Abstract Background Elderly patients represent a large proportion of patients admitted for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Whether frailty, defined as a biological syndrome that reflects a state of ...decreased physiological reserve and vulnerability to stressors, may impact the clinical outcomes in this population remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of frailty and its impact on mortality in patients aged ≥ 80 years admitted for ACS. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted among patients aged 80 or older admitted in a tertiary hospital for ACS. Frailty was assessed using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) which provides a score ranging from 0 (not frail) to 17 (very frail). Population was divided into 3 classes: 0-3 EFS-score, 4-6 EFS-score, and >7 EFS-score. Results 236 patients were included with a mean follow-up duration of 470 days. The mean age was 85.9 years. 75 patients died during follow-up period.119 subjects (50.4%) had a 0-3 EFS-score, 68 patients (28.8%) had a 4-6 EFS-score and 49 patients (20.8%) had a ≥ 7 EFS-score. All-cause mortality rate was 17.7% in the 0-3 EFS-score group, 35.3% in the 4-6 EFS-score group and 61.2% in the ≥ 7 EFS-score group, (p<0.001). After multivariate analysis, frailty status remained associated with all-cause mortality: HR was 1.53 (95% CI 0.74 - 3.16) within the 4-6 EFS-score group, and HR was 3.60 (95% CI 1.70 - 7.63) within the ≥ 7 EFS-score group. Conclusion Frailty is a strong and independent prognosis factor of midterm all-cause mortality in elderly patients presenting with ACS.
Abstract Background Elderly patients are underrepresented in acute myocardial infarction trials. Our aim was to determine whether, in elderly patients, changes in management in the past 15 years is ...associated with improved one-year mortality after hospital admission for myocardial infarction. Methods We used data from 4 one-month French registries, conducted 5 years apart from 1995 to 2010, including 3,389 elderly patients (≥75 years). Results From 1995 to 2010, mean age remained stable (82.1 years), similar in ST- and non-ST-elevation myocardial infraction patients. Obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia increased. History of prior myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral artery disease remained stable, while history of heart failure decreased. Major changes in management were noted: early percutaneous coronary intervention, early treatment with antiplatelet agents, low molecular weight heparin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and statins all increased. Early mortality after hospital admission decreased from 25.0% to 8.4%. One-year mortality decreased from 36.2% to 20.0% (adjusted hazard ratio 2010 vs 1995: 0.47, 0.39-0.57), both for ST-elevation myocardial infraction (36.8% to 21.1%) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infraction (34.8% to 19.1%). Mortality reduction was observed in all age groups, including those ≥85 years of age (from 46.2% to 31.4%). Study period, however was no longer associated with decreased mortality when variables reflecting management changes were taken into account. Conclusions Early and one-year mortality after hospital admission of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction has dramatically decreased over the past 15 years. This improvement is likely mediated by increasing use of recommended management strategies. These data support the application of guidelines derived from trials mostly including younger patients to elderly populations as well.
Early infarct-related artery (IRA) patency is associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Using the French Registry of ST-elevation and ...non–ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2010 registry, we investigated factors related to IRA patency (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction TIMI 2/3 flow) at the start of procedure in patients admitted for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. FAST-MI 2010 is a nationwide French registry including 4,169 patients with acute MI. Of 1,452 patients with STEMI with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, 466 (32%) had TIMI 2/3 flow of IRA before the procedure. Mean age (62 ± 14 years in both groups), Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event score (141 ± 31 vs 142 ± 34), and time from onset to angiography (472 ± 499 vs 451 ± 479 minutes) did not differ according to IRA patency (TIMI 2/3 vs TIMI 0/1). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, IRA patency was more frequently found in patients having called earlier (time from onset to electrocardiogram ECG <120 minutes; odds ratio OR 1.49; 95% confidence interval CI 1.17 to 1.89), or receiving rapid-onset of action (prasugrel or glycoprotein IIb-IIIa) antiplatelet therapy in the prehospital setting (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.21). Increasing time from diagnostic ECG to angiography was also associated with IRA patency (>90 minutes; OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.75). In conclusion, preprocedural IRA patency is observed in one third of patients with STEMI, it is more frequently found in patients having received fast-acting antiplatelet therapy before angiography, and in patients having called early. Higher IRA patency with increasing time delays from qualifying ECG to angiography suggests an additional role of spontaneous or medication-mediated fibrinolysis.
