This randomized trial of the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer tested the efficacy of adding cetuximab, an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, to standard therapy ...(platinum-based chemotherapy). As compared with standard chemotherapy alone, cetuximab plus chemotherapy prolonged median overall survival by almost 3 months.
In the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer, cetuximab plus chemotherapy prolonged median overall survival by almost 3 months.
Platinum-based chemotherapy consisting of either cisplatin or carboplatin is the usual first-line treatment for inoperable recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cisplatin is often combined with fluorouracil, but the results of this treatment are far from satisfactory.
1
Head and neck cancer cells often express the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and its presence is associated with a poor outcome.
2
–
4
Cetuximab (Erbitux, developed by Merck Darmstadt, under license from ImClone) is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits ligand binding to the EGFR
5
–
7
and stimulates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
8
–
10
It also enhances the activity of a . . .
Summary Background Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) progressing after first-line platinum regimens have a poor prognosis and few treatment ...options. Afatinib, an irreversible ERBB family blocker, has shown efficacy in a phase 2 study in this setting. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib compared with methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC progressing on or after platinum-based therapy. Methods In this open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial conducted in 101 centres in 19 countries, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC that was recurrent, metastatic, or both who had progressed on or after first-line platinum-based therapy, were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Previous treatment with more than one systemic regimen in this setting was not allowed; previous treatment with EGFR-targeted antibody therapy (but not EGFR-targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors) was allowed. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m2 per week), stratified by ECOG performance status and previous EGFR-targeted antibody therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice or web-based response system. Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation; independent review of tumour response was done in a blinded manner. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent, central imaging review committee. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01345682. Findings Between Jan 10, 2012, and Dec 12, 2013, we enrolled 483 patients and randomly assigned 322 to afatinib and 161 to methotrexate. After a median follow-up of 6·7 months (IQR 3·1–9·0), progression-free survival was longer in the afatinib group than in the methotrexate group (median 2·6 months 95% CI 2·0–2·7 for the afatinib group vs 1·7 months 1·5–2·4 for the methotrexate group; hazard ratio HR 0·80 95% CI 0·65–0·98, p=0·030). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were rash or acne (31 10% of 320 patients in the afatinib group vs none of 160 patients in the methotrexate group), diarrhoea (30 9% vs three 2%), stomatitis (20 6% vs 13 8%), fatigue (18 6% vs five 3%), and neutropenia (1 <1% vs 11 7%); serious adverse events occurred in 44 (14%) of afatinib-treated patients and 18 (11%) of methotrexate-treated patients. Interpretation Afatinib was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival and had a manageable safety profile. These findings provide important new insights into the treatment of this patient population and support further investigations with irreversible ERBB family blockers in HNSCC. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim.
Summary Background Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with proven activity in refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours and chemotherapy-refractory advanced colorectal cancers. We assessed this ...agent's efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas previously treated with anthracycline. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial undertaken in France and Austria, we enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with advanced soft tissue sarcomas who had received previous doxorubicin or other anthracycline treatment. These patients were randomly assigned (1:1) into one of the following four cohorts: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and other sarcomas. Participants were treated with oral regorafenib (160 mg per day 3 weeks on and 1 week off) or matched placebo. Patients receiving placebo were offered optional crossover in case of centrally confirmed disease progression. The random allocation schedule was computer-generated with permuted blocks of four patients, with two stratification factors: country (France or Austria) and previous