Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome is a distinct childhood cancer predisposition syndrome that results from biallelic germline mutations in one of the four MMR genes, MLH1, ...MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2. The tumour spectrum is very broad, including mainly haematological, brain and intestinal tract tumours. Patients show a variety of non-malignant features that are indicative of CMMRD. However, currently no criteria that should entail diagnostic evaluation of CMMRD exist. We present a three-point scoring system for the suspected diagnosis CMMRD in a paediatric/young adult cancer patient. Tumours highly specific for CMMRD syndrome are assigned three points, malignancies overrepresented in CMMRD two points and all other malignancies one point. According to their specificity for CMMRD and their frequency in the general population, additional features are weighted with 1-2 points. They include multiple hyperpigmented and hypopigmented skin areas, brain malformations, pilomatricomas, a second childhood malignancy, a Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated tumour in a relative and parental consanguinity. According to the scoring system, CMMRD should be suspected in any cancer patient who reaches a minimum of three points by adding the points of the malignancy and the additional features. The diagnostic steps to confirm or refute the suspected diagnosis are outlined. We expect that application of the suggested strategy for CMMRD diagnosis will increase the number of patients being identified at the time when they develop their first tumour. This will allow adjustment of the treatment modalities, offering surveillance strategies for second malignancies and appropriate counselling of the entire family.
In Lynch-like syndrome, patients have tumors with microsatellite instability but no germline pathogenic variant in mismatch repair genes or somatic methylation of the MLH1 promoter. Identification of ...the mechanism that causes these tumors is crucial for guiding screening of the patients and their relatives. Double somatic hits are the usual explanation for these cases; however, we have previously reported a de novo mosaic pathogenic variant in a patient with Lynch-like syndrome. Using tumoral NGS analysis of a series of 16 patients with Lynch-like syndrome, we found six patients with double somatic hits, including one patient with mosaicism of a de novo pathogenic variant in MSH2. This variant was transmitted to the patient's offspring, which has significant implications for genetic counseling.
Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare, autosomal-dominantly inherited cancer predisposition caused in approximately 50% of cases by pathogenic germline variants in SMAD4 and BMPR1A. We aimed to ...gather detailed clinical and molecular genetic information on JPS disease expression to provide a basis for management guidelines and establish open access variant databases.
We performed a retrospective, questionnaire-based European multicenter survey on and established a cohort of SMAD4/BMPR1A pathogenic variant carriers from the medical literature.
We analyzed questionnaire-based data on 221 JPS patients (126 kindreds) from ten European centers and retrieved literature-based information on 473 patients. Compared with BMPR1A carriers, SMAD4 carriers displayed anemia twice as often (58% vs. 26%), and exclusively showed overlap symptoms with hemorrhagic telangiectasia (32%) and an increased prevalence (39% vs. 13%) of gastric juvenile polyps. Cancer, reported in 15% of JPS patients (median age 41 years), mainly occurred in the colorectum (overall: 62%, SMAD4: 58%, BMPR1A: 88%) and the stomach (overall: 21%; SMAD4: 27%, BMPR1A: 0%).
This comprehensive retrospective study on genotype-phenotype correlations in 694 JPS patients corroborates previous observations on JPS in general and SMAD4 carriers in particular, facilitates recommendations for clinical management, and provides the basis for open access variant SMAD4 and BMPR1A databases.
In 2017, we implemented
CTNNA1
germline analysis in probands suspected of having hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Here, we report the results from a retrospective series of 41 cases, including the ...identification of a new family with a
CTNNA1
mutation and the first prophylactic total gastrectomy in an asymptomatic carrier after a normal upper endoscopy. Diffuse gastric cancer foci with loss of catenin alpha-1 expression were seen in the resected tissue, suggesting that
CTNNA1
and
CDH1
germline mutations behave in a similar manner. Life-changing prophylactic total gastrectomy should therefore also be considered in
CTNNA1
mutation carriers.
Polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis is a dominantly inherited colorectal cancer syndrome caused by exonuclease domain missense variants in the DNA polymerases POLE and POLD1. Manifestations ...may also include malignancies at extracolonic sites. Cancer risks in this syndrome are not yet accurately quantified.
We sequenced POLE and POLD1 exonuclease domains in 354 individuals with early/familial colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomatous polyposis. We assessed the pathogenicity of POLE variants with yeast fluctuation assays and structural modeling. We estimated the penetrance function for each cancer site in variant carriers with a previously published nonparametric method based on survival analysis approach, able to manage unknown genotypes.
Pathogenic POLE exonuclease domain variants P286L, M294R, P324L, N363K, D368N, L424V, K425R, and P436S were found in ten families. The estimated cumulative risk of CRC at 30, 50, and 70 years was 11.1% (95% confidence interval CI: 4.2-17.5), 48.5% (33.2-60.3), and 74% (51.6-86.1). Cumulative risk of glioblastoma was 18.7% (3.2-25.8) at 70 years. Variants interfering with DNA binding (P286L and N363K) had a significantly higher mutagenic effect than variants disrupting ion metal coordination at the exonuclease site.
The risk estimates derived from this study provide a rational basis on which to provide genetic counseling to POLE variant carriers.
Multigene panel testing for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition diagnosis is a useful tool as it makes possible to sequence a considerable number of genes in a large number of individuals. More ...than 200 different multigene panels in which the two major BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer predisposing genes are included are proposed by public or commercial laboratories. We review the clinical validity and clinical utility of the 26 genes most oftenly included in these panels. Because clinical validity and utility are not established for all genes and due to the heterogeneity of tumour risk levels, there is a substantial difficulty in the routine use of multigene panels if management guidelines and recommendations for testing relatives are not previously defined for each gene. Besides, the classification of variant of unknown significance (VUS) is a particular limitation and challenge. Efforts to classify VUSs and also to identify factors that modify cancer risks are now needed to produce personalised risk estimates. The complexity of information, the capacity to come back to patients when VUS are re-classified as pathogenic, and the expected large increase in the number of individuals to be tested especially when the aim of multigene panel testing is not only prevention but also treatment are challenging both for physicians and patients. Quality of tests, interpretation of results, information and accompaniment of patients must be at the heart of the guidelines of multigene panel testing.
•Multigene panel allows to sequence a high number of genes in numerous individuals.•Management and relative testing guidelines need to be defined for each gene.•Variant classification is a challenge amplified by NGS.•Quality of tests, information and accompaniment of patients are testing guidelines.•Tumour DNA is the native DNA of the patient!.
The germline predisposition associated with the autosomal dominant inheritance of the 14q32 duplication implicating ATG2B/GSKIP genes is characterized by a wide clinical spectrum of myeloid ...neoplasms. We analyzed 12 asymptomatic carriers and 52 patients aged 18-74 years from six families, by targeted sequencing of 41 genes commonly mutated in myeloid malignancies. We found that 75% of healthy carriers displayed early clonal hematopoiesis mainly driven by TET2 mutations. Molecular landscapes of patients revealed two distinct routes of clonal expansion and leukemogenesis. The first route is characterized by the clonal dominance of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN)-driver events associated with TET2 mutations in half of cases and mutations affecting splicing and/or the RAS pathway in one-third of cases, leading to the early development of MPN, mostly essential thrombocythemia, with a high risk of transformation (50% after 10 years). The second route is distinguished by the absence of MPN-driver mutations and leads to AML without prior MPN. These patients mostly harbored a genomic landscape specific to acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome. An unexpected result was the total absence of DNMT3A mutations in this cohort. Our results suggest that the germline duplication constitutively mimics hematopoiesis aging by favoring TET2 clonal hematopoiesis.