The prognostic value of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is well documented, but few reports differentiating between symptomatic and ...asymptomatic forms of PAD are available. We investigated the respective prognostic effect of clinical and subclinical PAD on long-term all-cause mortality in patients with stable CHD. We analyzed 710 patients with stable CHD referred for hospitalization for CHD evaluation and management. As a part of the study, they completed questionnaires on medical history, underwent a standardized clinical examination, including ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement, and provided a fasting blood sample. Three groups of patients were individualized: no PAD (no history of PAD and ABI >0.9 but ≤1.4); subclinical PAD (no history of PAD but abnormal ABI i.e., ≤0.9 or >1.4); and clinical PAD (history of claudication, peripheral arterial surgery, or amputation due to PAD). Clinical and subclinical PAD was present in 83 (11.7%) and 181 (25.5%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 130 patients died. On multivariate analysis adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, left ventricular ejection fraction, CHD duration, heart rate, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and coronary revascularization, previous clinical PAD (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 3.47) and subclinical PAD (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.44) were significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality. In conclusion, our study has demonstrated that the detection of subclinical PAD by ABI in patients with stable CHD provides additional information for long-term mortality risk evaluation.
Study objective We assess the performance of a single multimarker strategy, using a combination of sensitive troponin I-Ultra and copeptin assays to rule out non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction ...(NSTEMI) at presentation to an emergency department (ED). Methods A secondary analysis was carried out on 587 consecutive patients with chest pain who presented to the ED without ST elevation on ECG and were included in a single-site, prospective observational study. Samples for copeptin and combination of sensitive troponin I-Ultra assays were collected at presentation. The performance of the combination of copeptin and combination of sensitive troponin I-Ultra for NSTEMI was calculated in the whole cohort and after stratification by thrombosis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score. Results NSTEMI was diagnosed in 87 patients (14.8%). The sensitivity and the negative predictive value of the combination of copeptin and combination of sensitive troponin I-Ultra were 96.6% (95% confidence interval CI 90.3% to 99.3%) and 99.1% (95% CI 97.4% to 99.8%), respectively, for a cutoff level of copeptin less than 12 pmol/L. Among the 243 patients with a low TIMI score, all 8 who had an NSTEMI were detected with the combination (sensitivity 100%; 95% CI 63.1% to 100%), and 158 were a combination of sensitive troponin I-Ultra and copeptin negative and had no NSTEMI (negative predictive value 100%; 95% CI 97.7% to 100%). Conclusion In this study, the combination of sensitive troponin and copeptin measurements had a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for NSTEMI diagnosis, especially among subjects with a low TIMI risk score. However, the sensitivity was too low to rule out NSTEMI with a single-draw strategy at ED presentation. Future studies are needed on the low-risk TIMI group to further investigate this preliminary finding.
Abstract Objective The influence of initial-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (i-TIMI) coronary flow in the culprit coronary artery on myocardial infarct and microvascular obstruction (MVO) size ...is unclear. We assessed the impact on infarct size of i-TIMI flow in the culprit coronary artery, as well as on MVO incidence and size, by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (ce-CMR). Methods In a prospective, multicenter study, pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) coronary occlusion was defined by an i-TIMI flow ≤1, and patency was defined by an i-TIMI flow ≥2. Infarct size, as well as MVO presence and size, were measured on ce-CMR 72 h after admission. Results A total of 140 patients presenting with ST-elevated myocardial infarction referred for primary PCI were included. There was no significant difference in final post-PCI TIMI flow between the groups (2.95 ± 0.02 vs. 2.97 ± 0.02, respectively; p = 0.44). In the i-TIMI flow ≤1 group, infarct size was significantly larger (32 ± 17 g vs. 21 ± 17 g, respectively; p = 0.002), MVO was significantly more frequent (74% vs. 53%, respectively; p = 0.012), and MVO size was significantly larger 1.3 IQR (0; 7.1) vs. 0 IQR (0; 1.6), compared to in the i-TIMI ≥2 patient group. Conclusion Initial angiographic TIMI flow in the culprit coronary artery prior to any PCI predicted final infarct size and MVO size: the better was the i-TIMI flow, the smaller were the infarct and MVO size.
