Summary
Background
Tralokinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, specifically neutralizes interleukin‐13, a key cytokine driving peripheral inflammation in atopic dermatitis (AD). In phase II ...studies, tralokinumab combined with topical corticosteroids provided early and sustained improvements in AD signs and symptoms.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab monotherapy in adults with moderate‐to‐severe AD who had an inadequate response to topical treatments.
Methods
In two 52‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, adults with moderate‐to‐severe AD were randomized (3 : 1) to subcutaneous tralokinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo. Primary endpoints were Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 at week 16 and ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16. Patients achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1 and/or EASI 75 with tralokinumab at week 16 were rerandomized to tralokinumab Q2W or every 4 weeks or placebo, for 36 weeks. The trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03131648 and NCT03160885.
Results
At week 16, more patients who received tralokinumab vs. placebo achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1: 15·8% vs. 7·1% in ECZTRA 1 difference 8·6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4·1–13·1; P = 0·002 and 22·2% vs. 10·9% in ECZTRA 2 (11·1%, 95% CI 5·8–16·4; P < 0·001) and EASI 75: 25·0% vs. 12·7% (12·1%, 95% CI 6·5–17·7; P < 0·001) and 33·2% vs. 11·4% (21·6%, 95% CI 15·8–27·3; P < 0·001). Early improvements in pruritus, sleep interference, Dermatology Life Quality Index, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis and Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure were observed from the first postbaseline measurements. The majority of week 16 tralokinumab responders maintained response at week 52 with continued tralokinumab treatment without any rescue medication (including topical corticosteroids). Adverse events were reported in 76·4% and 61·5% of patients receiving tralokinumab in ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, respectively, and in 77·0% and 66·0% of patients receiving placebo in ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, respectively, in the 16‐week initial period.
Conclusions
Tralokinumab monotherapy was superior to placebo at 16 weeks of treatment and was well tolerated up to 52 weeks of treatment.
What is already known about this topic?
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic interleukin (IL)‐13‐mediated disease.
There is a need for safe and effective long‐term treatment options for AD.
Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to IL‐13 with high affinity, thereby preventing receptor interaction and subsequent downstream signalling.
Tralokinumab combined with topical corticosteroids showed early and sustained efficacy and safety in a 12‐week, phase IIb trial in moderate‐to‐severe AD.
What does this study add?
These are the first pivotal phase III trials demonstrating that by specifically targeting IL‐13 alone, patients can achieve significant improvements in AD signs and symptoms and quality of life, and maintain these improvements over time without the requirement for topical corticosteroids.
These trials provide evidence that tralokinumab offers a long‐term, well‐tolerated treatment option for patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD.
Linked Comment: Morra and Drucker. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:386–387.
Plain language summary available online
Secukinumab, a fully human immunoglobulin G1-kappa monoclonal antibody that directly inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A, has been shown to have robust efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ...psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) demonstrating a rapid onset of action and sustained long-term clinical responses with a consistently favorable safety profile in multiple Phase 2 and 3 trials. Here, we report longer-term pooled safety and tolerability data for secukinumab across three indications (up to 5 years of treatment in PsO and PsA; up to 4 years in AS).
The integrated clinical trial safety dataset included data pooled from 21 randomized controlled clinical trials of secukinumab 300 or 150 or 75 mg in PsO (14 Phase 3 trials and 1 Phase 4 trial), PsA (3 Phase 3 trials), and AS (3 Phase 3 trials), along with post-marketing safety surveillance data with a cut-off date of June 25, 2017. Adverse events (AEs) were reported as exposure-adjusted incident rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years. Analyses included all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of secukinumab.
A total of 5181, 1380, and 794 patients from PsO, PsA, and AS clinical trials representing secukinumab exposures of 10,416.9, 3866.9, and 1943.1 patient-years, respectively, and post-marketing data from patients with a cumulative exposure to secukinumab of ~ 96,054 patient-years were included in the analysis. The most frequent AE was upper respiratory tract infection. EAIRs across PsO, PsA, and AS indications were generally low for serious infections (1.4, 1.9, and 1.2, respectively), Candida infections (2.2, 1.5, and 0.7, respectively), inflammatory bowel disease (0.01, 0.05, and 0.1, respectively), and major adverse cardiac events (0.3, 0.4, and 0.6, respectively). No cases of tuberculosis reactivation were reported. The incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies was low with secukinumab across all studies, with no discernible loss of efficacy, unexpected alterations in pharmacokinetics, or association with immunogenicity-related AEs.
Secukinumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile over long-term treatment in patients with PsO, PsA, and AS. This comprehensive assessment demonstrated that the safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with previous reports in patients with PsO, PsA, and AS, supporting its long-term use in these chronic conditions.
Summary
Background
Secukinumab, a fully human anti‐interleukin‐17A monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy and safety in moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis when administered via subcutaneous ...injection. Self‐administration by pre‐filled syringe (PFS) can offer patients clinical benefits of a drug, with increased convenience.
Objectives
To assess efficacy, safety and usability of secukinumab administration via PFS in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.
Materials and methods
Subjects in this phase 3 trial were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to secukinumab 300 or 150 mg or matching placebo. Results to week 12 are presented here. Each treatment was delivered using a PFS once weekly to week 4, and again at week 8. Co‐primary endpoints were secukinumab superiority over placebo for week 12 PASI 75 (≥ 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) and IGA mod 2011 (2011 modified Investigator's Global Assessment) 0/1 response rates. Secondary endpoints included PFS usability, determined by observer rating of successful, hazard‐free self‐injection and subject rating of acceptability by the Self‐Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ).
Results
Co‐primary endpoints were met, with demonstration of superiority for each secukinumab dose vs. placebo at week 12 (PASI 75: 75·9%, 69·5% and 0% for secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg and placebo; IGA mod 2011 0/1: 69·0%, 52·5% and 0%, respectively; P < 0·0001 for all comparisons vs. placebo). PFS usability was high: 100% of subjects successfully self‐administered treatment at week 1, and subjects reported high SIAQ‐assessed acceptability of the PFS throughout the trial. No new/unexpected safety signals were observed.
Conclusions
Secukinumab administration by PFS was effective, with an acceptable safety profile and high usability. The PFS provides a reliable, convenient form of secukinumab administration in subjects with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.
What's already known about this topic?
Secukinumab is a fully human antibody targeting interleukin‐17A.
What does this study add?
Use of the secukinumab PFS was associated with high usability as determined by successful, hazard‐free, subject‐accepted self‐injection.
Self‐administration of secukinumab via PFS allows the delivery of its clinical benefits with improved convenience in disease management.
This phase 3 study in moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis showed that secukinumab administration via pre‐filled syringe (PFS) demonstrated significant clinical efficacy vs. placebo, with an acceptable safety profile.
Summary
Background
Patients with plaque psoriasis treated with biologic therapies need more efficacious, safe and convenient treatments to improve quality of life. Risankizumab and secukinumab ...inhibit interleukin‐23 and interleukin‐17A, respectively, and are effective in adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis but have different dosing regimens.
Objectives
To compare directly the efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab over 52 weeks.
Methods
IMMerge was an international, phase III, multicentre, open‐label, efficacy–assessor‐blinded, active‐comparator study, in which adult patients with chronic, moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to treatment with risankizumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg. Primary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) at week 16 (noninferiority comparison with margin of 12%) and week 52 (superiority comparison).
Results
In total 327 patients from nine countries were treated with risankizumab (n = 164) or secukinumab (n = 163). Risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab in the proportion of patients achieving PASI 90 at week 16 73·8% vs. 65·6%; difference of 8·2%, 96·25% confidence interval (CI)−2·2 to 18·6; within the 12% noninferiority margin and superior to secukinumab at week 52 (86·6% vs. 57·1%; difference of 29·8%, 95% CI 20·8–38·8; P < 0·001), thus meeting both primary endpoints. All secondary endpoints (PASI 100, static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1, and PASI 75) at week 52 demonstrated superiority for risankizumab vs. secukinumab (P < 0·001). No new safety concerns were identified.
Conclusions
At week 52, risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy and similar safety with less frequent dosing compared with secukinumab.
What is already known about this topic?
The need remains for treatments with sustained efficacy and a more convenient dosing schedule in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.
Risankizumab and secukinumab are indicated for the treatment of adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis and target interleukin‐23 and interleukin‐17, respectively.
