STUDY DESIGN.Literature review.
OBJECTIVE.To discern which social media outlets contribute most to spine surgery literature dissemination and to investigate how popular articles compare to articles ...with most citations.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Scientific literature is increasingly disseminated through social media. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is defined as an automated, weighted score calculation from counts of all online attention received by various research outputs. Increasing AAS values indicate more online attention. For example, the overall top 100 Altmetric spine surgery peer-reviewed articles since 2010 had an AAS range from 78 to 1537. Among all spine surgery literature reviewed since 2010, the mean AAS was 5.3 with a median of 1.0.
METHODS.We performed an Altmetric database search of nine spine surgery journals from January 2010 to October 2019. Mean AAS was summarized alongside metrics including citation count and impact factor. We assessed correlations between AAS and online sources, readers, and citations. Journals were grouped by impact factor, and analysis-of-variance compared mean AAS. The 100 highest AAS articles were compared to the most cited.
RESULTS.13,601 articles were included. The mean AAS was 5.3, with Twitter contributing the most. The three highest associations were news (P < 0.001), Twitter (P < 0.001), and Facebook (P < 0.001). There was no significant association between impact factor and AAS. Compared with the most cited articles, the top 100 AAS articles had significantly more article types, more prospective studies, fewer retrospective studies, fewer reviews, and fewer systematic reviews (P < 0.001 for all). Spine contributed the most articles in both top 100 sets.
CONCLUSION.Our evaluation revealed Twitter, newsfeeds, and Facebook were the most significant social media outlets. Compared to articles with the most citations, the most popular articles are prospective and encompass broader study designs. Social media plays an integral role in dissemination, both within spine literature and the public sphere.Level of Evidence3
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective.
OBJECTIVE.To determine clinical outcomes in obese patients compared with non-obese patients utilizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical ...Function (PROMIS PF) following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Although obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes after spinal fusion, there has not been a study to evaluate clinical outcomes of obese patients utilizing the PROMIS PF survey.
METHODS.Patients undergoing MIS TLIF were stratified into three cohortsnon-obese (body mass index BMI ≤ 29.9 kg/m), obese I (BMI = 30.0–34.9 kg/m), and obese II–III (BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m). Demographic and perioperative characteristics were compared using chi-squared analysis and linear regression. Change in PROMIS PF scores was calculated using paired t tests. Differences in PROMIS PF scores at each postoperative timepoint and changes in PROMIS PF from baseline were compared using linear regression.
RESULTS.One hundred eighty-six patients were included101 were non-obese, 41 were classified as obese I, and 44 were classified as obese II–III. Obese patients were more likely to be diabetic. Otherwise, no significant differences in demographic and perioperative characteristics were identified. Patients with higher BMIs reported significantly lower PROMIS PF scores at preoperative and all postoperative timepoints. However, patients experienced similar improvements through 6-month follow-up in PROMIS PF scores regardless of BMI. For the non-obese cohort, the change in the postoperative PROMIS PF score from baseline was significant at every postoperative timepoint. However, for the obese I and obese II–III cohorts, the change in the PROMIS PF score from baseline was significant at the 3-month and 6-month timepoints, but not at the 6-week timepoint.
CONCLUSION.Patients with higher BMI had lower preoperative PROMIS PF scores and experienced similar improvement in PROMIS PF scores in the postoperative period. This study established that PROMIS PF may be utilized to evaluate the recovery of obese patients following MIS TLIF.Level of Evidence3
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective.
OBJECTIVE.To examine the relationship between American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and inpatient pain and narcotics consumption following anterior cervical ...discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Higher ASA scores have been previously linked to increased postoperative complication rates, healthcare costs, length of stay, and hospital readmissions. However, to our knowledge, there have not been previous investigations into the association between ASA scores and postoperative inpatient pain and narcotics utilization following ACDF.
METHODS.Patients who underwent a single-level, primary ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into two cohorts based on ASA score less than or equal to 2 or ASA score more than 2. ASA score was tested for association with demographic variables and perioperative characteristics using studentʼs t test, chi-squared analysis, and Fisher exact test. Inpatient pain scores and narcotics consumption on each postoperative day were then compared between cohorts using bivariate linear regression.
