Introduction Previous studies have examined the impact of healthy lifestyle choices on health-related outcomes; however, given their fragmented, often cross-sectional nature, assessing the relative ...impact of daily modifiable behaviors on overall long-term outcomes, particularly for a diverse working adult population, remains challenging. Methods Relationships between ten self-reported healthy lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes during the subsequent 9 years in a cohort of 10,248 participants enrolled during 2003 in a voluntary workplace wellness program were assessed. Cox proportional-hazards models computed hazard ratios (HRs) for lifestyle characteristics associated with time to one of seven self-reported chronic diseases or death. Data were collected between 2003 and 2012 and analyzed between 2014 and 2016. Results Behaviors that most significantly affected future outcomes were low-fat diet, aerobic exercise, nonsmoking, and adequate sleep. A dose–response effect was seen between dietary fat intake and hypertension, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and hypercholesterolemia. After dietary fat intake, aerobic exercise was the next most significant behavior associated with development of outcomes. Compared with sedentary participants, those who exercised 4 days per week were less likely to develop new-onset diabetes (HR=0.31, 95% CI=0.20, 0.48); heart disease (HR=0.46, 95% CI=0.27, 0.80); and hypercholesterolemia (HR=0.61, 95% CI=0.50, 0.74). Low-fat diet and adequate sleep were more significant than commonly promoted healthy behaviors, such as eating a daily breakfast. Conclusions Modifiable lifestyle behaviors targeted in health promotion programs should be prioritized in an evidence-based manner. Top priorities for workplace health promotion should include low-fat diet, aerobic exercise, nonsmoking, and adequate sleep.
Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma are an understudied population but account for considerable asthma morbidity, mortality, and costs. The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: ...Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study was a large, 3-year, multicenter, observational cohort study of 4756 patients (n = 3489 adults ≥18 years of age, n = 497 adolescents 13-17 years of age, and n = 770 children 6-12 years of age) with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. TENOR's primary objective was to characterize the natural history of disease in this cohort. Data assessed semiannually and annually included demographics, medical history, comorbidities, asthma control, asthma-related health care use, medication use, lung function, IgE levels, self-reported asthma triggers, and asthma-related quality of life. We highlight the key findings and clinical implications from more than 25 peer-reviewed TENOR publications. Regardless of age, patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma demonstrated high rates of health care use and substantial asthma burden despite receiving multiple long-term controller medications. Recent exacerbation history was the strongest predictor of future asthma exacerbations. Uncontrolled asthma, as defined by the 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines' impairment domain, was highly prevalent and predictive of future asthma exacerbations; this assessment can be used to identify high-risk patients. IgE and allergen sensitization played a role in the majority of severe or difficult-to-treat asthmatic patients.
Background The Epidemiologic Study of Xolair (omalizumab): Evaluating Clinical Effectiveness and Long-term Safety in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Asthma (EXCELS) assessed the long-term safety of ...omalizumab in a clinical practice setting as part of a phase IV US Food and Drug Administration postmarketing commitment. Objective We sought to evaluate long-term safety in omalizumab-treated and nonomalizumab-treated patients. Primary outcome measures focused on assessment of malignancies. Methods EXCELS was a prospective observational cohort study in patients (≥12 years of age) with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. There were 2 cohorts: omalizumab (taking omalizumab at baseline) and nonomalizumab (no history of omalizumab treatment). Primary outcomes included all confirmed, incident, study-emergent primary malignancies (malignancies), including and excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC); all malignancies were externally adjudicated. Results The omalizumab cohort had a higher proportion of patients with severe asthma compared with the nonomalizumab cohort (50.0% vs 23.0%). Median follow-up was approximately 5 years for both cohorts. Crude malignancy rates were similar in the omalizumab and nonomalizumab cohorts, with a rate ratio of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.62-1.13) for all malignancies and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.71-1.36) for all malignancies excluding NMSC. Kaplan-Meier plots of time to first confirmed study-emergent primary malignancy were similar for the 2 treatment cohorts. Cox proportional hazards modeling, adjusting for confounders and risk factors, resulted in a hazard ratio (omalizumab vs nonomalizumab) of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.87-1.38) for all malignancies and 1.15 (95% CI, 0.83-1.59) for all malignancies excluding NMSC. Conclusion Results from EXCELS suggest that omalizumab therapy is not associated with an increased risk of malignancy.