To date, risankizumab and secukinumab have not been directly compared.
What does this study add?
IMMerge directly compared the safety and efficacy of risankizumab and secukinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis using ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at weeks 16 (noninferiority) and 52 (superiority) as primary endpoints.
In terms of efficacy risankizumab was noninferior to secukinumab at week 16 and superior to secukinumab at week 52 of treatment based on primary endpoint analyses. The two medications had a similar safety profile.
Linked Comment: Schmitt-Egenolf. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:
3–4.
Plain language summary available online
Summary
Background
Dupilumab a monoclonal antibody blocking the shared receptor subunit for interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13 is approved for patients aged ≥ 12 years with inadequately controlled, ...moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab trials of up to 52 weeks demonstrated efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD inadequately controlled with topical medications.
Objectives
To further characterize the safety of dupilumab by evaluating clinical laboratory findings from three randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled phase III trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 & 2 and LIBERTY AD CHRONOS).
Methods
Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 (SOLO 1 & 2) or 3 : 1 : 3 (CHRONOS) for 16 and 52 weeks, respectively, to dupilumab weekly, every 2 weeks or placebo. CHRONOS patients received a standardized concomitant topical corticosteroid regimen. Laboratory outcomes were summarized descriptively in 1376 patients from SOLO 1 & 2 and 740 from CHRONOS.
Results
Treatment groups had similar results in baseline laboratory parameters. Platelets and neutrophils showed mild decreases from baseline in dupilumab vs. placebo groups. Some dupilumab‐treated patients had small transient increases in eosinophils. Grade 3 eosinophilia was reported in < 1% of dupilumab‐treated and placebo‐treated patients; no adverse events were associated with eosinophilia. Lactate dehydrogenase levels decreased from baseline during dupilumab treatment in all trials. No clinically meaningful changes were observed between treatment groups in other haematology, chemistry or urinalysis parameters.
Conclusions
There were no clinically important changes in routine laboratory parameters that could be attributed to dupilumab. This study supports the use of dupilumab as a systemic treatment for moderate‐to‐severe AD that does not require laboratory monitoring.
What's already known about this topic?
Long‐term treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) with conventional immunosuppressive agents is limited by the risk of significant side‐effects and a need for repeated tests to monitor haematological and/or organ (e.g. liver, kidney) toxicities.
Dupilumab a monoclonal antibody blocking the shared receptor subunit for interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13 is approved for the treatment of patients with inadequately controlled, moderate‐to‐severe AD.
In 16‐week and 52‐week studies, dupilumab demonstrated a positive risk/benefit profile in moderate‐to‐severe AD.
What does this study add?
This study is the first comprehensive analysis of dupilumab laboratory safety data of the 16‐week SOLO 1 & 2 (pooled N = 1376) and 52‐week CHRONOS (N = 740) trials, demonstrating an absence of clinically important changes in haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis parameters in patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD treated with dupilumab.
Our data support the use of dupilumab as a systemic treatment for the long‐term management of moderate‐to‐severe AD without routine laboratory monitoring in clinical practice.
Respond to this article
Summary
Background
Ixekizumab, a high‐affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)‐17A, is approved for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.
Objectives
This ...analysis represents an overview of the efficacy outcomes from three phase III psoriasis studies.
Methods
Data were integrated from the 12‐week induction period of three studies in which patients received ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks (IXE Q2W; n = 1169) or every 4 weeks (IXE Q4W; n = 1165) after an initial 160‐mg dose for both; etanercept (50 mg biweekly; n = 740; two studies) or placebo (n = 792). The coprimary end points were the percentages of patients with response of static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA; score 0 or 1) and ≥ 75% improvement in baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 12. Response rates were compared between treatments using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test stratified by study. Treatment comparisons with placebo included data from three studies, whereas etanercept comparisons were based on two studies.
Results
Ixekizumab treatment was superior to placebo (P < 0·001) and etanercept (P < 0·001) on sPGA (0, 1) and PASI 75, with significant differences in PASI improvement at week 1. With IXE Q2W, at week 12, the frequencies of patients achieving PASI 75, 90 and 100 were nearly 90%, 70% and 40%, respectively. Ixekizumab‐treated patients showed significantly greater improvement vs. placebo and etanercept in percentage body surface area involvement and fingernail psoriasis. IXE Q2W was superior to IXE Q4W on all treatment outcomes.
