STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective clinical and radiographic single-center study
OBJECTIVE.Assess simultaneous cervical spine and lower extremity compensatory changes with changes in thoracolumbar spinal ...alignment.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Full-body stereoradiographic imaging allows better understanding of reciprocal changes in cervical and lower extremity alignment in the setting of thoracolumbar malalignment. Few studies describe the simultaneous effect of alignment correction on these mechanisms.
METHODS.Patients ≥18 years undergoing instrumented thoracolumbar fusion without previous cervical spine fusion, hip, knee or ankle arthroplasty were included. Spinopelvic, lower extremity and cervical alignment were assessed from full-body standing stereoradiographs using validated software. Patients were matched for pelvic incidence and stratified based on baseline T1-pelvic angle (TPA) asTPA-Low <14°, TPA-Moderate =14–22° and TPA-High >22°. Perioperative changes between baseline and first postoperative visit <6 months in lower extremity alignment (pelvic shiftP Shift, sacrofemoral angleSFA, Knee AngleKA, Ankle AngleAA, global sagittal axisGSA) and cervical alignment (C0-C2 angle, C2-slope, C2-C7 lordosis and C2-C7 SVA:cSVA) were correlated with change in magnitude of TPA and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction.
RESULTS.After matching, 87 patients were assessed. Increasing baseline TPA severity associated with a progressive increase in all regional spinopelvic parameters except thoracic kyphosis, in addition to increased SFA, P Shift, KA, GSA, and C2-C7 lordosis. As TPA correction increased, there was a reciprocal reduction in SFA, KA, P Shift, GSA and C2-C7 lordosis. Change in SVA correlated most with change in GSA (r = 0.886), P Shift (r = 0.601), KA (r = 0.534) and C2-C7 lordosis (r = 0.467). Change in TPA correlated with change in SFA (r = 0.372) while SVA did not.
CONCLUSIONS.Patients with thoracolumbar malalignment exhibit compensatory changes in cervical spine and lower extremity simultaneously in the form of cervical hyperlordosis, pelvic shift, knee flexion, and pelvic retroversion. These compensatory mechanisms resolve reciprocally in a linear fashion following optimal surgical correction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE.3
Lateral decubitus single position anterior-posterior (AP) fusion utilizing anterior lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous posterior fixation is a novel, minimally invasive surgical technique. ...Single position lumbar surgery (SPLS) with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) or lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has been shown to be a safe, effective technique. This study directly compares perioperative outcomes of SPLS with lateral ALIF vs. traditional supine ALIF with repositioning (FLIP) for degenerative pathologies.
To determine if SPLS with lateral ALIF improves perioperative outcomes compared to FLIP with supine ALIF.
Multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Patients undergoing primary AP fusions with ALIF at 5 institutions from 2015 to 2020.
Levels fused, inclusion of L4-L5, L5-S1, radiation dosage, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications. Radiographic analysis included lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI-LL mismatch.
Retrospective analysis of primary ALIFs with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between L4-S1 over 5 years at 5 institutions. Patients were grouped as FLIP or SPLS. Demographic, procedural, perioperative, and radiographic outcome measures were compared using independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analyses with significance set at p <.05. Cohorts were propensity-matched for demographic or procedural differences.
A total of 321 patients were included; 124 SPS and 197 Flip patients. Propensity-matching yielded 248 patients: 124 SPLS and 124 FLIP. The SPLS cohort demonstrated significantly reduced operative time (132.95±77.45 vs. 261.79±91.65 min; p <0.001), EBL (120.44±217.08 vs. 224.29±243.99 mL; p <.001), LOS (2.07±1.26 vs. 3.47±1.40 days; p <.001), and rate of perioperative ileus (0.00% vs. 6.45%; p =.005). Radiation dose (39.79±31.66 vs. 37.54±35.85 mGy; p =.719) and perioperative complications including vascular injury (1.61% vs. 1.61%; p =.000), retrograde ejaculation (0.00% vs. 0.81%, p =.328), abdominal wall (0.81% vs. 2.42%; p =.338), neuropraxia (1.61% vs. 0.81%; p =.532), persistent motor deficit (0.00% vs. 1.61%; p =.166), wound complications (1.61% vs. 1.61%; p =.000), or VTE (0.81% vs. 0.81%; p =.972) were similar. No difference was seen in 90-day return to OR. Similar results were noted in sub-analyses of single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 fusions. On radiographic analysis, the SPLS cohort had greater changes in LL (4.23±11.14 vs. 0.43±8.07 deg; p =.005) and PI-LL mismatch (-4.78±8.77 vs. -0.39±7.51 deg; p =.002).
Single position lateral ALIF with percutaneous posterior fixation improves operative time, EBL, LOS, rate of ileus, and maintains safety compared to supine ALIF with prone percutaneous pedicle screws between L4-S1.
