•Concomitant radio-chemotherapy remain the standard of care in locally advanced HNSCC.•Immunotherapy leads to better oncological results in R/M HNSCC.•Immunotherapy in first line treatment failed to ...improve outcomes.•Design of trials should be based on patients selection or predictive biomarkers.
Immunotherapy represents an effective therapeutic option in the management of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, along with chemotherapy in metastatic disease or radiotherapy/re-irradiation for (locoregionally confined) recurrent disease.
On the other hand, concomitant chemo-radiation remains the primary treatment modality in many patients with locally advanced disease. In spite of promising preclinical, it is difficult to clearly establish the role of immunotherapy in the upfront management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and its integration with the standard of care. In this paper, we discuss/review the main results thus far available and outline some unanswered questions that might help design future clinical trials.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is characterized by the delivery of high doses of ionizing radiation in few fractions. It is highly effective in achieving local control, and, due to the high ...biological effective dose administered, it seems to overcome the radioresistance of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thus, SBRT could constitute a treatment option for the management of localized RCC in patients who are not surgical candidates. In this paper, we report an overview about data from the current evidence about SBRT in patients affected by localized RCC.
A non-systematic review was performed, including data from both retrospective and prospective studies focusing on the use of SBRT for localized RCC and its biological rationale. Furthermore, ongoing trials on this issue are reported.
Currently, SBRT might be considered a treatment alternative in inoperable patients affected by primary RCC. Currently, dose-escalation to 48 Gy in 3–4 fractions are effective and well tolerated. Emerging role of immune therapies in RCC patients warrant further studies to explore interactions between SBRT and immune response.
Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when ...primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29–86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ = 0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ = 0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.
Display omitted
•13 studies comparing moderate hypofractionation and conventional fractionation prostate cancer patients were included.•Pooled analysis about acute toxicity was performed.•Narrative ...overview of late toxicity was reported.•Majority of trials included in our meta-analysis suggested that moderately hypofractionated RT is equivalent, in terms of GI and GU adverse events, to conventional fractionation.•Pooled analysis showed a 9.8 % and 1.5 % increase in acute GI and GU toxicity, respectively.•Results may have been influenced by effect of to dose escalation rather than hypofractionation.
Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) currently represents the standard RT approach for all prostate cancer (PCa) risk categories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature, focusing on acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) of moderate hypofractionation for localized PCa.
Literature search was performed and two independent reviewers selected the records according to the following Population (P) Intervention (I) Comparator (C) and Outcomes (O) (PICO) question: “In patients affected by localized PCa (P), moderately hypofractionated RT (defined as a treatment schedule providing a single dose per fraction of 3–4.5 Gy) (I) can be considered equivalent to conventionally fractionated RT (C) in terms of G > 2 GI and GU acute and late adverse events (O)?”. Bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias.
Thirteen records were identified and a meta-analysis was performed. Risk of acute GI and GU > 2 adverse events in the moderately hypofractionated arm was increased by 9.8 % (95 %CI 4.8 %–14.7 %; I2 = 57 %) and 1.5 % (95 % CI -1.5 %-4.4 %; I2 = 0%), respectively.
Overall, majority of trials included in our meta-analysis suggested that moderately hypofractionated RT is equivalent, in terms of GI and GU adverse events, to conventional fractionation. Pooled analysis showed a trend to increased GI toxicity after hypofractionated treatment, but this might be related to dose escalation rather than hypofractionation.
The aim of our study is to assess which factors may affect the quality of life (QoL) and its fluctuation over time in adult patients who received endonasal endoscopic oncologic sinus surgery (EOSS) ...for sinonasal malignancies (SNM) in our center.
We analyzed EOSS cases for primary SNM from January 2015 to June 2020. For each patient, we have recorded the age at treatment, gender, smoking habits, use of psychotropic drugs for mood disorders, stage, histotype, type of surgical resection, need for skull-base reconstruction, development of postoperative major complications, and the use of adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We evaluated the patient's performance status pre-treatment using the ECOG scale. Quality of life was measured using three questionnaires (SNOT-22; ASK-9; EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3).
Fifty-five patients were enrolled in our study, of whom thirty-two (58.18%) received adjuvant IMRT. Overall, a significant improvement in all QoL outcomes was observed at eighteen months, while, female sex, higher ECOG scores, advanced stage of disease, and adjuvant IMRT were associated with worse QoL. After 18 months the delta in QoL between women and men worsened (in SNOT-22 and EORTC QLQ-GLOBAL) while if only the most fragile patients according to ECOG are considered, this difference was reduced for both tools.
Our analysis revealed that IMRT is the element that has the greatest impact on patient's quality of life, in association with the female sex, ECOG >2, and advanced stage of the disease.
•Locally advanced SCCHN is a common oncologic pathology in older adults.•It’s unclear what is the optimal palliative radiation regimen for older adults SCCHN.•The use and the role of quality of life ...and geriatric assessment are unexplored.•Radiotherapy is an effective palliative treatment for symptomatic older adults SCCHN.
Locally advanced Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCCHN) represents a common oncologic pathology in older adults (OA). While radiotherapy represents a cornerstone in this context, it is unclear what is the optimal radiation regimen for SCCHN in the palliative setting, especially for OA.
This article addresses issues related to palliative radiotherapy (PRT) in this setting with a focus on treatment modalities and toxicity. We also explore the use of quality of life and geriatric assessment in this setting.
