Genome‐wide association studies have linked single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near the interleukin‐28B gene to the hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV‐1) response to peginterferon/ribavirin ...treatment. We aimed to explore the impact on the treatment outcomes of Asian HCV‐2 patients. We determined rs8105790, rs8099917, rs4803219, and rs10853728 to be candidate SNPs in 482 Asian HCV‐2 patients treated with the standard of care. Because the first three SNPs were in very strong linkage disequilibrium with one another (r2 = 0.94‐0.96), rs8099917 and rs10853728 were selected for an analysis of their influence on the achievement of rapid virological response RVR; seronegativity for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in treatment week 4 and sustained virological response (SVR; seronegativity for HCV RNA throughout 24 weeks of posttreatment follow‐up). The rs10853728 genotype did not predict RVR or SVR in HCV‐2 patients. However, patients with the rs8099917 TT genotype, in comparison with patients with GT/GG genotypes, had a significantly higher rate of achieving RVR (85.2% versus 72.0%, P = 0.017) but did have not a significantly higher rate of achieving SVR (89.4% versus 86.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed that a baseline HCV viral load <400,000 IU/mL was the strongest predictor of RVR odds ratio (OR) = 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.31‐7.87, P < 0.001, and this was followed by advanced liver fibrosis (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.15‐0.53, P < 0.001), the carriage of the rs8099917 TT genotype (OR = 3.10, 95% CI = 1.34‐7.21, P = 0.008), and the pretreatment level of aspartate aminotransferase (OR = 0.996, 95% CI = 0.99‐1.00, P = 0.04). Nevertheless, the achievement of RVR was the single predictor of SVR with an OR of 19.37 (95% CI = 8.89‐42.23, P < 0.001), whereas the rs8099917 genotypes played no role in achieving SVR with or without RVR. Conclusion: The rs8099917 TT genotype is significantly independently predictive of RVR, which is the single best predictor of SVR, in Asian HCV‐2 patients. (Hepatology 2011)
Age and hepatic fibrosis are the factors that increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma over time. We aimed to explore their impact at the initiation of antiviral therapy on hepatocellular ...carcinoma among chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.
A total of 1,281 biopsy-proven CHC patients receiving IFN-based therapy were followed for a mean period of 5.5 years.
The 5-year cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma did not differ between non-sustained virological response (SVR) and SVR patients who were <40 years old (7.7% vs. 0.5%,
= 0.1) but was significantly higher in non-SVR patients between 40 and 55 years old (18.0% vs. 1.3%,
< 0.001) and >55 years old (15.1% vs. 7.9%,
= 0.03). Compared with SVR, non-SVR was independently predictive of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients 40 to 55 years old HR/95% confidence intervals (CI), 10.92/3.78-31.56;
< 0.001 and >55 years old (HR/CI, 1.96/1.06-3.63;
= 0.03) but not in patients <40 years old (HR/CI, 2.76/0.41-18.84;
= 0.3). The 5-year cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma did not differ between non-SVR and SVR patients whose fibrosis stage was F0-1 (4.6% vs. 1.9%,
= 0.25) but was higher in non-SVR patients with F2-3 (21.4% vs. 4.3%,
< 0.001) or F4 (33.5% vs. 8.4%,
= 0.002). Compared with SVR, non-SVR was independently predictive of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with F2-3 (HR/CI, 4.36/2.10-9.03;
< 0.001) and F4 (HR/CI, 3.84/1.59-9.30;
= 0.03) but not in those with F0-1 (HR/CI, 1.53/0.49-4.74;
= 0.47).
Delayed hepatitis C virus clearance for patients with CHC >40 years old or with a fibrosis stage >2 increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma over time.
.
Background and Aim
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) may reactivate when treating chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with direct acting antivirals (DAA). We aim to investigate the risk of HBV reactivation during DAA ...therapy.
Methods
Chronic hepatitis C patients receiving pan‐oral DAA therapy from December 2013 to August 2016 were evaluated. Fifty‐seven patients that had a past HBV infection (negative hepatitis B surface antigen HBsAg and positive hepatitis B core antibody) and seven patients that had a current HBV infection (positive HBsAg) were enrolled. Serum HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) markers were regularly measured. The endpoints were the HCV sustained virological response (SVR) and the HBV virological/clinical reactivation.
