Why do we repeat choices that we know are bad for us? Decision making is characterized by the parallel engagement of two distinct systems, goal-directed and habitual, thought to arise from two ...computational learning mechanisms, model-based and model-free. The habitual system is a candidate source of pathological fixedness. Using a decision task that measures the contribution to learning of either mechanism, we show a bias towards model-free (habit) acquisition in disorders involving both natural (binge eating) and artificial (methamphetamine) rewards, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. This favoring of model-free learning may underlie the repetitive behaviors that ultimately dominate in these disorders. Further, we show that the habit formation bias is associated with lower gray matter volumes in caudate and medial orbitofrontal cortex. Our findings suggest that the dysfunction in a common neurocomputational mechanism may underlie diverse disorders involving compulsion.
In response to the emerging crisis and growing calls from patients and clinicians for guidance 5, a working group of clinical experts from the International College of Obsessive Compulsive Spectrum ...Disorders (ICOCS) and the Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders Research Network of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (OCRN) have produced this consensus statement with the aim of delivering pragmatic guidance at the earliest opportunity to clinicians for managing this complex challenge. Based on the risks associated with exposure and response prevention (ERP) in the pandemic (see below), and uncertainty as to which of the two evidence-based treatments, pharmacotherapy or cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), represents the most efficacious first line treatment modality 11, pharmacotherapy should be the first option for adults and children with OCD with contamination, washing or cleaning symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Consider A) type of medication; most patients should receive an SSRI, or if not responsive, another SSRI and as a third choice clomipramine (for which an ECG may be required in certain patient groups); Note US Food and Drug Administration "black box" warnings or advice from equivalent national regulatory authorities regarding increased risk in young people and other vulnerable patient groups. Check for adverse effects and be available for any concerns related to "activation" or newly emergent or increased suicidal ideation, which in the young can be mitigated by starting treatment at a low dose and titrating more gradually; B) dosage; if the patient is on a suboptimal dose, consider increasing it, paying attention to any contraindications; C) SSRI-resistance; consider a low dose of adjunctive antipsychotic (aripiprazole, risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine), especially if a tic is present; D) adherence; ensure the patient is able to obtain an adequate supply and is taking the treatment regularly.
Abstract
Brain-imaging findings implicate aberrant cortico-striatal neurocircuitry in the underlying pathology of OCD, so representing a potential treatment target. Ablative neurosurgery or deep ...brain (invasive) stimulation (DBS) of tracts or nodes within this circuitry is sometimes found to improve OCD, possibly by enhancing information-processing functions. Non-invasive neurostimulation, targeting superficial cortical nodes within cortico-striatal circuitry, is a safer and more acceptable alternative, with potential for scaling up and applying to a larger patient population, earlier in the course of illness.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is the form of neuromodulation studied most in OCD. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and supplementary motor area (SMA) have been identified as promising targets. The effect is larger for those not resistant to SSRI or failing to respond to only one SSRI trial. Thus, r-TMS may be best implemented earlier in the care pathway. rTMS is also relatively costly, involves specialist technical equipment and staff, and cannot be delivered in patients’ homes.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves applying a low-amplitude (1-3mA) electric current to the brain via electrodes placed on the scalp. Compared with rTMS, tDCS tends to electrically modulate a more diffuse and superficial brain area, but it could represent a preferable option for patients with common mental disorders such as OCD, as it is cheaper, portable, simple and safe to use. In a recent randomised controlled feasibility study, the L-OFC represented the optimal target based on clinical changes. Further investigation of tDCS in OCD is warranted, to determine the optimal stimulation protocol, longer-term effectiveness and brain-based mechanisms of effect. If efficacy is substantiated, home-based approaches represent a rational next step.
Disclosure of Interest
N. Fineberg Grant / Research support from: In the past three years I have received research funding from the NIHR, COST and Orchard; . I have additionally received financial support to attend meetings from the British Association for Psychopharmacology, European College for Neuropsychopharmacology, Royal College of Psychiatrists, International College for Neuropsychopharmacology, World Psychiatric Association, International Forum for Mood and Anxiety Disorders, American College for Neuropsychopharmacology. In the past I have received funding from various pharmaceutical companies for research into the role of SSRIs and other forms of medication as treatments for OCD., Consultant of: payment for expert advisory work on psychopharmacology for the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, royalties from Oxford University Press and an honorarium from Elsevier for editorial work., Paid Instructor of: payment for lectures for the Global Mental Health Academy.
Progress in understanding the underlying neurobiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has stalled in part because of the considerable problem of heterogeneity within this diagnostic category, ...and homogeneity across other putatively discrete, diagnostic categories. As psychiatry begins to recognize the shortcomings of a purely symptom-based psychiatric nosology, new data-driven approaches have begun to be utilized with the goal of solving these problems: specifically, identifying trans-diagnostic aspects of clinical phenomenology based on their association with neurobiological processes. In this review, we describe key methodological approaches to understanding OCD from this perspective and highlight the candidate traits that have already been identified as a result of these early endeavours. We discuss how important inferences can be made from pre-existing case-control studies as well as showcasing newer methods that rely on large general population datasets to refine and validate psychiatric phenotypes. As exemplars, we take ‘compulsivity’ and ‘anxiety’, putatively trans-diagnostic symptom dimensions that are linked to well-defined neurobiological mechanisms, goal-directed learning and error-related negativity, respectively. We argue that the identification of biologically valid, more homogeneous, dimensions such as these provides renewed optimism for identifying reliable genetic contributions to OCD and other disorders, improving animal models and critically, provides a path towards a future of more targeted psychiatric treatments.
