Background
Unintentional injury is the leading cause of death in pediatric patients. Despite a heavy burden of pediatric trauma, prehospital transport and triage of pediatric trauma patients are not ...standardized. Prehospital providers report anxiety and a lack of confidence in transport, triage, and care of pediatric trauma patients.
Materials and Methods
Prehospital transport providers with 3 organizations across southeast Georgia and northeast Florida were contacted via email (n = 146) and asked to complete 2 Web-based surveys to evaluate their comfort level with performing tasks in the transport of pediatric and adult trauma patients. Bivariate statistics and qualitative thematic analyses were performed to assess comfort with pediatric trauma transports.
Results
Survey 1 (N = 35) showed that mean comfort levels of prehospital providers were significantly lower for pediatric patients than adult trauma patients in 7 out of 9 tasks queried, including airway management and interpreting children’s physiology. The following themes emerged from survey 2 (N = 14) responses: additional clinical knowledge resources would be beneficial when caring for pediatric trauma patients, pediatric medication administration is a source of uncertainty, prehospital transport teams would benefit from additional pediatric trauma training, infrequent transport of pediatric trauma patients affects provider comfort level, and pediatric trauma generates higher levels of anxiety among providers.
Discussion
Prehospital transport of pediatric trauma patients is infrequent and a source of anxiety for prehospital providers. Rigs should be equipped with a reference tool addressing crucial tasks and deficiencies in training.
While motorcycle helmets reduce mortality and morbidity, no guidelines specify which is safest. We sought to determine if full-face helmets reduce injury and death.
We searched for studies without ...exclusion based on: age, language, date, or randomization. Case reports, professional riders, and studies without original data were excluded. Pooled results were reported as OR (95% CI). Risk of bias and certainty was assessed. (PROSPERO #CRD42021226929).
Of 4431 studies identified, 3074 were duplicates, leaving 1357 that were screened. Eighty-one full texts were assessed for eligibility, with 37 studies (n = 37,233) eventually included. Full-face helmets reduced traumatic brain injury (OR 0.40 0.23–0.70); injury severity for the head and neck (Abbreviated Injury Scale AIS mean difference −0.64 -1.10 to −0.18) and face (AIS mean difference −0.49 -0.71 to −0.27); and facial fracture (OR 0.26 0.15–0.46).
Full-face motorcycle helmets are conditionally recommended to reduce traumatic brain injury, facial fractures, and injury severity.
Display omitted
•Full-face helmets significantly reduce traumatic brain injury.•Full-face helmets significantly reduce facial fracture.•Full-face helmets reduce severity of head, neck, and facial injury.
Each year, thousands of surgeons and other trauma health care providers participate in the American College of Surgeon's Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program, which historically has allowed ...trainees to practice cricothyroidotomy, chest tube insertion, pericardiocentesis, venous cutdown, and diagnostic peritoneal lavage on live dogs, pigs, sheep, and goats. However, more than 99% of ATLS programs in the United States and Canada have now ended animal use, driven primarily by simulation technology advancements.
This review details an international survey of animal versus simulation use in ATLS programs and summarizes the surgical training impact of a novel collaboration between the industry manufacturer of the TraumaMan human simulator, Simulab Corporation (Seattle, Washington), and an animal protection nongovernmental organization (NGO) based in Norfolk, Virginia, to replace animal use in ATLS programs with human simulators.
From 2012 through 2017, the NGO e-mailed formal surveys concerning program statistics and animal use practices to ATLS officials in various countries (N = 64). The survey response rate was 87.5% and included pre- and post-comparison surveys relative to the industry-NGO simulation collaboration.
Eighteen ATLS programs (32.1%) initially replied that they use nonanimal training methods, whereas 38 ATLS programs (67.8%) replied that they use animals for surgical skills training and cited financial constraints as the primary barrier to adopting human simulation methods. Through the industry-NGO collaboration, the NGO donated 119 TraumaMan models valued at nearly $3 million (USD) to ATLS programs in 22 countries, such that 75% of those ATLS programs surveyed by the NGO now use exclusively nonanimal simulation models.
