Abstract only
10516
Background: The prognosis of patients with primary multifocal metastatic Ewing sarcoma (PMES) remains dismal. So far, combination with temozolomide and irinotecan (TEMIRI) was ...tested in patients with refractory or relapsed disease. This study evaluates the activity and the tolerability of TEMIRI as front-line treatment in PMES. Methods: In the study-period 2012-2018, a front-line window therapy with 2 courses TEMIRI (temozolomide 100 mg/sqm/day + irinotecan 50 mg/sqm/day for 5 days every three weeks) was introduced as amendment to the ISG/AIEOP EW-2 protocol ( EUDRACT#2009-011197-15, Vers. 1.02 ) for patients with PMES. Main objective was to test the activity of TEMIRI evaluated by RECIST 1.1 criteria, with centralized revision of the radiological response. Secondary objectives included assessment of the toxicity profile and clinical benefit of the combination. A two-step study design by Simon was planned. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Median age at diagnosis was 19 years (range 3-55); males/females ratio was 2.4. Primary axial tumour was present in 24 (70%). After TEMIRI, RECIST response was as follows: partial response -20 (59%), stable disease -11 (32%), progression disease -3 (9%). After TEMIRI, amelioration in ECOG/Lansky score was achieved in 25/34 (73,5%), and reduction or disappearance of pain was observed in 31/34 patients (91%). TEMIRI toxicity was manageable: incidence of grade 3-4 nonhaematological and haematological toxicity was 3% and 3%, respectively (67/68 evaluable courses). At the time of the present analysis, 11 patients are alive; 7 of them are in complete remission and completed their treatment program (5-drug standard chemotherapy). With a median follow-up of 31 months (range 23-75), the 3-year survival estimate is 36,5%±0.09. Conclusions: Upfront TEMIRI x 2 courses showed an encouraging activity, with response rate 59% and deserves further evaluation combined with conventional treatments also in non-metastatic patients. In PMES new treatment strategies are urgently needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02727387.
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is rare in adults and it is generally characterized by poor outcome. In a previous retrospective study, we demonstrated a better prognosis in adults treated with multimodality ...approach resembling pediatric protocols. Thereafter, we developed specific recommendations based on the principles adopted in pediatric oncology. The present analysis reports the results in a subsequent prospective series. The study included 95 consecutive patients (age 18–77 years) treated from 2002 to 2015 for embryonal and alveolar RMS. As in the previous series, patients were stratified by the appropriateness of their treatment according to therapeutic guidelines for childhood RMS. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 33.6% and 40.3%, respectively. The 5-year EFS was 40.8% for patients with the highest treatment score, and 15% for those with lower score, while OS was 44.4% and 24.5%, respectively. The developing of specific recommendations enabled an increase in the number of patients treated with intensive multimodal treatment resembling pediatric strategy (69.7% vs. 39.1% in the retrospective series). This study reinforced the idea that adherence to the principles of pediatric protocols, improves adult RMS outcomes. However, treating adults with pediatric-type strategy is not enough to achieve the results obtained in children. Issues in compliance and a more aggressive biology of adult RMS might have a role in the different outcome according to age. Improving the collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists in promoting specific clinical and biological research is crucial to improve the outcome for this patient population.
Whether the severity and mortality of COVID-19 in patients with cancer have improved in terms of disease management and capacity is yet to be defined.
To test whether severity and mortality from ...COVID-19 among patients with cancer have improved during the course of the pandemic.
OnCovid is a European registry that collects data on consecutive patients with solid or hematologic cancer and COVID-19. This multicenter case series study included real-world data from 35 institutions across 6 countries (UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany). This update included patients diagnosed between February 27, 2020, and February, 14, 2021. Inclusion criteria were confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a history of solid or hematologic cancer.
SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Deaths were differentiated at 14 days and 3 months as the 2 landmark end points. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared by stratifying patients across 5 phases (February to March 2020, April to June 2020, July to September 2020, October to December 2020, and January to February 2021) and across 2 major outbreaks (February to June 2020 and July 2020 to February 2021).
