The success of rotator cuff repair is often measured by patient-reported outcomes or structural healing on magnetic resonance imaging. Ideally, we can achieve both a satisfied patient and a healed ...tendon. Various technical modifications and stitch patterns have been presented in an effort to achieve the perfect rotator cuff repair. It appears the independently popular suture bridge technique and Mason-Allen stitch may do their best work when combined together. First, double-row repair “anchors down” the tendon to its footprint, and suture bridge adds to this concept with double-row compressive interlinking suture. Second, the Mason-Allen stitch, combining a horizontal stich and a simple stitch that passes around the horizontal, leverages the rip-stop concept where an “anchor suture” is included as a suture is passed around friable tendon like steel rebar rods strengthening concrete. In the midst of many factors out of the surgeon’s control during the healing process, we are compelled to listen when a change in our technique might actually make a difference.
Background:
The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure combines the benefits of arthroscopic surgery with the low rate of recurrent instability associated with the Latarjet procedure. Only short-term ...outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure have been reported.
Purpose:
To evaluate the rate of recurrent instability and patient outcomes a minimum of 5 years after stabilization performed with the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.
Study Design:
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
Patients who underwent the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure before June 2008 completed a questionnaire to determine whether they had experienced a dislocation, subluxation, or further surgery. The patients also completed the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).
Results:
A total of 62 of 87 patients (64/89 shoulders) were contacted for follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 76.4 months (range, 61.2-100.7 months). No patients had reported a dislocation since their surgery. One patient reported having subluxations since the surgery. Thus, 1 patient (1.59%) had recurrent instability after the procedure. The mean ± standard deviation aggregate WOSI score was 90.6% ± 9.4%. Mean WOSI domain scores were as follows: Physical Symptoms, 90.1% ± 8.7%; Sports/Recreation/Work, 90.3% ± 12.9%; Lifestyle, 93.7% ± 9.8%; and Emotions, 88.7% ± 17.3%.
Conclusion:
The rate of recurrent instability after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is low in this series of patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patient outcomes as measured by the WOSI are good.
Background:
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are commonly associated with meniscal and chondral injuries. Although lateral meniscal tears are commonly associated with acute ACL injuries, the ...chronically ACL-deficient knee is associated with an increased rate of medial meniscal injury. These associations have been described in the adult knee literature.
Purpose:
To evaluate the relationship of elapsed time from injury with the incidence of meniscal and chondral injuries noted at the time of surgical treatment for ACL tears in pediatric patients. The effect of age, gender, weight, and mechanism of injury was also evaluated.
Study Design:
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients undergoing primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between January 2005 and January 2011 was performed. The presence of meniscal tear, chondral injury, number of days from injury to treatment, age, weight, gender, and mechanism of injury were recorded. The data were analyzed for associations between elapsed time before surgery as well as patient-specific factors with rates of meniscal and chondral injuries.
Results:
Three hundred seventy pediatric patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were included. Two hundred forty-one were treated ≤150 days (early) from injury, and 129 were treated >150 days (delayed) from injury. Ninety-one (37.8%) patients in the early treatment group and 69 (53.5%) patients in the delayed treatment group had medial meniscal tears (MMTs) (P = .014; odds ratio OR, 1.8; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.12-2.83). Lateral meniscal tear (LMT) rates were similar (56.0% and 57.4%) in each group. Age >15 years also influenced the presence of MMTs (P = .033; OR, 1.6; CI, 1.04-2.54). Increased patient weight was associated with an increased rate of MMTs and LMTs. Fifty-four of 170 (31.8%) patients weighing ≤65 kg and 106 of 200 (53%) weighing >65 kg had MMTs (P < .001; OR, 2.2; CI, 1.36-3.42). Eighty-two of 170 (48.2%) patients weighing ≤65 kg and 127 of 200 (63.5%) weighing >65 kg had LMTs (P < .018; OR, 1.7; CI, 1.10-2.68). The presence of chondral injury was significantly associated with the presence of meniscal tear in the same compartment of the knee.
Conclusion:
Pediatric patients treated >150 days after injury for ACL tears have a higher rate of MMT than those treated ≤150 days after injury. Increased age and weight are independently associated with a higher rate of MMT. Patients with ACL tears and an MMT or LMT are more likely to have a chondral injury in that particular compartment than those without meniscal tears.
