Purpose
To evaluate preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) treatment to reduce early-periprosthetic joint infections (early-PJIs) after hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) for fracture.
Methods
...Open-label, multicenter RCT comparing fosfomycin-trometamol versus no intervention with a parallel follow-up cohort without ASB. Primary outcome: early-PJI after HHA.
Results
Five hundred ninety-four patients enrolled (mean age 84.3); 152(25%) with ASB (77 treated with fosfomycin-trometamol/75 controls) and 442(75%) without. Despite the study closed without the intended sample size, ASB was not predictive of early-PJI (OR: 1.06 95%CI: 0.33–3.38), and its treatment did not modify early-PJI incidence (OR: 1.03 95%CI: 0.15–7.10).
Conclusions
Neither preoperative ASB nor its treatment appears to be risk factors of early-PJI after HHA.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier: Eudra CT 2016-001108-47
Introduction
After two-stage exchange due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), the new prosthesis carries a high risk of reinfection (RePJI). There isn`t solid evidence regarding the antibiotic ...prophylaxis in 2nd-stage surgery. The objective of this study is to describe what antibiotic prophylaxis is used in this surgery and evaluate its impact on the risk of developing RePJI.
Methods
Retrospective multicenter case–control study in Spanish hospitals. The study included cases of PJI treated with two-stage exchange and subsequently developed a new infection. For each case, two controls were included, matched by prosthesis location, center, and year of surgery. The prophylaxis regimens were grouped based on their antibacterial spectrum, and we calculated the association between the type of regimen and the development of RePJI using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for possible confounding factors.
Results
We included 90 cases from 12 centers, which were compared with 172 controls. The most frequent causative microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis with 34 cases (37.8%). Staphylococci were responsible for 50 cases (55.6%), 32 of them (64%) methicillin-resistant. Gram-negative bacilli were involved in 30 cases (33.3%), the most common Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In total, 83 different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were used in 2nd-stage surgery, the most frequent a single preoperative dose of cefazolin (48 occasions; 18.3%); however, it was most common a combination of a glycopeptide and a beta-lactam with activity against
Pseudomonas spp
(99 cases, 25.2%). In the adjusted analysis, regimens that included antibiotics with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci AND
Pseudomonas spp
were associated with a significantly lower risk of RePJI (adjusted OR = 0.24; 95% IC: 0.09–0.65).
Conclusions
The lack of standardization in 2nd-satge surgery prophylaxis explains the wide diversity of regimens used in this procedure. The results suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis in this surgery should include an antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and
Pseudomonas
.
De-escalation from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotics is considered an important measure to reduce the selective pressure of antibiotics, but a scarcity of adequate evidence is a barrier ...to its implementation. We aimed to determine whether de-escalation from an antipseudomonal β-lactam to a narrower-spectrum drug was non-inferior to continuing the antipseudomonal drug in patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia.
An open-label, pragmatic, randomised trial was performed in 21 Spanish hospitals. Patients with bacteraemia caused by Enterobacterales susceptible to one of the de-escalation options and treated empirically with an antipseudomonal β-lactam were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by urinary source) to de-escalate to ampicillin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (urinary tract infections only), cefuroxime, cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, or ertapenem in that order according to susceptibility (de-escalation group), or to continue with the empiric antipseudomonal β-lactam (control group). Oral switching was allowed in both groups. The primary outcome was clinical cure 3–5 days after end of treatment in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, formed of patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety was assessed in all participants. Non-inferiority was declared when the lower bound of the 95% CI of the absolute difference in cure rate was above the –10% non-inferiority margin. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2015-004219-19) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02795949) and is complete.
2030 patients were screened between Oct 5, 2016, and Jan 23, 2020, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to the de-escalation group and 173 to the control group. 164 (50%) patients in the de-escalation group and 167 (50%) in the control group were included in the mITT population. 148 (90%) patients in the de-escalation group and 148 (89%) in the control group had clinical cure (risk difference 1·6 percentage points, 95% CI –5·0 to 8·2). The number of adverse events reported was 219 in the de-escalation group and 175 in the control group, of these, 53 (24%) in the de-escalation group and 56 (32%) in the control group were considered severe. Seven (5%) of 164 patients in the de-escalation group and nine (6%) of 167 patients in the control group died during the 60-day follow-up. There were no treatment-related deaths.
De-escalation from an antipseudomonal β-lactam in Enterobacterales bacteraemia following a predefined rule was non-inferior to continuing the empiric antipseudomonal drug. These results support de-escalation in this setting.
Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013–2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases; Spanish Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Platform, co-financed by the EU; European Development Regional Fund “A way to achieve Europe”, Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014–2020.
•CPJI is usually a chronic infection occurring in patients of advanced age with comorbidities.•Success rate is low and treatment with prosthesis removal improves outcome.•In our experience, ...antifungals with antibiofilm activity may be recommendable.
Candida periprosthetic joint infection (CPJI) is a rare, difficult-to-treat disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of CPJI treated with various surgical and antifungal strategies.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of all CPJI diagnosed between 2003 and 2015 in 16 Spanish hospitals.