At data cutoff, 2795 consecutive patients were included, with 2634 patients eligible for analysis (median IQR age, 68 18-77 years ; 52.8% men). Eligible patients demonstrated significant time-dependent improvement in 14-day case-fatality rate (CFR) with estimates of 29.8% (95% CI, 0.26-0.33) for February to March 2020; 20.3% (95% CI, 0.17-0.23) for April to June 2020; 12.5% (95% CI, 0.06-22.90) for July to September 2020; 17.2% (95% CI, 0.15-0.21) for October to December 2020; and 14.5% (95% CI, 0.09-0.21) for January to February 2021 (all P < .001) across the predefined phases. Compared with the second major outbreak, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak were more likely to be 65 years or older (974 of 1626 60.3% vs 564 of 1008 56.1%; P = .03), have at least 2 comorbidities (793 of 1626 48.8% vs 427 of 1008 42.4%; P = .001), and have advanced tumors (708 of 1626 46.4% vs 536 of 1008 56.1%; P < .001). Complications of COVID-19 were more likely to be seen (738 of 1626 45.4% vs 342 of 1008 33.9%; P < .001) and require hospitalization (969 of 1626 59.8% vs 418 of 1008 42.1%; P < .001) and anti-COVID-19 therapy (1004 of 1626 61.7% vs 501 of 1008 49.7%; P < .001) during the first major outbreak. The 14-day CFRs for the first and second major outbreaks were 25.6% (95% CI, 0.23-0.28) vs 16.2% (95% CI, 0.13-0.19; P < .001), respectively. After adjusting for country, sex, age, comorbidities, tumor stage and status, anti-COVID-19 and anticancer therapy, and COVID-19 complications, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak had an increased risk of death at 14 days (hazard ratio HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.47-2.32) and 3 months (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.51) compared with those diagnosed in the second outbreak.
The findings of this registry-based study suggest that mortality in patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 has improved in Europe; this improvement may be associated with earlier diagnosis, improved management, and dynamic changes in community transmission over time.
Abstract only
11501
Background: The role of dose intensification of chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma (ES) is under evaluation in prospective trials. This is a controlled, randomized phase III study ...evaluating the impact on event-free survival (EFS) of two arms at different intensity of induction therapy in localized ES at onset. Methods: Newly diagnosed localized ES patients aged 2-40 were eligible. They were randomized to receive 4-courses induction therapy - 1 every 21 days - either with a standard arm (arm A) as per ISG/SSGIII protocol (Ferrari S, et at, Ann Oncol. 2011;22(5):1221) or with an intense arm B, consisting of vincristine 1,5mg/sqm+ doxorubicin 80mg/sqm+ifosfamide 9g/sqm for each course. After induction, patients underwent surgery and/or radiotherapy,followed by an adaptive treatment. Good responders received standard courses chemotherapy: arm A pts received 9 courses, while arm B pts received 5 courses. Poor responders in both arms received 4 courses followed by high-dose busulfan/melphalan+autologous stem cell rescue. The primary outcome measure was EFS for the 2 arms in the intention-to-treat population. Kaplan-Meier curves compared with log-rank test and Cox model were performed to assess differences between study arms. A secondary outcome was toxicity differences, assessed by means of the Fisher’s exact test. Initial sample size was 230 pts, type I error rate 5%, power 80%. Results: Between 2009 and 2019, 234 patients were randomized (arm A-115; arm B-119). M:F ratio was 1.8; median age 14 years (range 2-40); tumour site extremity in 55%, axial/pelvis in 45%; tumour volume < 200ml in 31% and ≥200ml in 69%. A good response was obtained in 56% in arm A and 60% in arm B. Median follow-up was 68 months. EFS was not significantly different between arms; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0,51-1,41, 5-year EFS (95% CI) was 73% (64-82%) in arm A and 75% (67-83%) in arm B ( p = 0.526). Good responders in arm A and in arm B and poor responders in arm B had comparable results: 5-year EFS (95% CI) was 80% (71-91%), 77% (67-88%), and 72% (59-86%), respectively, while poor responders in arm A showed a worse, not statistically significant (p = 0.164) performance (63%; 50-78%). Subgroup analyses showed similar outcome for age, tumour site and volume in both arms. Hematological, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular grade ≥3 toxicities were more pronounced in arm B (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Intense induction therapy with arm B did not improve 5-year EFS when compared with the standard arm A. The higher toxicity observed in arm B than in arm A was counterbalanced, in good responders, by a similar outcome with a shorter treatment plan. For poor responders, with almost 30 patients per arm event-free and with < 48-month FUP, better 5-year EFS in arm B than in arm A was observed but needs further observation. Clinical trial information: NCT02063022.
