A subset of individuals infected with HIV-1 develops broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) that can prevent infection, but it has not yet been possible to elicit these antibodies by immunization. ...To systematically explore how immunization might be tailored to produce them, we generated mice expressing the predicted germline or mature heavy chains of a potent bNAb to the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) on the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env). Immunogens specifically designed to activate B cells bearing germline antibodies are required to initiate immune responses, but they do not elicit bNAbs. In contrast, native-like Env trimers fail to activate B cells expressing germline antibodies but elicit bNAbs by selecting for a restricted group of light chains bearing specific somatic mutations that enhance neutralizing activity. The data suggest that vaccination to elicit anti-HIV-1 antibodies will require immunization with a succession of related immunogens.
Display omitted
•Engineered germline-targeting HIV proteins are required to activate naive B cells•Native-like HIV proteins do not activate naive B cells•Native-like HIV proteins are needed to select for broad neutralization against HIV•Vaccination against HIV requires immunization with a succession of immunogens
Different viral antigens are required to initiate and then to drive the selection of HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies, showing that vaccination to induce HIV protection in humans will likely require immunization with a succession of related immunogens.
Objectives This study sought to determine if the risk of mortality associated with inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is due to the underlying arrhythmia or the shock ...itself. Background Shocks delivered from ICDs are associated with an increased risk of mortality. It is unknown if all patients who experience inappropriate ICD shocks have an increased risk of death. Methods We evaluated survival outcomes in patients with an ICD and a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator enrolled in the LATITUDE remote monitoring system (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) through January 1, 2010. First shock episode rhythms from 3,809 patients who acutely survived the initial shock were adjudicated by 7 electrophysiologists. Patients with a shock were matched to patients without a shock (n = 3,630) by age at implant, implant year, sex, and device type. Results The mean age of the study group was 64 ± 13 years, and 78% were male. Compared with no shock, there was an increased rate of mortality in those who received their first shock for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (hazard ratio HR: 1.65, p < 0.0001), ventricular fibrillation/polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (HR: 2.10, p < 0.0001), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (HR: 1.61, p = 0.003). In contrast, mortality after first shocks due to sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia (HR: 0.97, p = 0.86) and noise/artifact/oversensing (HR: 0.91, p = 0.76) was comparable to that in patients without a shock. Conclusions Compared with no shock, those who received their first shock for ventricular rhythms and atrial fibrillation had an increased risk of death. There was no significant difference in survival after inappropriate shocks for sinus tachycardia or noise/artifact/oversensing. In this study, the adverse prognosis after first shock appears to be more related to the underlying arrhythmia than to an adverse effect from the shock itself.
Early telemonitoring of weights and symptoms did not decrease heart failure hospitalizations but helped identify steps toward effective monitoring programs. A signal that is accurate and actionable ...with response kinetics for early re-assessment is required for the treatment of patients at high risk, while signal specifications differ for surveillance of low-risk patients. Tracking of congestion with cardiac filling pressures or lung water content has shown most impact to decrease hospitalizations, while multiparameter scores from implanted rhythm devices have identified patients at increased risk. Algorithms require better personalization of signal thresholds and interventions. The COVID-19 epidemic accelerated transition to remote care away from clinics, preparing for new digital health care platforms to accommodate multiple technologies and empower patients. Addressing inequities will require bridging the digital divide and the deep gap in access to HF care teams, who will not be replaced by technology but by care teams who can embrace it.
Display omitted
•Remote monitoring coupled with a system of care that engages, informs, and empowers patients is essential for effective home management of HF to control symptoms, avoid hospitalization, and ameliorate the patient’s perception of illness.•Effective remote monitoring requires an accurate, reliable signal that is actionable through personalized algorithms.•Evolving digital health care must address the digital divide and deep gaps in access to HF management.
The aim of this study was to develop and validate a device-based diagnostic algorithm to predict heart failure (HF) events.
HF involves costly hospitalizations with adverse impact on patient ...outcomes. The authors hypothesized that an algorithm combining a diverse set of implanted device-based sensors chosen to target HF pathophysiology could detect worsening HF.