Forty-three patients included: median age, 75 years, and median Charlson Comorbidity Index score, 4. Thirty-four (79.1%) patients had ≥1 risk factor for Candida infection. Most common causative species were C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Thirty-five patients were evaluable for outcome: overall, treatment succeeded in 17 (48.6%) and failed in 18 (51.4%). Success was 13/20 (67%) in patients with prosthesis removal and 4/15 (27%) with debridement and prosthesis retention (p = 0.041). All 3 patients who received an amphotericin B-impregnated cement spacer cured. In the prosthesis removal group, success was 5/6 (83%) with an antibiofilm regimen and 8/13 (62%) with azoles (p = 0.605). In the debridement and prosthesis retention group, success was 3/10 (30%) with azoles and 1/5 (20%) with antibiofilm agents. Therapeutic failure was due to relapse in 9 patients, need for suppressive treatment in 5, persistent infection in 2, and CPJI-related death in 2; overall attributable mortality was 6%.
CPJI is usually a chronic disease in patients with comorbidities and risk factors for Candida infection. Treatment success is low, and prosthesis removal improves outcome. Although there is insufficient evidence that use of antifungals with antibiofilm activity has additional benefits, our experience indicates it may be recommendable.
Mycobacterium abscessus is a rare, non-tuberculous, rapidly growing mycobacterium. Although it has been usually associated with chronic pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis patients, the second ...most frequent infection sites are the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Most of the cutaneous infections described in the literature occur secondary to cosmetic invasive procedures, many of them in the context of medical tourism. Its atypical presentation and antibiotic-resistant nature make its diagnosis and therapeutics challenging. In this case report, we present 2 cases of M. abscessus infections secondary to breast lipotransfer reported in the same private center. Case 1 patient underwent surgery to treat scar contracture resulting from previous quadrantectomy. Case 2 patient underwent breast augmentation with lipotransfer. Both of them developed lesions in the breast and in the donor site (abdomen). The therapeutic regimen used was amikacin (1 g/24 h) + tigecycline (50 mg/12 h). In case 1, we performed a simple mastectomy, and in case 2, periodical ultrasound-guided drainages were performed as additional procedures. To our knowledge, these are the first 2 cases that describe an infection secondary to breast lipotransfer. The aim of our report was to illustrate the presentation, diagnosis, therapeutic management, and strategies available to prevent this complication.
El recambio en 2 tiempos es un procedimiento habitual en el tratamiento de las infecciones de prótesis articular (IPA). Sin embargo, la prótesis que se coloca en el segundo tiempo (2T) puede ...reinfectarse de nuevo (ReIPA). Además, existe escasa evidencia sobre qué profilaxis antibiótica debe utilizarse en el 2T. Nuestro objetivo es describir las características de las ReIPA, su pronóstico y las profilaxis antibióticas que se emplean habitualmente en la cirugía del 2T.
Estudio observacional retrospectivo descriptivo multicéntrico en hospitales españoles de pacientes con ReIPA en el periodo 2009-2018.
Se registraron 92 casos de 12 hospitales. El microorganismo más frecuentemente implicado fue Staphylococcus epidermidis con 35 casos (38,5%). El 61,1% de Staphylococcus spp. eran resistentes a meticilina. En 12 casos (13%), la ReIPA fue provocada por el mismo microorganismo responsable de la IPA primaria. En comparación con la IPA primaria, hubo más casos producidos por gramnegativos (el más frecuente Pseudomonas spp.) y menos por grampositivos. En 69 casos (75%), la estrategia de tratamiento elegida fracasó. Se identificaron 43 pautas diferentes de profilaxis en la cirugía del 2T, la más frecuente cefazolina en dosis única preoperatoria, aunque lo más frecuente es que se administraran antibióticos antes y después del implante.
Los principales agentes causales de ReIPA son Staphylococcus spp. resistentes a meticilina, aunque los gramnegativos, particularmente Pseudomonas spp., también participan en una importante cuantía. Existe una notable heterogeneidad en la profilaxis antibiótica que se emplea en la cirugía del 2T. El tratamiento de la ReIPA tiene una alta tasa de fracasos.
Two-stage exchange is the gold standard in the surgical management of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, perioperative reinfections (RePJI) can occur to newly inserted prosthesis, which highlights the importance of an adequate antibiotic prophylaxis, although there is scarce evidence in this field. Our objective was to evaluate the characteristics of RePJI, its prognosis and the antibiotic prophylaxis that is commonly used in second-stage surgery.
Multicentric retrospective observational study in Spanish hospitals including patients with RePJI between 2009 and 2018.
We included 92 patients with RePJI from 12 hospitals. The most frequent isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis in 35 cases (38.5%); 61.1% of staphylococci were methiciliin-resistant. In 12 cases (13%), the same microorganism causing the primary PJI was isolated in RePJI. When comparing with the microbiology of primary PJI, there were more cases caused by Gram-negative bacteria (the most frequent was Pseudomonas spp.) and less by Gram-positive bacteria. Failure occurred in 69 cases (75%). There were 43 different courses of antibiotic prophylaxis after the second-stage surgery; the most frequent was a unique preoperative cefazolin dose, but most patients received prophylaxis before and after the second-stage surgery (61 cases).
