Abstract Background Within HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer, PAM50 non-luminal tumors (HER2-enriched HER2-E and Basal-like) have higher expression of proliferation and immune-related genes and tumor ...infiltrating lymphocytes and might benefit from immunotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy, safety, and correlative analysis data of the TATEN trial, the first study designed to evaluate pembrolizumab and paclitaxel in HR+/HER2-negative, PAM50 non-luminal, ABC. Methods TATEN trial (NCT04251169) is a single-arm, multicenter, phase II study evaluating pembrolizumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with HR+/HER2-, PAM50 non-luminal ABC. Key inclusion criteria include progression to prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), presence of measurable disease, no prior chemotherapy for ABC, ECOG 0-1, and non-luminal metastatic disease by PAM50. Included patients received pembrolizumab at 200 mg every 3 weeks (beginning at cycle 1) in combination with weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 beginning at cycle 2. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST V1.1. in patients who received at least one dose of combination treatment and had a first, post-baseline tumor assessment (evaluable population). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), safety, and predictive biomarkers. The study was based on a Simon two-stage design. Stage I of the trial would be considered successful if at least 6 of 15 patients achieved a partial response and/or complete response. In that case, the trial would recruit up to 46 evaluable patients for a target ORR ≥ 41%. Metastatic biopsies from patients enrolled in pre-screening were also evaluated for tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and were further analyzed with an expression panel of 192 genes, including PDL1 and PD1. Results From July 2020 to December 2021, 132 tumors were screened, and 27 PAM50 non-luminal tumors were identified (20%). Non-luminal tumors trended to have higher PDL1 expression (p=0.090) and TILs (p=0.084) compared to luminal tumors, while no difference was observed for PD1 (p=0.850). Of 20 recruited patients in the study (stage I+II), 18 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Baseline characteristics were as follows: median age 55 years, ECOG 0 55%, de novo MBC 22%, and visceral disease 72.2%. Eleven patients had received paclitaxel treatment in the adjuvant setting. Regarding PAM50 subtype, 2 patients had basal-like and 16 HER2-E tumors. At the time of data cut-off (June 2023), 13 patients (72.2%) had stopped their treatment because of progressive disease and 3 (16.6%) due to toxicity. Two patients (11.1%) were still on treatment. The ORR was 61.1 % (11 of 18, 95% CI 35.7-82.7). CBR was 88.9% (16 of 18, 95% CI 65.3-98.6), and median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 7.3 – 14.1). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade (G) occurred in 19 patients (95%), while 45% of patients experienced G3 TRAEs. No G4 or G5 TRAEs were reported in the evaluable population. Gene expression analysis was successful for all recruited patients (n=20). High expression of the PAM50 luminal A signature (p=0.049), and the luminal genes PGR (p=0.028) and RRAGA (p=0.038) were associated with worse PFS (univariate analyses). The pan-leucocyte receptor CD84 (p=0.028) was associated with better PFS (univariate analysis). Conclusions Pembrolizumab in combination with paclitaxel is safe and exhibits promising efficacy outcomes in patients with CDK4/6i resistant HR+/HER2- ABC with a PAM50 non-luminal subtype. Although meeting the criteria for stage II, the enrollment was stopped prematurely due to the lack of funding and pembrolizumab supply. More correlative analyses will be presented at the conference. This study was funded in part by MSD. Citation Format: Aleix Prat, Benedetta Conte, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Nuria Chic, Montserrat Muñoz, Cristina Hernando, Manuel Alva, Silvia Vazquez, Salvador Blanch, Mafalda Oliveira, Esther Fernández, Oleguer Castillo, Patricia Galván, Ángela Aguirre, Esther Sanfeliu, Lorea Villanueva, Tomás Pascual, Eva Ciruelos. Solti-1716 TATEN phase II trial: Targeting non-Luminal disease by PAM50 with pembrolizumab and paclitaxel in Hormone Receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-02.