Results
The overall SVR12 rate was 96.9%, and two patients, one with positive HBsAg, had a relapse of HCV. No episodes of HBV virological reactivation were observed among the patients with a past HBV infection. For the seven patients with a current HBV infection, HBV virological reactivation was found in four (57.1%) of the seven patients. Clinical reactivation of HBV was observed in one patient with pretreatment detectable HBV DNA and recovered after entecavir administration. For the other three patients with HBV virological reactivation, the reappearance of low level HBV DNA without clinical reactivation was observed. HBsAg levels demonstrated only small fluctuations in all the patients.
Conclusions
There was a minimal impact of hepatitis B core antibody seropositivity on HCV efficacy and safety. For CHC patients with current HBV infection, the risk of HBV reactivation was present, and monitoring the HBV DNA level during therapy is warranted.
Background and Aim
Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Both HBV and HCV infections lead to risks of end‐stage liver diseases ...and extrahepatic manifestations. This study aimed to investigate hepatic and extrahepatic comorbidities in hemodialysis patients with HBV or HCV infections compared with those without viral hepatitis.
Methods
A total of 1910 hemodialysis patients, including 159 HCV viremic patients (HCV group), 217 seropositive for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg, HBV group) and 1534 seronegative for both anti‐HCV and HBsAg (non‐B and non‐C NBNC group), from 23 hemodialysis centers were enrolled. Comorbidities were classified into 10 categories by the International Classification of Diseases‐10th Revision.
Results
Among the 1910 patients, the mean age was 64.6 years, and 52.7% were male patients. A total of 1834 (96%) patients had at least one comorbidity, and the mean number of comorbidities was 2.9 ± 1.5 per person. The three most common comorbidities were hypertension, diabetes, and ischemic heart diseases. The mean number of comorbidities per person was significantly higher in the HCV group (3.3 ± 1.7) than in the HBV (2.7 ± 1.5, P < 0.001) and NBNC groups (2.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.004), mainly due to the higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease, respiratory disorders, and mental/behavioral disorders. The HBV and NBNC groups exhibited comparable burdens of comorbidities.
Conclusions
Hemodialysis patients had a high prevalence of multiple comorbidities. Hemodialysis patients with HCV exhibited a higher burden of comorbidities, especially ischemic heart diseases, respiratory disorders, and mental/behavioral disorders, than HBV and NBNC patients did.
Background and Aim
The serial serologic changes of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection among chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients who received oral nucleotide/nucleoside analogues are ...elusive.
Methods
Serum anti‐HDV and HDV RNA among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were tested at the time of initiating anti‐HBV therapy and subsequently during the follow‐up period.
Results
The seropositive rate of anti‐HDV and HDV RNA among 2850 CHB patients, was 2.7% and 0.9%, respectively. Factors associated with anti‐HDV seropositivity were platelet counts (odds ratio OR/95% confidence intervals CI: 0.995/0.992–0.999; P = 0.006), HBV DNA levels (OR/CI: 0.81/0.70–0.94; P = 0.005), and hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) seropositivity (OR/CI: 0.22/0.05–0.95; P = 0.04). The only factor associated with HDV RNA positivity among anti‐HDV seropositive patients was age (OR/CI: 0.95/0.90–1.00; P = 0.03). The spontaneous clearance rate of serum anti‐HDV antibody was 3.0 per 100 person‐years with a median follow‐up period of 3.5 years (range 2–12 years), whereas the seroclearance rate of HDV RNA was 4.3 per 100 person‐years among anti‐HDV seropositive patients after a median follow‐up period of 6.0 years (range 2–11 years). A baseline anti‐HDV titer < 0.5 cut‐off index was the only factor predictive of anti‐HDV seroclearance (hazard ratio HR/CI: 30.11/3.73–242.85; P = 0.001).
Conclusions
HDV infection was not common among patients treated for HBV in Taiwan. Seroclearance of anti‐HDV and HDV RNA did occur over time, albeit the chance is rare.
