The last two decades have witnessed a rapid increase in the knowledge about the role of the orexin system, particularly in the regulation of wakefulness and arousal. Dual orexin receptor antagonists ...(DORAs) have been approved for the treatment of insomnia disorders (suvorexant, lemborexant) and drugs with a distinctive profile (daridorexant) or orexin-2 receptor selectivity (seltorexant) are in development.
This review discusses pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety properties of orexin receptor antagonists (ORAs).
In general, the drugs described have a similar effect on sleep characteristics although their pharmacokinetic variables differ. ORAs have the potential to revolutionize the pharmacological treatment of insomnia because they not only improve sleep, but, in addition, appear to have no dependence - and tolerance-inducing effects, which makes them suitable for long-term-treatment.
The safety and tolerability profile of ORAs clearly differ from those of more traditional sleep-promoting drugs. Further research is needed to demonstrate benefits to patients suffering from insomnia disorder, e.g., with respect to improving not only sleep but also daytime functioning. In addition, ongoing and future research will show whether ORAs may have beneficial effects in patients with various psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease.
The complement system comprises the frontline of the innate immune system. Triggered by pathogenic surface patterns in different pathways, the cascade concludes with the formation of a membrane ...attack complex (MAC; complement components C5b to C9) and C5a, a potent anaphylatoxin that elicits various inflammatory signals through binding to C5a receptor 1 (C5aR1). Despite its important role in pathogen elimination, priming and recruitment of myeloid cells from the immune system, as well as crosstalk with other physiological systems, inadvertent activation of the complement system can result in self-attack and overreaction in autoinflammatory diseases. Consequently, it constitutes an interesting target for specialized therapies. The paradigm of safe and efficacious terminal complement pathway inhibition has been demonstrated by the approval of eculizumab in paroxysmal nocturnal hematuria. In addition, complement contribution in rare kidney diseases, such as lupus nephritis, IgA nephropathy, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, C3 glomerulopathy, or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis has been demonstrated. This review summarizes the involvement of the terminal effector agents of the complement system in these diseases and provides an overview of inhibitors for complement components C5, C5a, C5aR1, and MAC that are currently in clinical development. Furthermore, a link between increased complement activity and lung damage in severe COVID-19 patients is discussed and the potential for use of complement inhibitors in COVID-19 is presented.
Background:
The dual orexin receptor antagonist ACT-541468 showed sedative pharmacodynamic effects during initial clinical testing in adult subjects. The present study explored pharmacokinetics, ...pharmacodynamics and tolerability in healthy elderly subjects.
Methods:
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, single-ascending dose study in 24 male/female elderly (65–80 years, 5, 15 and 25 mg in the morning, 6/2 active/placebo per group). Additionally, 10 subjects (8/2 active/placebo) received 25 mg for 7 days in the evening. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (saccadic peak velocity, adaptive tracking, body sway, visual analogue scales according to Bowdle and Bond and Lader, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and tolerability were assessed. In particular, pharmacodynamics results are to be interpreted exploratorily.
Results:
Absorption was quick with a median time to maximum concentration of ∼ 1.0 h. The mean elimination half-life was 8.5–9.8 h, the area under the curve and the maximum plasma concentration increased proportionally with dose. Following repeated evening administration of 25 mg, minimal accumulation was observed. There were no pharmacodynamic effects at 5 mg. At 15 mg, saccadic peak velocity (degree/s; SD) was reduced (69; 38), while other variables showed no effects. At 25 mg, effects on all objective pharmacodynamic parameters were observed. At 8–12 h post-dose, there were no differences to placebo and no next-day effects on pharmacodynamic variables after evening administration. Elderly subjects reported fewer adverse events compared to adults in previous studies.
Conclusion:
ACT-541468 in elderly subjects was well tolerated and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are compatible with a drug for the treatment of insomnia.
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02571855
Aprocitentan is an orally active, dual endothelin receptor antagonist that may offer a new therapeutic option for the treatment of difficult-to-control hypertension.
To investigate safety, ...tolerability, mass balance, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of aprocitentan.
In this single-center, open-label study, a single oral dose of 25 mg containing 3.7 MBq of
C-radiolabeled aprocitentan was administered to 6 healthy male subjects. Metabolites were identified using mass spectrometry and, where possible, confirmed and quantified with reference compounds.