Purpose
To provide definitions and a conceptual framework for single position surgery (SPS) applied to circumferential fusion of the lumbar spine.
Methods
Narrative literature review and experts’ ...opinion.
Results
Two major limitations of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been (a) a perceived need to reposition the patient to the prone position for posterior fixation, and (b) the lack of a robust solution for fusion at the L5/S1 level. Recently, two strategies for performing single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion have been described. The combination of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position (LALIF), LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (pPSF) in the lateral decubitus position is known as lateral single-position surgery (LSPS). Prone LLIF (PLLIF) involves transpsoas LLIF done in the prone position that is more familiar for surgeons to then implant pedicle screw fixation. This can be referred to as prone single-position surgery (PSPS). In this review, we describe the evolution of and rationale for single-position spinal surgery. Pertinent studies validating LSPS and PSPS are reviewed and future questions regarding the future of these techniques are posed. Lastly, we present an algorithm for single-position surgery that describes the utility of LALIF, LLIF and PLLIF in the treatment of patients requiring AP lumbar fusions.
Conclusions
Single position surgery in circumferential fusion of the lumbar spine includes posterior fixation in association with any of the following: lateral position LLIF, prone position LLIF, lateral position ALIF, and their combination (lateral position LLIF+ALIF). Preliminary studies have validated these methods.
BACKGROUND:Surgical site infections are common and costly complications after spine surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics are the standard of care; however, the appropriate duration of antibiotics has ...yet to be adequately addressed. We sought to determine whether the duration of antibiotic administration (preoperatively only versus preoperatively and for 24 hours postoperatively) impacts postoperative infection rates.
METHODS:All patients undergoing inpatient spinal procedures at a single institution from 2011 to 2018 were evaluated for inclusion. A minimum of 1 year of follow-up was used to adequately capture postoperative infections. The 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching technique was used between patients who did and did not receive postoperative antibiotics, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to control for confounding.
RESULTS:A total of 4,454 patients were evaluated and, of those, 2,672 (60%) received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics and 1,782 (40%) received no postoperative antibiotics. After propensity-matched analysis, there was no difference between patients who received postoperative antibiotics and those who did not in terms of the infection rate (1.8% compared with 1.5%). No significant decrease in the odds of postoperative infection was noted in association with the use of postoperative antibiotics (odds ratio = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.620 to 2.23; p = 0.628). Additionally, there was no observed increase in the risk of Clostridium difficile infection or in the short-term rate of infection with multidrug-resistant organisms.
CONCLUSIONS:There was no difference in the rate of surgical site infections between patients who received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics and those who did not. Additionally, we found no observable risks, such as more antibiotic-resistant infections and C. difficile infections, with prolonged antibiotic use.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
The authors report an Australian experience of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with respect to clinical outcomes, fusion rates, and complications, with recombinant human bone morphogenetic ...protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and other graft materials.
Retrospective cohort study of LLIF patients 2011-2021. LLIFs performed lateral decubitus by four experienced surgeons past their learning curve. Graft materials classified rhBMP-2 or non-rhBMP-2. Patient-reported outcomes assessed by VAS, ODI, and SF-12 preoperatively and postoperatively. Fusion rates assessed by CT postoperatively at 6 and 12 months. Complications classified minor or major. Clinical outcomes and complications analysed and compared between rhBMP-2 and non-rhBMP-2 groups.
A cohort of 343 patients underwent 437 levels of LLIF. Mean age 67 ± 11 years (range 29-89) with a female preponderance (65%). Mean BMI 29kg/m
2
(18-56). Most common operated levels L3/4 (36%) and L4/5 (35%). VAS, ODI and SF-12 improved significantly from baseline. Total complication rate 15% (53/343) with minor 11% (39/343) and major 4% (14/343). Ten patients returned to OR (2-wound infection, 8-further instrumentation and decompression). Most patients (264, 77%) received rhBMP-2, the remainder a non-rhBMP-2 graft material. No significant differences between groups at baseline. No increase in minor or major complications in the rhBMP-2 group compared to the non-rhBMP-2 group respectively; (10.6% vs 13.9% p = 0.42, 2.7% vs 8.9% p < 0.01). Fusion rates significantly higher in the rhBMP-2 group at 6 and 12 months (63% vs 40%, p < 0.01, 92% vs 80%, p < 0.02).
LLIF is a safe and efficacious procedure. rhBMP-2 in LLIF produced earlier and higher fusion rates compared to available non-rhBMP-2 graft substitutes.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Investigate the differences in spine surgery cost for metabolic syndrome patients.
Included were patients ≥18 undergoing fusion. Patients were divided into cervical, thoracic, and lumbar groups based ...on their upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV). Metabolic syndrome patients (MetS) included those with body mass index >30, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Propensity score matching for invasiveness between non-MetS and MetS used to assess cost differences. Total surgery costs for MetS and non-MetS adult spinal deformity patients were compared. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost per QALY for UIV groups were calculated.
