There is a need for high quality research to improve perioperative patient care in Africa. The aim of this study was to understand the particular barriers to clinical research in this environment.
We ...conducted an electronic survey of African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS) investigators, including 29 quantitative Likert scale questions and eight qualitative questions with subsequent thematic analysis. Protocol compliant and non-compliant countries were compared according to WHO statistics for research and development, health workforce data, and world internet statistics.
Responses were received from 134/418 of invited researchers in 24/25 (96%) of participating countries, and three non-participating countries. Barriers included lack of a dedicated research team (47.7%), reliable internet access (32.6%), staff skilled in research (31.8%), and team commitment (23.8%). Protocol compliant countries had significantly more physicians per 1000 population (4 vs 0.9, P<0.01), internet penetration (38% vs 28%, P=0.01) and published clinical trials (1461 vs 208, P<0.01) compared with non-compliant countries. Facilitators of research included establishing a research culture (86.9%), simple data collection tools (80%), and ASOS team interaction (77.9%). Most participants are interested in future research (93.8%). Qualitative data reiterated human resource, financial resource, and regulatory barriers. However, the desire to contribute to an African collaboration producing relevant data to improve patient outcomes was expressed strongly by ASOS investigators.
Barriers to successful participation in ASOS related to resource limitations and not motivation of the clinician investigators. Practical solutions to individual barriers may increase the success of multi-centre perioperative research in Africa.
Summary
Healthcare workers involved in aerosol‐generating procedures, such as tracheal intubation, may be at elevated risk of acquiring COVID‐19. However, the magnitude of this risk is unknown. We ...conducted a prospective international multicentre cohort study recruiting healthcare workers participating in tracheal intubation of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19. Information on tracheal intubation episodes, personal protective equipment use and subsequent provider health status was collected via self‐reporting. The primary endpoint was the incidence of laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 diagnosis or new symptoms requiring self‐isolation or hospitalisation after a tracheal intubation episode. Cox regression analysis examined associations between the primary endpoint and healthcare worker characteristics, procedure‐related factors and personal protective equipment use. Between 23 March and 2 June 2020, 1718 healthcare workers from 503 hospitals in 17 countries reported 5148 tracheal intubation episodes. The overall incidence of the primary endpoint was 10.7% over a median (IQR range) follow‐up of 32 (18–48 0–116) days. The cumulative incidence within 7, 14 and 21 days of the first tracheal intubation episode was 3.6%, 6.1% and 8.5%, respectively. The risk of the primary endpoint varied by country and was higher in women, but was not associated with other factors. Around 1 in 10 healthcare workers involved in tracheal intubation of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19 subsequently reported a COVID‐19 outcome. This has human resource implications for institutional capacity to deliver essential healthcare services, and wider societal implications for COVID‐19 transmission.
Summary
Despite the acknowledged injustice and widespread existence of parachute research studies conducted in low‐ or middle‐income countries by researchers from institutions in high‐income ...countries, there is currently no pragmatic guidance for how academic journals should evaluate manuscript submissions and challenge this practice. We assembled a multidisciplinary group of editors and researchers with expertise in international health research to develop this consensus statement. We reviewed relevant existing literature and held three workshops to present research data and holistically discuss the concept of equitable authorship and the role of academic journals in the context of international health research partnerships. We subsequently developed statements to guide prospective authors and journal editors as to how they should address this issue. We recommend that for manuscripts that report research conducted in low‐ or middle‐income countries by collaborations including partners from one or more high‐income countries, authors should submit accompanying structured reflexivity statements. We provide specific questions that these statements should address and suggest that journals should transparently publish reflexivity statements with accepted manuscripts. We also provide guidance to journal editors about how they should assess the structured statements when making decisions on whether to accept or reject submitted manuscripts. We urge journals across disciplines to adopt these recommendations to accelerate the changes needed to halt the practice of parachute research.
