The stratospheric ozone layer, which prevents solar ultraviolet radiation from reaching the surface and thereby protects life on earth, is expected to recover from past depletion during this century ...due to the impact of the Montreal Protocol. However, how the ozone column over the Arctic will evolve over the next few decades is still under debate. In this study, we found that the ozone level in the Arctic stratosphere at 100–150 hPa during 1998–2018 exhibits a decreasing trend of − 0.12 ± 0.07 ppmv decade
–1
from MERRA2, suggesting a continued depletion during this century. About 30% of this ozone depletion is contributed by the second leading mode of sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTAs) over the North Pacific with one month leading and therefore is dynamical in origin. The North Pacific SSTAs associated with this mode tend to result in a weakened Aleutian low, a strengthened Western Pacific pattern and a weakened Pacific–North American pattern, which impede the upward propagation of wavenumber-1 waves into the lower stratosphere. The changes in the stratospheric wave activity may result in decreased ozone in the Arctic lower stratosphere through weakening the Brewer-Dobson circulation. Our findings uniquely linked the recent ozone depletion in the Arctic stratosphere to the North Pacific SSTs and might provide new understanding of how dynamical processes control Arctic stratospheric ozone.
Excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation harms humans and ecosystems. The level of surface UV radiation had increased due to declines in stratospheric ozone in the late 1970s in response to ...emissions of chlorofluorocarbons. Following the implementation of the Montreal Protocol, the stratospheric loading of chlorine/bromine peaked in the late 1990s and then decreased; subsequently, stratospheric ozone and surface UV radiation would be expected to recover and decrease, respectively. Here, we show, based on multiple data sources, that the May–September surface UV radiation in the tropics and Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes has undergone a statistically significant increasing trend about 60.0 J m
−2
(10 yr)
−1
at the 2σ level for the period 2010–20, due to the onset of total column ozone (TCO) depletion about −3.5 DU (10 yr)
−1
. Further analysis shows that the declines in stratospheric ozone after 2010 could be related to an increase in stratospheric nitrogen oxides due to increasing emissions of the source gas nitrous oxide (N
2
O).
The authors examine the chemistry and changes of the mesosphere. Topics discussed include metal layers and meteoric smoke particles and the gas-phase chemistry of metallic species.
We use a three‐dimensional chemical transport model and satellite observations to investigate Arctic ozone depletion in winter/spring 2019/20 and compare with earlier years. Persistently, low ...temperatures caused extensive chlorine activation through to March. March‐mean polar‐cap‐mean modeled chemical column ozone loss reached 78 DU (local maximum loss of ∼108 DU in the vortex), similar to that in 2011. However, weak dynamical replenishment of only 59 DU from December to March was key to producing very low (<220 DU) column ozone values. The only other winter to exhibit such weak transport in the past 20 years was 2010/11, so this process is fundamental to causing such low ozone values. A model simulation with peak observed stratospheric total chlorine and bromine loading (from the mid‐1990s) shows that gradual recovery of the ozone layer over the past 2 decades ameliorated the polar cap ozone depletion in March 2020 by ∼20 DU.
Plain Language Summary
Ozone depletion in the polar stratosphere is caused by chlorine and bromine species which are activated by low temperatures. Chlorine and bromine are transported to the stratosphere following the surface emission of ozone‐depleting substances (ODSs). While springtime ozone depletion in the Antarctic is almost always large, it is much more variable in the Arctic due to warmer temperatures and more disturbed stratospheric dynamics. Using a three‐dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model and satellite observations, we show that the very low ozone columns observed in March 2020 were a consequence of large chemical destruction and weaker‐than‐normal replenishment by transport. These very low ozone levels are, by some measures, record values despite 2 decades of decreasing stratospheric chlorine and bromine through controls of the Montreal Protocol. Had the meteorology of 2019/20 occurred 2 decades ago, the ozone loss would have been notably larger. The Arctic stratospheric dynamics for 2019/20 are extreme relative to the past 2 decades but fit a compact relationship that links column ozone variations over Arctic and Antarctic winters.