The industry-NGO collaboration successfully transformed the surgical skills laboratories of 22 international ATLS programs to replace animal use with nonanimal simulation models that are more anatomically realistic, cost less, and allow trainees to repeat surgical skills until proficiency.
Abstract Background Outcomes in adults who undergo resuscitative thoracotomy are poor. Few studies have examined the procedure’s use in pediatric trauma. Methods The Illinois State Trauma Registry ...was queried for thoracotomy performed in the emergency department from 1999 to 2009, for patients aged 0 to 15. Injury mechanism, vital signs, and mortality were examined while controlling for injury severity. Results Resuscitative thoracotomy was infrequently performed in pediatric trauma (n = 25; 2.3/year). Most patients had suffered penetrating injury. Patients who underwent resuscitative thoracotomy were in extremis, with only 17% demonstrating signs of life upon presentation. Although 6 patients (24%) survived initially, only 2 (8%) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions Resuscitative thoracotomy was rarely performed in children in Illinois emergency departments. Survival is low for thoracotomy in the emergency department, but some patients who presented with penetrating injuries did have positive outcomes, supporting a continued role for the procedure in select cases.
In an era of decreasing reimbursements, the incentive to decrease readmissions has never been greater. It has been suggested that trauma readmission is an indicator of poor hospital care or ...fragmented discharge. Even though trauma readmissions are relatively low, readmissions add significant cost, tie up already limited resources and lead to worse outcomes, including mortality. The literature on trauma readmissions is sparse, and the reasons and risk factors for readmission are inconsistent across studies. If readmissions are to serve as useful indicators of quality of care, we must elucidate factors that may predict readmissions.
We performed a retrospective review of all admissions to our urban Level I trauma center from July 1, 2012, to June 30, 2015. All patients aged 16 years or older who were discharged alive were included. We identified all unplanned readmissions that occurred within 30 days of discharge and performed an extensive chart review to determine the reasons for readmission. We performed univariate and multivariable analyses.
We identified 6,026 index trauma admissions, with 158 (2.6%) unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge. The most common reasons for readmission were disease/symptom progression (30.2%), wound complications (28.9%), and pain control (11.8%). On multivariate analysis, only Injury Severity Score (odds ratio OR, 1.02; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.00-1.05; p=0.016), penetrating injuries (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.12-3.24; p=0.018), and smoking (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.05-2.86; p=0.031) were found to be significant. Hospital length of stay, insurance status, and race were not significant.
In a resource-limited environment, we expected a lack of access to care would lead to increased trauma readmissions; however, we were still able to achieve similar readmission rates, irrespective of insurance status and race. Our trauma readmission rate is low and consistent with previously published studies. Our results at our Level I trauma center support previously published studies that found Injury Severity Score and penetrating injury to be risk factors for readmission; however, more ubiquitous risk factors, such as hospital length of stay and discharge destination, were not significant. With no consensus on the risk factors for unplanned early trauma readmission, individual trauma centers should evaluate their specific risk factors for readmission to improve patient outcomes and decrease hospital costs.
Care management, level IV; Epidemiologic, level IV.
Abstract Background Recent guidelines recommend universal substance abuse screening for all trauma patients aged 12 years and older because brief interventions can help prevent future trauma. ...However, little is known about actual rates of screening in this setting. Methods The Illinois State Trauma Registry was queried for severely injured patients from 1999 to 2009. Multivariate logistic regression was used to characterize, according to demographic and physiologic parameters, which patients were screened with blood alcohol and urine toxicology and which screened positive. Results Of the 12,264 pediatric patients, 40% were tested for alcohol and 37% for drugs. Nine percent of patients screened positive for alcohol and 8% for drugs. Age strongly predicted positive tests, as did male sex. Black and Hispanic patients were screened for alcohol most frequently, but only Hispanics were more likely to test positive. Conclusion Although current guidelines recommend screening all trauma patients 12 years and older, current practice falls far short of this goal.