Conclusions
Ixekizumab therapy at both dosing regimens demonstrated rapid onset and superior efficacy to placebo and etanercept, with IXE Q2W providing better outcomes than IXE Q4W during the first 12 weeks of treatment.
What's already known about this topic?
Study results have been reported from each of the pivotal phase III trials that compared two dose schedules of ixekizumab (a high‐affinity anti‐interleukin‐17A antibody) with placebo and/or etanercept (a tumour necrosis factor blocker) in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
What does this study add?
We provide a comprehensive overview of ixekizumab therapy for moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis by presenting integrated 12‐week efficacy outcomes for two ixekizumab dosing regimens from the pivotal phase III studies.
Linked Comment: Fleming. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178:585–586
Plain language summary available online
Respond to this article
Summary
Background
The interleukin‐17 cytokine family plays a central role in psoriasis pathogenesis.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab, a human anti‐interleukin‐17 ...receptor antibody, in treating patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.
Methods
In this phase III, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study (NCT01708590; AMAGINE‐1), adult patients in the U.S.A., Canada and Europe were randomized to brodalumab (140 or 210 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W), with an additional dose at week 1, for a 12‐week induction phase. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab who achieved static Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1 (sPGA success) were rerandomized to the placebo or induction dose. After week 16, patients with sPGA ≥ 3 were re‐treated with the induction dose. After ≥ 12 weeks of retreatment, patients with sPGA 2 for ≥ 4 weeks or sPGA ≥ 3 were rescued with brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. At week 12, patients randomized to brodalumab with sPGA ≥ 2 or placebo received brodalumab 210 mg Q2W. Coprimary end points were the percentage of patients with ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) and sPGA success at week 12.
Results
There were 661 patients randomized: 220 placebo, 219 brodalumab 140 mg and 222 brodalumab 210 mg. At week 12, 60% (140 mg) and 83% (210 mg) vs. 3% (placebo) achieved PASI 75, and 54% (140 mg) and 76% (210 mg) vs. 1% (placebo) achieved sPGA success. The safety profile was considered acceptable.
Conclusions
Brodalumab therapy resulted in significant clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.
What's already known about this topic?
Anti‐interleukin (anti‐IL)‐17 receptor A and anti‐IL‐17A antibodies have been shown to be efficacious in treating patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.
What does this study add?
This study further demonstrates that brodalumab therapy in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis results in a high degree of complete skin clearance.
This study also further elucidates the safety profile of brodalumab.
Linked Comment: Ormerod. Br J Dermatol 2016; 175:243–244
Plain language summary available online
Summary
Background
Tildrakizumab is a specific anti‐interleukin‐23p19 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
Objectives
To evaluate the long‐term efficacy and safety of ...tildrakizumab treatment for patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis for up to 148 weeks.
Methods
Pooled analysis from two double‐blind, randomized controlled trials: reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2. Efficacy was assessed for responders (≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 75) and partial responders (PASI 50–75) to tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg at week 28 who were maintained on the same dose (administered every 12 weeks), and for partial responders or nonresponders (PASI < 50) to etanercept 50 mg at week 28 who, after a 4‐week washout, were switched to tildrakizumab 200 mg (administered at weeks 32 and 36, and every 12 weeks thereafter). Safety was assessed in the all‐patients‐as‐treated population. Three different methods of imputing missing data were used: nonresponder imputation (NRI), multiple imputation and observed cases. The Clinicaltrials.gov numbers are NCT01722331 (reSURFACE 1) and NCT01729754 (reSURFACE 2).