Abstract The availability of antemortem biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) enables monitoring the evolution of neurodegenerative processes in real time. Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) positron ...emission tomography (PET) was used to select participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and the Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center with elevated β-amyloid, designated as “A+,” and hippocampal volume and18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography were used to characterize participants as having evidence of neurodegeneration (“N+”) at the baseline evaluation. There were 145 clinically normal (CN) A+ individuals, 62 persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who were A+ and 20 with A+ AD dementia. Over a period of 1-6 years, MCI A+N+ individuals showed declines in medial temporal, lateral temporal, lateral parietal, and to a lesser extent, medial parietal regions for both FDG standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) and grey matter (GM) volume that exceeded declines seen in the CN A+N+ group. The AD dementia group showed declines in the same regions on FDG SUVR and GM volume with rates that exceeded that in MCI A+N+. Expansion of regional involvement and faster rate of neurodegeneration characterizes progression in the AD pathway.
Abstract Background EXCELS was a postmarketing commitment to the US Food and Drug Administration to assess long-term safety of omalizumab in an observational setting, focusing predominantly on ...malignancies. Objective To examine a potential association between omalizumab and cardiovascular (CV)/cerebrovascular (CBV) events in EXCELS. Methods Cohort study of patients (≥12 years of age) with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma followed ≤5 years, treated with omalizumab (n = 5007) or not treated with omalizumab (n = 2829) at baseline. Analyses included overall CV/CBV events, but focused on the subset of arterial thromboembolic events (ATE), comprising CV death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina. A prespecified analysis for the endpoint of ATE was conducted to control for available potential confounders. A blinded independent expert panel adjudicated all events. Results At baseline, cohorts had similar demographic characteristics, but severe asthma was more common in the omalizumab versus non-omalizumab cohorts (50% vs 23%). Omalizumab-treated patients had a higher rate of CV/CBV serious adverse events (13.4 per 1000 person-years PY) than non-omalizumab–treated patients (8.1 per 1000 PY). ATE rate per 1000 PY was 6.66 (101 patients/15,160 PY) for the omalizumab cohort and 4.64 (46 patients/9904 PY) for the non-omalizumab cohort. After controlling for available confounding factors, the hazard ratio was 1.32 (95% CI, 0.91-1.91). Conclusion Results from this observational study demonstrated a higher incidence rate of CV/CBV events in the omalizumab versus non-omalizumab cohorts. Differences in asthma severity between cohorts likely contributed to this imbalance, but some increase in risk cannot be excluded (NCT00252135). Clinical implications Current asthma management guidelines should not be affected. However, health professionals should be aware of a possible association of omalizumab and serious cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events.
To the Editor: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) presents as recurrent itchy wheals, angioedema, or both for at least 6 weeks without a specific trigger.1 Roughly half of the patients with CSU ...achieve symptomatic control with H1-antihistamine therapy at approved doses, increased doses, or with additional therapies such as leukotriene receptor antagonists.1 CSU can be unpredictable and debilitating for patients because of a lack of clinical response.2 Recently, omalizumab, a neutralizing anti-IgE mAb, has gained approval for treatment of patients with CSU on the basis of evidence of substantial efficacy.3 However, the treatment benefit with omalizumab is usually lost when treatment is stopped. Specific IgE may target an endogenous antigen, a hypothesis supported by evidence that approximately 50% of patients with CSU have elevated levels of antithyroperoxidase IgE.5 Quilizumab, a humanized, afucosylated, monoclonal IgG1 antibody, binds membrane IgE at the M1-prime segment, which is absent in soluble IgE.6 In animal studies, quilizumab bound membrane IgE on IgE-switched B cells and plasmablasts and depleted them through apoptosis and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity.6 In clinical trials, quilizumab reduced serum total and specific IgE levels in healthy volunteers and in patients with allergic rhinitis or mild asthma.7,8 These reductions were sustained for at least 6 months after the last dose, suggesting that quilizumab affected long-term IgE memory.