OCD is characterized by obsessions (recurrent, intrusive, unwanted thoughts, images or impulses and compulsions (repetitive behaviors or mental acts that the individual feels compelled to perform), ...which can manifest together or separately (Fineberg et al., 2020). NICE guidelines suggest that low intensity psychological treatments (including ERP) is the first line treatment for OCD, and that a “stepped care” treatment approach for OCD reserves combination treatment for adults with OCD with severe functional impairment, and for adults without an adequate response to: 1) treatment with an SSRI alone (12 weeks duration) or 2) CBT (including ERP) alone (NICE, 2005). Existing US treatment guidelines (APA guidelines) suggest that there are three first-line treatments for OCD (SSRI, CBT, SSRI+CBT) and recommends combined treatment for patients with an unsatisfactory response to monotherapy or for patients with severe OCD. Although, systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in 1993–2014 suggest that combination treatment was not significantly better than CBT plus placebo (Ost et al., 2015), based on data from a recent systematic and meta-analysis which searched the two controlled trials registers maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration Common Mental Disorders group, the combination treatment approach is likely to be more effective than psychotherapeutic interventions alone, at least in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (Skapinakis et al., 2016a). Based on data from Optimal treatment for OCD study conducted by Fineberg et al., (2018) combined treatment appeared to be the most effective especially when compared to CBT monotherapy, but SSRI monotherapy was found as the most cost effective. In this review we summarize available treatment recommendations.
•This manuscript examines whether or not combination treatment with an SSRI and low intensity psychological treatment (ERP or CBT with or without ERP) is the optimal initial treatment for OCD in comparison to monotherapy treatments (CBT or SSRI).•NICE guidelines suggest that low intensity psychological treatments (including ERP) is the first line treatment for OCD, and that a “stepped care” treatment approach for OCD reserves combination treatment for adults with OCD with severe functional impairment, and for adults without an adequate response to: 1) treatment with an SSRI alone (12 weeks duration) or 2) CBT (including ERP) alone (Fineberg et al., 2020).•NICE guidelines further suggest that more research is needed as to the effect of combination treatment versus single-strand treatments and involve a follow-up of 1, 2 and 5 years (Fineberg et al., 2020).•Questions remain as to whether combination treatment is better for improving treatment response or for disease remission.
Background. Gambling and gaming disorders have been included as “disorders due to addictive behaviors” in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Other problematic behaviors may be ...considered as “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors (6C5Y).” Methods. Narrative review, experts' opinions. Results. We suggest the following meta-level criteria for considering potential addictive behaviors as fulfilling the category of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”: 1. Clinical relevance: Empirical evidence from multiple scientific studies demonstrates that the specific potential addictive behavior is clinically relevant and individuals experience negative consequences and functional impairments in daily life due to the problematic and potentially addictive behavior. 2. Theoretical embedding: Current theories and theoretical models belonging to the field of research on addictive behaviors describe and explain most appropriately the candidate phenomenon of a potential addictive behavior. 3. Empirical evidence: Data based on self-reports, clinical interviews, surveys, behavioral experiments, and, if available, biological investigations (neural, physiological, genetic) suggest that psychological (and neurobiological) mechanisms involved in other addictive behaviors are also valid for the candidate phenomenon. Varying degrees of support for problematic forms of pornography use, buying and shopping, and use of social networks are available. These conditions may fit the category of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”. Conclusion. It is important not to over-pathologize everyday-life behavior while concurrently not trivializing conditions that are of clinical importance and that deserve public health considerations. The proposed meta-level-criteria may help guide both research efforts and clinical practice.
Abstract Background To present the rationale for the new Obsessive–Compulsive and Related Disorders (OCRD) grouping in the Mental and Behavioural Disorders chapter of the Eleventh Revision of the ...World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), including the conceptualization and essential features of disorders in this grouping. Methods Review of the recommendations of the ICD-11 Working Group on the Classification for OCRD. These sought to maximize clinical utility, global applicability, and scientific validity. Results The rationale for the grouping is based on common clinical features of included disorders including repetitive unwanted thoughts and associated behaviours, and is supported by emerging evidence from imaging, neurochemical, and genetic studies. The proposed grouping includes obsessive–compulsive disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, olfactory reference disorder, and hoarding disorder. Body-focused repetitive behaviour disorders, including trichotillomania and excoriation disorder are also included. Tourette disorder, a neurological disorder in ICD-11, and personality disorder with anankastic features, a personality disorder in ICD-11, are recommended for cross-referencing. Limitations Alternative nosological conceptualizations have been described in the literature and have some merit and empirical basis. Further work is needed to determine whether the proposed ICD-11 OCRD grouping and diagnostic guidelines are mostly likely to achieve the goals of maximizing clinical utility and global applicability. Conclusion It is anticipated that creation of an OCRD grouping will contribute to accurate identification and appropriate treatment of affected patients as well as research efforts aimed at improving our understanding of the prevalence, assessment, and management of its constituent disorders.
