High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduces procedure time; however, safety and efficacy thresholds vary with catheter design.
The study sought to determine optimal HPSD ...ablation conditions with a novel flexible-tipped, contact force–sensing RFA catheter.
RFA lesions were created in thigh muscle (16 swine) over a range of conditions (51–82 W, 2–40 g, 8–40 mL/min irrigation). An intracardiac study was performed (12 swine) to characterize steam pop thresholds. Lesions were created in a second intracardiac study (14 swine, n = 290 pulmonary vein isolation PVI lesions) with combinations of radiofrequency power, duration, and contact force. PVI was tested, animals were sacrificed, and lesions were measured.
The likelihood of coagulation formation in the thigh model was <20% when power was ≤79 W, when contact force was ≤40 g, when duration was ≤11 seconds, and when irrigation rates were 8 to 40 mL/min. The impact of contact force on lesion safety and efficacy was more pronounced using HPSD (60 W/8 seconds) compared with conventional ablation (30 W/45 seconds) (P = .038). During PVI, focal atrial lesions ranged in width from 4.2 to 12.5 mm and were transmural 80.8% of the time. PVI was achieved in 13 of 14 veins. Logistic regression identified that the optimal parameters for radiofrequency application were 60 to 70 W with a duration <8 seconds and <15 g contact force.
Optimal HPSD lesions with this this flexible-tipped, force-sensing RFA catheter were created at 60 to 70 W for <8 seconds with <15 g contact force. Chronic studies are ongoing to assess radiofrequency parameter refinements and long-term lesion durability using these conditions.
Display omitted
The European Union Medical Device Regulation (MDR) requires manufacturers to undertake post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) to assess the safety and performance of their devices following approval ...and Conformité Européenne (CE) marking. The quality and reliability of device registries for this Regulation have not been reported. As part of the Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices (CORE-MD) project, we identified and reviewed European cardiovascular and orthopaedic registries to assess their structures, methods, and suitability as data sources for regulatory purposes.
Regional, national and multi-country European cardiovascular (coronary stents and valve repair/replacement) and orthopaedic (hip/knee prostheses) registries were identified using a systematic literature search. Annual reports, peer-reviewed publications, and websites were reviewed to extract publicly available information for 33 items related to structure and methodology in six domains and also for reported outcomes.
Of the 20 cardiovascular and 26 orthopaedic registries fulfilling eligibility criteria, a median of 33% (IQR: 14%-71%) items for cardiovascular and 60% (IQR: 28%-100%) items for orthopaedic registries were reported, with large variation across domains. For instance, no cardiovascular and 16 (62%) orthopaedic registries reported patient/ procedure-level completeness. No cardiovascular and 5 (19%) orthopaedic registries reported outlier performances of devices, but each with a different outlier definition. There was large heterogeneity in reporting on items, outcomes, definitions of outcomes, and follow-up durations.
European cardiovascular and orthopaedic device registries could improve their potential as data sources for regulatory purposes by reaching consensus on standardised reporting of structural and methodological characteristics to judge the quality of the evidence as well as outcomes.