The most frequent microorganisms in RePJI are coagulase-negative staphylococci, although Gram-negative bacteria, especially Pseudomonas spp. are also common. There is a significant heterogeneity in antibiotic prophylaxis for a second-stage surgery. ReIPJI treatment has a high failure rate.
Two-stage exchange is the gold standard in the surgical management of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, perioperative reinfections (RePJI) can occur to newly inserted prosthesis, which ...highlights the importance of an adequate antibiotic prophylaxis, although there is scarce evidence in this field. Our objective was to evaluate the characteristics of RePJI, its prognosis and the antibiotic prophylaxis that is commonly used in second-stage surgery.
Multicentric retrospective observational study in Spanish hospitals including patients with RePJI between 2009 and 2018.
We included 92 patients with RePJI from 12 hospitals. The most frequent isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis in 35 cases (38.5%); 61.1% of staphylococci were methiciliin-resistant. In 12 cases (13%), the same microoganism causing the primary PJI was isolated in RePJI. When comparing with the microbiology of primary PJI, there were more cases caused by Gram-negative bacteria (the most frequent was Pseudomonas spp.) and less by Gram-positive bacteria. Failure occured in 69 cases (75%). There were 43 different courses of antibiotic prophylaxis after the second-stage surgery; the most frequent was a unique preoperative cefazolin dose, but most patients received prophylaxis before and after the second-stage surgery (61 cases).
The most frequent microorganisms in RePJI are coagulase-negative staphylococci, although Gram-negative bacteria, especially Pseudomonas spp. are also common. There is a significant heterogeneity in antibiotic prophylaxis for a second-stage surgery. ReIPJI treatment has a high failure rate.
Two-stage exchange is the gold standard in the surgical management of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, perioperative reinfections (RePJI) can occur to newly inserted prosthesis, which ...highlights the importance of an adequate antibiotic prophylaxis, although there is scarce evidence in this field. Our objective was to evaluate the characteristics of RePJI, its prognosis and the antibiotic prophylaxis that is commonly used in second-stage surgery.
Multicentric retrospective observational study in Spanish hospitals including patients with RePJI between 2009 and 2018.
We included 92 patients with RePJI from 12 hospitals. The most frequent isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis in 35 cases (38.5%); 61.1% of staphylococci were methiciliin-resistant. In 12 cases (13%), the same microoganism causing the primary PJI was isolated in RePJI. When comparing with the microbiology of primary PJI, there were more cases caused by Gram-negative bacteria (the most frequent was Pseudomonas spp.) and less by Gram-positive bacteria. Failure occured in 69 cases (75%). There were 43 different courses of antibiotic prophylaxis after the second-stage surgery; the most frequent was a unique preoperative cefazolin dose, but most patients received prophylaxis before and after the second-stage surgery (61 cases).
The most frequent microorganisms in RePJI are coagulase-negative staphylococci, although Gram-negative bacteria, especially Pseudomonas spp. are also common. There is a significant heterogeneity in antibiotic prophylaxis for a second-stage surgery. ReIPJI treatment has a high failure rate.
El recambio en 2 tiempos es un procedimiento habitual en el tratamiento de las infecciones de prótesis articular (IPA). Sin embargo, la prótesis que se coloca en el segundo tiempo (2T) puede reinfectarse de nuevo (ReIPA). Además, existe escasa evidencia sobre qué profilaxis antibiótica debe utilizarse en el 2T. Nuestro objetivo es describir las características de las ReIPA, su pronóstico y las profilaxis antibióticas que se emplean habitualmente en la cirugía del 2T.
Estudio observacional retrospectivo descriptivo multicéntrico en hospitales españoles de pacientes con ReIPA en el periodo 2009–2018.
Se registraron 92 casos de 12 hospitales. El microorganismo más frecuentemente implicado fue Staphylococcus epidermidis con 35 casos (38,5%). El 61,1% de Staphylococcus spp. eran meticilin-resistentes. En 12 casos (13%), la ReIPA fue provocada por el mismo microrganismo responsable de la IPA primaria. En comparación con la IPA primaria hubo más casos producidos por gramnegativos (el más frecuente Pseudomonas spp.) y menos por grampositivos. En 69 casos (75%), la estrategia de tratamiento elegida fracasó. Se identificaron 43 pautas diferentes de profilaxis en la cirugía del 2T, la más frecuente cefazolina en dosis única preoperatoria, aunque lo más frecuente es que se administraran antibióticos antes y después del implante.
Los principales agentes causales de ReIPA son Staphylococcus spp. meticilin-resistentes, aunque los gramnegativos, particularmente Pseudomonas spp., también participan en una importante cuantía. Existe una notable heterogeneidad en la profilaxis antibiótica que se emplea en la cirugía del 2T. El tratamiento de la ReIPA tiene una alta tasa de fracasos.
PDF