Key Points
Large mean Arctic (>63°N) chemical ozone destruction in 2019/20 of 78 DU, similar to other extreme cold winters in the past 2 decades
Anomalously weak wintertime dynamical replenishment of only ∼60 DU contributed strongly to the very low observed ozone column in March
Ozone recovery caused 20 DU less mean Arctic ozone loss in March 2020 than would have occurred with stratospheric halogens at 1995 levels
We use height‐resolved and total column satellite observations and 3‐D chemical transport model simulations to study stratospheric ozone variations during 1998–2017 as ozone‐depleting substances ...decline. In 2017 extrapolar lower stratospheric ozone displayed a strong positive anomaly following much lower values in 2016. This points to large interannual variability rather than an ongoing downward trend, as reported recently by Ball et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp‐18‐1379‐2018). The observed ozone variations are well captured by the chemical transport model throughout the stratosphere and are largely driven by meteorology. Model sensitivity experiments show that the contribution of past trends in short‐lived chlorine species to the ozone changes is small. Similarly, the potential impact of modest trends in natural brominated short‐lived species is small. These results confirm the important role that atmospheric dynamics plays in controlling ozone in the extrapolar lower stratosphere on multiannual time scales and the continued importance of monitoring ozone profiles as the stratosphere changes.
Plain Language Summary
Emission of long‐lived chlorine and bromine‐containing ozone‐depleting substances has led to the depletion of the ozone layer, most notably the Antarctic ozone hole. Policy action through the Montreal Protocol has phased out the production of the major long‐lived ozone‐depleting substances. Consequently, stratospheric chlorine and bromine amounts are declining, and we expect the ozone layer to slowly recover. However, although the tropical lower stratosphere is not a region where large ozone loss has so‐far been observed, a recent study by Ball et al. (2018) suggested that ozone there is decreasing, in disagreement with models and expectations of ozone recovery. We use updated observations and an atmospheric model to investigate these issues. First, we use an additional year of observations which show that ozone values in the lower stratosphere increased in 2017, which is a consequence of variations in atmospheric dynamics. Second, our 3‐D model performs well in reproducing the observed ozone variations. Although the model is not perfect, the comparisons suggest that we do have a good understanding of the lower stratospheric ozone. Third, we quantify the role of short‐lived chlorine and bromine compounds, which are not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, on the recent ozone changes. The effect is small.
Key Points
Observations show that lower stratospheric ozone at extrapolar latitudes increased strongly in 2017 relative to a negative anomaly in 2016
Model simulations reproduce the observed ozone variations well, and the main driver in the lower stratosphere is atmospheric dynamics
The contribution of an observation‐based trend in short‐lived chlorine species to recent lower stratospheric ozone variations is small
Chlorine atoms (Cl) are highly reactive toward hydrocarbons in the Earth's troposphere, including the greenhouse gas methane (CH4). However, the regional and global CH4 sink from Cl is poorly ...quantified as tropospheric Cl concentrations (Cl) are uncertain by ~2 orders of magnitude. Here we describe the addition of a detailed tropospheric chlorine scheme to the TOMCAT chemical transport model. The model includes several sources of tropospheric inorganic chlorine (Cly), including (i) the oxidation of chlorocarbons of natural (CH3Cl, CHBr2Cl, CH2BrCl, and CHBrCl2) and anthropogenic (CH2Cl2, CHCl3, C2Cl4, C2HCl3, and CH2ClCH2Cl) origin and (ii) sea‐salt aerosol dechlorination. Simulations were performed to quantify tropospheric Cl, with a focus on the marine boundary layer, and quantify the global significance of Cl atom CH4 oxidation. In agreement with observations, simulated surface levels of hydrogen chloride (HCl), the most abundant Cly reservoir, reach several parts per billion (ppb) over polluted coastal/continental regions, with sub‐ppb levels typical in more remote regions. Modeled annual mean surface Cl exhibits large spatial variability with the largest levels, typically in the range of 1–5 × 104 atoms cm−3, in the polluted northern hemisphere. Chlorocarbon oxidation provides a tropospheric Cly source of up to ~4320 Gg Cl/yr, sustaining a background surface Cl of <0.1 to 0.5 × 103 atoms cm−3 over large areas. Globally, we estimate a tropospheric methane sink of ~12–13 Tg CH4/yr due the CH4 + Cl reaction (~2.5% of total CH4 oxidation). Larger regional effects are predicted, with Cl accounting for ~10 to >20% of total boundary layer CH4 oxidation in some locations.