The MultiSENSE (Multisensor Chronic Evaluation in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) study enrolled patients with investigational chronic ambulatory data collection via implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. HF events (HFEs), defined as HF admissions or unscheduled visits with intravenous treatment, were independently adjudicated. The development cohort of patients was used to construct a composite index and alert algorithm (HeartLogic) combining heart sounds, respiration, thoracic impedance, heart rate, and activity; the test cohort was sequestered for independent validation. The 2 coprimary endpoints were sensitivity to detect HFE >40% and unexplained alert rate <2 alerts per patient-year.
Overall, 900 patients (development cohort, n = 500; test cohort, n = 400) were followed for up to 1 year. Coprimary endpoints were evaluated using 320 patient-years of follow-up data and 50 HFEs in the test cohort (72% men; mean age 66.8 ± 10.3 years; New York Heart Association functional class at enrollment: 69% in class II, 25% in class III; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 30.0 ± 11.4%). Both endpoints were significantly exceeded, with sensitivity of 70% (95% confidence interval CI: 55.4% to 82.1%) and an unexplained alert rate of 1.47 per patient-year (95% CI: 1.32 to 1.65). The median lead time before HFE was 34.0 days (interquartile range: 19.0 to 66.3 days).
The HeartLogic multisensor index and alert algorithm provides a sensitive and timely predictor of impending HF decompensation. (Evaluation of Multisensor Data in Heart Failure Patients With Implanted Devices MultiSENSE; NCT01128166).
Although claims data provide a large and efficient source of clinical events, validation is needed prior to use in heart failure (HF) diagnostic development.
Data from the Multisensor Chronic ...Evaluations in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients (MultiSENSE) study, used to create the HeartLogic HF diagnostic, were linked with fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare claims. Events were matched by patient ID and date, and agreement was calculated between claims primary HF diagnosis codes and study event adjudication. HF events (HFEs) were defined as inpatient visits, or outpatient visits with intravenous decongestive therapy. Diagnostic performance was measured as HFE-detection sensitivity and false-positive rate (FPR). Linkage of 791 MultiSENSE subjects returned 320 FFS patients with an average follow-up duration of 0.94 years. Although study and claims deaths matched exactly (n = 14), matching was imperfect between study hospitalizations and acute inpatient claims events. Of 239 total events, 165 study hospitalizations (69%) matched inpatient claims events, 28 hospitalizations matched outpatient claims events (12%), 14 hospitalizations were study-unique (6%), and 32 inpatient events were claims-unique (13%). Inpatient HF classification had substantial agreement with study adjudication (κ = 0.823). Diagnostic performance was not different between claims and study events (sensitivity = 75.6% vs 77.6% and FPR = 1.539 vs 1.528 alerts/patient-year). HeartLogic-detected events contributed to > 90% of the HFE costs used for evaluation.
Acceptable event matching, good agreement of claims diagnostic codes with adjudication, and equivalent diagnostic performance support the validity of using claims for HF diagnostic development.
Outcome data for patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) devices treated outside of clinical trials are lacking. No ...clinical trial has evaluated mortality after device implantation or after shock therapy in large numbers of patients with implanted devices that regularly transmit device data over a network.
Survival status in patients implanted with ICD and CRT devices across the United States from a single manufacturer was assessed. Outcomes were compared between patients followed in device clinic settings and those who regularly transmit remote data collected from the device an average of 4 times monthly. Shock delivery and electrogram analysis could be ascertained from patients followed on the network, enabling survival after ICD shock to be evaluated. One- and 5-year survival rates in 185,778 patients after ICD implantation were 92% and 68% and were 88% and 54% for CRT-D device recipients. In 8228 patients implanted with CRT-only devices, survival was 82% and 48% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. For the 69,556 ICD and CRT-D patients receiving remote follow-up on the network, 1- and 5-year survival rates were higher compared with those in the 116,222 patients who received device follow-up in device clinics only (50% reduction; P<0.0001). There were no differences between patients followed on or off the remote network for the characteristics of age, gender, implanted device year or type, and economic or educational status. Shock therapy was associated with subsequent mortality risk for both ICD and CRT-D recipients.