RESULTS.Two hundred eleven patients who underwent ACDF were included184 had an ASA score less than or equal to 2 and 27 had an ASA score more than 2. Higher ASA score was associated with older age, higher comorbidity burden as measured by the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and lower prevalence of obesity. Higher ASA scores were associated with longer duration of hospital stay, while other perioperative characteristics were similar between ASA score cohorts. There were no differences in inpatient Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, or hourly, daily, and cumulative inpatient narcotic consumption between cohorts on any postoperative day.
CONCLUSION.This retrospective investigation demonstrated that a higher ASA score is associated with increased operative time following ACDF. However, ASA score was determined not to be an independent risk factor that can predict postoperative pain or narcotics consumption among patients who undergo ACDF. Therefore, postoperative pain in the inpatient setting can be managed with similar modalities regardless of ASA score for patients undergoing ACDF.Level of Evidence3
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective.
OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among patients undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar interbody ...fusion.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Few studies have evaluated the utility and concurrent validity of the PHQ-9 survey in patients undergoing spinal procedures.
METHODS.Patients undergoing a one- or two-level MIS lumbar interbody fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-reported outcome surveys were completed preoperatively and at 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, and 1-year timepoints. Postoperative survey scores were compared to preoperative values using paired t tests. PHQ-9 scores were compared with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores of the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) surveys at each timepoint using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
RESULTS.A total of 215 patients were included in the analysis. The mean preoperative scores for the PHQ-9, SF-12 MCS, and VR-12 MCS were 6.78, 49.55, and 50.39, respectively. Significant improvements in each survey outcome measure were observed at all postoperative timepoints. Strong correlations with PHQ-9 scores were identified for SF-12 MCS scores and VR-12 MCS scores at preoperative and postoperative timepoints (|r| ≥ 0.5 and P < 0.05 for each).
CONCLUSION.This study demonstrated that mental health, as measured by the PHQ-9, SF-12 MCS, and VR-12 MCS surveys, improves significantly after MIS lumbar fusion. In addition, PHQ-9 scores were strongly correlated with SF-12 and VR-12 scores. These results suggest that PHQ-9 can be a valid assessment of baseline mental health and postoperative improvement after MIS lumbar fusion. Concordant results among PHQ-9, SF-12 MCS, and VR-12 indicate that the simultaneous utilization of multiple survey instruments may not be necessary. Limiting the number of questionnaires that are administered in the evaluation of mental health could also help reduce survey burden placed on patients.Level of Evidence3
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective.
OBJECTIVE.The purpose of this study is to evaluate depressive symptoms as measured by the PHQ-9 survey and correlated them with scores from the SF-12 and VR-12 Mental ...Component Summary (MCS).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.With the rising incidence of depression and the need to identify modifiable risk factors before surgery, it is increasingly important to screen for preoperative depressive symptoms in spine surgery. Although the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) has favorable characteristics as a depressive symptom screening instrument, it has not been evaluated within cervical spine surgery.
METHODS.A prospectively maintained surgical registry was reviewed for patients undergoing single or multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc replacement (CDR) from March 2016 until May 2019. Included patients underwent a procedure for degenerative spinal pathology. We collected demographic, baseline, and perioperative variables. The mean scores for postoperative PHQ-9, Short Form-12 (SF-12), and Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) surveys were calculated, and an average change between preoperative and postoperative scores. Scatterplots depicted the association of SF-12 MCS and VR-12 MCS with PHQ-9. We evaluated the relationship of PHQ-9 with SF-12 MCS and VR-12 MCS scores by calculating a Pearson correlation coefficient and time-independent partial correlation coefficient.
RESULTS.One hundred fifty-two patients underwent single or multilevel level cervical spine surgery (ACDF73% and CDR27%). The average age was 42.4 and 39% were female. Compared to preoperative scores, significant increases were observed among postoperative PHQ-9, SF-12, and VR-12 MCS surveys (P ≤ 0.001). We observed strong correlations between SF-12 and VR-12 MCS with PHQ-9 scores for both assessed correlations.
CONCLUSION.Patients undergoing ACDF or CDR demonstrated significant improvement with PHQ-9, SF-12 MCS, and VR-12 MCS instruments. PHQ-9 scores strongly correlated with SF-12 MCS and VR-12 MCS. Our findings indicate PHQ-9 is a valid tool to evaluate pre and postsurgical depressive symptoms.Level of Evidence4
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective.
