Background and Aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease that can develop via several pathways. Different CRC subtypes, identified based on tumor markers, have been proposed to reflect ...these pathways. We evaluated the significance of these previously proposed classifications to survival. Methods Participants in the population-based Seattle Colon Cancer Family Registry were diagnosed with invasive CRC from 1998 through 2007 in western Washington State (N = 2706), and followed for survival through 2012. Tumor samples were collected from 2050 participants and classified into 5 subtypes based on combinations of tumor markers: type 1 (microsatellite instability MSI–high, CpG island methylator phenotype CIMP –positive, positive for BRAF mutation, negative for KRAS mutation); type 2 (microsatellite stable MSS or MSI-low, CIMP-positive, positive for BRAF mutation, negative for KRAS mutation); type 3 (MSS or MSI low, non-CIMP, negative for BRAF mutation, positive for KRAS mutation); type 4 (MSS or MSI-low, non-CIMP, negative for mutations in BRAF and KRAS ); and type 5 (MSI-high, non-CIMP, negative for mutations in BRAF and KRAS ). Multiple imputation was used to impute tumor markers for those missing data on 1–3 markers. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of subtypes with disease-specific and overall mortality, adjusting for age, sex, body mass, diagnosis year, and smoking history. Results Compared with participants with type 4 tumors (the most predominant), participants with type 2 tumors had the highest disease-specific mortality (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.47–3.31); subjects with type 3 tumors also had higher disease-specific mortality (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07–1.63). Subjects with type 5 tumors had the lowest disease-specific mortality (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14–0.66). Associations with overall mortality were similar to those with disease-specific mortality. Conclusions Based on a large, population-based study, CRC subtypes, defined by proposed etiologic pathways, are associated with marked differences in survival. These findings indicate the clinical importance of studies into the molecular heterogeneity of CRC.
Although high-risk mutations in identified major susceptibility genes (DNA mismatch repair genes and
) account for some familial aggregation of colorectal cancer, their population prevalence and the ...causes of the remaining familial aggregation are not known.
We studied the families of 5,744 colorectal cancer cases (probands) recruited from population cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia and screened probands for mutations in mismatch repair genes and
We conducted modified segregation analyses using the cancer history of first-degree relatives, conditional on the proband's age at diagnosis. We estimated the prevalence of mutations in the identified genes, the prevalence of HR for unidentified major gene mutations, and the variance of the residual polygenic component.
We estimated that 1 in 279 of the population carry mutations in mismatch repair genes (
= 1 in 1,946,
= 1 in 2,841,
= 1 in 758,
= 1 in 714), 1 in 45 carry mutations in
, and 1 in 504 carry mutations associated with an average 31-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer in unidentified major genes. The estimated polygenic variance was reduced by 30% to 50% after allowing for unidentified major genes and decreased from 3.3 for age <40 years to 0.5 for age ≥70 years (equivalent to sibling relative risks of 5.1 to 1.3, respectively).
Unidentified major genes might explain one third to one half of the missing heritability of colorectal cancer.
Our findings could aid gene discovery and development of better colorectal cancer risk prediction models.
.
The association between aging and cancer is complex. Recent studies have developed measures of biological aging based on DNA methylation and called them “age acceleration.” We aimed to assess the ...associations of age acceleration with risk of and survival from seven common cancers. Seven case–control studies of DNA methylation and colorectal, gastric, kidney, lung, prostate and urothelial cancer and B‐cell lymphoma nested in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study were conducted. Cancer cases, vital status and cause of death were ascertained through linkage with cancer and death registries. Conditional logistic regression and Cox models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of five age acceleration measures derived from the Human Methylation 450 K Beadchip assay with cancer risk (N = 3,216 cases) and survival (N = 1,726 deaths), respectively. Epigenetic aging was associated with increased cancer risk, ranging from 4% to 9% per five‐year age acceleration for the 5 measures considered. Heterogeneity by study was observed, with stronger associations for risk of kidney cancer and B‐cell lymphoma. An associated increased risk of death following cancer diagnosis ranged from 2% to 6% per five‐year age acceleration, with no evidence of heterogeneity by cancer site. Cancer risk and mortality were increased by 15–30% for the fourth versus first quartile of age acceleration. DNA methylation‐based measures of biological aging are associated with increased cancer risk and shorter cancer survival, independently of major health risk factors.
