Abstract Background The SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, California) transcatheter valve incorporates features designed to address the well-known deficiencies of transcatheter aortic ...valve replacement (TAVR). An ultra–low-profile delivery system facilitates safe, controlled, and accurate implantation and an external seal minimizes paravalvular regurgitation. Objectives The study evaluated whether TAVR with this third-generation valve would be a viable alternative to high- or intermediate-risk surgery for severe aortic stenosis. Methods The prospective study enrolled 150 patients at 16 sites in Europe and Canada. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-procedure, and 30 days. New sizing recommendations were developed during the course of the study. Results Patients were 83.6 ± 5.0 years of age, with multiple comorbidities reflected by a Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 7.4 ± 4.5% and logistic EuroSCORE of 21.6 ± 12.3%. A transfemoral approach was chosen in 64.0% and alternative access (transapical/direct aortic) in the remainder. At 30 days, paravalvular regurgitation was none to mild in 96.4% and moderate in 3.5%. No patient had severe regurgitation. Transfemoral implantation was associated with low mortality (2.1%), no disabling stroke (0.0%), and fully percutaneous access and closure in 95.8%. Nontransfemoral alternative access was associated with higher rates of mortality (11.6%) and stroke (5.6%). Conclusions This third-generation device addresses major deficiencies of earlier valves in terms of ease of use, accuracy of positioning, and paravalvular sealing. The rates of mortality and stroke with transfemoral access are among the lowest reported and support further evaluation as an alternative to open surgery in intermediate-risk patients. (Safety and Performance Study of the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve SAPIEN3; NCT01808287 )
Objective The aim of this propensity-matched, multicenter study was to compare early clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) ...versus patients undergoing sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Methods We reviewed 468 TA-TAVIs performed in 20 centers from April 2008 to May 2011, and 51 SU-AVRs performed in 3 centers from March to September 2011. Based on a propensity score analysis, 2 groups with 38 matched pairs were created. Variables used in the propensity analysis were age, sex, body surface area, New York Heart Association class, logistic EuroSCORE, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic valve area, mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Results Preoperative characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. Hospital mortality was 5.3% and 0% in the TA-TAVI and SU-AVR groups, respectively ( P = .49). We did not observe stroke or acute myocardial infarction in the 2 groups. Permanent pacemaker implantation was needed in 2 patients of each group (5.3%, P = 1.0). Dialysis was required in 2 patients (5.3%) in the SU-AVR group and in 1 patient (2.7%) in the TA-TAVI group ( P = 1.0). Predischarge echocardiographic data showed that the incidence of paravalvular leak (at least mild) was greater in the TA-TAVI group (44.7% vs 15.8%, P = .001), but there were no differences in terms of mean transprosthetic gradient (10.3 ± 5 mm Hg vs 11 ± 3.7 mm Hg, P = .59). Conclusions This preliminary experience showed that, in patients at high risk for conventional surgery, SU-AVR is as safe and effective as TA-TAVI and that it is associated with a lower rate of postprocedural paravalvular leak.
The aims of the present study were to investigate the incidence and characteristics of conduction disorders (CDs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), to analyze the predictors of ...permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, and to evaluate the outcomes of CDs over time. In particular, we sought to investigate whether the depth of deployment and other technical aspects of valve implantation might predict the need for PPM implantation after TAVI. TAVI has been reported to favor the onset or worsening of CDs often requiring PPM implantation. A total of 70 patients with aortic stenosis due to dystrophic calcification underwent TAVI with third-generation CoreValve Revalving System from May 2007 to April 2009. We collected electrocardiograms at baseline, during TAVI, during hospitalization and at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits thereafter. The clinical, anatomic, and procedural variables were tested to identify the predictors of PPM implantation. The PPM dependency at follow-up was analyzed. Six patients were excluded from the analysis because of a pre-existing PPM. Of the 64 patients, 32 (50%) had one or more atrioventricular-intraventricular CDs at baseline. TAVI induced a worsening in the CDs in 49 (77%) of the 64 patients, with 25 (39%) requiring in-hospital PPM implantation. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of PPM implantation were the depth of the prosthesis implantation (p = 0.039) and the pre-existing right bundle branch block (p = 0.046). A trend in the recovery of the CDs over time was recorded, although 2 patients required PPM implantation 1 month after discharge for late complete atrioventricular block. In conclusion, TAVI often induces or worsens CDs, requiring PPM in more than one third of patients, although a trend in the recovery of CDs during the midterm was recorded. The independent predictors of PPM implantation were the depth of prosthesis implantation and pre-existing right bundle branch block.