In this study, we aimed to report clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection who were referred for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the peak of the ...pandemic in France.
We included all consecutive patients referred for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) during the first 3 weeks of April 2020 in 5 university hospitals (Paris, south, and north of France), all performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
The study included 237 patients (67 ± 14 years old; 69% male), 116 (49%) with STEMI and 121 (51%) with NSTEMI. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-associated ACS was 11% (n = 26) and 11 patients had severe hypoxemia on presentation (mechanical ventilation or nasal oxygen > 6 L/min). Patients were comparable regarding medical history and risk factors, except a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus in SARS-CoV-2 patients (53.8% vs 25.6%; P = 0.003). In SARS-CoV-2 patients, cardiac arrest on admission was more frequent (26.9% vs 6.6%; P < 0.001). The presence of significant coronary artery disease and culprit artery occlusion in SARS-CoV-2 patients respectively, was 92% and 69.4% for those with STEMI, and 50% and 15.5% for those with NSTEMI. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in the same percentage of STEMI (84.6%) and NSTEMI (84.8%) patients, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but no-reflow (19.2% vs 3.3%; P < 0.001) was greater in SARS-CoV-2 patients. In-hospital death occurred in 7 SARS-CoV-2 patients (5 from cardiac cause) and was higher compared with noninfected patients (26.9% vs 6.2%; P < 0.001).
In this registry, ACS in SARS-CoV-2 patients presented with high a percentage of cardiac arrest on admission, high incidence of no-reflow, and high in-hospital mortality.
Notre étude avait pour but d’établir les caractéristiques cliniques et les résultats de patients infectés ou non par le SRAS-CoV-2 qui ont été orientés en raison d’un syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) pendant la phase aiguë de la pandémie en France.
Nous avons inclus dans l’étude tous les patients consécutifs qui ont présenté un infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST (STEMI) ou sans sus-décalage du segment ST (NSTEMI) au cours des 3 premières semaines d’avril 2020 et qui ont été orientés vers 5 hôpitaux universitaires (situés à Paris, ainsi que dans le sud et le nord de la France), tous en mesure de réaliser des interventions co-ronariennes percutanées primaires.
L’étude comprenait 237 patients (âge : 67 ± 14 ans; proportion d’hommes : 69 %); 116 (49 %) présentaient un STEMI et 121 (51 %), un NSTEMI. La prévalence d’un SCA associé à une infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 s’établissait à 11 % (n = 26), et 11 patients étaient en hypoxémie grave (nécessitant une ventilation artificielle ou l’administration d’oxygène par voie nasale à un débit de plus de 6 l/min) à leur arrivée. Les patients présentaient des antécédents médicaux et des facteurs de risque comparables, à l’exception du fait que la prévalence du diabète était plus élevée chez les patients infectés par le SRAS-CoV-2 (53,8 % vs 25,6 %; p = 0,003). Ces derniers avaient plus souvent subi un arrêt cardiaque à leur admission (26,9 % vs 6,6 %; p < 0,001). Chez les patients infectés par le SRAS-CoV-2, une coronaropathie importante et une occlusion de l’artère coupable ont été observées chez respectivement 92 % et 69,4 % des patients présentant un STEMI, et chez 50 % et 15,5 % des patients présentant un NSTEMI. Une intervention coronarienne percutanée a été effectuée dans les mêmes proportions chez les patients subissant un STEMI (84,6 %) que chez ceux présentant un NSTEMI (84,8 %), sans égard à la présence ou à l’absence d’une infection par le SRAS-CoV-2, mais les cas de non-reperfusion (no-reflow) ont été plus fréquents chez les patients infectés que chez les autres patients (19,2 % et 3,3 %, respectivement; p < 0,001). Sept patients infectés par le SRAS-CoV-2 sont morts à l’hôpital (5 de cause cardiaque), ce qui représente un taux de mortalité plus élevé que chez les patients non infectés (26,9 % vs 6,2 %; p < 0,001).