The outcome of HBV infection, including the dynamics of HBsAg and HBV virological reactivation, among patients coinfected with HCV receiving direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) remains unclear. Thus, we ...aimed to analyze HBV-related outcomes in these patients.
Serial HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were measured in 79 HBV/HCV-coinfected patients receiving DAAs (13 receiving anti-HBV nucleot(s)ide analog NUC therapy simultaneously). The endpoints included HBsAg dynamics and seroclearance, HBV reactivation (HBV DNA >1 log increase or >100 IU/ml if undetectable at baseline) and HBV-related clinical reactivation.
HBsAg levels declined from a median of 73.3 IU/ml at baseline to 16.2 IU/ml at the end-of-DAA treatment and increased to 94.1 IU/ml at 12 months post-treatment. During a mean 11.1-months of follow-up, 8 (10.1%) patients experienced HBsAg seroclearance and 30 (38.0%) HBV reactivation (12-month cumulative incidence, 10.3% and 40.4%, respectively). Patients with pre-treatment HBsAg ≤10 IU/ml had a significantly higher rate of HBsAg seroclearance (hazard ratio HR 8.52; 95% CI 1.048–69.312) and lower risk of HBV reactivation than those with pre-treatment HBsAg >10 IU/ml (HR 2.88; 95% CI 1.057–7.844) in multivariate analyses. Six patients (4 cirrhotics) not receiving NUC therapy experienced HBV-related clinical reactivation; 3 of the 4 cirrhotics developed liver failure and 2 died despite immediate NUC therapy. Compared to untreated HBV-monoinfected patients, HBV/HCV-coinfected patients without NUC prophylaxis had a similar rate of HBsAg seroclearance, but a significantly higher risk of HBV reactivation following DAA therapy (HR 6.59; 95% CI 2.488–17.432).
DAA-treated HBV/HCV-coinfected patients had significantly higher rates of HBV seroclearance, particularly among those with low pre-treatment HBsAg titer, but were at higher risk of HBV reactivation, particularly among those with higher pre-treatment HBsAg titer. Prophylactic anti-HBV therapy is essential for cirrhotic patients, irrespective of baseline HBV DNA levels.
We studied outcomes relating to hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients coinfected with both hepatitis B and C. Patients receiving direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C were more likely to experience seroclearance (or functional cure of HBV), but were also more likely to experience HBV reactivation, which can lead to hepatitis, liver failure and death. In coinfected cirrhotic patients being treated for HCV, prophylactic treatment for HBV is mandatory.
Display omitted
•HBsAg levels decline during DAA therapy and rebound post-DAA therapy in HBV/HCV coinfected patients.•HBsAg loss can occur in HBV/HCV coinfected patients on DAA therapy at a frequency seen in HBV monoinfection.•HBV/HCV-coinfected patients are at risk of HBV reactivation after DAA, especially in those with higher HBsAg levels.•HBV/HCV coinfected cirrhotic patients on DAAs should undergo HBV prophylaxis to reduce risk of hepatic failure and death.•Quantitative HBsAg measurement could guide decision-making in HBV/HCV coinfected patients on DAA therapy.
Uraemic patients undergoing haemodialysis are at high risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We aimed to evaluate the evolutionary seroprevalence of viral hepatitis ...and the gap in HCV care cascades in this special population by a large‐scale surveillance study in Taiwan. Uraemic patients on maintenance haemodialysis from 22 sites (FORMOSA‐LIKE group) in 2012 (n = 1,680) and 2019 (n = 2,326) were recruited for this study. The distributions and sequential changes of viral hepatitis markers were analysed. The prevalence of anti‐HCV antibody and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity was 13.6% (316/2326) and 11.5% (267/2326), respectively, in 2019 compared with 17.3% (290/1680, P = .002) and 13.6% (229/1680, P = .046), respectively, in 2012. The HCV‐viremic rate among anti‐HCV‐seropositive patients was significantly lower in 2019 than in 2012 (56.3% 178/316 vs. 73.8% 214/290, P < .001). The HCV treatment rate increased from 2.3% (5/217) in 2012 to 21.7% (49/226) in 2019 (P < .001). In the sequential analysis of the 490 patients who participated in both screens, 17 of the 55 HCV‐viremic patients became HCV RNA seronegative, including 13 by antivirals and four spontaneously. By contrast, one anti‐HCV‐seropositive but nonviremic patient became viremic, and six anti‐HCV‐seronegative patients became anti‐HCV‐seropositive in 2019. The annual incidence of new HCV was 0.2%/year. Seven HBsAg‐seropositive patients experienced HBsAg loss (1.25%/year). Two patients had new anti‐HBc seropositivity (new HBV exposure: 0.57%/year). The seroprevalence of viral hepatitis decreased in an 8‐year follow‐up but remained prevalent, and the treatment of HCV infection was underutilized in uraemic patients. Additional efforts are needed to enhance the HCV treatment uptake of uraemic patients.