The Internet is now all-pervasive across much of the globe. While it has positive uses (e.g. prompt access to information, rapid news dissemination), many individuals develop Problematic Use of the ...Internet (PUI), an umbrella term incorporating a range of repetitive impairing behaviours. The Internet can act as a conduit for, and may contribute to, functionally impairing behaviours including excessive and compulsive video gaming, compulsive sexual behaviour, buying, gambling, streaming or social networks use. There is growing public and National health authority concern about the health and societal costs of PUI across the lifespan. Gaming Disorder is being considered for inclusion as a mental disorder in diagnostic classification systems, and was listed in the ICD-11 version released for consideration by Member States (http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision/timeline/en/). More research is needed into disorder definitions, validation of clinical tools, prevalence, clinical parameters, brain-based biology, socio-health-economic impact, and empirically validated intervention and policy approaches. Potential cultural differences in the magnitudes and natures of types and patterns of PUI need to be better understood, to inform optimal health policy and service development. To this end, the EU under Horizon 2020 has launched a new four-year European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action Programme (CA 16207), bringing together scientists and clinicians from across the fields of impulsive, compulsive, and addictive disorders, to advance networked interdisciplinary research into PUI across Europe and beyond, ultimately seeking to inform regulatory policies and clinical practice. This paper describes nine critical and achievable research priorities identified by the Network, needed in order to advance understanding of PUI, with a view towards identifying vulnerable individuals for early intervention. The network shall enable collaborative research networks, shared multinational databases, multicentre studies and joint publications.
Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly debilitating neuropsychiatric condition with estimated lifetime prevalence of 2–3%, more than twice that of schizophrenia. However, in contrast to ...other neuropsychiatric conditions of a comparable or lesser prevalence, relatively little is understood about the aetiology, neural substrates and cognitive profile of OCD. Despite strong evidence for OCD being familial, with risk to first-degree relatives much greater than for the background population, its genetic underpinnings have not yet been adequately delineated. Although cognitive dysfunction is evident in the everyday behaviour of OCD sufferers and is central to contemporary psychological models, theory-based studies of neurocognitive function have yet to reveal a reliable cognitive signature, and interpretation has often been confounded by failures to control for co-morbidities. The neuroimaging findings in OCD are amongst the most robust reported in the psychiatric literature, with structural and functional abnormalities frequently reported in orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and caudate nucleus. In spite of this, our relative lack of understanding of OCD neurochemical processes continues to impede progress in the development of novel pharmacological treatment approaches. Integrating the neurobiological, cognitive, and clinical findings, we propose that OCD might usefully be conceptualised in terms of lateral orbitofrontal loop dysfunction, and that failures in cognitive and behavioural inhibitory processes appear to underlie many of the symptoms and neurocognitive findings. We highlight existing limitations in the literature, and the potential utility of endophenotypes in overcoming these limitations. We propose that neurocognitive indices of inhibitory functions may represent a useful heuristic in the search for endophenotypes in OCD. This has direct implications not only for OCD but also for putative obsessive-compulsive spectrum conditions including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Tourette's syndrome, and trichotillomania (compulsive hair pulling).
Obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by obsessions (intrusive thoughts) and compulsions (repetitive ritualistic behaviours) leading to functional impairment. Accumulating evidence ...links these conditions with underlying dysregulation of fronto‐striatal circuitry and monoamine systems. These abnormalities represent key targets for existing and novel treatment interventions. However, the brain bases of these conditions and treatment mechanisms are still not fully elucidated. Animal models simulating the behavioural and clinical manifestations of the disorder show great potential for augmenting our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of OCD. This paper provides an overview of what is known about OCD from several perspectives. We begin by describing the clinical features of OCD and the criteria used to assess the validity of animal models of symptomatology; namely, face validity (phenomenological similarity between inducing conditions and specific symptoms of the human phenomenon), predictive validity (similarity in response to treatment) and construct validity (similarity in underlying physiological or psychological mechanisms). We then survey animal models of OC spectrum conditions within this framework, focusing on (i) ethological models; (ii) genetic and pharmacological models; and (iii) neurobehavioural models. We also discuss their advantages and shortcomings in relation to their capacity to identify potentially efficacious new compounds. It is of interest that there has been rather little evidence of ‘false alarms’ for therapeutic drug effects in OCD models which actually fail in the clinic. While it is more difficult to model obsessive cognition than compulsive behaviour in experimental animals, it is feasible to infer cognitive inflexibility in certain animal paradigms. Finally, key future neurobiological and treatment research areas are highlighted.
LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed issue on Translational Neuropharmacology. To view the other articles in this issue visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2011.164.issue‐4
PDF
