Cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab is a frequently used treatment regimen for metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer, and carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab are also among the recommended ...regimens. In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these two regimens for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.
Patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer treated with cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab or carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab were retrospectively evaluated in this study. The clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in each group were evaluated. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rates between the two groups were compared.
A total of 250 patients were included. Overall, the numbers of patients with recurrent disease and metastatic disease were 159 and 91, respectively. The most common histologic subtype was squamous cell carcinoma (83.2%). The median duration of follow-up was 13.6 (range 0.5-86) months. The median progression-free survival was 10.5 (95% CI 9.0 to 11.8) months in the cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab group (group 1), and 10.8 (95% CI 8.6 to 13.0) months in the carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab group (group 2) (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.63; p=0.25). The median overall survival was 19.1 (95% CI 13.0 to 25.1) months in group 1 and 18.3 (95% CI 15.3 to 21.3) months in group 2 (HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.80; p=0.15).
There is no survival difference between cisplatin or carboplatin combined with paclitaxel and bevacizumab in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.
Increasing evidence supports an association between systemic inflammation and cancer development and progression. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is used as a basic parameter of systemic ...inflammation in some tumors. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the pretreatment NLR, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
We retrospectively studied patients diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC who had completed all phases of primary treatment from 2002 to 2013. The association between the pretreatment NLR and survival was analyzed. The difference among variables was calculated by chi-square test. OS and DFS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the prognostic impact of clinical parameters.
Eighty-five patients were eligible for study inclusion. There were no statistically significant differences among the pretreatment NLR and clinicopathological variables. Patients with an NLR of > 2 had significantly lower DFS (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.03) than patients with an NLR of ≤ 2. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models showed that a higher pretreatment NLR was independently correlated with poor DFS and OS, with a hazard ratio 5.46 (95% confidence interval CI 1.61-18.85, p=0.006) and 2.86 (95% CI 1.04-7.86, p=0.04), respectively.
Patients with early TNBC and with elevated pretreatment NLR showed poorer DFS and OS than patients without elevated NLR. However, this finding needs to be confirmed in a large prospective study.
Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality both globally and in our country. In Turkey, we conducted a multicenter investigation into the effectiveness of second-line treatments and ...real-life data for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT04757311).
In this retrospective analysis, records from 28 centers were collected, and histopathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics were documented. Patients were categorized into groups based on their second-line biological treatments: anti-EGFR (Group A and Group B, panitumumab and cetuximab) and anti-VEGF (Group C, bevacizumab and aflibercept). They were then compared within these groups.
A total of 588 patients with documented RAS wild-type status were evaluated. The median OS was 15.7, 14.3 and 14.7 months in Group A, Group B and Group C, respectively (
= 0.764). The median PFS of the patients in second-line setting that received panitumumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab/aflibercept were 7.8, 6.6 and 7.4 months, respectively (
= 0.848).
According to the results of our real-life data study, there is no significant difference in efficiency between the combination of biological agent and chemotherapy used in the second-line treatments.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes 80-85% of all lung cancers. Patients with advanced-stage NSCLC may benefit from chemotherapy. Gemcitabine and cisplatin is a well-established therapy ...for this malignancy. Recently, biweekly administration is becoming more acceptable, but the most effective and tolerable dose remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the toxicity and efficacy of 1000 mg/m
gemcitabine (GEM 1000) and 1500 mg/m
gemcitabine (GEM 1500) in combination with 50 mg/m
cisplatin.
Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1000 or 1500 mg/m
with cisplatin administered at a dose of 50 mg/m
on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks for a total of 4 courses. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities were assessed.
114 patients with IIIB and IV stages of NSCLC were included. Seventy two patients (63%) received GEM 1000 and 42 (37%) received GEM 1500. The overall reponse rate (ORR), PFS and OS were 24%, 6 months and 13 months respectively in the GEM 1000 group and 36%, 6 months and 15 months in the GEM 1500 group, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 4% of the GEM 1000 group and 9% of the GEM 1500 group (p=0.41).
Biweekly administration of GEM 1000 and 1500 is a well tolerated regimen. Although the GEM 1000 group showed a lower response rate than the GEM 1500 group, PFS and OS were similar.
The standard treatment in the metastatic colorectal cancer consists of 5-FU based infusional regimens. However, with oral fluoropyrimidines, equal tumor responses may be obtained. Capecitabine causes ...macrocytosis of the cells by inhibition of DNA synthesis. In this context, a relationship was found between mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and response to therapy in breast cancer patients treated with Capecitabine, but whether this relationship also pertains in colorectal cancer has not been established.
A total of 102 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with a oxaliplatin (XELOX) ±Bevacizumab combination were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were randomized into three groups. Hematological parameters (MCV, MPV, PCT, PLT, NLR) were recorded retrospectively, before treatment and after 3 cycles of chemotherapy.
After three cycles of therapy, 20 (19.6%) patients had progressive disease (PD), 41 (40.1%) had stable disease (SD), and 41 (40.1%) demonstrated a partial response (PR). In 62 (60.7%) treatment was with capesitabin plus XELOX therapy, and in 40 (39.2%) it was XELOX-Bevacizumab combination therapy. There was no difference among three groups before the treatment in terms of MCV, MPV, PCT, PLT, and NLR. MCV showed significant increase in chemotherapy response groups (PR and SD). In addition, a significant decrease was observed for platelet count in chemotherapy response groups. While NLR decrease was seen in only a PR group, PCT decrease was observed in all three groups. PCT and PLT values were higher in patients receiving Bevacizumab.
PLT, PCT, MPV, and NLR values were decreased due to Capecitabine- based chemotherapy, however MCV was increased. PCT and PLT values were higher in patients who received Bevacizumab than those who did not. MCV, PLT, and NLR can be considered as important factors in predicting response to colorectal carcinoma treatment.
Abstract only
e14672
Background: There is no suggested molecular indicator in identifying which patients will benefit from anti-angiogenic treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Over expression ...of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) are associated with bad prognosis. In this study, VEGF and HIF-1α expression and their clinical significance are studied in tumor tissues of patients with colorectal cancer receiving treatment with bevacizumab. Methods: VEGF and HIF-1α were observed immunohistochemically in primary tumors of 53 patients. The expressions were separated by evaluating low and high of VEGF and HIF-1α expression. We evaluated whether expression of VEGF and HIF-1α can help to predict treatment response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Median age was 55. VEGF was strongly expressed in 30 patients (57%) whilst low expression was observed in 23 of them (43%). When VEGF expression was evaluated in association with therapy response rates; the clinical benefit rate was 38% in the low expression group whereas it was 62% in high expression group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.01). In the group with strong VEGF expression PFS was 10 months whereas it was 8 months in the low expression group (p=0.009). When evaluated for OS, 26 months versus 15 months was in favor of highly expressed VEGF group (p=0.03). Highly expressed HIF-1α was found in 29 patients (55%), on the other hand low expressed HIF-1α was detected in 24 (%45) patients. For clinical benefit rates, PFS and OS there was no difference between high and low expressed HIF-1α groups. Conclusions: It has been demonstrated that VEGF and HIF-1α expressions are associated with poor prognosis in several tumors, mainly colorectal carcinomas. With the better understanding of carciogenesis and angiogenesis at molecular level, especially VEGF and HIF-1α became target molecules of the therapy. According to results of our study, VEGF expression is a predictive factor in designating the metastatic colorectal cancer treatment.
PDF
