Aims
The HFA‐PEFF and H2FPEF scores have been developed to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and hold prognostic value. Their value in patients with HFpEF caused by ...cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has never been investigated.
Methods and results
We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the HFA‐PEFF and H2FPEF scores in 304 patients from three cohorts with HFpEF caused by transthyretin CA (n = 160, 53%) or immunoglobulin light‐chain CA (n = 144, 47%). A diagnosis of HFpEF was more likely using the HFA‐PEFF score with 2 (1%), 71 (23%), and 231 (76%) patients ranked as having a low (0–1), intermediate (2–4), or high (5, 6) probability of HFpEF, respectively. Conversely, 36 (12%), 179 (59%) and 89 (29%) of patients ranked as having a low (0–1), intermediate (2–5), or high (6–9) probability of HFpEF using the H2FPEF score. During a median follow‐up of 19 months (interquartile range 8–40), 132 (43%) patients died. The HFA‐PEFF score, but not the H2FPEF score, predicted a high risk of all‐cause death which remained significant after adjustment for age, AL‐CA diagnosis, high‐sensitivity troponin T, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, and echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular global longitudinal strain, left ventricular diastolic function and right ventricular function (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.95, p = 0.002 for every 1‐point increase in HFA‐PEFF).
Conclusions
The HFA‐PEFF score has a higher diagnostic utility in HFpEF caused by CA and holds independent prognostic value for all‐cause mortality, while the H2FPEF score does not.
The HFA‐PEFF score outperforms the H2FPEF score as a diagnostic tool in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) caused by cardiac amyloidosis and holds independent prognostic value for all‐cause mortality, while the H2FPEF score does not. AL, immunoglobulin light‐chain; ATTR, transthyretin; AUC, area under the curve; CA, cardiac amyloidosis; HR, hazard ratio; ROC, receiver‐operating characteristic.
Graphical Abstract
ESC Guidelines don’t recommend ICD implantation within 40 days after MI, on the basis of old evidence with several limitations. However, a significant number of patients remain at ...high risk of arrhythmic death also in the early period after ACS, in these patients early ICD implantation or LifeVest may be use with benefit on survival.
Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common heart rhythm disorder that is associated with an increased risk of stroke and heart failure (HF). Initially, an association between AF and ion channel ...dysfunction was identified, classifying the pathology as a predominantly electrical disease. More recently it has been recognized that fibrosis and structural atrial remodeling play a driving role in the development of this arrhythmia also in these cases.
Purpose
Understanding the role of fibrosis in genetic determined AF could be important to better comprise the pathophysiology of this arrhythmia and to refine its management also in nongenetic forms. In this review we analyze genetic and epigenetic mechanisms responsible for AF and their link with atrial fibrosis, then we will consider analogies with the pathophysiological mechanism in nongenetic AF, and discuss consequent therapeutic options.
Aims
Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is due to a deposition of amyloid fibrils in the heart causing an increase in wall thickness. A left ventricular (LV) wall thickness ≥12 mm plus at least one red flag ...should raise the suspicion of CA. As normal values of LV wall thickness are lower in women, the adoption or the same cut‐off values for men and women could lead to underdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis in women. We investigated the relationship between LV wall thickness and the severity of cardiac involvement in women and men with transthyretin (ATTR) CA.
Methods and results
We evaluated 330 consecutive patients diagnosed with ATTR‐CA at three centres (Pisa, n = 232; Brescia, n = 69; Trieste, n = 29). Interventricular septum (IVS) and posterior wall (PW) thickness values were lower in women (n = 53, 16%) than men, but most differences were abolished when indexing by body surface area (BSA), height, or height2.7, suggesting similar disease severity when accounting for the smaller body size of women. PW thickness indexed for height2.7 was even higher in women. We also searched for correlations between IVS and PW thickness and other indicators of the severity of cardiac disease. IVS values indexed by height2.7 displayed tighter associations with N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide values than non‐indexed IVS values. Similarly, indexed values displayed closer relationships with relative wall thickness, E/e' ratio, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
Conclusions
Indexed LV wall thickness values, particularly by height2.7, reflect more accurately the severity of cardiac involvement than non‐indexed values.
The HFA-PEFF and H
FPEF scores have been developed to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and hold prognostic value. Their value in patients with HFpEF caused by cardiac ...amyloidosis (CA) has never been investigated.