Survival after ICD and CRT-D implantation in patients treated in naturalistic practice compares favorably with survival rates observed in clinical trials. Remote follow-up of device data is associated with excellent survival, but arrhythmias that result in device therapy in this population are associated with a higher mortality risk compared with patients who do not require shock therapy.
We sought to determine clinical and demographic predictors of recovery of left ventricular function for subjects with recent onset cardiomyopathy (ROCM).
Although ROCM is a frequent reason for ...consultation and transplantation referral, its prognosis and natural history on contemporary therapy are unknown.
In the multicenter IMAC (Intervention in Myocarditis and Acute Cardiomyopathy)-2 study, subjects with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤0.40, fewer than 6 months of symptom duration, and an evaluation consistent with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy or myocarditis were enrolled. LVEF was reassessed at 6 months, and subjects were followed up for 4 years. LVEF and event-free survival were compared by race, sex, and clinical phenotype.
The cohort of 373 persons was 38% female and 21% black, with a mean age of 45 ± 14 years. At entry, 91% were receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and 82% were receiving beta-blockers, which increased to 92% and 94% at 6 months. LVEF was 0.24 ± 0.08 at entry and 0.40 ± 0.12 at 6 months (mean increase: 17 ± 13 ejection fraction units). Transplant-free survival at 1, 2, and 4 years was 94%, 92%, and 88%, respectively; survival free of heart failure hospitalization was 88%, 82%, and 78%, respectively. In analyses adjusted for sex, baseline LVEF, and blood pressure, LVEF at 6 months was significantly lower in blacks than in nonblacks (p = 0.02). Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at presentation was the strongest predictor of LVEF at 6 months (p < 0.0001).
Outcomes in ROCM are favorable but differ by race. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter by transthoracic echo at presentation was most predictive of subsequent myocardial recovery. (Genetic Modulation of Left Ventricular Recovery in Recent Onset Cardiomyopathy; NCT00575211).
This study sought to determine if the risk of mortality associated with inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks is due to the underlying arrhythmia or the shock itself.
...Shocks delivered from ICDs are associated with an increased risk of mortality. It is unknown if all patients who experience inappropriate ICD shocks have an increased risk of death.
We evaluated survival outcomes in patients with an ICD and a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator enrolled in the LATITUDE remote monitoring system (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) through January 1, 2010. First shock episode rhythms from 3,809 patients who acutely survived the initial shock were adjudicated by 7 electrophysiologists. Patients with a shock were matched to patients without a shock (n = 3,630) by age at implant, implant year, sex, and device type.
The mean age of the study group was 64 ± 13 years, and 78% were male. Compared with no shock, there was an increased rate of mortality in those who received their first shock for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (hazard ratio HR: 1.65, p < 0.0001), ventricular fibrillation/polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (HR: 2.10, p < 0.0001), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (HR: 1.61, p = 0.003). In contrast, mortality after first shocks due to sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia (HR: 0.97, p = 0.86) and noise/artifact/oversensing (HR: 0.91, p = 0.76) was comparable to that in patients without a shock.
Compared with no shock, those who received their first shock for ventricular rhythms and atrial fibrillation had an increased risk of death. There was no significant difference in survival after inappropriate shocks for sinus tachycardia or noise/artifact/oversensing. In this study, the adverse prognosis after first shock appears to be more related to the underlying arrhythmia than to an adverse effect from the shock itself.
Lymphocytic myocarditis remains a poorly characterized disorder. Approximately 10 percent of patients with cardiomyopathy of recent onset who undergo endomyocardial biopsy have this condition, which ...is presumed to be caused by viral infection.
1
,
2
The clinical course of patients with lymphocytic myocarditis varies; some patients have subclinical disease,
3
some present with fulminant disease, which is frequently fatal,
4
–
6
and others have indolent disease that progresses to dilated cardiomyopathy.
7
,
8
Although a histopathological classification system, referred to as the Dallas criteria, has been widely applied in the diagnosis of myocarditis since 1987,
9
whether these criteria alone can be used to predict . . .
PDF