Abstract only
e12507
Background: T-DM1 is widely used in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts), often for many cycles until progression. However, little is known about its long ...term toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of T-DM1 when delivered for ≥12 cycles. Methods: HER2 positive MBC pts who had received ≥12 cycles of T-DM1 across 18 Italian cancer centers were enrolled from January 2017 to September 2018. The 12 cycles cut-off was chosen based on the EMILIA trial median PFS (9.6 months), to identify a patient population treated with T-DM1 for longer time. Tumor and clinical characteristics were collected. Standard haematological tests, blood chemistries and side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, asthenia) were recorded cycle by cycle, according CTCAE criteria version 4. Haematological and laboratory toxicities were available for 86 patients, while other toxicities for all 115 patients. Results: Overall, 115 pts were enrolled. Median age was 54.5 (range 29.6–81.9); median time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to first T-DM1 cycle was 32.5 months. T-DM1 was administered as 2nd line and 3rd line of treatment in 45.2% and 27.8% of pts, respectively. Median number of cycles was 18 (range 12-59). Complete response, partial response and stable disease rates were 11.4%, 43% and 45.6%, respectively. Treatment related side effects are shown in table 1. Interestingly, no increased liver toxicity was observed in pts with liver metastases. Analysis of mean CTCAE grade by cycle showed that no relevant incremental toxicity was observed during long term T-DM1 therapy. Conclusions: T-DM1 is safe and well tolerated in these long responding pts. We found no relevant cumulative toxicity. Patients should be treated with T-DM1 as long as their tumor responds, as no safety issues are related to its long term use. Table: see text
Abstract
Introduction: The TNBC-DX risk score includes the 14-gene immunoglobulin (IGG) immune signature, tumor size, and nodal status and has shown prognostic value for survival in early-stage TNBC ...(B. Conte et al., ESMO Breast 2021). However, currently unknown are the value of the TNBC-DX risk score and IGG immune signature in 1) predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy, and 2) predicting outcomes the context of neoadjuvant anti-PD1 treatment. Here, we assessed the IGG signature and the TNBC-DX risk score in patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NeoPACT; NCT03639948) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy without immunotherapy (NeoSTOP; NCT02413320). Methods: NeoPACT trial enrolled 120 patients with stage I-III TNBC who received carboplatin (AUC 6) + docetaxel (75 mg/m2) + pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 21 days x 6 cycles. NeoSTOP randomized 100 patients with stage I-III TNBC to two chemotherapy regimens; Arm B of NeoSTOP was included in this correlative study as the chemotherapy regimen was identical to NeoPACT. RNA isolated from pretreatment tumor tissue was subjected to next-generation sequencing. The 14-gene IGG immune signature and TNBC-DX risk score were calculated in silico as previously described. Evaluation of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) was performed as previously described. Markers were tested for prediction of pCR. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the effect of multiple variables. Event-free survival (EFS) curves were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and groups compared by the log-rank test, followed by Cox regression analysis. Results: In this analysis, 112 patients were treated with chemoimmunotherapy on NeoPACT (node-positive = 38%, pCR rate = 58%). In the NeoPACT trial, the 14-gene IGG signature (as a continuous variable) was significantly associated with improved pCR (odds ratio OR=1.105, 95% CI 1.019-1.197, P=0.015 for every 0.2 increment). The pCR rates in IGG-high (≥ median) and IGG-low (< median) groups were 71% and 44%, respectively (OR=3.152, 95% CI 1.420-6.996, P=0.005). In terms of EFS, the 14-gene IGG signature was not prognostic (hazard ratio HR=0.507, 95% CI 0.148-1.735, p=0.269). In contrast, TNBC-DX risk score was strongly associated with EFS (HR=5.684, 95% CI 1.226-26.356, P=0.012), even when adjusted for sTILs and pCR status (HR=8.415, 95% CI 1.054-67.169, P=0.044). Estimated 3-year EFS rates in TNBC-DX high and low risk groups (above and below median) were 77% and 89%, respectively (P=0.012). In 43 NeoSTOP patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy only (node-positive = 33%, pCR rate = 53%), no association of IGG signature with pCR or TNBC-DX score with EFS was observed. Finally, we observed a moderate correlation between IGG signature and sTILs in both trial datasets combined (r=0.642, P< 0.001). Conclusions: High expression of the 14-gene IGG immune signature in baseline pretreatment tumor samples in early-stage TNBC is significantly associated with pCR following pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The combination of this signature with tumor burden as assessed by TNBC-DX is prognostic for long-term outcomes. Availability of biomarkers that can predict both pathological response and survival with chemoimmunotherapy can optimize this therapy, and evaluation of this biomarker in larger studies is warranted.