What's new?
Aging is associated with profound changes in DNA methylation levels. These can be used to build accurate age predictors (“epigenetic clocks”) that deviate from chronological age by only a few years, a phenomenon named “age acceleration”. In this study of seven types of cancer, the authors found that age acceleration was associated with both increased cancer risk and decreased cancer survival, independently of major health risk factors. These results support the usefulness of methylation markers of biological aging as a tool to predict health outcomes and may provide valuable insight into the relationship between aging and cancer.
Lay Summary
Endometrial cancer is common, and a subset recurs and requires additional treatment.
Some of these are recognized as being susceptible to immune therapies and are said to have mismatch ...repair deficiency (dMMR).
However, this clinical trial highlights which cases are more likely to respond well: those containing mutations in genes known as Lynch genes and also some with mutations in POLE/POLD1 (“ultra‐hypermutation” genes).
In contrast, the majority of dMMR endometrial cancers have silencing or DNA methylation of one of these genes, MLH1, and do not seem to be as responsive to single‐agent immune therapy.
The availability of combination therapies may be important to consider for these women.
This hypothesis‐driving study highlights the need for further evaluation of the interaction between immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy responses and the mechanism of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. Although MMR gene germline pathogenic variant carriers and Lynch‐like tumors with double somatic MMR gene mutations are highly likely to respond to a single‐agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), those with MLH1 hypermethylation may benefit from additional agents to induce an ICI response.
BRAFV600E mutation in microsatellite-unstable (MSI) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) virtually excludes Lynch syndrome (LS). In microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRCs it predicts poor prognosis. We propose a ...universal CRC LS screening algorithm using concurrent reflex immunohistochemistry (IHC) for BRAFV600E and mismatch-repair (MMR) proteins. We compared BRAFV600E IHC with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in 216 consecutive CRCs from 2011. Discordant cases were resolved with real-time PCR. BRAFV600E IHC was performed on 51 CRCs from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (ACCFR), which were fully characterized for BRAF mutation by allele-specific PCR, MMR status (MMR IHC and MSI), MLH1 promoter methylation, and germline MLH1 mutation. We then assessed MMR and BRAFV600E IHC on 1403 consecutive CRCs. By matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry 15 cases did not yield a BRAF result, whereas 38/201 (19%) were positive. By IHC 45/216 (20%) were positive. Of the 7 discordant cases, real-time PCR confirmed the IHC result in 6. In the 51 CRCs from the ACCFR, IHC was concordant with allele-specific PCR in 50 cases. BRAFV600E and MSI IHC on 1403 CRCs demonstrated the following phenotypesBRAF/MSS (1029 cases, 73%), BRAF/MSS (98, 7%), BRAF/MSI (183, 13%), and BRAF/MSI (93, 7%). All 11/1403 cancers associated with proven LS were BRAF/MSI. We conclude that BRAF IHC is highly concordant with 2 commonly used PCR-based BRAFV600E assays; it performed well in identifying MLH1 mutation carriers from the ACCFR and identified all cases of proven LS among the 1403 CRCs. Reflex BRAFV600E and MMR IHC are simple cheap tests that facilitate universal LS screening and identify the poor prognosis of the BRAFV600E-mutant MSS CRC phenotype.