Summary
Identification of high‐risk patients admitted to intensive care with COVID‐19 may inform management strategies. The objective of this meta‐analysis was to determine factors associated with ...mortality among adults with COVID‐19 admitted to intensive care by searching databases for studies published between 1 January 2020 and 6 December 2020. Observational studies of COVID‐19 adults admitted to critical care were included. Studies of mixed cohorts and intensive care cohorts restricted to a specific patient sub‐group were excluded. Dichotomous variables were reported with pooled OR and 95%CI, and continuous variables with pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI. Fifty‐eight studies (44,305 patients) were included in the review. Increasing age (SMD 0.65, 95%CI 0.53–0.77); smoking (OR 1.40, 95%CI 1.03–1.90); hypertension (OR 1.54, 95%CI 1.29–1.85); diabetes (OR 1.41, 95%CI 1.22–1.63); cardiovascular disease (OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.52–2.38); respiratory disease (OR 1.75, 95%CI 1.33–2.31); renal disease (OR 2.39, 95%CI 1.68–3.40); and malignancy (OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.30–2.52) were associated with mortality. A higher sequential organ failure assessment score (SMD 0.86, 95%CI 0.63–1.10) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation‐2 score (SMD 0.89, 95%CI 0.65–1.13); a lower PaO2:FIO2 (SMD −0.44, 95%CI −0.62 to −0.26) and the need for mechanical ventilation at admission (OR 2.53, 95%CI 1.90–3.37) were associated with mortality. Higher white cell counts (SMD 0.37, 95%CI 0.22–0.51); neutrophils (SMD 0.42, 95%CI 0.19–0.64); D‐dimers (SMD 0.56, 95%CI 0.43–0.69); ferritin (SMD 0.32, 95%CI 0.19–0.45); lower platelet (SMD −0.22, 95%CI −0.35 to −0.10); and lymphocyte counts (SMD −0.37, 95%CI −0.54 to −0.19) were all associated with mortality. In conclusion, increasing age, pre‐existing comorbidities, severity of illness based on validated scoring systems, and the host response to the disease were associated with mortality; while male sex and increasing BMI were not. These factors have prognostic relevance for patients admitted to intensive care with COVID‐19.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction & Cardiac Arrest (NSQIP MICA) calculator and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) were derived using currently outdated ...methods of diagnosing perioperative myocardial infarctions. We tested the external validity of these tools in a setting of a systematic perioperative cardiac biomarker measurement.
Analysis of routinely collected data nested in the Vascular Events In Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation Study. A consecutive sample of patients ≥45 yr old undergoing in-hospital noncardiac surgery in a single tertiary care centre was enrolled. The predictive performance of the models was tested in terms of the occurrence of major cardiac complications defined as a composite of a nonfatal myocardial infarction, a nonfatal cardiac arrest, or a cardiac death within 30 days after surgery. The plasma concentration of high-sensitivity troponin T was measured before surgery, 6–12 h after operation, and on the first, second, and third days after surgery. Myocardial infarction was diagnosed according to the Third Universal Definition.
The median age was 65 (59–72) yr, and 704/870 (80.9%) subjects were male. The primary outcome occurred in 76/870 (8.7%; 95% confidence interval CI, 6.9–10.8%) patients. The c-statistic was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.57–0.70) for the NSQIP MICA and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.54–0.65) for the RCRI. Predicted risks were systematically underestimated in calibration belts (P<0.001). The RCRI and the NSQIP MICA showed no clinical utility before recalibration.
The NSQIP and RCRI models had limited predictive performance in this at-risk population. The recently updated version of the RCRI was more reliable than the original index.
Summary
The purpose of this meta‐analysis was to determine the efficacy of peri‐operative interventions in decreasing the incidence of postoperative delirium. An electronic search of four databases ...was conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered to. We included randomised controlled trials of non‐cardiac surgery with a peri‐operative intervention and that reported postoperative delirium, and identified 29 trials. Meta‐analysis revealed that peri‐operative geriatric consultation (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32–0.67) and lighter anaesthesia (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.27–5.56) were associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative delirium. For the other interventions, the point estimate suggested possible protection with prophylactic haloperidol (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36–1.05), bright light therapy (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03–1.19) and general as opposed to regional anaesthesia (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47–1.23). This meta‐analysis has shown that peri‐operative geriatric consultations with multicomponent interventions and lighter anaesthesia are potentially effective in decreasing the incidence of postoperative delirium.
Low- and middle-income countries have a critical shortage of specialist anaesthetists. Most patients arriving for surgery are of low perioperative risk. Without immediate access to preoperative ...specialist care, an appropriate interim strategy may be to ensure that only high-risk patients are seen preoperatively by a specialist. Matching human resources to the burden of disease with a nurse-administered pre-operative screening tool to identify high-risk patients who might benefit from specialist review prior to the day of surgery may be an effective strategy.
To develop a nurse-administered preoperative anaesthesia screening tool to identify patients who would most likely benefit from a specialist review before the day of surgery, and those patients who could safely be seen by the anaesthetist on the day of surgery. This would ensure adequate time for optimisation of high-risk patients preoperatively and limit avoidable day-of-surgery cancellations.
A systematic review was conducted to identify preoperative screening questions for use in a three-round Delphi consensus process. A panel of 16 experienced full-time clinical anaesthetists representing all university-affiliated anaesthesia departments in South Africa participated to define a nurses' screening tool for preoperative assessment.
