Lens-sparing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is often followed by cataract development. However, there have been few prospective studies evaluating the timing of cataract progression and potential ...associated factors. This was an observational study conducted at the Ophthalmology Unit of the University Hospital of Parma (Parma, Italy). Patients presenting with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), who underwent PPV with preservation of the lens, were examined according to a scheduled follow-up (3, 6 and 12 months after PPV) and then preoperatively when cataract extraction surgery (CES) was indicated, or at the end of the study follow-up period (May 2021). The primary outcome was the interval between PPV and CES indication (based on predefined refractive criteria). A total of 36 eyes of 36 patients (mean age: 52 ± 10 years) were included in the study. Nineteen eyes (53%) were indicated for CES a median of 14.5 months (IQR: 12.0-24.8) after PPV. The nuclear and posterior subcapsular forms of cataract progressed significantly starting at 6 months after PPV. Older age at the time of PPV, silicone oil tamponade and RRD without macular involvement were significantly and independently associated with an earlier indication for CES. Patient age and the use of silicone oil tamponade must be taken into consideration when evaluating the risk of cataract development after PPV.
Abstract
Background
Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) is now considered as the standard treatment for Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy (CHED) by many surgeons. We present the 12-year clinical ...outcome of the youngest operated patient with CHED in which we successfully performed a bilateral EK procedure without removing the recipient endothelium-Descemet complex.
Case presentation
In November 2010 we performed EK without Descemet Stripping in a 3-month female newborn, thinking that the lower manipulation obtained by leaving the recipient endothelium–Descemet complex could be the key factor for the success of our surgery. Such a particular technique was new in newborns. The surgery was a success, but the long-term visual result was not predictable at that time. We followed the patient at 4 months, and then yearly. At the latest visit in October 2022 the visual, cognitive, and motorial developments were normal, with Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity of 0.4 LogMAR with − 0.75 D sf + 2.75 D cyl @ 105° in the right eye (RE) and 0.4 LogMAR with + 1.50 D sf + 2.50 D cyl @ 60° in the left eye (LE). The endothelial microscope showed an unexpected healthy endothelium, with a cell count of 2383 cells/mm
2
in the RE and of 2547 cells/mm
2
in the LE from a starting donor count of 2900 cells/mm
2
. No secondary procedures were performed during the 12-year follow-up.
Conclusion
EK without Descemet stripping has proved to be a successful procedure over time in our newborn. The unexpected healthy endothelium suggests a role of the Descemet membrane in CHED.
Information on the centration and tilt of iris-claw intraocular lenses (IC-IOLs) is limited. In this study, we tested the capacity of an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) ...instrument to measure decentration and tilt of anterior and posterior IC-IOLs through an integrated software.
The present observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at University Eye Clinic of Parma (Parma, Italy). The CASIA2 swept-source AS-OCT (Tomey Corp.) was used to measure the tilt and decentration of posterior and anterior IC-IOLs in patients implanted at least 6 months in advance. After failure with full-automation, semi-manual IOL tracing was applied. In-the-bag (IB) contralateral IOLs, when present, were measured automatically. The Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the agreement between repeated measurements (2 images for each study eye). The amount and direction of tilt and decentration were recorded and plotted into polar charts for evaluation.
A total of 21 patients were included: 14 with posterior and 7 with anterior IC-IOL fixation. In 17 eyes (81%), the AS-OCT provided a repeatable measurement of tilt and decentration. All contralateral eyes with IB IOL were automatically measured. The median decentration was 0.67 mm, 0.24 mm, and 0.24 mm in posterior IC-IOLs, anterior IC-IOLs, and IB IOLs group, respectively. The median tilt was 5.0°, 5.6°, and 5.6° for posterior IC-IOLs, anterior IC-IOLs, and IB IOLs, respectively. Tilt direction was mainly temporal, while decentration was inferior-temporal with posterior IC-IOLs and scattered with anterior IC-IOLs and IB IOLs.
The semi-manual tracing function of the CASIA2 AS-OCT provides repeatable and affordable measurements of the decentration and tilt of IC-IOLs in both the anterior and posterior chamber. Data from the former group were similar to the IB group.
Introduction
To compare the short-term visual and aberrometric outcomes and the long-term capsulotomy incidence in a cohort of patients receiving IOLs with similar structural profile but with a ...hydrophobic matrix in one eye (PHOB group) and a hydrophilic matrix in the other one (PHIL group).
Methods
In this retrospective, contralateral study, 26 patients sequentially undergoing phacoemulsification were implanted as mentioned above. Refraction and aberrometry were evaluated 6 months after surgery. For the quality of vision, the Hartmann-Shack optical aberration, Double-Pass Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), contrast sensitivity, and dysphotopsia results were compared. Capsulotomy was ascertained and dated by medical chart revision or phone call.
Results
All the considered quantitative and qualitative visual parameters tested statistically comparable between PHIL and PHOB group. After 5 years, four patients (16.7%) in the PHOB group and five patients (20.8%) in the PHIL group underwent a Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy (
P
> 0.5).