OBJECTIVE.To demonstrate whether preoperative mental health status can be predictive of postoperative functional outcomes as measured by Patient-Reported Outcome ...Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF) following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.There is a paucity of scientific investigations into the association between preoperative mental health as evaluated by a validated questionnaire such as the Short Form-12 Mental Health Composite Score (SF-12 MCS) and postoperative outcomes following MIS TLIF.
METHODS.Patients undergoing a primary MIS TLIF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into cohorts based on preoperative SF-12 MCS scores. The Physical Function scores of PROMIS, of which there are other domains including Pain Interference, Sexual Function, and Cognitive Function, were compared between the cohorts. In addition, the improvement in PROMIS scores based on preoperative SF-12 MCS scores following MIS TLIF was analyzed using multivariate linear regression.
RESULTS.One hundred seventy-two patients were included85 patients (49.4%) had a preoperative SF-12 MCS score <50 and 87 (50.6%) had a preoperative SF-12 MCS score ≥50. Patients with poorer mental health demonstrated significantly worse PROMIS PF scores preoperatively (33.8 vs. 36.5, P < 0.001), as well as at all postoperative timepoints6-weeks (35.1 vs. 38.4, P < 0.001), 3-months (38.9 vs. 42.9, P < 0.001), 6-months (41.4 vs. 45.5, P < 0.001), and 1-year (42.4 vs. 47.6, P < 0.001). However, at the 1-year timepoint, patients with worse mental health reported experiencing significantly less improvement from baseline (postoperative change of 8.6 vs. 11.1, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION.Patients with worse preoperative mental health not only demonstrated worse preoperative PROMIS PF scores, but also continued to have significantly worse postoperative outcomes. However, the postoperative improvement experienced by patients was similar in the short-term following surgery regardless of preoperative mental health status. Patients with poor mental health experienced significantly less postoperative improvement only at the 1-year timepoint.Level of Evidence3
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective.
OBJECTIVE.To determine the association between preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) scores with ...postoperative pain, narcotics use, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.There is a scarcity of prior literature on the ability of baseline PROMIS scores to predict clinical outcomes for patients undergoing ACDF procedures.
METHODS.Patients who underwent a primary ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into low and high disability cohorts. Preoperative PROMIS PF cohorts were tested for association with demographic and perioperative characteristics using chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance. Cohorts were tested for association with inpatient pain scores and narcotics consumption, as well as postoperative improvements in PROMIS PF, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain using linear regression.
RESULTS.Ninety one patients were included39 low disability and 52 high disability. Inpatient postoperative VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption are also compared between cohorts. Patients with greater disability reported higher VAS pain scores (P = 0.003). However, patients in both cohorts consumed comparable amounts of narcotics (P = 0.926). Patients with greater preoperative disability demonstrated lower PROMIS PF scores, greater NDI scores, and greater VAS Neck scores at the preoperative baseline. However, patients demonstrated similar improvement of VAS neck and arm pain, as well as NDI at all postoperative timepoints. Patients with low disability reported worsened physical function at the 6 weeks timepoint.
CONCLUSION.Patients with worse preoperative disability as measured by PROMIS PF reported increased pain but comparable narcotics consumption in the immediate postoperative period following a single-level ACDF procedure. Furthermore, patients experienced similar long-term postoperative improvement of PROs regardless of preoperative physical function. PROMIS PF can efficiently quantify physical function before and after the ACDF procedure as self-evaluated by patients.Level of Evidence3
As the number of advances in surgical techniques increases, it becomes increasingly important to assess and research the technology regarding spine surgery techniques in order to increase surgical ...accuracy, decrease overall length of surgery, and minimize overall radiation exposure. Currently, augmented reality and virtual reality have shown promising results in regard to their applicability beyond their current functions. At present, VR has been generally applied to a teaching and preparatory role, while AR has been utilized in surgical settings. As such, the following review attempts to provide an overview of both virtual reality and augmented reality, followed by a discussion of their current applications and future direction.
OBJECTIVEAssess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores ...for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODSAfter Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015-2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g. , ≥ 35.0, < 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement. RESULTSEighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONPatients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.
PDF