Instability of the hip can manifest in a wide range of settings, with presenting symptoms including subtle discomfort at end range of motion or more dramatic dislocation of the joint. It can result ...from traumatic injury with dislocation or subluxation; atraumatic capsular laxity; structural bony abnormality, such as acetabular dysplasia; and iatrogenic injury. Initial treatment of the concentrically reduced joint often begins with physical therapy to strengthen dynamic stabilizers and to allow time for resolution of acute symptoms. Surgical treatment is aimed at repairing injured soft tissue structures, including static stabilizers, and addressing underlying bony structural deficiencies.
To quantify the effect of the learning curve in performing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears on total operating room time, including times for setup, surgery, ...and wake up, during a single surgeon’s initial hip arthroscopy procedures.
A single surgeon’s case list was retrospectively reviewed to identify all primary hip arthroscopy surgeries between November 1, 2018, and February 28, 2018, for the treatment of FAI and labral tears. Surgical times were recorded, including total room time; surgical time; setup time; and wake-up time. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship of these times relative to case number in the series. In addition, the series was divided into 3 sequential groups to further compare these times.
In total, 225 patients were included in the study. The mean total room time for all cases was 155.4 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI 150.9-160.0); mean surgical time was 115.6 minutes (95% CI 111.5-119.8), and mean setup time was 32.6 minutes (95% CI 31.8-33.4). Decreasing surgical time was associated with advancing number in the case series (P < .001, R2 = 0.36). Decreasing total room time was accordingly associated with advancing number in the case series (P < .001, R2 = 0.34). There were no significant differences in setup time and wake-up time as the case series advanced. When groups of 75 sequential cases were compared, significant decreases in surgical and total room time were noted between the first and second groups (P < .001) but not between the second and third groups (P = .52). Increasing complexity of surgeries was noted as the series advanced, including capsular closure and subspine decompression.
This study supports the existence of a substantial learning curve for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of FAI and labral tears. Our findings suggest decreasing surgical time as the surgeon advances through the learning curve, with the initial 75 procedures requiring longer time to perform than subsequent cases.
Hip arthroscopy is a technically demanding procedure. Understanding the long duration of the hip arthroscopy learning curve is helpful for surgeons considering the addition of hip arthroscopy to their practice.
Purpose To compare the surface area available for bony contact and the width of bone on each side of the Latarjet fixation screws in the traditional Latarjet technique versus the congruent arc ...modification of the Latarjet technique. Methods Computed tomographic scans of 24 shoulders in patients with glenohumeral instability who underwent multiplanar reconstruction measurements with multiple dimensions of the coracoid. The surface area of the coracoid available for bony contact with the anterior glenoid and width of bone on each side of a 3.5-mm screw was compared for the traditional Latarjet technique versus the congruent arc modification. Results The surface area available for bony contact to the anterior glenoid was 5.65 ± 1.08 cm2 using the traditional Latarjet technique compared with 3.64 ± 0.93 cm2 using the congruent arc modification of the Latarjet technique ( P < .001). The mean width of bone on each side of a 3.5-mm screw was 7.1 ± 1.0 mm using the traditional Latarjet technique compared with 4.1 ± 1.0 mm using the congruent arc modification ( P < .001). Conclusions The traditional Latarjet technique has greater bony contact with the glenoid and greater bone width on each side of the screws compared with the congruent arc modification of the Latarjet technique. This potentially allows for a larger surface for healing in the traditional Latarjet technique. Moreover, because of smaller width of the bone around the screw, the congruent arc modification is potentially less tolerant of screw-positioning error compared with the traditional Latarjet technique. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.
To evaluate the impact of the portal used for drilling, the position of the drill guide on the acetabular rim, and the use of straight versus curved drill guides on drill perforation of the ...acetabular subchondral bone and the outer cortex of the acetabulum.
Sixty acetabular models were marked at the 3-, 2-, 1-, 12-, and 11-o'clock positions. Simulated anterior, anterolateral, and distal anterolateral accessory (DALA) portals were created. Twelve groups of 5 acetabula were drilled at each clock-face position using all combinations of variables.
A total of 38 of 300 drillings (12.7%) perforated the subchondral bone, and 45 of 300 (15%) breached the outer cortex. Drilling from the anterior, anterolateral, and DALA portals perforated the acetabular subchondral bone on 21 of 100 attempts (21%), 17 of 100 attempts (17%), and 0 of 100 attempts (0%), respectively (P < .001), and perforated the outer acetabular cortex on 36 of 100 attempts (36%), 1 of 100 attempts (1%), and 8 of 100 attempts (8%), respectively (P < .001). The use of a curved or straight drill guide did not make a statistically significant difference. Drilling with a starting point on the acetabular rim perforated the acetabular subchondral bone on 29 of 150 attempts (19.3%) compared with 9 of 150 attempts (6%) when the starting point was 2 mm removed from the acetabular rim (P < .001).