Medline, Scopus and Embase databases were queried for articles in this setting. We included studies published from January 1, 2000 through June 1, 2020, that were independently evaluated by two authors. Analyzed endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and PRT toxicities. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata v.14.
A total of 33 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled median OS is 7.7 months, 2-years OS was worse for higher radiation dose (p = 0.02). The pooled median PFS was 5.4 months, PFS was influenced by EQD2 (p = 0.01), with patients receiving an EQD2 < 40 Gy that presented a poorer outcome. Regarding acute toxicities, most common pooled G3 toxicities were mucositis (7%) and dysphagia (15%). Among late toxicity, most common G3 toxicity was dysphagia in 7% of patients.
Radiotherapy should be the most effective palliative treatment in symptomatic SCCHN OA. A tailored approach, guided by geriatric tools, would be indicated to choose the right therapy.
To investigate the role of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for regional nodal irradiation in patients with breast carcinoma in comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
A ...cohort of 20 patients (10 in the breast-conserving surgery group and 10 post-mastectomy patients with tissue expander implants) was investigated. Proton plans were also computed using robust optimisation methods. Plan quality was assessed by means of dose–volume histograms and scored with conventional metrics. Estimates of the risk of secondary cancer induction (excess absolute risk, EAR) were carried out, taking into account fractionation, repopulation and repair.
Concerning target coverage, the data proved a substantial equivalence of VMAT and IMPT: for example, coverage for the 50 Gy target, expressed in terms of V98%, was 47.8 ± 0.4, 47.6 ± 0.4, 47.3 ± 0.8, consistent with the objective of 47.5 Gy, for post-mastectomy patients for the three groups of patients. Also, the conformality of the dose distributions was similar for the two techniques, about 1.1, without statistically significant differences. Organ at risk planning aims were achieved for all structures for both techniques. The mean dose to the ipsilateral lung was 10.8 ± 1.1, 6.2 ± 0.8, 7.2 ± 1.0; for the contralateral lung was 3.2 ± 0.7, 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.4 ± 0.2; for the contralateral breast was: 3.1 ± 0.7, 0.3 ± 0.3 and 0.3 ± 0.3, whereas it was 3.9 ± 0.9, 0.4 ± 0.3 and 0.5 ± 0.5, respectively, for the heart for VMAT, IMPT and robust IMPT plans over the whole group of patients. Robust optimisation affected the near-to-maximum dose values for contralateral lung and breast, the mean dose for the heart and ipsilateral lung, with a deterioration ranging from 20 to 40% of the nominal value of IMPT plans (e.g. from 8.1 ± 6.4 to 11.4 ± 8.8 for the heart compared with 16.2 ± 5.2 for the VMAT plans). The numerical values of EAR per 10 000 patient-years were about one order of magnitude higher for VMAT than for IMPT for contralateral structures: 11.66 ± 2.01, 0.89 ± 0.80, 0.98 ± 0.77 for the contralateral breast and the three groups of plans, respectively; 14.31 ± 2.75, 1.42 ± 0.80, 1.78 ± 0.87 for the contralateral lung; and 34.86 ± 2.64, 18.85 ± 2.15, 20.98 ± 2.35 for the ipsilateral lung.
IMPT with or without robust optimisation seems to be a potentially promising approach for the radiation treatment of breast cancer when nodal volumes should be irradiated. This was measured in terms of dosimetric advantage and predicted clinical benefit. In fact, the significant reduction in estimated EAR could add further clinical value to the dosimetric sparing of the organs at risk achievable with IMPT.
•IMPT for breast with regional nodal irradiation was investigated.•Target coverage was fully achieved by both VMAT and IMPT plans.•The sparing of the organs at risk was improved with IMPT.•The estimated EAR per 10 000 patient-years was significantly higher for VMAT than for IMPT.
Purpose
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) may participate to antitumor activity of anti-HER2-targeted therapies (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab) in breast cancers harbouring HER-2 overexpression through ...antibody-dependent phagocytosis. Additive antitumor effect of concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapies, including Paclitaxel, may be counterbalanced by alteration in TAM infiltrate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of TAM in tumor response to anti-HER2-targeted therapies and chemotherapy in an experimental model of HER2-amplified breast cancer.
Methods
A xenograft mouse model was built by subcutaneous injection of the SKBR-3 human HER2-amplified breast cancer cell line in Hu-CD34+ mice. Animals were randomized to receive weekly administration of Cremophor (control), Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab (TP), and Paclitaxel+Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab (PTP) with or without macrophage depletion with clodronate (C). At week 4, mice were euthanised and tumors were harvested for immunohistochemical analysis of TAM infiltration (RBP-J CD163 and CD68 for M1, M2, and overall TAM, respectively).
Results
Tumor size was significantly lower in mice treated with TP, PTP, and PTP+C as compared to control, while no meaningful difference was observed in the TP+C arm. Analysis of TAM infiltrate showed significantly lower CD68 and CD163 expression in PTP, TP+C, and PTP+C as compared to TP and control arm. RBP-J expression was significantly decreased in mice treated with clodronate depletion.
Conclusions
Activity of TP is modulated by TAM infiltrate, that is inhibited by concurrent administration of Paclitaxel. To enhance the effect of anti-HER2-targeted therapies and minimize chemotherapy-related side effects, modulation of TAM should be considered in novel therapeutic combinations.
PDF