A total of 312 invasiveness matched surgeries met inclusion criteria. Baseline demographics and surgical details included age 57.7 ± 14.5, 54% female, body mass index 31.1 ± 6.6, 17% anterior approach, 70% posterior approach, 13% combined approach, and 3.8 ± 4.1 levels fused. The average costs of surgery between MetS and non-Mets patients was $60,579.30 versus $52,053.23 (P < 0.05). When costs were compared between UIV groups, MetS patients had higher cervical and thoracic surgery costs ($23,203.43 vs. $19,153.43, $75,230.05 vs. $65,746.16, all P < 0.05) and lower lumbar costs ($31,775.64 vs. $42,643.37, P < 0.05). However, the average cost per QALY at 1 year was $639,069.32 for MetS patients and $425,840.30 for non-Mets patients (P < 0.05). At life expectancy, the cost per QALY was $45,456.83 versus $26,026.84 (P < 0.05).
When matched by invasiveness, MetS patients had an average 16.4% higher surgery costs, 50% higher costs per QALY at 1 year, and 75% higher cost per QALY at life expectancy. Further research is needed on the possible utility of reducing comorbidities in preoperative patients.
Chin-Brow Vertical Angle (CBVA) is not routinely measured on radiographs even though it is a strong assessor of horizontal gaze.
Retrospective cohort study of patients with full-body ...stereoradiographs and a primary cervical diagnosis at the time of presentation.
Assess the utility of McGregor's Slope (McGS) and Slope of Line of Sight (SLS) as surrogate markers for the CBVA in cervical spine pathology.
A retrospective review of patients with full-body stereoradiographs was performed. Patients were ≥18 years of age with a primary cervical diagnosis. Analysis of CBVA, McGS, and SLS was conducted as markers of horizontal gaze. Sagittal alignment was characterized by: pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), T1-pelvic angle (TPA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T2-T12 thoracic kyphosis, C2-C7 SVA (cSVA), C2-C7 Cervical lordosis, T1-Slope minus Cervical Lordosis (TS-CL), and C2-Slope (C2S). A subgroup analysis was performed in patients with cervical deformity. Independent sample t tests and paired t tests compared radiographic alignment. Pearson correlations characterized linear relationships. Linear regression analysis identified relationships between the parameters.
In all, 329 patients were identified with primary cervical spine diagnoses. Chin-Brow Vertical Angle was visible in 171 patients (52.0%), McGS in 281 (85.4%), and SLS in 259 (78.7%). Of the 171 patients with visible CBVA, the mean CBVA was 2.30±7.7, mean McGS was 5.02±8.1, and mean SLS was −1.588±2.03. Chin-Brow Vertical Angle strongly correlated with McGS (r=0.83) and SLS (r=0.89) with p<.001. McGregor's Slope positively correlated with SLS (r=0.89, p=.001).
This study demonstrates that McGS and SLS serve as strong, positive correlates for CBVA. The reported mean differences between these measurements provide a useful conversion, broadening CBVA's use as a radiographic assessment of horizontal gaze.
STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE.To evaluate the ability of patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) assessments to capture disability related to cervical ...sagittal alignment and secondarily to compare these findings to legacy outcome measures.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.PROMIS is a validated patient-reported outcome metric that is increasing in popularity due to its speed of administration relative to legacy metrics. The ability of PROMIS to capture disability from sagittal alignment and baseline health status in patients with neck pain has not been investigated.
METHODS.Patients presenting with a chief complaint of neck pain from December 2016 to July 2017 were included. Demographics and comorbidities were retrospectively collected. All patients prospectively completed the neck disability index (NDI), EQ-5D, visual analog scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, PROMIS physical function, PROMIS pain intensity, and PROMIS pain interference metrics. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters were measured on standing X-rays. The correlations between outcome measures, health status indexes, psychiatric diagnoses, and sagittal alignment were analyzed.
RESULTS.Two hundred twenty-six patients were included. The sample was 58.4% female with a mean age of 55.1 years. In patients with neck pain, PROMIS physical function correlated strongly with the NDI (r = −0.763, P < 0.01), EQ-5D (r = 0.616, P < 0.01), VAS neck pain (−0.466, P < 0.01), and VAS arm pain (r = −0.388, P < 0.01). One hundred seventy-seven patients (69.96%) were included in the radiographic analysis. 20.3% of the radiographic cohort had cervical deformity and in this group, less cervical lordosis correlated with PROMIS pain intensity and EQ-5D but not NDI. In patients without cervical deformity, no outcome metric was found to correlate significantly with cervical alignment parameters.
CONCLUSION.PROMIS domains correlated strongly with legacy outcome metrics. For the whole cohort, sagittal alignment was not correlated with outcomes. In patients with sagittal cervical deformity, worsening alignment correlated with PROMIS pain intensity and EQ-5D but not NDI.Level of Evidence3
PDF