The use of the DALA portal and a drill starting point slightly off the acetabular rim was associated with the lowest rate of acetabular subchondral perforation and is recommended to reduce the risk of iatrogenic chondral injury.
Iatrogenic chondral injury is a relatively common complication of hip arthroscopy. Increased awareness of factors associated with drill perforation during suture anchor placement can help surgeons mitigate this risk.
Purpose To evaluate glenoid version and humeral subluxation on preoperative multiplanar imaging of patients who underwent surgery for posterior glenohumeral instability compared with a matched group ...of patients who had shoulder surgery for other pathology. Methods All patients over a 2-year period who underwent surgery for posterior instability had preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or MR arthrogram reviewed. Patients undergoing shoulder surgery for reasons other than instability were identified as a control group and matched by sex, laterality, and age. Measurement of glenoid version and percentage of humeral subluxation was performed by 2 reviewers after completing a tutorial. Reviewers were blinded to diagnosis and to whether or not the patients were in the experimental or control group. Results There were 41 patients in each group. The average glenoid version in the control group was 5.6° of retroversion (standard deviation SD 3.0), and the average humeral subluxation was 54% (SD 5.1%). In the experimental group, the average glenoid version was 8.1° of retroversion (SD 5.0). The average humeral subluxation in the experimental group was 56% (SD 6.8%). Student t test revealed a statistically significant difference in glenoid version ( P = .009) but not humeral subluxation ( P = .25). Intra- and inter-rater reliability was measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient and found to have an excellent Fleiss rating with regard to both measurements. Conclusions Glenoid retroversion is significantly increased in patients with symptomatic posterior labral tears compared with a control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to posterior humeral subluxation and, therefore, is not a reliable indicator of the presence or absence of symptomatic posterior shoulder instability. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Shoulder dislocation and subsequent anterior instability is a common problem in young athletes. The arthroscopic Bankart repair was originally described by Morgan et al. in 1987. The procedure has ...benefited from many technical advancements over the past 25 years and currently remains the most commonly utilized procedure in the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability without glenoid bone loss. Capsulolabral repair alone may not be sufficient for treatment of patients with poor capsular tissue quality and significant bony defects. In the presence of chronic anterior glenoid bony defects, a bony reconstruction should be considered. The treatment of anterior shoulder instability with transfer of the coracoid and attached conjoint tendon such as the Latarjet procedure has provided reliable results. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure was described in 2007 by the senior author, who has now performed the procedure over 450 times. The initial surgical technique has evolved considerably since its introduction, and this article presents a comprehensive update on this demanding but well-defined procedure. This article reviews technical tips to help the surgeon perform the surgery more smoothly, navigate through challenging situations, and avoid potential complications.
Level of evidence
V.
To establish the accuracy and reliability of the circle-line method (CLM) of measuring glenoid bone loss; to compare the CLM calculation with a traditionally used method of calculating a ratio; and ...to evaluate surgeons' ability to estimate the amount of glenoid bone loss before performing any calculations.
Three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans of consecutive patients with anterior instability and glenoid bone loss were reviewed by 13 surgeons blinded to the diagnosis. The reviewers made estimations of bone loss before creating any measurements by viewing the available computed tomography scan as well as the 3-dimensional reconstructions. They selected an en face view of the glenoid to create a best-fit circle. Bone loss calculation with a traditional linear method as well as a CLM calculated by algebraic geometry was completed. The CLM requires calculation of the diameter of a best-fit circle on the glenoid, as well as the length of a single line along the circle representing the line of bone loss. All methods were compared with a computerized method of tracing the area of the glenoid within a best-fit circle. Interobserver and intraobserver calculations were performed. Analysis-of-variance testing was used to compare the estimates of bone loss versus the CLM-calculated bone loss. Tukey post hoc analysis was used to define the accuracy of the CLM calculation compared with a more traditional method of calculating bone loss.
Bone loss estimations were significantly different from CLM-calculated bone loss in all cases except those with greater than 25% bone loss. The CLM was more accurate in all types of bone loss except cases of greater than 25% bone loss. Interobserver reliability was very good for the glenoid diameter measurement and moderate for the CLM. Intraobserver reliability ranged from moderate to good for all methods of measurement.
Surgeon estimations of glenoid bone loss, as well as traditional line-measurement calculations, are inconsistent and unreliable for accurate determination of the optimal surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability. The CLM is a simple, reproducible, and accurate method for determining glenoid bone loss and does not require specialized software or imaging protocols.
Level II, diagnostic study.