Citation Format: Priyanka Sharma, Shane R. Stecklein, Rachel Yoder, Joshua M. Staley, Roberto Salgado, Laia Paré, Benedetta Conte, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Anne O’Dea, Lauren Nye, Manana Elia, Deepti Satelli, Gregory Crane, Richard McKittrick, Qamar Khan, Andrew K. Godwin, Aleix Prat. PD11-07 Association of TNBC-DX scores with outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy: a correlative analysis from NeoPACT and NeoSTOP trials abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-07.
Abstract HER2DX genomic assay in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients treated with 12-weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a correlative analysis from WSG-ADAPT-TN phase II trial Background: ...Biomarkers for de-escalation and escalation of systemic therapy in early-stage TNBC are needed. HER2DX is a standardized prognostic (risk-score) and predictive (pathological complete response pCR-score) assay based on clinical and gene expression-based data. Here we aimed to test the value of HER2DX assay in early TNBC. Methods: Standardized HER2DX was evaluated centrally using RNA from baseline FFPE tumor biopsies from the WSG-ADAPT-TN study (NCT01815242), a multicenter phase II trial that randomized 336 patients with stage I–III early TNBC to 12-weeks of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1,8 every 3 weeks (arm A) versus nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC2 day 1,8 every 3 weeks (arm B). The primary aim was to test the ability of HER2DX pCR and risk-score models to predict pCR (ypT0/isN0) and survival endpoints, respectively, such as invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were to assess the association of the i) HER2DX immune signature score and ii) percentage (%) of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) with efficacy endpoints. Uni- and multi-variable logistic regression and Cox models tested the association of each variable with each endpoint. Results: HER2DX was evaluated in 126 (37.5%) baseline pre-treatment tumors. Mean age was 52.1 (range 26-76). cT1 represented 40.5% of cases and 72.2% were cN0. Overall, pCR rate was 34.1% (95%CI 26.1 – 43.2) and median follow-up was 5.0 years. Median sTILs at baseline was 31.6% (range 0-90) and moderately correlated with the IGG signature (coefficient=0.57). The % of HER2DX high-, medium- and low-pCR groups was 41.3%, 47.6% and 11.1%, respectively. HER2DX pCR score (as a continuous variable) was significantly associated with pCR in univariate (odds ratio OR per 10-unit increase=1.31, 1.06-1.64, p=0.016) and after adjusting by treatment arm (OR=1.31, 1.06-1.65, p=0.015). Overall, the pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high, -medium and -low groups were 46.2%, 26.7% and 21.4%, respectively (high vs medium/low OR=2.48, 1.17-5.34, p=0.018). In arm B (n=51), the pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high, -medium and -low groups were 47.8%, 25.0% and 0.0% respectively (high vs medium/low OR=3.36, 1.02-12.0, p=0.051). In terms of the risk-score, the % of HER2DX low-risk and high-risk groups was 60.3% and 39.7%, respectively. HER2DX risk score as a continuous variable was significantly associated with iDFS, DDFS and OS (p< 0.001 in all univariate analysis), and after adjusting by variables such as arm and pCR status (all p< 0.05). sTILs were not associated with any survival endpoint (all p >0.35). The HER2DX immune signature was significantly associated with iDFS (p=0.012), DDFS (p=0.022) and OS (p=0.012). Conclusion: The HER2DX genomic test in TNBC provides valuable insights into the response and survival following neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in the absence of immunotherapy. The development of a tailored genomic assay for TNBC is currently in progress. Citation Format: Oleg Gluz, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Ulrike Nitz, Laia Paré, Matthias Christgen, Guillermo Villacampa, Benedetta Conte, Sherko Kuemmel, Ronald Kates, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke, Eva-Maria Grischke, Helmut Forstbauer, Michael Braun, Mathias Warm, John Hackmann, Christoph Uleer, Bahriye Aktas, Claudia Schumacher, Ana Vivancos, Rachel Wuerstlein, Joel S. Parker, Monika Graeser, Charles M. Perou, Christine zu Eulenburg, Patricia Villagrasa, Hans-Heinrich Kreipe, Aleix Prat, Nadia Harbeck. HER2DX genomic assay in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients treated with 12-weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a correlative analysis from WSG-ADAPT-TN phase II trial abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-15-07.
