SUMMARY A major challenge in seismic tomography consists in quantifying and representing model resolution and uncertainty, particularly at global scales. This information is crucial for ...interpretations of tomographic images and their technical application in geodynamics. However, due to large computational costs, there have been only few attempts so far to coherently analyse the spatially varying resolving power for a complete set of model parameters. Here, we present a concept for an effective evaluation and global representation of the 3-D resolution information contained in a full set of averaging kernels. In our case, these kernels are constructed using the ‘Subtractive Optimally Localized Averages’ (SOLA) method, a variant of classic Backus-Gilbert inversion suitable for global tomography. Our assessment strategy incorporates the following steps: (1) a 3-D Gaussian function is fitted to each averaging kernel to measure resolution lengths in different directions and (2) we define a classification scheme for the quality of the averaging kernels based on their focus with respect to the estimated 3-D Gaussian, allowing us to reliably identify whether the inferred resolution lengths are robust. This strategy is not restricted to SOLA inversions, but can, for example, be applied in all cases where point-spread functions are computed in other tomographic frameworks. Together with model uncertainty estimates that are derived from error propagation in the SOLA method, our concept reveals at which locations, resolution lengths and interpretations of model values are actually meaningful. We finally illustrate how the complete information from our analysis can be used to calibrate the SOLA inversion parameters—locally tunable target resolution kernels and trade-off parameters—without the need for visual inspection of the individual resulting averaging kernels. Instead, our global representations provide a tool for designing tomographic models with specific resolution-uncertainty properties that are useful in geodynamic applications, especially for linking seismic inversions to models of mantle flow.
SUMMARY
Tomographic-geodynamic model comparisons are a key component in studies of the present-day state and evolution of Earth’s mantle. To account for the limited seismic resolution, ‘tomographic ...filtering’ of the geodynamically predicted mantle structures is a standard processing step in this context. The filtered model provides valuable information on how heterogeneities are smeared and modified in amplitude given the available seismic data and underlying inversion strategy. An important aspect that has so far not been taken into account are the effects of data uncertainties. We present a new method for ‘tomographic filtering’ in which it is possible to include the effects of random and systematic errors in the seismic measurements and to analyse the associated uncertainties in the tomographic model space. The ‘imaged’ model is constructed by computing the generalized-inverse projection (GIP) of synthetic data calculated in an earth model of choice. An advantage of this approach is that a reparametrization onto the tomographic grid can be avoided, depending on how the synthetic data are calculated. To demonstrate the viability of the method, we compute traveltimes in an existing mantle circulation model (MCM), add specific realizations of random seismic ‘noise’ to the synthetic data and apply the generalized inverse operator of a recent Backus–Gilbert-type global S-wave tomography. GIP models based on different noise realizations show a significant variability of the shape and amplitude of seismic anomalies. This highlights the importance of interpreting tomographic images in a prudent and cautious manner. Systematic errors, such as event mislocation or imperfect crustal corrections, can be investigated by introducing an additional term to the noise component so that the resulting noise distributions are biased. In contrast to Gaussian zero-mean noise, this leads to a bias in model space; that is, the mean of all GIP realizations also is non-zero. Knowledge of the statistical properties of model uncertainties together with tomographic resolution is crucial for obtaining meaningful estimates of Earth’s present-day thermodynamic state. A practicable treatment of error propagation and uncertainty quantification will therefore be increasingly important, especially in view of geodynamic inversions that aim at ‘retrodicting’ past mantle evolution based on tomographic images.