Key Points
Monthly mean surface Cl >104 atoms cm−3 in polluted northern hemisphere
Cl atoms account for up to 25% of regional boundary layer CH4 oxidation
Global tropospheric sink of ~12–13 Tg CH4/yr from CH4 + Cl reaction (~2.5% of total CH4 oxidation)
Substantial and prolonged enhancements in stratospheric water vapor (SWV) have occurred after large‐magnitude explosive tropical volcanic eruptions, with modified tropopause entry caused by ...aerosol‐absorptive heating. Here, we analyze the timing and longevity of heating‐driven post‐eruption SWV changes within CMIP6‐VolMIP short‐term climate‐response experiments with the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1). We find aerosol‐absorptive heating causes peak SWV increases of 17% (∼1 ppmv) and 10% (0.5 ppmv) at 100 and 50 hPa, at ∼18 and ∼23 months after a Pinatubo‐like eruption, respectively. We track the temperature response in the tropical lower stratosphere and identify the main SWV increase occurs only after the descending aerosol heating reaches the tropopause, suggesting a key role for aerosol microphysical processes (sedimentation rate). We explore how El Niño–Southern Oscillation variability modulates this effect. Post‐eruption SWV increases are ∼80% stronger for the La Nina phase compared to the ensemble mean. Tropical upwelling strongly mediates this effect.
Plain Language Summary
Strong volcanic eruptions, such as the 1991 eruption of Mt Pinatubo, inject a large amount of SO2 directly into the stratosphere, thereby enhancing the stratospheric aerosol layer and causing a short‐term climatic perturbation. Another substantial part of the climatic influence is the change in stratospheric water vapor (SWV), which affects the chemical processes and the radiative budget of the atmosphere. Along with near‐instantaneous injection of water vapor into the stratosphere, volcanic eruptions can indirectly enhance the entry of water vapor into the stratosphere through aerosol‐induced tropopause heating. This work analyses Earth system model experiments designed to explore how volcanic impacts combine with internal climate variability. We find that peak SWV entry mixing ratios occur only within the second post‐eruption year, consistent with the substantially lagged timing of SWV increase seen in post‐Pinatubo satellite measurements. This analysis provides a new perspective on the temporal evolution of the observed post‐Pinatubo SWV increase and an improved quantification of its impacts.
Key Points
Aerosol‐induced absorptive‐heating increases stratospheric water vapor (SWV) by up to 17% at 18 months post‐eruption in a Pinatubo‐like experiment
Analyzing simulations by El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variability show an 80% larger peak SWV increase occurs if an eruption is followed by a La Niña phase
The timing of peak SWV increase occurs when volcanic‐aerosol‐induced heating reaches the tropopause, with ENSO modulation of tropical upwelling
Severe vortex-wide ozone loss in the Arctic would expose both
ecosystems and several millions of people to unhealthy ultraviolet
radiation. Adding to these worries, and extreme events as the ...harbingers of
climate change, exceptionally low ozone with column values below 220 DU
occurred over the Arctic in March and April 2020. Sporadic occurrences of
low ozone with less than 220 DU at different regions of the vortex for almost
3 weeks were found for the first time in the observed history in the
Arctic. Furthermore, a large ozone loss of about 2.0–3.4 ppmv triggered by
an unprecedented chlorine activation (1.5–2.2 ppbv) matching the levels
occurring in the Antarctic was also observed. The polar processing situation
led to the first-ever appearance of loss saturation in the Arctic. Apart
from these, there were also ozone-mini holes in December 2019 and January 2020 driven by atmospheric dynamics. The large loss in ozone in the colder
Arctic winters is intriguing and demands rigorous monitoring of the region.