We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF and H
FPEF scores in 304 patients from three cohorts with HFpEF caused by transthyretin CA (n = 160, 53%) or immunoglobulin light-chain CA (n = 144, 47%). A diagnosis of HFpEF was more likely using the HFA-PEFF score with 2 (1%), 71 (23%), and 231 (76%) patients ranked as having a low (0-1), intermediate (2-4), or high (5, 6) probability of HFpEF, respectively. Conversely, 36 (12%), 179 (59%) and 89 (29%) of patients ranked as having a low (0-1), intermediate (2-5), or high (6-9) probability of HFpEF using the H
FPEF score. During a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 8-40), 132 (43%) patients died. The HFA-PEFF score, but not the H
FPEF score, predicted a high risk of all-cause death which remained significant after adjustment for age, AL-CA diagnosis, high-sensitivity troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular global longitudinal strain, left ventricular diastolic function and right ventricular function (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.95, p = 0.002 for every 1-point increase in HFA-PEFF).
The HFA-PEFF score has a higher diagnostic utility in HFpEF caused by CA and holds independent prognostic value for all-cause mortality, while the H
FPEF score does not.
Abstract
Aims
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis, which could potentially affect any organ system. However, there have only been a few reports on cardiac ...involvement. In fact, it most commonly involves the sinuses, lungs, and kidneys with necrotizing granulomatous vasculitis. In 12% of a large series of patients with GPA there was cardiac involvement, largely manifested by pericarditis and coronary arteritis.
Methods and results
We describe a rare case of a 23-year-old girl, with no pathological history, at exception of a recent flu-like syndrome for which she carried out the search for SARS-CoV-2 RNA through nasopharyngeal swab, results negative. After a month, she went to the emergency department for a syncopal episode and subsequent head trauma. On this occasion, echocardiogram performed showed the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction due to hypokinesia of the middle distal segments; CT angiography of the chest revealed the presence of pulmonary embolism. For this reason, the patient was admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit, where EKG shown anterolateral myocardial infarction with ST elevation and immediately was performed coronary angiography, that evidenced two-vessel disease, with subsequent ineffective attempt to angioplasty. Due to the intercurrent appearance of hyposthenia and paraesthesia in the left upper limb, CT angiography of the brain was performed with detection of lower right pre central frontal hypodensity, suspected for recent ischaemic lesion and hypodensity of the right carotid artery as recent thrombosis. In light of the multi-organ involvement of ischaemic nature and the young age of the patient, rheumatological evaluation was carried out, with execution of a laboratory tests that showed the presence of positivity for ANCA anti-PR3 antibodies, on the basis of which was diagnosed GPA, and rituximab therapy was immediately initiated, with clinical benefit.
Conclusions
Cardiac involvement of GPA was first reported by Wegener in 1936. Classical or generalized GPA is characterized by necrotizing granulomatous vasculitis of the upper and lower respiratory tract together with glomerulonephritis. Widespread disseminated vasculitis involving both small arteries and veins occurs to a greater or lesser degree as the disease progresses. A localized form of GPA limited primarily to the upper and lower respiratory tracts has been described. Despite histopathological diagnosis of GPA, with autoantibodies against to circulatory neutrophilic cytoplasmic antigens, we can diagnose GPA easily and early. GPA must be kept in mind as the differential diagnosis of new onset cardiomyopathy, especially in the existence of pulmonary and renal pathologies. The clinical presentation of GPA can be so diverse that the list of differential diagnoses is vast, ranging from infections (fungal, bacterial, and mycobacterial) to other vasculitides, including Henoch–Schönlein purpura, sarcoidosis, Behcet syndrome, and malignancies. Despite that involving the heart is well described, significant cardiac complications occurring during the course of the disease are rare.
AIMSThe HFA-PEFF and H2 FPEF scores have been developed to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and hold prognostic value. Their value in patients with HFpEF caused by ...cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has never been investigated. METHODS AND RESULTSWe evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF and H2 FPEF scores in 304 patients from three cohorts with HFpEF caused by transthyretin CA (n = 160, 53%) or immunoglobulin light-chain CA (n = 144, 47%). A diagnosis of HFpEF was more likely using the HFA-PEFF score with 2 (1%), 71 (23%), and 231 (76%) patients ranked as having a low (0-1), intermediate (2-4), or high (5, 6) probability of HFpEF, respectively. Conversely, 36 (12%), 179 (59%) and 89 (29%) of patients ranked as having a low (0-1), intermediate (2-5), or high (6-9) probability of HFpEF using the H2 FPEF score. During a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 8-40), 132 (43%) patients died. The HFA-PEFF score, but not the H2 FPEF score, predicted a high risk of all-cause death which remained significant after adjustment for age, AL-CA diagnosis, high-sensitivity troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular global longitudinal strain, left ventricular diastolic function and right ventricular function (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.95, p = 0.002 for every 1-point increase in HFA-PEFF). CONCLUSIONSThe HFA-PEFF score has a higher diagnostic utility in HFpEF caused by CA and holds independent prognostic value for all-cause mortality, while the H2 FPEF score does not.
PDF