35% (95% CI 28-43%) in CR1, 22% (95% CI 13-37%) in CR2, 23% (95% CI 9-59%) in advanced disease, p=0.029, the ALL subtype, 37% (95% CI 30-47%) in Ph+ ALL, 33% (95% CI 23-46%) in Ph- ALL, 15% (95% CI 7-32%) in T-ALL, 17% (95% CI 8-38%) in other/NA, p=0.0029, year of HSCT worse < 2018, p<0.001. CI of aGVHD grade II-IV was 33% (95% CI 28-38%), grade III-IV 11% (95% CI 8-15%), cGVHD 35% (95% CI30-41%), extensive cGVHD 21% (95% CI 16-26%).Multivariable analyses confirmed a worse OS and PFS for advanced disease, with a HR of 1.79 (95% CI 1.22-2.64), p=0.00322 and ALL subtype with a HR for other than Ph+ ALL of 1.99 (95%CI 1.42-2.79). Conclusion: This study suggests that alloHSCT is a reasonable option for elderly ALL patients without any impact of age but advanced disease and ALL subtype other than Ph+ ALL negatively influenced the outcome.