Clinical Trial IDs: NCT03803410, NCT01766895.
Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the natural course of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Its role in patients treated with ...nucleotide/nucleoside analogues (NAs) is unclear. We aimed to study the role of hepatitis D in the development of HCC in CHB patients treated with NAs. Altogether, 1349 CHB patients treated with NAs were tested for anti-HDV antibody and RNA. The incidence and risk factors of HCC development were analyzed. Rates of anti-HDV and HDV RNA positivity were 2.3% and 1.0%, respectively. The annual incidence of HCC was 1.4 per 100 person-years after a follow-up period of over 5409.5 person-years. The strongest factor association with HCC development was liver cirrhosis (hazard ratio HR/95% confidence interval CI 9.98/5.11-19.46, P < 0.001), followed by HDV RNA positivity (HR/ CI 5.73/1.35-24.29, P = 0.02), age > 50 years old (HR/CI 3.64/2.03-6.54, P < 0.001), male gender (HR/CI 2.69/1.29-5.60, P: 0.01), and body mass index (BMI, HR/CI 1.11/1.03-1.18, P = 0.004). The 5-year cumulative incidence of HCC was 7.3% for patients with HDV RNA negativity compared to that of 22.2% for patients with HDV RNA positivity (P = 0.01). In the subgroup of cirrhotic patients, the factors associated with HCC development were HDV RNA positivity (HR/CI 4.45/1.04-19.09, P = 0.04) and BMI (HR/CI 1.11/1.03-1.19, P = 0.01). HDV viremia played a crucial role in HCC development in CHB patients who underwent NA therapy.
Background and Aim
Ribavirin (RBV) remains crucial in difficult‐to‐cure chronic hepatitis C patients receiving directly acting antivirals (DAAs). The current study aimed to address whether RBV ...enhanced early viral kinetics in patients with DAAs.
Methods
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype‐1b patients were allocated to daclatasvir/asunaprevir +weight‐based RBV (1000–1200 mg/day) for 12–24 weeks. HCV RNA levels were compared at day 1, week 1, week 2, and week 4 of treatment.
Results
The sustained virological response rate was 100% (67/67) and 96.7% (59/61) in the RBV and non‐RBV group, respectively. The HCV RNA levels at treatment week 2 (W2) were significantly lower in the RBV group than in the non‐RBV group (0.42 ± 0.81 log IU/mL vs 0.79 ± 1.03 log IU/mL, P = 0.04). Among the intermediate responders who remained to have detectable RNA after W1 of treatment, patients with RBV had a significantly higher rate of undetectable HCV RNA (71.4% vs 36.0%, P = 0.003) and lower HCV RNA level at W2 (0.55 ± 0.89 log IU/mL vs 1.32 ± 1.04 log IU/mL, P = 0.001). A more significant magnitude of HCV RNA reduction was also noted from baseline to day 1 (3.15 ± 0.38 log IU/mL vs 2.80 ± 0.70 log IU/mL, P = 0.009) and W1 to W2 (1.40 ± 0.65 log IU/mL vs 0.88 ± 0.78 log IU/mL, P = 0.007) in the RBV group compared to the non‐RBV group among the intermediate responders. Logistic regression analysis revealed that adding RBV independently predicted undetectable HCV RNA at W2 (odds ratio/confidence interval: 4.74/1.54–14.57, P = 0.007) in the intermediate responders.
Conclusions
Adding RBV to DAAs improved early viral kinetic, in particular, for intermediate responders.
PDF