Dans le cadre de cette étude, le SCA survenu chez les patients infectés par le SRAS-CoV-2 était associé à un fort pourcentage d’arrêt cardiaque à l’admission, à une fréquence élevée de cas de non-reperfusion et à un taux élevé de mortalité hospitalière.
Whether frailty, defined as a biological syndrome that reflects a state of decreased physiological reserve and vulnerability to stressors, may impact the outcomes of elderly patients admitted to a ...cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of frailty and its impact on mortality in patients aged ≥ 80 years admitted to a CICU.
This prospective single-centre observational study was conducted among patients aged ≥ 80 years admitted to a CICU in a tertiary centre. Frailty was assessed using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), which provides a score ranging from 0 (not frail) to 17 (very frail). The population was divided into 3 classes: EFS-score of 0-3, EFS-score of 4-6, and EFS-score > 7.
A total of 199 patients were included, and median follow-up duration was 365 days. The mean age was 84.8 years, and 50 patients (25.1%) died during the follow-up period. In all, 45 (22.6%), 60 (30.2%), and 94 patients (47.2%) had an EFS-score of 0-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7, respectively. The all-cause mortality rate was 4.4%, 27.1%, and 37.2% in the 0-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7 EFS-score groups, respectively (P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, frailty status remained associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratio was 2.60 (95% confidence interval 0.54-12.45) within the 4-6 EFS-score group, and 5.46 (95% confidence interval 1.23-24.08) within the ≥ 7 EFS-score group.
Frailty is highly prevalent in older adults admitted to the population hospitalized in a CICU and represents a strong prognostic factor for 1-year all-cause mortality.
On ignore si la fragilité, définie comme un syndrome biologique reflétant une diminution des réserves physiologique et une vulnérabilité au stress, impacte le pronostic des sujets âgés admis en unité de soins intensifs cardiologiques (USIC). Notre objectif était de déterminer la prévalence de la fragilité et son impact sur la mortalité chez les sujets âgés de 80 ans ou plus admis en USIC.
Il s'agit d'une étude prospective monocentrique observationnelle conduite sur les patients de 80 ans ou plus admis en USIC dans un centre tertiaire. La fragilité a été évaluée par l’échelle de fragilité d'Edmonton (EFS) qui donne un score allant de 0 (pas fragile) à 17 (très fragile). La population a été divisé en 3 classes : score EFS de 0 à 3, score EFS de 4 à 6, et score EFS de > 7.
Cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf patients ont été inclus avec un suivi médian de 365 jours. L’âge moyen était de 84,8 ans. Cinquante patients (25,1 %) sont décédés au cours de la période de suivi. Quarante-cinq patients (22,6 %) avaient un score EFS de 0 à 3, 60 patients (30,2 %) avaient un score EFS de 4 à 6 et 94 patients (47,2 %) avaient un score EFS de ≥ 7. Les taux de mortalité toutes causes étaient de 4,4 % dans la classe de score EFS de 0 à 3, 27,1 % dans la classe de score EFS de 4 à 6 et 37,2 % dans la classe de score EFS de ≥ 7, (p < 0.001). En analyse multivariée, la fragilité demeurait associée avec la mortalité toutes causes : le rapport de risques instantanés (RRI) était à 2,60 (intervalle de confiance IC à 95 % 0,54 - 12,45) dans la classe de score EFS de 4 à 6, et le RRI était à 5,46 (IC à 95 % 1,23 - 24,08) dans la classe de score EFS de ≥ 7.
La fragilité est fortement prévalente dans la population des sujets âgés admis en USIC et constitue un facteur pronostique fort de mortalité toutes causes à un an.
PDF