Some patients happen to have a colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability (MSI), but without any alteration in Mismatch Repair (MMR) system (germline mutation/promoter methylation). We aimed ...to identify the mechanism of inactivation of MMR genes in those cases. We studied 18 patients with MSI CCR and loss of expression of a MMR protein. DNA was extracted from tumoral and normal colonic material. We studied the 3 main MMR genes in tumors, by sequencing and large rearrangement analysis, and looked for mosaicism. Seven patients lost expression of
MLH1
, we found 1 mutation in the tumor for 3 patients and 2 mutations in one. Eight patients lost expression of
MSH2
: we found 1 mutation in 2 patients and 2 mutations in four. In the 5 cases with 2 hits, MSI was due to double somatic hits (n = 3), mosaicism (n = 1) and missed germline mutation (n = 1). Mosaicism was confirmed by HRM analysis, and by finding a germline mutation in one patient’s son. We could explain MSI in the tumors of 5 patients (27.8 %). Their follow up and family’s surveillance could be adjusted, as the sporadic cases don’t require intensive surveillance. We describe the first case of somatic mosaicism after de novo mutation in
MSH2
.
Breast cancers (BC) are rare in men and are often caused by constitutional predisposing factors. In women, mosaic BRCA1 promoter methylations (MBPM) are frequent events, detected in 4–8% of healthy ...subjects. This constitutional epimutation increases risk of early-onset and triple-negative BC. However, the role of MBPM in male BC predisposition has never been assessed. We screened 40 blood samples from men affected by BC, and performed extensive tumour analysis on MBPM-positive patients. We detected two patients carrying MBPM. Surprisingly, tumour analysis revealed that neither of these two male BCs were caused by the constitutional BRCA1 epimutations carried by the patients.
•Mosaic BRCA1 promoter methylations (MBPM) are frequent epimutations in women.•We report the first two male breast cancer patients carrying MBPM.•They presented invasive breast cancers expressing estrogen receptors.•Their breast cancers were not due to BRCA1: no homologous recombination deficiency.•Additional studies are necessary to use MBPM status to guide clinical decisions.
Breast cancer (BC) risk prediction models consider cancer family history (FH) and germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in risk genes. It remains elusive to what extent complementation with polygenic ...risk score (PRS) and non-genetic risk factor (NGRFs) data affects individual intensified breast surveillance (IBS) recommendations according to European guidelines.
For 425 cancer-free women with cancer FH (mean age 40·6 years, range 21–74), recruited in France, Germany and the Netherlands, germline PV status, NGRFs, and a 306 variant-based PRS (PRS306) were assessed to calculate estimated lifetime risks (eLTR) and estimated 10-year risks (e10YR) using CanRisk. The proportions of women changing country-specific European risk categories for IBS recommendations, i.e. ≥20 % and ≥30 % eLTR, or ≥5 % e10YR were determined.
Of the women with non-informative PV status, including PRS306 and NGRFs changed clinical recommendations for 31·0 %, (57/184, 20 % eLTR), 15·8 % (29/184, 30 % eLTR) and 22·4 % (41/183, 5 % e10YR), respectively whereas of the women tested negative for a PV observed in their family, clinical recommendations changed for 16·7 % (25/150), 1·3 % (2/150) and 9·5 % (14/147). No change was observed for 82 women with PVs in high-risk genes (BRCA1/2, PALB2). Combined consideration of eLTRs and e10YRs identified BRCA1/2 PV carriers benefitting from IBS <30 years, and women tested non-informative/negative for whom IBS may be postponed.
For women who tested non-informative/negative, PRS and NGRFs have a considerable impact on IBS recommendations. Combined consideration of eLTRs and e10YRs allows personalizing IBS starting age.
Horizon 2020, German Cancer Aid, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Köln Fortune.
•Breast cancer (BC) risk prediction considers cancer family history and germline pathogenic variants (PVs).•Polygenic risk score (PRS) and non-genetic risk factors (NGRFs) may affect intensified breast surveillance (IBS) recommendations.•For women without PVs, PRS and NGRFs considerably impact IBS recommendations.•Comprehensive risk calculation may personalize IBS starting ages.
PDF