Aprocitentan was well tolerated and there were no clinically significant findings for any safety variable. The geometric mean cumulative recovery of radioactivity from urine and feces over 14 days was 77% of the administered radioactive dose, with 52.1% cumulative recovery from urine and 24.8% from feces. Concentrations of total radioactivity in whole blood were markedly lower compared to plasma. In plasma, 94.3% of total radioactivity was aprocitentan. In urine and feces, 5 and 2, respectively (in feces one being aprocitentan) main products were identified. Metabolism data of aprocitentan identified two main elimination pathways, glucosidation to M3 and hydrolysis to M1, representing approximately 25% and 32% of the radioactive dose, respectively.
Based on these metabolism data, aprocitentan can be concomitantly administered without dose adjustment with drugs that are inhibitors or inducers of any metabolizing enzyme, specifically cytochrome P450 enzymes.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and tolerability of daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist intended for the ...treatment of insomnia. A single‐center, open‐label study evaluated the PKs of daridorexant in patients with severe renal function impairment (SRFI; determined by creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft‐Gault equation; N = 8) not on dialysis, and in matched control subjects (based on sex, age, and body weight; N = 7). A single oral dose of daridorexant 25 mg was orally administered in the morning. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h postdose for PK assessments of daridorexant. In patients with SRFI, maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax; geometric mean ratio GMR and 90% confidence interval CI: 0.94 0.60–1.46), time to reach Cmax (Tmax; median difference 90% CI of −0.25 h −0.75 to 0.25), and half‐life (GMR 90% CI of 0.99 0.66–1.48), were virtually unchanged. Exposure (area under the plasma concentration‐time profile) to daridorexant was slightly higher in patients with SRFI than in control subjects with the GMR (90% CI) being 1.16 (0.63–2.12). No safety issue of concern was detected as all adverse events were transient and of mild or moderate intensity, and no treatment‐related effects on vital signs, clinical laboratory, or electrocardiogram variables were observed following daridorexant administration in patients with SRFI and control subjects. Based on these observations, PK alterations of daridorexant due to renal function impairment are not considered of clinical relevance and no dose adjustment is necessary in these patients.
Background and Objectives
Daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist was recently approved for the treatment of insomnia at doses up to 50 mg once per night. This study investigated the effect ...of single-dose and multiple-dose daridorexant 50 mg at steady state on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-sensitive substrate midazolam, and the effect of single-dose daridorexant 50 mg on the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the CYP2C9-sensitive substrate warfarin.
Methods
In this prospective, single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, phase I, drug–drug interaction study, 18 healthy male subjects sequentially received Treatment A, B, and C in three periods. Treatment A consisted of a single oral concomitant administration of midazolam 2 mg and warfarin 25 mg on day 1 of the first period. Treatment B consisted of one oral administration of daridorexant 50 mg followed 1 h later by a single oral dose of midazolam 2 mg concomitantly with a single oral dose of warfarin 25 mg on day 1 and a once-daily oral administration of daridorexant 50 mg for 6 days of the second period. Treatment C consisted of a single oral administration of daridorexant 50 mg at steady state followed 1 h later by a single oral administration of midazolam 2 mg on day 1 of the third period. Blood samples were assessed for midazolam and S-warfarin PK, and PD (international normalized ratio and factor VII). Noncompartmental PK parameters and PD variables were evaluated with geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of Treatment B/A versus C/A for midazolam, and treatment B/A for warfarin. Safety and tolerability of each treatment were also assessed.
Results
Midazolam maximum plasma concentration (
C
max
) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC
0–24
) were 1.13- and 1.42-fold higher, respectively, after single-dose administration of daridorexant 50 mg compared to administration of midazolam alone, while
C
max
and AUC
0–24
were 1.12- and 1.35-fold higher, respectively, after administration of daridorexant 50 mg once daily at steady state. Terminal half-life and time to maximum plasma concentration were comparable between treatments. Daridorexant had no influence on the PK and PD of warfarin. All treatments were safe and well tolerated.
Conclusions
Daridorexant at 50 mg is classified as a weak CYP3A4 inhibitor after single- and multiple-dose administration once daily at steady state. Daridorexant 50 mg did not induce CYP3A4 activity or inhibit CYP2C9 activity.
