•Toxic effects of 300−1,500 mg min/m3 sulfur mustard (SM) vapor were characterized in rabbit corneas.•Recurrent edematous lesions (RELs) emerged in a stereotyped fashion over a 20 wk ...period.•Likelihood of REL emergence was strongly correlated to SM vapor dose.•However, REL pathophysiologies were similar regardless of SM vapor dose.•These data illustrate optimal SM vapor doses for future therapeutic and mechanistic studies.
Sulfur mustard (SM) is a lipid soluble alkylating agent that causes genotoxic injury. The eye is highly sensitive to SM toxicity and exposures exceeding 400 mg min/m3 can elicit irreversible corneal pathophysiologies. Development of medical countermeasures for ocular SM exposure has been hindered by a limited understanding of dose-dependent effects of SM on corneal injury. Here, clinical, histological and ultrastructural analyses were used to characterize the effects of SM dose on corneal injury progression. Corneas were evaluated for up to 20 wk following exposure to saturated SM vapor for 30−150 s, which corresponds to 300−1,500 mg min/m3. In acute studies, a ceiling effect on corneal edema developed at doses associated with full-thickness corneal lesions, implicating endothelial toxicity in corneal swelling. Recurrent edematous lesions (RELs) transiently emerged after 2 wk in a dose-dependent fashion, followed by the development of secondary corneal pathophysiologies such as neovascularization, stromal scarring and endothelial abnormalities. RELs appeared in 96 % of corneas exposed for ≥ 90 s, 52 % of corneas exposed for 60 s and 0 % of corneas exposed for 30 s. While REL latency was variable in corneas exposed for 60 s, REL emergence was synchronized at exposures ≥ 90 s. Corneas did not exhibit more than one REL, suggesting RELs are part of a programmed pathophysiological response to severe alkylating lesions. In post-mortem studies at 12 wk, corneal edema was positively correlated to severity of endothelial pathologies, consistent with previous findings that endothelial toxicity influences long-term outcomes. These results provide novel insight into long-term corneal pathophysiological responses to acute toxicity and identify exposure conditions suitable for therapeutic testing.
In a prospective, randomized trial involving patients with resected pancreatic cancer, adjuvant combination chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX resulted in a median disease-free survival of 21.6 months, as ...compared with 12.8 months with gemcitabine therapy. Overall survival was also longer with FOLFIRINOX.
Accurate assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is essential to improve our understanding of how cancer and chemotherapy influence patients' ...life and to adapt treatment strategies. Specific questionnaires have descriptive and predictive value and can be used to evaluate new therapies. Results from HRQoL assessments in randomised trials help patients and physicians to choose between treatment options. More than half of the patients treated with palliative chemotherapy have an improvement or at least a preservation of their HRQoL. However, several trials have found small differences in HRQoL between treatment groups. This may be due to the insufficient sensitivity of tools, low numbers of patients or missing data. An international consensus on the methods of measurement of HRQoL in oncology is warranted to enhance compliance, to better interpret results and to optimise the publication of precise HRQoL data.
Background The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the French version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) quality-of-life colorectal questionnaire ...(QLQ-CR38) and the functional assessment of cancer therapy-colorectal version 4 (FACT-C). Method This prospective study included 209 patients with colorectal cancer: 71 undergoing chemotherapy, 56 radiation, 15 surgery, and 67 survivors. Patients first completed in random order the FACT-C and the EORTC QLQ-CR38 and were asked if they had any preference for either questionnaire. The timing of administration of instruments differed according to patients' treatment to better assess psychometric properties. Results The FACT-C showed good acceptability, good reproducibility and excellent internal consistency. The QLQ-CR38 had lower internal consistency. Patients did not express a preference for one survey over another. Conclusion This study confirms the value of the FACT-C and suggests some limits of the QLQ-CR38 for patients with colorectal cancer.
In a recent randomized study, we demonstrated that XELOX (oxaliplatin + oral capecitabine) was well tolerated and not inferior in terms of efficacy to the infusional FOLFOX-6 regimen in first-line ...treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The objective of this additional analysis was to compare the cost of XELOX and FOLFOX-6.