Background Acute fulminant myocarditis (AFM) may represent a life-threatening event, characterized by rapidly progressive cardiac compromise that ultimately leads to refractory cardiogenic shock or ...cardiac arrest. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides effective cardiocirculatory support in this circumstance, but few clinical series are available about early and long-term results. Data from a multicenter study group are reported which analyzed subjects affected by AFM and treated with VA-ECMO during a 5-year period. Method From hospital databases, 57 patients with diagnoses of AFM treated with VA-ECMO in the past 5 years were found and analyzed. Mean age was 37.6 ± 11.8 years; 37 patients were women. At VA-ECMO implantation, cardiogenic shock was present in 38 patients, cardiac arrest in 12, and severe hemodynamic instability in 7. A peripheral approach was used with 47 patients, whereas 10 patients had a central implantation or other access. Results Mean VA-ECMO support was 9.9 ± 19 days (range, 2 to 24 days). Cardiac recovery with ECMO weaning was achieved in 43 patients (75.5%), major complications were observed in 40 patients (70.1%), and survival to hospital discharge occurred in 41 patients (71.9%). After hospital discharge (median follow-up, 15 months) there were 2 late deaths. The 5-year actual survival was 65.2% ± 7.9%, with recurrent self-recovering myocarditis observed in 2 patients (at 6 and 12 months from the first AFM event), and 1 heart transplantation. Conclusions Cardiopulmonary support with VA-ECMO provides an invaluable tool in the treatment of AFM, although major complications may characterize the hospital course. Long-term outcome appears favorable with rare episodes of recurrent myocarditis or cardiac-related events.
Abstract Background The role of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in primary cardiogenic shock (PCS) is well established. In this study, we evaluated the impact of etiology on outcomes. Methods ...Between January 2009 and March 2013, we implanted a total of 249 patients with ECLS; we focused on 64 patients for whom peripheral ECLS was the treatment for PCS. Of these, 37 cases (58%) were “acute” (mostly acute myocardial infarction: 39%); 27 (42%) had an exacerbation of “chronic” heart failure (dilated cardiomyopathy: 30%; post-ischemic cardiomyopathy: 9%; and congenital: 3%). Results In the group with chronic etiology, 23 patients were bridged to a left ventricular assist device (52%) or heart transplantation (33%). In the group with acute etiology, ECLS was used as a bridge-to-transplantation in 3 patients (8%), a bridge-to-bridge in 9 (24%), and a bridge-to-recovery in 18 (49%). One patient in each group was bridged to conventional surgery. Recovery of cardiac function was achieved in only the group with acute primary cardiogenic shock (18 vs 0 patients, P = .0001). A mean flow during support of ≤60% of the theoretic flow (body surface area × 2.4) was a predictor of successful weaning ( P = .02). Median duration of ECLS support was 7 days (range: 2-11.5 days). Nine patients (14%) died during support; 30-day overall survival was 80% (51 of 64 patients); and 59% of patients were discharged, in whom survival at 48 months was 90%. Thirty-day survival was correlated with duration of ECLS support. Conclusions In “chronic” heart failure, ECLS represents a bridge to a ventricular assist device or heart transplantation, whereas in “acute” settings, it offers a considerable chance of recovery, and is often the only required therapy.
Abstract Objective Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) are suitable alternatives to conventional surgery. The aim of this study is to ...compare early outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI and SU-AVR. Methods Data were analyzed on patients who underwent TAVI and patients who underwent SU-AVR. Two matched cohorts (TAVI vs SU-AVR) were created using propensity scores; all analyses were repeated for transapical TAVI and transfemoral TAVI, separately. Outcomes were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium–2 criteria. Results A total of 2177 patients were included in the analysis: 1885 (86.6%) treated with TAVI; 292 (13.4%) treated with SU-AVR. Mortality in unmatched TAVI and SU-AVR patients was 7.1% and 2.1%, respectively, at 30 days, and 12.9% and 4.6%, respectively, at 1 year. No differences were found in 30-day mortality in the 214 matched patient pairs (3.7% vs 2.3%; P = .4), but patients treated with TAVI showed a lower incidence of device success (85.9% vs 98.6%; P < .001) and pacemaker implantation (2.8% vs 9.4%; P = .005), and a higher incidence of any paravalvular leakage (PVL). Conclusions SU-AVR is associated with better device success and a lower incidence of PVL, compared with TAVI. Nevertheless, patients treated with SU-AVR were more likely to receive a permanent pacemaker. SU-AVR and TAVI provide good results in patients who have severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Given the multiple therapeutic options available, patients may receive the treatment that is most appropriate for their clinical and anatomical characteristics.
