•It is unclear whether the KRAS G12C has a prognostic role in early stage LUAD.•In the stage I IRE cohort we found an association between KRAS G12C and worse DFS.•In the TCGA cohort, an association ...between the KRAS G12C and DFS was not found.•In the MSK LUAD604 cohort KRAS G12C had worse RFS when compared to KRAS nonG12C.•In the pooled cohort KRAS G12C had worse DFS than KRAS nonG12C and KRAS wild type.
KRAS G12C mutations are found in about 12–13% of LUAD samples and it is unclear whether they are associated with worse survival outcomes in resected, stage I LUAD. We assessed whether KRAS-G12C mutated tumours had worse DFS when compared to KRAS-nonG12C mutated tumours and to KRAS wild-type tumours in a cohort of resected, stage I LUAD (IRE cohort). We then leveraged on publicly available datasets (TCGA-LUAD, MSK-LUAD604) to further test the hypothesis in external cohorts. In the stage I IRE cohort we found a significant association between the KRAS-G12C mutation and worse DFS in multivariable analysis (HR: 2.47). In the TCGA-LUAD stage I cohort we did not find statistically significant associations between the KRAS-G12C mutation and DFS. In the MSK-LUAD604 stage I cohort we found that KRAS-G12C mutated tumours had worse RFS when compared to KRAS-nonG12C mutated tumours in univariable analysis (HR 3.5). In the pooled stage I cohort we found that KRAS-G12C mutated tumours had worse DFS when compared to KRAS-nonG12C mutated tumours (HR 2.6), to KRAS wild-type tumours (HR 1.6) and to any other tumours (HR 1.8); in multivariable analysis, the KRAS-G12C mutation was associated with worse DFS (HR 1.61). Our results suggest that patients with resected, stage I LUAD with a KRAS-G12C mutation may have inferior survival outcomes..
KEAP1 mutations have been associated with reduced survival in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly in the presence of STK11/KRAS ...alterations. We hypothesized that, beyond co-occurring genomic events, clonality prediction may help identify deleterious KEAP1 mutations and their counterparts with retained sensitivity to ICIs.
Beta-binomial modelling of sequencing read counts was used to infer KEAP1 clonal inactivation by combined somatic mutation and loss of heterozygosity (KEAP1 C-LOH) versus partial inactivation KEAP1 clonal diploid-subclonal (KEAP1 CD-SC) in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) MetTropism cohort (N = 2550). Clonality/LOH prediction was compared to a streamlined clinical classifier that relies on variant allele frequencies (VAFs) and tumor purity (TP) (VAF/TP ratio). The impact of this classification on survival outcomes was tested in two independent cohorts of LUAD patients treated with immunotherapy (MSK/Rome N = 237; DFCI N = 461). Immune-related features were studied by exploiting RNA-sequencing data (TCGA) and multiplexed immunofluorescence (DFCI mIF cohort).
Clonality/LOH inference in the MSK MetTropism cohort overlapped with a clinical classification model defined by the VAF/TP ratio. In the ICI-treated MSK/Rome discovery cohort, predicted KEAP1 C-LOH mutations were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to KEAP1 wild-type cases (PFS log-rank P = 0.001; OS log-rank P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in the DFCI validation cohort (PFS log-rank P = 0.006; OS log-rank P = 0.014). In both cohorts, we did not observe any significant difference in survival outcomes when comparing KEAP1 CD-SC and wild-type tumors. Immune deconvolution and multiplexed immunofluorescence revealed that KEAP1 C-LOH and KEAP1 CD-SC differed for immune-related features.
KEAP1 C-LOH mutations are associated with an immune-excluded phenotype and worse clinical outcomes among advanced LUAD patients treated with ICIs. By contrast, survival outcomes of patients whose tumors harbored KEAP1 CD-SC mutations were similar to those with KEAP1 wild-type LUADs.
•Variant allele frequency and tumor purity frame deleterious KEAP1 mutations in LUAD.•Clonal KEAP1 mutations with LOH (KEAP1 C-LOH) define a subset of LUAD patients unresponsive to immunotherapy.•Preserved immunotherapy efficacy was noticed in tumors with clonal diploid/subclonal KEAP1 mutations (KEAP1 CD-SC).•Immune-related pathways and markers were differentially represented across KEAP1 C-LOH, KEAP1 CD-SC, and wild-type tumors.
Highly expressed in cancer protein 1 (Hec1) is a subunit of the kinetochore (KT)-associated Ndc80 complex, which ensures proper segregation of sister chromatids at mitosis by mediating the ...interaction between KTs and microtubules (MTs). HEC1 mRNA and protein are highly expressed in many malignancies as part of a signature of chromosome instability. These properties render Hec1 a promising molecular target for developing therapeutic drugs that exert their anticancer activities by producing massive chromosome aneuploidy. A virtual screening study aimed at identifying small molecules able to bind at the Hec1-MT interaction domain identified one positive hit compound and two analogs of the hit with high cytotoxic, pro-apoptotic and anti-mitotic activities. The most cytotoxic analog (SM15) was shown to produce chromosome segregation defects in cancer cells by inhibiting the correction of erroneous KT-MT interactions. Live cell imaging of treated cells demonstrated that mitotic arrest and segregation abnormalities lead to cell death through mitotic catastrophe and that cell death occurred also from interphase. Importantly, SM15 was shown to be more effective in inducing apoptotic cell death in cancer cells as compared to normal ones and effectively reduced tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model. Mechanistically, cold-induced MT depolymerization experiments demonstrated a hyper-stabilization of both mitotic and interphase MTs. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborate this finding by showing that SM15 can bind the MT surface independently from Hec1 and acts as a stabilizer of both MTs and KT-MT interactions. Overall, our studies represent a clear proof of principle that MT-Hec1-interacting compounds may represent novel powerful anticancer agents.
PDF