Background: Early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displays clinical and biological diversity. From a biological standpoint, immune infiltration plays a crucial role in TNBC prognosis. ...Currently, there is a lack of genomic tools aiding in treatment decisions for TNBC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a B-cell/immunoglobulin signature (IGG) alone, or in combination with tumor burden, in predicting prognosis and treatment response in patients with TNBC. Methods: Genomic and clinical data were retrieved from 7 cohorts: SCAN-B (N = 874), BrighTNess (n = 482), CALGB-40603 (n = 389), METABRIC (n = 267), TCGA (n = 118), GSE58812 (n = 107), GSE21653 (n = 67). IGG and a risk score integrating IGG with tumor/nodal staging (IGG-Clin) were assessed for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in each cohort. Random effects model was used to derive pooled effect sizes. Association of IGG with pathological complete response (pCR) was assessed in CALGB-40603 and BrighTNess. Immune significance of IGG was estimated through CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper. Findings: IGG was associated with improved EFS (pooled HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.70–0.85, I2 = 18%) and OS (pooled HR = 0.79, 0.73–0.85, I2 = 0%) across cohorts, and was predictive of pCR in CALGB-40603 (OR 1.25, 1.10–1.50) and BrighTNess (OR 1.57 1.25–1.98). IGG-Clin was predictive of recurrence (pooled HR = 2.11, 1.75–2.55, I2 = 0%) and death (pooled HR = 1.99, 95% 0.84–4.73, I2 = 79%) across cohorts. IGG was associated with adaptive immune response at CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper analysis. Interpretation: IGG is linked to improved prognosis and pCR in early-stage TNBC. The integration of IGG alongside tumor and nodal staging holds promise as an approach to identify patients benefitting from intensified or de-intensified treatments. Funding: This study received funding from: Associació Beca Marta Santamaria, European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation and Marie Skłodowska–Curie Actions programs, Fundación FERO, Fundación CRIS contra el cáncer, Agència de Gestó d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fundación Contigo, Asociación Cáncer de Mama Metastásico IV, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, RESCUER, Fundación científica AECC and FSEOM.
Early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displays clinical and biological diversity. From a biological standpoint, immune infiltration plays a crucial role in TNBC prognosis. Currently, there ...is a lack of genomic tools aiding in treatment decisions for TNBC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a B-cell/immunoglobulin signature (IGG) alone, or in combination with tumor burden, in predicting prognosis and treatment response in patients with TNBC.
Genomic and clinical data were retrieved from 7 cohorts: SCAN-B (N = 874), BrighTNess (n = 482), CALGB-40603 (n = 389), METABRIC (n = 267), TCGA (n = 118), GSE58812 (n = 107), GSE21653 (n = 67). IGG and a risk score integrating IGG with tumor/nodal staging (IGG-Clin) were assessed for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in each cohort. Random effects model was used to derive pooled effect sizes. Association of IGG with pathological complete response (pCR) was assessed in CALGB-40603 and BrighTNess. Immune significance of IGG was estimated through CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper.
IGG was associated with improved EFS (pooled HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.70–0.85, I2 = 18%) and OS (pooled HR = 0.79, 0.73–0.85, I2 = 0%) across cohorts, and was predictive of pCR in CALGB-40603 (OR 1.25, 1.10–1.50) and BrighTNess (OR 1.57 1.25–1.98). IGG-Clin was predictive of recurrence (pooled HR = 2.11, 1.75–2.55, I2 = 0%) and death (pooled HR = 1.99, 95% 0.84–4.73, I2 = 79%) across cohorts. IGG was associated with adaptive immune response at CIBERSORTx and EcoTyper analysis.
IGG is linked to improved prognosis and pCR in early-stage TNBC. The integration of IGG alongside tumor and nodal staging holds promise as an approach to identify patients benefitting from intensified or de-intensified treatments.
This study received funding from: Associació Beca Marta Santamaria, European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation and Marie Skłodowska–Curie Actions programs, Fundación FERO, Fundación CRIS contra el cáncer, Agència de Gestó d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fundación Contigo, Asociación Cáncer de Mama Metastásico IV, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, RESCUER, Fundación científica AECC and FSEOM.