Objective Although surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and sutureless aortic ...valve replacement (SU-AVR) have shown good results. The aim of our multicenter, propensity-matched study was to compare the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of surgical SAVR, transapical TAVR (TA-TAVR), and SU-AVR. Methods We analyzed data from 566 TA-TAVR, 349 SAVR, and 38 SU-AVR patients treated from January 2009 to March 2012. We used a propensity-matching strategy to compare on-pump (SAVR, SU-AVR) and off-pump (TA-TAVR) surgical techniques. The outcomes were analyzed using multivariate weighted logistic regression or multinomial logistic analysis. Results In the matched cohorts, the 30-day overall mortality was significantly lower after SAVR than TA-TAVR (7% vs 1.8%, P = .026), with no differences in mortality between SU-AVR and TA-TAVR. Multivariate analysis showed SU-AVR to have a protective effect, although not statistically significant, against aortic regurgitation, pacemaker implantation, and renal replacement therapy compared with TA-TAVR. Compared with TA-TAVR, SAVR demonstrated significant protection against aortic regurgitation (odds ratio, 0.04; P < .001) and a trend toward protection against death, pacemaker implantation, and myocardial infarction. The mean transaortic gradient was 10.3 ± 4.4 mm Hg, 11 ± 3.4 mm Hg, and 16.5 ± 5.8 mm Hg in the TA-TAVR, SU-AVR, and SAVR patients, respectively. Conclusions SAVR was associated with lower 30-day mortality than TA-TAVR. SAVR was also associated with a lower risk of postoperative aortic regurgitation compared with TA-TAVR. We did not find other significant differences in outcomes among matched patients treated with SAVR, SU-AVR, and TA-TAVR.
Abstract Objectives The Registry of the Utilization of the TAo-TAVR approach using the Edwards SAPIEN Valve (ROUTE) was established to assess the effectiveness and safety of the use of transaortic ...(TAo) access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures ( NCT01991431 ). Background TAVR represents an alternative to surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients. Whereas the transfemoral access route is used commonly as the first-line approach, transapical access is an option for patients not suitable for transfemoral treatment mainly due to anatomic conditions. TAo-TAVR has been shown to be a viable alternative surgical access route; however, only limited data on its effectiveness and safety has been published. Methods ROUTE is a multicenter, international, prospective, observational registry; data were collected from 18 centers across Europe starting in February 2013. Patients having severe calcific aortic stenosis were documented if they were scheduled to undergo TAo-TAVR using an Edwards SAPIEN XT or a SAPIEN 3 valve. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were intraprocedural or in hospital and 30-day complication rates. Results A total of 301 patients with a mean age of 81.7 ± 5.9 years and an Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 9.0 ± 7.6% were included. Valve success was documented in 96.7%. The 30-day mortality was 6.1% (18/293) (procedure-related mortality: 3.1%; 9 of 293). The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 defined complications included myocardial infarction (1.0%), stroke (1.0%), transient ischemic attack (0.3%), major vascular complications (3.4%), life-threatening bleeding (3.4%), and acute kidney injury (9.5%). In 3.3% of patients, paravalvular regurgitation was classified as moderate or severe (10 of 300). Twenty-six patients (8.8%) required permanent pacemaker implantation. Conclusions TAo access for TAVR seems to be a safe alternative to the transapical procedure.
Background This single-center retrospective study assessed the variation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation and its effect on ...survival. We also evaluated the effect of sheath diameter on LVEF. Methods We analyzed data of all consecutive patients who underwent transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Sapien (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) device (and its evolutions) between 2009 and 2015. We analyzed the difference between preoperative LVEF and LVEF at discharge (ΔEF = LVEFpost-op – LVEFpre-op) and considered its interquartile range (±5%) as the cutoff. Patients were divided in three groups: (1) improved LVEF (ΔEF ≥ +5%); (2) unchanged LVEF (ΔEF –5% to +5%), and (3) worsened LVEF (ΔEF ≤ –5%). Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and logistic regression multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of LVEF improvement. Results Data of 122 patients were analyzed. Patients in the three groups were distributed as follows: (group 1) 27 patients (22.1%), (group 2) 69 (56.6%), and (group 3) 26 (21.3%). The mean ΔEF was 12.7% ± 4.7% in group 1 and –10.8% ± 3.9% in group 3. The ΔEF was more likely to improve in patients with preoperative LVEF of less than 0.35 ( p = 0.014). There were no significant differences in survival ( p = 0.41), rehospitalization ( p = 0.472), and New York Heart Association Functional Classification ( p = 0.307) among the groups. The use of the smallest available sheath (18F) was not associated with a significant change of ΔEF. Conclusions LVEF worsened in a small number of patients after transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but this change was not associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Patients with a low LVEF showed better improvement. The progressive reduction of sheath diameter does not have a significant effect on LVEF changes.
...the hemodynamic pattern was likely different. ...patients with HF with elevated AHI and several CSAs have the same cardiac output and circulatory delay as patients who do not show these findings ...(1). ...changes in AHI are unlikely related to changes in pulmonary receptor stimulation.
PDF