exposure to pazopanib (yes or no). Eligibility criteria included patients with histologically proven advanced and inoperable soft tissue sarcomas with intolerance or failure to doxorubicin or other anthracycline-based chemotherapy and at least one unidimensionally or bidimensionally measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). The primary endpoint was RECIST-based progression-free survival after central radiological review in the intention-to-treat population. Patients, physicians, and radiologists of the panel were masked to treatment allocation. This study is still open for recruitment for an additional stratum (patients previously treated with pazopanib) and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01900743. Findings From Aug 5, 2013, to Nov 26, 2014, 182 patients were randomly assigned to one of four cohorts and included in the final analysis. At the cutoff date (Jan 7, 2016), the number of required events was reached for the four cohorts. In the liposarcoma cohort, progression-free survival was 1·1 months (95% CI 0·9–2·3) with regorafenib versus 1·7 months (0·9–1·8) with placebo (HR 0·89 95% CI 0·48–1·64 p=0·70). In the leiomyosarcoma cohort, progression-free survival was 3·7 months (95% CI 2·5–5·0) with regorafenib versus 1·8 (1·0–2·8) months with placebo (HR 0·46 95% CI 0·46–0·80 p=0·0045). In the synovial sarcoma cohort, progression-free survival was 5·6 months (95% CI 1·4–11·6) with regorafenib versus 1·0 (0·8–1·4) with placebo (HR 0·10 95% CI 0·03–0·35 p<0·0001). In the other sarcoma cohort, progression-free survival was 2·9 months (95% CI 1·0–7·8) with regorafenib versus 1·0 (0·9–1·9) with placebo (HR 0·46 95% CI 0·25–0·81 p=0·0061). Before crossover, the most common clinically significant grade 3 or higher adverse events were arterial hypertension (17 19% events in the 89 patients in the regorafenib group vs two 2% events in the 92 patients in the placebo group), hand and foot skin reaction (14 15% vs no events) and asthenia (12 13% vs six 6%). One treatment-related death occurred in the regorafenib group due to liver failure. Interpretation Regorafenib has an important clinical antitumour effect in non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcomas, improving progression-free survival. Regorafenib should be further evaluated in this setting, and its therapeutic role has to be defined in the context of the growing therapeutic armamentarium, already including one approved multikinase inhibitor, pazopanib. Funding Bayer HealthCare.
This trial of therapies for unresectable advanced head and neck cancer showed that induction chemotherapy (given before radiotherapy) with a combination of docetaxel plus the standard regimen of ...cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) was superior to the standard induction chemotherapy. Progression-free survival and overall survival were improved, and the toxicity of the triple-agent regimen was less than the toxicity of the standard regimen.
Induction chemotherapy with a combination of docetaxel plus the standard regimen of cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) was superior to the standard induction chemotherapy.
Head and neck cancer, mostly of squamous-cell origin, ranks sixth among the most common cancers, accounting for approximately 6% of all cases of cancer. Each year, more than 500,000 new cases are diagnosed worldwide.
1
Approximately 60% of patients present with advanced disease (stages III and IV), for which the prognosis is poor.
2
For many years, radiotherapy has been the treatment of choice for unresectable disease,
3
resulting in 5-year rates of survival of less than 20%.
4
,
5
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has now largely replaced radiotherapy alone in the treatment of unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck,
3
,
6
but induction chemotherapy . . .
The objective of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma.
Thirty patients were entered onto the ...study from April 2005 through October 2006. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously as a 60-minute infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was the nonprogression rate after two cycles.
The progression-free survival rates after 2 and 4 months were 74% and 45%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months, the median time to progression was 4 months and the median overall survival was 8 months. The progression-free survival rate was similar in patients pretreated with chemotherapy and in chemotherapy-naïve patients (77% v 71%). Three patients with locally advanced breast angiosarcoma presented partial response, which enabled a secondary curative-intent surgery with complete histologic response in two cases. One toxic death occurred as a result of a thrombocytopenia episode. Six patients presented with grade 3 toxicities and one patient presented with a grade 4 toxicity. Anemia and fatigue were the most frequently reported toxicities.
Weekly paclitaxel at the dose schedule used in the current study was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit.