We use the 3‐D Whole Atmospheric Community Climate Model to investigate stratospheric ozone depletion due to the launch of small satellites (e.g., CubeSats) with an iodine propulsion system. The ...model considers the injection of iodine from the satellites into the Earth's thermosphere and suggests a 4‐yr timescale for transport of the emissions down to the troposphere. The base case scenario is 40,000 small satellite launches per year into low orbit (100–600 km), which would inject 8 tons I yr−1 above 120 km as I+ ions and increase stratospheric inorganic iodine by ∼0.1 part per trillion (pptv). The model shows that this scenario produces a negligible impact on global stratospheric ozone (∼0.05 DU column depletion). In contrast, a 100‐fold increase in the launch rate, and therefore thermospheric iodine injection, is predicted to result in modeled ozone depletion of up to 14 DU (approximately 2%–7%) over the polar regions.
Plain Language Summary
Iodine has the potential to cause stratospheric ozone depletion. Small satellites (<10 kg) in low Earth orbit require electric propulsion to prolong their time in orbit, and there is strong interest in replacing the rare gas propellant (Xe or Kr) with I2. Here we estimate the potential impact of thermosphere iodine injection from such satellites on stratospheric ozone. Since the demand for small satellites could increase greatly in the future, it is important to understand the potential risks to ozone depletion if iodine propulsion systems are used. Assuming a scenario in which 40,000 small satellites are launched each year into relatively low orbits and each satellite is assumed to contain 200 g I2, this could inject 8 tons/year of iodine ions into the upper atmosphere (above 120 km). Using a 3‐D atmospheric chemistry‐climate model, we show that the perturbation to the total column ozone is very small, decreasing by 0.05 DU (<0.02%) globally and 0.2 DU (<0.1%) for September/October in the Antarctic polar region. However, a 100‐fold increase in the number of launches and therefore mass of iodine emitted into near‐Earth orbit is predicted to cause significant ozone depletion up to 14 DU (5.6%) in the Antarctic spring.
Key Points
The effect of injecting iodine into the atmosphere from I2‐propelled satellites has been modeled using an atmosphere chemistry‐climate model
Injection of 8 tons I yr−1, based on the expected launch rate, is predicted to cause negligible O3 depletion (0.05 DU) globally
O3 depletion increases near‐linearly with iodine mass injected, reaching up to 14 DU in the polar regions for 800 tons I yr−1
The Montreal Protocol has succeeded in limiting major ozone-depleting substance emissions, and consequently stratospheric ozone concentrations are expected to recover this century. However, there is ...a large uncertainty in the rate of regional ozone recovery in the Northern Hemisphere. Here we identify a Eurasia-North America dipole mode in the total column ozone over the Northern Hemisphere, showing negative and positive total column ozone anomaly centres over Eurasia and North America, respectively. The positive trend of this mode explains an enhanced total column ozone decline over the Eurasian continent in the past three decades, which is closely related to the polar vortex shift towards Eurasia. Multiple chemistry-climate-model simulations indicate that the positive Eurasia-North America dipole trend in late winter is likely to continue in the near future. Our findings suggest that the anticipated ozone recovery in late winter will be sensitive not only to the ozone-depleting substance decline but also to the polar vortex changes, and could be substantially delayed in some regions of the Northern Hemisphere extratropics.