Conclusion
In this contralateral comparative study, the hydrophobic and hydrophilic matrix of the IOL similarly influenced the visual and aberrometric outcomes. Also the long-term laser capsulotomy incidence did not statistically differ between groups. The posterior IOL profile, rather than matrix hydrophilia, could consistently influence the posterior capsule opacification.
This retrospective case-control study was conducted to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the visual impairment in eyes with Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy (EBMD) after regular cataract ...surgery.
EBMD pseudophakic eyes were compared with matched pseudophakic eyes free from surface disorders. At least 3 weeks after surgery we evaluated uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), objective aberrometry, Point Spread Function (PSF), Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), and patient complaints.
Twenty-five EBMD eyes and 25 control eyes (13 patients per group) were included. Nine patients per group had a monofocal IOL, and four patients had a trifocal IOL. All the EBMD patients complained of postoperative blurred vision with ocular discomfort; intensive use of lubricants induced subjective improvement only in eyes with monofocal IOLs. Postoperative mean UDVA was 0.19 ± 0.16 LogMAR in the EBMD eyes and 0.11 ± 0.04 LogMAR in the control group (
= 0.016). Mean CDVA was 0.18 ± 0.15 LogMAR in the EBMD eyes and 0.06 ± 0.04 LogMAR in the control eyes (
= 0.001). The PSF curve width was significantly worse in the EBMD group (
< 0.001). The MTF cut-off value was lower in the EBMD group than in the control group (
< 0.001).
After cataract removal, eyes with EBMD had significantly lower UDVA and CDVA than controls. All the aberrometric parameters were significantly worse in EBMD cases. EBMD patients complained about their postoperative visual outcome, while control patients did not.
Pars plana vitrectomy is today a common first-line procedure for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Removal or preservation of the natural lens at the time of vitrectomy is ...associated with both advantages and disadvantages. The combination of cataract extraction (i.e., phacoemulsification) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPVc) enhances visualization of the peripheral retina and the surgical management of the vitreous base. However, PPVc prolongs the surgical time and is associated with iatrogenic loss of the accommodation function in younger patients, possible postoperative anisometropia, and unexpected refractive results. Performance of pars plana vitrectomy alone (PPVa) requires good technical skills to minimize the risk of lens damage, and quickens cataract development. We retrieved all recent papers that directly compared PPVc and PPVa using parameters that we consider essential when choosing between the two procedures (the success rate of anatomical RRD repair, postoperative refractive error, intra- and postoperative complications, and costs). PPVa and PPVc were generally comparable in terms of RRD anatomical repair. PPVc was associated with fewer intraoperative, but more postoperative, complications. Macula-off RRD PPVc treatment was often associated with undesirable myopic refractive error. PPVa followed by phacoemulsification was the most expensive procedure.
To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric results with a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) based on alternating positive and negative spherical aberration in the ...central 3.0 mm optical zone and an aspheric monofocal IOL of the same platform.
Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Verona, Italy.
Prospective case series.
Cataract patients free from other ocular disease had bilateral implantation of the EDOF Mini Well IOL or the monofocal Mini IOL. Four to 6 weeks after second-eye surgery, the refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and photic symptoms were assessed. Wavefront analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of was the amplitude of the dioptric interval for 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The secondary endpoint was an aberration comparison between the two IOLs.
The study comprised two groups of 25 patients each. The corrected distance visual acuity was better with the monofocal IOL by 0.02 logMAR (P = .03). The 0.1 logMAR dioptric interval was 2.0 diopters (D) for the EDOF IOL and 1.0 D for the monofocal IOL (P < .001). The mean CDVA at −2.0 defocus was 0.15 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in contrast sensitivity or photic symptoms. The optical aberrations at 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm aperture diameters were similar in the two groups.
The EDOF IOL based on spherical aberration provided greater depth of focus than the aspheric monofocal IOL without increasing optical aberrations and with few photic symptoms.
Automated refraction (Scheiner principle) is universally used to start a visual examination. Although the results are reliable in eyes implanted with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), they may be ...less precise with multifocal (mIOL) or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs and can even indicate a refractive error that does not clinically exist. Autorefractor results with monofocal, multifocal, and EDOF IOLs were investigated through literature search analyzing the papers reporting the difference between automated and clinical refraction. The average difference ranged between -0.50 diopter (D) and -1.00 D with most mIOL and EDOF IOLs. The differences in astigmatism were generally much lower. Autorefractors using infrared light cannot measure eyes with high technology IOLs precisely because of the influence of the refractive or of the diffractive near add. The systematic error induced with some IOLs should be mentioned in the IOL label to prevent possible inappropriate refractive procedures to treat apparent myopia.
At the twelfth month of follow up after surgery, the lens was still perfectly clear and accommodating with no sign of cataract (see video time: 2.32 min), the uncorrected visual acuity remained at ...0.00 logMAR, the IOP at 12 mmHg. Iris encircling procedures and sutures to revert fixed mydriasis have always been performed in pseudophakic eyes, sometimes after the removal of transparent lenses 1-4. The technique we are proposing might be of help especially in younger patients with accommodating natural lens.Declaration of Competing Interest The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.