Mutations in PIK3CA are present in 10 to 15% of colorectal carcinomas. We aimed to examine how PIK3CA mutations relate to other molecular alterations in colorectal carcinoma, to pathologic phenotype ...and survival. PIK3CA mutation testing was carried out using direct sequencing on 757 incident tumors from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. The status of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was assessed using both immunohistochemistry and methyLight techniques. Microsatellite instability, CpG island phenotype (CIMP), KRAS and BRAF V600E mutation status, and pathology review features were derived from previous reports. PIK3CA mutation was observed in 105 of 757 (14%) of carcinomas, characterized by location in the proximal colon (54% vs. 34%; P<0.001) and an increased frequency of KRAS mutation (48% vs. 25%; P<0.001). High-levels of CIMP were more frequently found in PIK3CA-mutated tumors compared with PIK3CA wild-type tumors (22% vs. 11%; P = 0.004). There was no difference in the prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation between these two tumor groups. PIK3CA-mutated tumors were associated with loss of MGMT expression (35% vs. 20%; P = 0.001) and the presence of tumor mucinous differentiation (54% vs. 32%; P<0.001). In patients with wild-type BRAF tumors, PIK3CA mutation was associated with poor survival (HR 1.51 95% CI 1.04-2.19, P = 0.03). In summary, PIK3CA-mutated colorectal carcinomas are more likely to develop in the proximal colon, to demonstrate high levels of CIMP, KRAS mutation and loss of MGMT expression. PIK3CA mutation also contributes to significantly decreased survival for patients with wild-type BRAF tumors.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Dysbiosis of gut microbiota is linked to the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, microbiota-based stratification of CRC tissue and how this relates to clinicomolecular characteristics ...and prognosis remains to be clarified.
Tumor and normal mucosa from 423 patients with stage I to IV CRC were profiled by bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Tumors were characterized for microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), APC, BRAF, KRAS, PIK3CA, FBXW7, SMAD4, and TP53 mutations, subsets for chromosome instability (CIN), mutation signatures, and consensus molecular subtypes (CMS). Microbial clusters were validated in an independent cohort of 293 stage II/III tumors.
Tumors reproducibly stratified into 3 oncomicrobial community subtypes (OCSs) with distinguishing features: OCS1 (Fusobacterium/oral pathogens, proteolytic, 21%), right-sided, high-grade, MSI-high, CIMP-positive, CMS1, BRAF V600E, and FBXW7 mutated; OCS2 (Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes, saccharolytic, 44%), and OCS3 (Escherichia/Pseudescherichia/Shigella, fatty acid β-oxidation, 35%) both left-sided and exhibiting CIN. OCS1 was associated with MSI-related mutation signatures (SBS15, SBS20, ID2, and ID7) and OCS2 and OCS3 with SBS18 related to damage by reactive oxygen species. Among stage II/III patients, OCS1 and OCS3 both had poorer overall survival compared with OCS2 for microsatellite stable tumors (multivariate hazard ratio HR, 1.85; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.15–2.99; P = .012; and HR, 1.52; 95% CI 1.01–2.29; P = .044, respectively) and left-sided tumors (multivariate HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.45–4.86; P = .002; and HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.03–3.02; P = .039, respectively).
OCS classification stratified CRCs into 3 distinct subgroups with different clinicomolecular features and outcomes. Our findings provide a framework for a microbiota-based stratification of CRC to refine prognostication and to inform the development of microbiota-targeted interventions.