This cost-minimisation study took into account costs related to drug acquisition, hospital care for chemotherapy administration and for serious adverse event management. Hospital care costs were based on French 'diagnosis-related group' tariffs. Drug acquisition costs were drawn from French official sources. Analysis was performed from the French health insurance perspective.
Baseline characteristics of the 282 patients included (143 XELOX, 139 FOLFOX-6) were well balanced. Patients reported less and shorter hospitalisations (day and overnight hospital care) with XELOX: 6.4 ± 2.2 hospitalisations versus 9.7 ± 3.1 (p < 0.001); 11.4 ± 10.6 days versus 17.7 ± 11.8 (p < 0.001). Mean disease management cost per patient was significantly lower with XELOX (EUR 12,918 ± 5,075 vs. EUR 17,229 ± 8,665, p < 0.001).
In the perspective of our analysis, taking into account hospitalisation and drug acquisition costs, the treatment of mCRC patients with XELOX in comparison to FOLFOX-6 significantly decreased the costs, as well as the mean overall hospitalisation length of stay.
After curative resection, the prognosis of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is poor. This phase III trial was designed to evaluate the benefit in overall survival (OS) of perioperative fluorouracil ...plus cisplatin in resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Overall, 224 patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), or stomach were randomly assigned to either perioperative chemotherapy and surgery (CS group; n = 113) or surgery alone (S group; n = 111). Chemotherapy consisted of two or three preoperative cycles of intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and a continuous intravenous infusion of fluorouracil (800 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 consecutive days (days 1 to 5) every 28 days and three or four postoperative cycles of the same regimen. The primary end point was OS.
Compared with the S group, the CS group had a better OS (5-year rate 38% v 24%; hazard ratio HR for death: 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.95; P = .02); and a better disease-free survival (5-year rate: 34% v 19%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; P = .003). In the multivariable analysis, the favorable prognostic factors for survival were perioperative chemotherapy (P = .01) and stomach tumor localization (P < .01). Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improved the curative resection rate (84% v 73%; P = .04). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 38% of CS patients (mainly neutropenia) but postoperative morbidity was similar in the two groups.
In patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus, GEJ, or stomach, perioperative chemotherapy using fluorouracil plus cisplatin significantly increased the curative resection rate, disease-free survival, and OS.
This dose escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses (RDs) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with concomitant ...radiotherapy in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. Patients received three courses of LV5FU2 regimen (folinic acid 200 mg m(-2), bolus 5FU 300-400 mg/m(2), continuous infusion 5FU 400-600 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 2) and escalating doses of oxaliplatin 50 to 100 mg m(-2) on day 1 (FOLFOX). This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks, concomitant to a 50-gray radiotherapy per 5 weeks. Three more cycles were delivered after completion of radiation therapy. Three to six patients were allocated to each of the five dose levels until MTD was reached. Thirty-three patients were enroled and 21 had metastatic disease. Maximum tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2), and continuous infusion 5FU was 600 mg m(-2) day(-) (level 5). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, dysphagia and oesophagitis. The RDs were those of FOLFOX-4 regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2) and full doses of LV5FU2). The overall response was 48.5%, including 12% complete response. Response rate on primary tumour was 62.9%. This FOLFOX-4 regimen was reasonably well tolerated and effective in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal carcinoma and warrants additional investigation.
In this study, a four-drug combination chemotherapy regimen was associated with objective responses in more than 30% of patients and increased survival by more than 4 months, as compared with ...standard gemcitabine.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was the fourth leading cause of death from cancer in the United States in 2010,
1
and it carries a grim prognosis: the 5-year survival rate is 6% in Europe and the United States.
1
,
2
Gemcitabine became the reference regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer after a randomized trial showed significant improvement in the median overall survival as compared with fluorouracil administered as an intravenous bolus (5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P=0.002).
3
In the subsequent phase 3 trials of single-agent gemcitabine,
4
the median overall survival ranged from 5.0 to 7.2 months. The combination of gemcitabine with a variety of cytotoxic and . . .