Breast cancer is still the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women aged ≤40 years and the primary cause of death in this age group. The management of these patients needs a dedicated approach ...involving a multidisciplinary team that takes into account their treatment and survivorship issues. The present review aims to provide a perspective on the many challenges associated with treatment of young women with early breast cancer. We will focus on the standard (neo)adjuvant treatment, highlighting the paucity of age-specific results about the available genomic signatures, the groundbreaking landscape of adjuvant endocrine therapy and the relevant issue of the fertility preservation.
Abstract Background: The long-term results of the Italian randomized phase III GIM2 study showed that, in women with node-positive breast cancer (BC), dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy significantly ...improved both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with standard-interval (SI) chemotherapy. Obesity has been identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with BC, with a potential negative impact on the efficacy and toxicity of systemic therapies. Nevertheless, the specific influence of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules (DD or SI) remains a subject of debate. This analysis aimed to investigate this hypothesis in patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial. Methods: GIM2 was a randomized multicentric phase III trial that compared different chemotherapy schedule (DD vs SI) and regimen (FEC-P vs EC-P) in 2091 node-positive early breast cancer patients. BMI (kg/m2) was categorized as follows: < 18.5 (underweight), 18.5 to < 25 (lean), 25 to < 30 (overweight), and ≥ 30 (obese). The primary endpoint was to assess association between BMI and DFS and OS. Survival estimates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for relevant prognostic factors, were used. Results: A total of 1925 patients were included in the present analysis, of whom 31.6% (n=632) were overweight and 19.3% (n=386) obese. Median age was 52 years. Overweight-obesity condition was significantly associated with postmenopausal status, greater representation of T2-T4 tumors with N > 2 in both patients in the DD and SI arm. After a median follow-up of 15.0 years (IQR 8.4-16.3), compared to patients with normal BMI, those who were overweight or obese at diagnosis had a higher risk of experiencing a DFS event (Hazard Ratio HR 1.11 95% CI 0.94-1.31 and HR 1.37 95%CI 1.14-1.65, respectively, p=0.003) and OS event (HR 1.11 95% CI 0.89-1.38 and HR 1.59 95%CI 1.26-2.01, respectively, p=0.0003). No significant interaction was found between BMI and treatment schedule in terms of DFS (p for interaction=0.56) nor OS (p for interaction=0.19). At the multivariate analysis, in the DD arm, adjusted HR (aHR) for DFS and for OS were 1.01 (95% CI 0.75- 1.35) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.72-1.52) for obese vs. normal BMI groups, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.68- 1.15) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.54-1.10) for overweight vs. normal BMI groups, respectively. In the SI arm, aHRs for DFS and OS were 1.24 (95% CI 0.94- 1.63) and 1.35 (95%CI 0.96- 1.90) for obese vs. normal BMI groups, and 1.04 (95%CI 0.82- 1.33) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.74-1.40) for overweight vs. normal BMI groups, respectively. Similar results were observed when considering hormone receptor-positive and negative BC separately. Conclusion: In the GIM2 trial, BMI was prognostic but not predictive of different benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. In high-risk patients, DD schedule should be considered the preferred schedule irrespective of BMI. Citation Format: Francesca Poggio, Eva Blondeaux, Marco Tagliamento, Marta Perachino, Simone Nardin, Benedetta Conte, Sabino De Placido, Mario Giuliano, Valeria Forestieri, Michelino De Laurentiis, Adriano Gravina, Giancarlo Bisagni, Anita Rimanti, Anna Turletti, Cecilia Nisticò, Angela Vaccaro, Francesco Cognetti, Alessandra Fabi, Simona Gasparro, Ornella Garrone, Ylenia Urracci, Maria Grazia Alicicco, Mauro Mansutti, Paola Poletti, Pierpaolo Correale, Claudia Bighin, Fabio Puglisi, Filippo Montemurro, Giuseppe Colantuoni, Luca Boni, Matteo Lambertini, Lucia Del Mastro. Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules in patients with breast cancer: analysis from the randomized phase III GIM2 trial abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-02.
PDF