Display omitted
This study describes a gut bacteria-based classification system for bowel cancer that delineates 3 distinct subtypes that differ in tumor features and patient outcomes.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) that demonstrates microsatellite instability (MSI) is caused by either germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations, or 'sporadic' somatic tumour MLH1 promoter methylation. ...MLH1 promoter methylation is reportedly correlated with tumour BRAF V600E mutation status. No systematic review has been undertaken to assess the value of BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter methylation tumour markers as negative predictors of germline MMR mutation status. A literature review of CRC cohorts tested for MMR mutations, and tumour BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter methylation was conducted using PubMed. Studies were assessed for tumour features, stratified by tumour MMR status based on immunohistochemistry or MSI where possible. Pooled frequencies and 95% CIs were calculated using a random effects model. BRAF V600E results for 4562 tumours from 35 studies, and MLH1 promoter methylation results for 2975 tumours from 43 studies, were assessed. In 550 MMR mutation carriers, the BRAF V600E mutation frequency was 1.40% (95% CI 0.06% to 3%). In MMR mutation-negative cases, the BRAF V600E mutation frequency was 5.00% (95% CI 4% to 7%) in 1623 microsatellite stable (MSS) cases and 63.50% (95% CI 47% to 79%) in 332 cases demonstrating MLH1 methylation or MLH1 expression loss. MLH1 promoter methylation of the 'A region' was reported more frequently than the 'C region' in MSS CRCs (17% vs 0.06%, p<0.0001) and in MLH1 mutation carriers (42% vs 6%, p<0.0001), but not in MMR mutation-negative MSI-H CRCs (40% vs 47%, p=0.12). Methylation of the 'C region' was a predictor of MMR mutation-negative status in MSI-H CRC cases (47% vs 6% in MLH1 mutation carriers, p<0.0001). This review demonstrates that tumour BRAF V600E mutation, and MLH1 promoter 'C region' methylation specifically, are strong predictors of negative MMR mutation status. It is important to incorporate these features in multifactorial models aimed at predicting MMR mutation status.
Clinicopathologic data from a population-based endometrial cancer cohort, unselected for age or family history, were analyzed to determine the optimal scheme for identification of patients with ...germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations.
Endometrial cancers from 702 patients recruited into the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for MLH1 gene promoter methylation in MLH1-deficient cases. MMR mutation testing was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR-protein deficient tumors. Prediction of germline mutation status was compared for combinations of tumor characteristics, age at diagnosis, and various clinical criteria (Amsterdam, Bethesda, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, ANECS).
Tumor MMR-protein deficiency was detected in 170 (24%) of 702 cases. Germline testing of 158 MMR-deficient cases identified 22 truncating mutations (3% of all cases) and four unclassified variants. Tumor MLH1 methylation was detected in 99 (89%) of 111 cases demonstrating MLH1/PMS2 IHC loss; all were germline MLH1 mutation negative. A combination of MMR IHC plus MLH1 methylation testing in women younger than 60 years of age at diagnosis provided the highest positive predictive value for the identification of mutation carriers at 46% versus ≤ 41% for any other criteria considered.
Population-level identification of patients with MMR mutation-positive endometrial cancer is optimized by stepwise testing for tumor MMR IHC loss in patients younger than 60 years, tumor MLH1 methylation in individuals with MLH1 IHC loss, and germline mutations in patients exhibiting loss of MSH6, MSH2, or PMS2 or loss of MLH1/PMS2 with absence of MLH1 methylation.
Abstract Pathologic features of Parkinson's disease (PD) include death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, presence of α-synuclein containing Lewy bodies, and iron accumulation in ...PD-related brain regions. The observed iron accumulation may be contributing to PD etiology but it also may be a byproduct of cell death or cellular dysfunction. To elucidate the possible role of iron accumulation in PD, we investigated genetic variation in 16 genes related to iron homeostasis in three case–control studies from the United States, Australia, and France. After screening 90 haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the genes of interest in the US study population, we investigated the five most promising gene regions in two additional independent case–control studies. For the pooled data set (1289 cases, 1391 controls) we observed a protective association (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71–0.96) between PD and a haplotype composed of the A allele at rs1880669 and the T allele at rs1049296 in transferrin ( TF ; GeneID: 7018). Additionally, we observed a suggestive protective association (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74-1.02) between PD and a haplotype composed of the G allele at rs10247962 and the A allele at rs4434553 in transferrin receptor 2 ( TFR2 ; GeneID: 7036). We observed no associations in our pooled sample for haplotypes in SLC40A1 , CYB561 , or HFE . Taken together with previous findings in model systems, our results suggest that TF or a TF - TFR2 complex may have a role in the etiology of PD, possibly through iron misregulation or mitochondrial dysfunction within dopaminergic neurons.
PDF