Background Alcohol screening scores ≥5 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption (AUDIT-C) up to a year before surgery have been associated with postoperative complications, but ...the association with postoperative health care use is unknown. This study evaluated whether AUDIT-C scores in the year before surgery were associated with postoperative hospital length of stay, total ICU days, return to the operating room, and hospital readmission. Study Design This cohort study included male Veterans Affairs patients who completed the AUDIT-C on mailed surveys (October 2003 through September 2006) and were hospitalized for nonemergent noncardiac major operations in the following year. Postoperative health care use was evaluated across 4 AUDIT-C risk groups (scores 0, 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12) using linear or logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographics, smoking status, surgical category, relative value unit, and time from AUDIT-C to surgery. Patients with AUDIT-C scores indicating low-risk drinking (scores 1 to 4) were the referent group. Results Adjusted analyses revealed that among eligible surgical patients (n = 5,171), those with the highest AUDIT-C scores (ie, 9 to 12) had longer postoperative hospital length of stay (5.8 95% CI, 5.0−6.7 vs 5.0 95% CI, 4.7−5.3 days), more ICU days (4.5 95% CI, 3.2−5.8 vs 2.8 95% CI, 2.6−3.1 days), and increased probability of return to the operating room (10% 95% CI, 6−13% vs 5% 95% CI, 4−6%) in the 30 days after surgery, but not increased hospital readmission within 30 days postdischarge, relative to the low-risk group. Conclusions AUDIT-C screening results could be used to identify patients at risk for increased postoperative health care use who might benefit from preoperative alcohol interventions.
...patients participating in clinical trials often are different than those treated in actual practice. ...although randomization is intended to balance unmeasured confounders in any given individual ...trial, it does not guarantee balanced groups when the data are pooled. ...although every attempt was made to keep adjudicators blinded to treatment status, the blinded case narratives were written by a third party (ie, neither sponsor nor adjudicator), who was unblinded to treatment allocation. ...in this analysis of pooled RCT data, the rates of observed ATEs were similar between the omalizumab and placebo groups.
The Epidemiologic Study of Xolair (omalizumab): Evaluating Clinical Effectiveness and Long-term Safety in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Asthma (EXCELS) is a unique opportunity to evaluate the ...prospective, long-term clinical safety and effectiveness of the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab (Xolair) in real-world clinical practice.
To describe the study design and study cohorts of EXCELS at baseline and to compare the characteristics of this population with other large asthma cohorts.
Patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma and a positive skin test result or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen were eligible for EXCELS. Two cohorts of patients with asthma were enrolled: those treated with omalizumab and those not treated with omalizumab. We analyzed baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, including asthma history and control and allergy history.
Large proportions of patients enrolled in EXCELS had historically severe and poorly or not well-controlled asthma at the time of enrollment, objective evidence of airway obstruction, a history of long-term oral corticosteroid use, and/or other allergic disorders. Minor differences were observed between the omalizumab and nonomalizumab cohorts. Our total patient cohort was generally similar to other large cohorts. In a subgroup analysis, patients who had received omalizumab within 7 days before enrollment had more severe asthma and greater degrees of impairment at baseline than nonomalizumab patients.
This study of baseline characteristics in EXCELS offers a unique opportunity to better understand the history of allergic patients with moderate-to-severe asthma in a real-world treatment setting. This analysis of EXCELS baseline data sets the foundation for long-term assessment of the safety and effectiveness of omalizumab.
PDF