Abstract only
11527
Background: Overexpression of ABCB1/P-glycoprotein (Pgp) predicts poor outcome in retrospective osteosarcoma series.Two prospective trials with Pgp expression and post-induction ...histologic response as stratification factors were activated in Italy (ISG/OS-2) and Spain (GEIS-33). Methods: Patients ≤ 40 years with extremity non-metastatic high-grade osteosarcoma were eligible. Analysisi of Pgp expression from diagnostic biopsy was centralized. Preoperatively, all patients received methotrexate, adriamycin, cisplatinum (MAP). Surgery was performed at week 8. All patients received a dose of adriamycin following surgery. In case of Pgp overexpression (Pgp+), mifamurtide (2 mg/m2 twice/week for 3 months then weekly for 6 months) was added after surgery, with 4 consecutive cycles of ifosfamide 3 gr/m2/day, day 1-5 (HDIFO) in case of poor histologic response (necrosis < 90%) to MAP. Patients without overexpression of Pgp (Pgp-) received MAP postoperatively, regardless the pathological response. From March 2013, an amendment increased high dose methotrexate cumulative dose from 60 g/m2 (5 cycles) to 120 mg/m2 (10 cycles). The post-amendment regimen was adopted in the observational prospective study by GEIS. Here we present the merged analysis of ISG/OS-2 patients treated post-amendment and GEIS-33. Results: From March 2013 to April 2018, 274 patients were included. Median age was 14 years (range 4-38), male/female: 163/111; 90 were Pgp-, 164 were Pgp+, 20 not evaluable. With a median follow-up of 48 months (1.3-78.5 months), the 3-year EFS and OS were 71.9% (95%CI 66-76.9) and 88% (95%CI: 83.2-91.5) respectively, with no inferior survival for Pgp positive patients and improved survival for good responders (Table). Conclusions: In this prospective uncontrolled study with a risk-adapted strategy for non-metastatic osteosarcoma, survival is superior to that of all ISG/GEIS previous series. The 3-year EFS of 71.9% compares favorably with other reports. Pgp+ patients performed well in this study, in which mifamurtide and HDIFO were added after a poor response to MAP. Clinical trial information: NCT01459484; NCT04383288. Table: see text
Introduction: in this review we discuss the standard of care for both pediatric and adult synovial sarcoma (SS), the prognostic differences between them, and the treatments available for localized ...and advanced diseases. We also overview the biology and the recent drugs under consideration in clinical trials on SS.
Areas covered: we focus on new targeted therapies being investigated for advanced SS, especially anti-angiogenic drugs, and immunotherapy. We review all the published data and ongoing trials dedicated to SS or to soft tissue sarcoma in general, paying particular attention to the results obtained in SS patients.
Expert opinion: we expect new treatment strategies to become available for SS in the near future. The ongoing and published trials on targeted therapies and immunotherapy mainly concern adult patients, but the somatic biology of pediatric SS has some similarities as in adult disease. A stronger cooperation between adult and pediatric oncologists in recent years has led to a more shared effort to find new treatment strategies for advanced SS patients, regardless of their age.
•Angiosarcoma presents unique challenges in clinical management of localized disease, due to its rarity and aggressiveness.•Dedicated clinical recommendations for angiosarcoma are currently lacking ...despite the applicability of ESMO guidelines.•The Italian Sarcoma Group, together with patient’s advocates from “Sofia nel Cuore Onlus”, convened to develop specific recommendations, aiming to standardize and harmonize clinical practices for localized angiosarcoma management.
Angiosarcoma (AS) represents a rare and aggressive vascular sarcoma, posing distinct challenges in clinical management compared to other sarcomas.
While the current European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) clinical practice guidelines for sarcoma treatment are applicable to AS, its unique aggressiveness and diverse tumor presentations necessitate dedicated and detailed clinical recommendations, which are currently lacking. Notably, considerations regarding surgical extent, radiation therapy (RT), and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy vary significantly in localized disease, depending on each different site of onset. Indeed, AS are one of the sarcoma types most sensitive to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite this, uncertainties persist regarding optimal management across different clinical presentations, highlighting the need for further investigation through clinical trials.
The Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG) organized a consensus meeting on April 1st, 2023, in Castel San Pietro, Italy, bringing together Italian sarcoma experts from several disciplines and patient representatives from “Sofia nel Cuore Onlus” and the ISG patient advocacy working group. The objective was to develop specific clinical recommendations for managing localized AS within the existing framework of sarcoma clinical practice guidelines, accounting for potential practice variations among ISG institutions. The aim was to try to standardize and harmonize clinical practices, or at least highlight the open questions in the local management of the disease, to define the best evidence-based practice for the optimal approach of localized AS and generate the recommendations presented herein.
Setting
In the last few years, the use of opioids for cancer pain has rapidly increased and new molecules have been developed. Currently, rapid‐onset opioids are widely used in clinical practice for ...breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). However, the tolerability of these molecules is still a matter of debate.
Patients
We describe two cases of rapid‐onset opioids misuse that have been recently observed at our palliative care unit.
Discussion
The reported cases are explicative as they occurred in patients suffering from different types of cancer and with different causes of BTcP. Further investigations are needed to identify factors predicting addiction to this new class of molecules.
PDF