Summary Background The effect of imatinib discontinuation on progression-free survival and overall survival in long-lasting responders with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) is ...unknown. We assessed treatment interruption in patients with non-progressive disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria after 3 years of imatinib in a randomised trial. Methods In this open-label national multicentre phase 3 study in France, patients with GIST free of progression after 3 years of imatinib 400 mg/day were randomly assigned to continue or interrupt imatinib. Randomisation was done centrally and independently from other study procedures with computer-generated permuted blocks of two and four patients stratified by participating centre and presence or absence of residual disease on CT scan. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. An interim analysis was planned after the first 50 randomly assigned patients. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle—ie, all patients randomly assigned to a study group were included. This study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov , number NCT00367861. Findings 434 patients were enrolled in this trial between May 27, 2002, and May 5, 2009. Between June 13, 2005, and May 30, 2007, 50 patients with non-progressive disease who had received 3 years of treatment with imatinib were randomly assigned to continue or interrupt their treatment, 25 patients in each group. By Dec 7, 2009, after a median follow-up of 35 months (95% CI 33–38) after random assignment, 2-year progression-free survival was 80% (95% CI 58–91) in the continuation group and 16% (5–33) in the interruption group (p<0·0001). There was no difference in adverse events grade 3 or greater (oedema and asthenia) between the two groups. Interpretation Imatinib interruption after 3 years in responders results in a high risk of rapid progression in patients with advanced GIST. Discontinuation of imatinib is not recommended outside clinical trials unless patients experience significant toxic effects. Funding Conticanet, the Ligue Contre Le Cancer du Rhone, and Novartis.
Summary Background Metastatic leiomyosarcomas of uterine or soft-tissue origin have poor prognosis and moderate chemosensitivity. Trabectedin has shown activity in pretreated leiomyosarcoma. We did a ...single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial (LMS-02) to assess the effect of first-line doxorubicin and trabectedin combination on disease control and survival. Methods Adults (18 years to physiological age ≤70 years) with measurable metastatic or unresectable uterine leiomyosarcoma or soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma who had not received any previous chemotherapy were enrolled at 19 centres in France. Treatment consisted of 60 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin followed by 1·1 mg/m2 trabectedin in a 3 h intravenous infusion on day 1, both by the central venous route, and 6 mg subcutaneous pegfilgrastim on day 2, repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Surgery for residual disease was permitted. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving disease control, defined as complete or partial response or stable disease. Stratification was done by anatomical site and analyses were per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02131480. Findings Between July 28, 2010, and May 10, 2013, 109 patients were enrolled and treated, of whom 108 were assessable for response: 47 in the uterine leiomyosarcoma group and 61 in the soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma group. 32 (68%) patients in the uterine leiomyosarcoma group and 45 (74%) in the soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma group received all six cycles of treatment. Of 47 patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma, 28 (59·6%, 95% CI 44·3–73·6) achieved a partial response and 13 (27·7%, 15·6–42·6) stable disease; 41 (87·2%, 74·3–95·2) patients achieved disease control. Of 61 patients with soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma, two (3·3%, 95% CI 0·4–11·7) achieved a complete response, 22 (36·1%, 25·0–50·8) had a partial response, and 32 (52·5%, 40·8–67·3) had stable disease; 56 (91·8%, 81·9–97·3) of patients achieved disease control. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-associated adverse events were neutropenia (84 78% of 108 patients), increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (42 39%), thrombocytopenia (40 37%), anaemia (29 27%), febrile neutropenia (26 24%), and fatigue (21 19%). Interpretation Despite expected but manageable toxic effects, these results support the activity of doxorubicin plus trabectedin as first-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma and soft-tissue leiomyosarcoma. This combination should be developed further in a phase 3 trial against the present standard of care. Funding Pharmamar and Amgen.
Imatinib is the standard treatment of advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs). It is not known whether imatinib may be stopped in patients in whom disease is controlled.
This prospective, randomized, ...multicentric phase III study was designed to compare continuous (CONT) compared with interrupted (INT) imatinib beyond 1 year of treatment in patients with advanced GIST. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, response rate after reinitiation of imatinib, and quality of life. Early stopping rules in cases of rapid progression of disease were defined, with preplanned interim analyses.
Between May 2002 and April 2004, 182 patients with advanced GIST were enrolled. Between May 2003 and April 2004, 98 patients in response or stable disease under imatinib reached more than 1 year of follow-up. Forty were not eligible for randomization, and 58 patients were randomly assigned, 32 and 26 patients in the INT and CONT arms, respectively. As of October 15, 2005, eight of 26 patients in the CONT group and 26 of 32 patients in the INT group had documented disease progression (P < .0001). Twenty-four of 26 patients with documented progression in the INT arm responded to imatinib reintroduction. No differences in overall survival or imatinib resistance were observed between the two arms. Quality of life evaluated 6 months after random assignment using the 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire was not significantly different between the two groups of randomly assigned patients.