Ninety-eight studies were identified, which generated 79 questions. An additional 14 items identified by the facilitators were added to create a list of 93 questions for the first round. The final screening tool consisted of 81 questions, of which 37 were deemed critical to identify patients who should be seen by a specialist prior to the day of surgery.
A structured nurse-administered preoperative screening tool is proposed to identify high-risk patients who are likely to benefit from a timely preoperative specialist anaesthetist review to avoid cancellation on the day of surgery.
Background
The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a patient safety tool shown to reduce mortality and to improve teamwork and adherence with perioperative safety practices. The results of the ...original pilot work were published 10 years ago. This study aimed to determine the contemporary prevalence and predictors of SSC use globally.
Methods
Pooled data from the GlobalSurg and Surgical Outcomes studies were analysed to describe SSC use in 2014–2016. The primary exposure was the Human Development Index (HDI) of the reporting country, and the primary outcome was reported SSC use. A generalized estimating equation, clustering by facility, was used to determine differences in SSC use by patient, facility and national characteristics.
Results
A total of 85 957 patients from 1464 facilities in 94 countries were included. On average, facilities used the SSC in 75·4 per cent of operations. Compared with very high HDI, SSC use was less in low HDI countries (odds ratio (OR) 0·08, 95 per cent c.i. 0·05 to 0·12). The SSC was used less in urgent compared with elective operations in low HDI countries (OR 0·68, 0·53 to 0·86), but used equally for urgent and elective operations in very high HDI countries (OR 0·96, 0·87 to 1·06). SSC use was lower for obstetrics and gynaecology versus abdominal surgery (OR 0·91, 0·85 to 0·98) and where the common or official language was not one of the WHO official languages (OR 0·30, 0·23 to 0·39).
Conclusion
Worldwide, SSC use is generally high, but significant variability exists. Implementation and dissemination strategies must be developed to address this variability.
Antecedentes
Se ha demostrado que la utilización de la lista de verificación de seguridad quirúrgica (Surgical Safety Checklist, SSC) reduce la mortalidad y mejora el trabajo en equipo, así como el cumplimiento de las prácticas de seguridad perioperatorias. Los resultados de un trabajo piloto original se publicaron hace 10 años. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia actual y los predictores de uso de la SSC a nivel mundial.
Métodos
Se analizaron los datos agrupados de los estudios GlobalSurg y Surgical Outcomes para describir la utilización de la SSC entre 2014‐2016. La principal variable de exposición fue el índice de desarrollo humano (Human Development Index, HDI) del país informante y la principal variable de resultado, la tasa de utilización de la SCC. Para determinar las diferencias en la utilización de la SSC por paciente, centro y características nacionales se utilizó una ecuación de estimación generalizada con conglomerados por centros.
Resultados
Se incluyeron 85.957 pacientes de 1.464 centros en 94 países. La tasa media de utilización de la SSC fue del 75,4% de las operaciones. Al compararlos con países de HDI muy alto, la utilización de la SCC fue menor en los países con HDI bajo (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 0,08, i.c. del 95% 0,05‐0,12). En países con HDI bajo, la SSC se utilizó menos en operaciones urgentes en comparación con operaciones electivas (OR 0,68, i.c. del 95% 0,53‐ 0,86) a diferencia de los países con HDI elevado, en los que se utilizó por igual en ambas situaciones (OR 0,96, i.c. del 95% 0,87‐1,06). La utilización de la SSC fue menor en operaciones de obstetricia y ginecología que en cirugía abdominal (OR 0,91, i.c. del 95% 0,85 a 0,98) y en aquellos países en los que el idioma habitual u oficial era diferente a los idiomas oficiales de la OMS (OR 0,30, i.c. del 95% 0,23 a 0,39).
Conclusión
A nivel mundial, el uso de SSC en general es alto, pero existe una variabilidad significativa. Se deben desarrollar estrategias de implementación y difusión para resolver esta variabilidad.
The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a patient safety tool shown to reduce mortality and improve teamwork and adherence with perioperative safety practices. Since its introduction a decade ago, the global uptake of the SSC has been generally high, but significant variability exists. Implementation and dissemination strategies must be developed to address this variability.
Variable implementation
Summary
Functional capacity is an integral component of the pre‐operative evaluation of the cardiac patient for non‐cardiac surgery. Stair climbing capacity has peri‐operative prognostic importance. ...It may predict survival after lung resection and complications after major non‐cardiac surgery. However, stair climbing cannot determine the aerobic metabolic capacity necessary to survive the peri‐operative stress response. The potential benefits and current limitations of cardiopulmonary exercise testing to determine peri‐operative aerobic capacity are discussed. Principles for the selection of an appropriate screening test of aerobic function are put forward.
PDF