Clinical Trial Registration
This trial (NCT05480488) was registered on 29 July, 2022.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
The effect of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan was clinically investigated as 25% of ...aprocitentan is cleared through the liver. Aprocitentan is in clinical development for the treatment of resistant hypertension. This was an open-label, Phase 1 study. Subjects were recruited in two groups (i.e., moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B; n = 8) and matched healthy subjects (n = 9) and received a single oral dose of 25 mg aprocitentan. Thereafter, they were observed for 14 days. Due to personal reasons one healthy subject discontinued the study. The PK of aprocitentan were similar between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects, with maximum plasma concentrations (C
) reached at 4.0 h. There was no difference in C
, indicated by the geometric means ratio (90% confidence interval) of 1.03 (0.86-1.24). There was a lower apparent clearance, a similar apparent volume of distribution, a longer terminal half-life (56.4 h vs 48.3 h in healthy subjects), and an increase in area under the curve from zero to infinity of 23% in moderate hepatically impaired subjects compared to healthy subjects. There were no differences observed in plasma protein binding (range 98.7-99.0%). Aprocitentan was well tolerated, and headache was the only adverse event reported by one subject. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant differences in PK between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects. Based on these results, aprocitentan can be administered in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment and dose adjustment is not required.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04252495.
•The dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant was administered once daily to healthy male subjects for 4 weeks.•A battery of ophthalmological, spermatogenetic, and hormone variables was ...assessed.•No clinically relevant effects were detected in spite of some findings in toxicology studies in rats and dogs.
The aim of this single-center, double-blind study was to investigate the effect of a 4-week once daily administration of 200 mg almorexant on tear film break-up time, spermatogenesis, hormone levels, and pancreatic elastase in stool in healthy male subjects.
Almorexant 200 mg or matching placebo was administered in the evening for 4 weeks once daily to 56 healthy male subjects. Changes in ophthalmological variables, sperm composition, hormone levels, and pancreatic elastase levels in stool were evaluated periodically up to 8 weeks after discontinuation of drug administration. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic measurements were taken after 4 weeks to confirm compliance to study drug intake.
The results of this study revealed no treatment effects of almorexant, neither on tear film break-up time nor on other ophthalmological variables investigated during this study. Furthermore, spermatogenesis, hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and –gonadal axes, and endocrine pancreatic secretion were shown to be not affected by a 4-week once daily administration of almorexant.
Almorexant was well tolerated and had no effect on the spectrum of pharmacodynamic variables assessed. Ophthalmology and testicular findings detected in preclinical studies were not observed in this clinical study. Therefore, these preclinical findings appear not to be relevant for humans and do not prevent from conducting larger clinical trials with either healthy subjects or patients.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may lead to cerebral vasospasm and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It represents a major unmet medical need due to few treatment ...options with limited efficacy. The role of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and its receptor ET
in the pathogenesis of aSAH-induced vasospasm suggests antagonism of this receptor as promising asset for pharmacological treatment. Clazosentan is a potent ET
receptor antagonist for intravenous use currently under development for the prevention of aSAH-induced cerebral vasospasm. The pharmacokinetics of clazosentan are characterized by an intermediate clearance, a volume of distribution similar to that of the extracellular fluid volume, dose-proportional exposure, an elimination independent of drug-metabolizing enzymes, and a disposition mainly dependent on the hepatic uptake transporter organic anion transport polypeptide 1B1/1B3. In healthy subjects, clazosentan leads to an increase in ET-1 concentration and prevents the cardiac and renal effects mediated by infusion of ET-1. In patients, it significantly reduced the incidence of moderate or severe vasospasm as well as post-aSAH vasospasm-related morbidity and mortality. Clazosentan is well tolerated up to the expected therapeutic dose of 15 mg/h and, in aSAH patients, lung complications, hypotension, and anemia were adverse events more commonly reported following clazosentan than placebo. In summary, clazosentan has a pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profile suitable to become a valuable asset in the armamentarium of therapeutic modalities to prevent aSAH-induced cerebral vasospasm.
Cenerimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator, is in development for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, a disease mainly affecting women of childbearing potential. The effect ...of cenerimod on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC, 100 µg levonorgestrel and 20 µg ethinylestradiol (EE)) was investigated. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was performed in 24 healthy male and female subjects. A single oral dose of COC was administered alone and after 35 days of once daily (o.d.) administration of cenerimod 0.5 (n = 10) or 4 (n = 14) mg. Exposure to EE alone or in combination with cenerimod was comparable as reflected by the geometric mean ratios and the respective 90% confidence intervals, while a slight increase in exposure (approximately 10–25%) to levonorgestrel was observed at clinically relevant concentrations of cenerimod. Overall, COC alone or in combination with cenerimod was safe and well tolerated. Two subjects reported one adverse event each (one headache after COC alone, and gastroenteritis in combination with cenerimod 4 mg). In conclusion, cenerimod does not affect the PK of levonorgestrel or EE to a clinically relevant extent. Therefore, COC can be selected as method of contraception during and after cenerimod therapy without the risk of interaction.
PDF