Imatinib interruption results in rapid progression in most patients with advanced GIST, and cannot be recommended in routine practice unless patient experience significant toxicity
In the OS2006 study, patients younger than 18 years were treated with a methotrexate‐based regimen (MTX), patients older than 25 years with a doxorubicin–cisplatin–ifosfamide‐based regimen (API–AI), ...whereas patients aged 18–25 years received either API–AI or MTX. We herein report the prespecified subgroup analysis of the outcome of 106 patients treated with API–AI. Preoperative chemotherapy combined three doxorubicin–ifosfamide–cisplatin (API) and two doxorubicin–ifosfamide (AI) courses. Postoperative chemotherapy was assigned by risk group: localised patients with a good histological response (<10% viable cells) received two AI and two cisplatin–ifosfamide (PI) courses; patients with synchronous metastases, poor histological response or unresectable primary received five cycles of etoposide–ifosfamide (EI). Of the 106 patients, 61 were randomised to receive or not zoledronate. Median age was 30 years (range 18–67), 66 (62%) patients were >25 years. The primary tumours were axial in 28 patients (26%), and 28 (26%) presented with metastases. Ninety‐six patients (91%) had surgery, conservative in 82 (85%); 36 patients (38%, 95% CI 28–48%) were good responders. Toxicity was manageable, with no significant difference in severe acute toxicity between patients aged >25 years and those younger. With a median follow‐up of 4.8 years, the 5‐year event‐free survival and overall survival rates were 46% (95% CI 36–56) and 57% (95% CI 47–67), respectively. The primary tumour size and initial metastases correlated with a higher risk of event. In these 106 osteosarcoma adult patients, API–AI proved feasible with no excess of toxicity, and favourable activity despite poor‐prognosis factors.
What's new?
Osteosarcoma paediatric patients are commonly treated with high‐dose methotrexate combined to other active agents. Methotrexate pharmacokinetics varies considerably with age, however, with few prospective studies dedicated to adult patients and currently no consensus concerning the optimal chemotherapy regimen in these patients. This paper describes the population of 106 adult osteosarcoma patients enrolled in the OS 2006 phase III study, their treatment and their outcomes using a chemotherapy backbone without methotrexate that combines doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide. This study confirms prior findings that the API‐AI regimen has acceptable toxicity and yields favourable activity in adult osteosarcoma patients with poor prognosis factors.
Aims
Cetuximab associated with cisplatin and 5‐fluorouracil is used to treat patients with inoperable or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) up until disease progression or ...unacceptable toxicities. To date, no biomarkers of efficacy are available to select patients who will benefit from treatment.
Methods
An ancillary pharmacokinetics (PK) exploration was performed in the context of a prospective study investigating circulating‐tumour cells vs progression‐free survival (PFS). Cetuximab plasma concentrations were analysed according to a population PK model. Individual exposure parameters were confronted with soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR) concentrations, tumour response and PFS.
Results
PK data (28 patients, 203 observations) were best described by a two‐compartment model with linear elimination. Performance status (PS) significantly correlated to both cetuximab clearance and central volume of distribution with both parameters increasing by 33.3% (95% CI 1–65.6) for each 1‐point increase of PS compared to PS = 0. Univariate analysis showed that patients with higher trough cetuximab concentrations at Day 7 (Cmin,D7) had better tumour response (P = 0.03) and longer PFS (P = 0.035). However, multivariate analysis revealed that only PS and tumour size at baseline remained significantly associated with PFS. Levels of sEGFR increased during cetuximab treatment but were not associated with PFS in the multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Our study prospectively indicates that PS is likely a confounding factor in the relationship between cetuximab PK and PFS, patients with a poor PS having lower cetuximab plasma exposure and lower PFS.
PDF