Results
At week 148 (NRI), 72·6%, 53·8% and 28·9% of tildrakizumab 100‐mg responders and 80·2%, 59·9% and 32·6% of tildrakizumab 200‐mg responders had PASI 75, 90 and 100 responses, respectively. For partial responders to tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg, the proportions of patients achieving PASI 75, 90 and 100 responses were 32·5%, 25·0% and 10·0%; and 47·1%, 27·5% and 12·8%, respectively. For patients who were partial responders or nonresponders to etanercept, the proportions of patients achieving PASI 75, 90 and 100 responses were 66·9%, 43·8% and 14·9% at week 148. Rates of discontinuations due to adverse events tildrakizumab 100 mg: 1·7 per 100 patient‐years (PYs); tildrakizumab 200 mg: 1·2 per 100 PYs and exposure‐adjusted rates of serious adverse events (5·9 per 100 PYs; 5·5 per 100 PYs), severe infections (1·1 per 100 PYs; 1·1 per 100 PYs), malignancies (0·6 per 100 PYs; 0·4 per 100 PYs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (0·4 per 100 PYs; 0·5 per 100 PYs) were low.
Conclusions
Tildrakizumab was well tolerated and efficacy was well maintained in week 28 responders who continued tildrakizumab treatment through 3 years, or improved among etanercept partial responders or nonresponders who switched to tildrakizumab.
What's already known about this topic?
Tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg are efficacious and well tolerated with short‐term use in the treatment of patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.
What does this study add?
High levels of efficacy are maintained for up to 3 years of psoriasis treatment with tildrakizumab.
There is a favourable long‐term safety profile with both tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg, with a low incidence of adverse events of special interest through 3 years.
Plain language summary available online
Respond to this article
Conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials Akinlade, B.; Guttman‐Yassky, E.; Bruin‐Weller, M. ...
British journal of dermatology (1951),
September 2019, Letnik:
181, Številka:
3
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Summary
Background
Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13. It is approved in the U.S.A. for patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis ...(AD) uncontrolled by topical prescription medicines or who cannot use topical medicines, for patients in Japan whose AD is uncontrolled with existing therapies, for patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD in Europe who are candidates for systemic therapy and for patients aged ≥ 12 years for maintenance treatment of moderate‐to‐severe asthma uncontrolled with their current medicines. AD trials have reported increased incidence of conjunctivitis for dupilumab vs. placebo.
Objectives
To characterize further the occurrence and risk factors of conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials.
Methods
We evaluated randomized placebo‐controlled trials of dupilumab in AD (n = 2629), asthma (n = 2876), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (n = 60) and eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) (n = 47).
Results
In most AD trials, dupilumab‐treated patients had higher conjunctivitis incidence than placebo controls. Higher baseline AD severity and previous history of conjunctivitis were associated with increased conjunctivitis incidence. Conjunctivitis was mostly mild to moderate. Most cases recovered or resolved during the treatment period; two patients permanently discontinued dupilumab due to conjunctivitis or keratitis. Common treatments included ophthalmic corticosteroids, antibiotics, and antihistamines or mast cell stabilizers. Most cases were diagnosed by the investigators. In asthma and CRSwNP trials, the incidence of conjunctivitis was lower for both dupilumab and placebo than in AD trials; dupilumab did not increase the incidence compared with placebo. In the EoE trial, no patients had conjunctivitis.
Conclusions
Conjunctivitis was more frequent with dupilumab treatment in most AD trials. In dupilumab trials in other type 2 diseases, incidence of conjunctivitis was overall very low, and was similar for dupilumab and placebo. In AD, the incidence of conjunctivitis was associated with AD severity and prior history of conjunctivitis. The aetiology and treatment of conjunctivitis in dupilumab‐treated patients require further study.
What's already known about this topic?
Ocular disorders, including allergic conjunctivitis, are common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).
In most dupilumab AD trials, dupilumab‐treated patients had higher conjunctivitis incidence than those receiving placebo.
Most cases were mild to moderate and recovered or were recovering during study treatment; study treatment discontinuation due to conjunctivitis was rare.
Conjunctivitis incidence was very low and similar for dupilumab and placebo in clinical trials in asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and eosinophilic oesophagitis.
What does this study add?
This analysis confirms and extends the results of the individual clinical trials.
Baseline disease‐related factors, including AD severity, prior conjunctivitis history and certain biomarkers (thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine, IgE, eosinophils), were associated with increased incidence of conjunctivitis.
Patients who responded well to dupilumab had reduced incidence of conjunctivitis.
Further study is needed to elucidate the aetiology and treatment of conjunctivitis in dupilumab‐treated patients with AD.
Linked Editorial: Chia‐Yu Chu. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:436–437.
Plain language summary available online
Respond to this article
PDF
