Hypothermic preservation is known to cause renal graft injury, especially in donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplantation. We investigated the impact of cold storage (SCS) versus ...short periods of normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP) after SCS versus prolonged, continuous NEVKP with near avoidance of SCS on kidney function after transplantation. Following 30 min of warm ischemia, kidneys were removed from 30‐kg Yorkshire pigs and preserved for 16 h with (A) 16 h SCS, (B) 15 h SCS + 1 h NEVKP, (C) 8 h SCS + 8 h NEVKP, and (D) 16 h NEVKP. After contralateral kidney resection, grafts were autotransplanted and pigs followed up for 8 days. Perfusate injury markers such as aspartate aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase remained low; lactate decreased significantly until end of perfusion in groups C and D (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002). Grafts in group D demonstrated significantly lower serum creatinine peak when compared to all other groups (p < 0.001) and 24‐h creatinine clearance at day 3 after surgery was significantly higher (63.4 ± 19.0 mL/min) versus all other groups (p < 0.001). Histological assessment on day 8 demonstrated fewer apoptotic cells in group D (p = 0.008). In conclusion, prolonged, continuous NEVKP provides superior short‐term outcomes following DCD kidney transplantation versus SCS or short additional NEVKP following SCS.
In a model of donation after circulatory death pig kidney autotransplantation, complete exclusion of cold ischemia using continuous normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion demonstrates superior posttransplant outcomes versus brief normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion following static cold storage.
Purpose
To identify prognostic factors after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the combined experience at Toronto General ...Hospital and Hospital Vall d’Hebron managing HCC recurrence after LT (
n
= 121) between 2000 and 2012. We analyzed prognostic factors by uni- and multi-variate analysis. Median follow-up from LT was 29.5 (range 2–129.4) months. Median follow-up from HCC recurrence was 12.2 (range 0.1–112.5) months.
Results
At recurrence, 31.4 % were treated with curative-intent treatments (surgery or ablation), 42.1 % received palliative treatment, and 26.4 % received best supportive care. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals, respectively, after HCC recurrence were 75, 60, and 31 %, vs. 60, 19, and 12 %, vs. 52, 4, and 5 % (
p
< 0.001). By multivariate analysis, not being amenable to a curative-intent treatment hazard ratio (HR) 4.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.7–8.3,
p
< 0.001, α-fetoprotein of ≥100 ng/mL at the time of HCC recurrence (HR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.3–2.3,
p
= 0.002) and early recurrence (<12 months) after LT (HR 1.6, 95 % CI 1.1–2.5,
p
= 0.03) were found to be poor prognosis factors. A prognostic score was devised on the basis of these three independent variables. Patients were divided into three groups, as follows: good prognosis, 0 points (
n
= 22); moderate prognosis, 1 or 2 points (
n
= 84); and poor prognosis, 3 points (
n
= 15). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival for each group was 91, 50, and 50 %, vs. 52, 7, and 2 %, vs. 13, 0, and 0 %, respectively (
p
< 0.001).
Conclusions
Patients with HCC recurrence after transplant amenable to curative-intent treatments can experience significant long-term survival (~50 % at 5 years), so aggressive management should be offered. Poor prognosis factors after recurrence are not being amenable to a curative-intent treatment, α-fetoprotein of ≥100 ng/mL, and early (<1 year) recurrence after LT.
Human regulatory T cells (Treg) are able to actively suppress autoreactive immune responses. Phenotypically, they are broadly characterized as CD4
+, CD25
+, CD127
lo/− and FoxP3
+. CD45RA can be ...used to further differentiate the population into naïve (CD45RA
+) and induced (CD45RA
−) Treg. The functional potential of Treg is routinely determined by assessing their ability to suppress T cell function in 3–5
day proliferation assays. Since Treg are being explored for therapeutic use, a short-term functional assay could serve as a valuable tool for evaluating the potency of Treg. Therefore, an assay designed to measure Treg suppression of activation marker expression by responder T cells in 7 to 20
h has been examined in this report. Using flow cytometry, expression of CD69 and CD154 on T cells, in response to stimulation with CD3/CD28 beads, was used as a measure of activation in the assay. Treg from healthy volunteers were sorted as CD4
+CD25
+CD127
lo/−CD45RA
+ cells with a BD FACSAria™ II. The highly purified Treg were then expanded
in vitro and their function was assessed in short term activation marker suppression assays using autologous PBMC as responder cells. The data suggest that this short term suppression assay could be a reliable surrogate for assessing Treg functional potential.
► Describes a robust, short term assay to measure function of in vitro expanded Treg. ► Suppression of CD69 and CD154 expression is a reliable surrogate of Treg function. ► The suppression of activation markers is specifically mediated by Treg. ► Assay can be used to identify therapeutic agents to modulate the function of Treg.
Normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP) demonstrated superior results compared to hypothermic storage in donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplantation. It is unknown whether an ...optimal perfusion time exists following hypothermic storage to allow for the recovery of renal grafts from cold ischemic injury. In a porcine model of DCD kidney autotransplantation, the impact of initial static cold storage (SCS) (8 h) followed by various periods of NEVKP recovery was investigated: group A, 8 hSCS only (control); group B, 8 hSCS + 1 hNEVKP (brief NEVKP); group C, 8 hSCS + 8 hNEVKP (intermediate NEVKP); and group D, 8 hSCS + 16 hNEVKP (prolonged NEVKP). All grafts were preserved and transplanted successfully. One animal in group D was sacrificed and excluded by postoperative day 3 due to hind limb paralysis, but demonstrated good renal function. Postoperative graft assessment during 8 days’ follow‐up demonstrated lowest levels of peak serum creatinine for intermediate (C) and prolonged (D) NEVKP (p = 0.027). Histological assessment on day 8 demonstrated a significant difference in tubular injury (p = 0.001), with highest values for group B. These results suggest that longer periods of NEVKP following SCS are feasible and safe for postponing surgical transplant procedure and superior to brief NEVKP, reducing the damage caused during cold ischemic storage of renal grafts.
Prolonged versus brief normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion following 8 hours of static cold storage demonstrates superior outcomes in a model of donation after circulatory death pig kidney transplantation.
The increased prevalence of obesity worldwide threatens the pool of living liver donors. Although the negative effects of graft steatosis on liver donation and transplantation are well known, the ...impact of obesity in the absence of hepatic steatosis on outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown. Consequently, we compared the outcome of LDLT using donors with BMI <30 versus donors with BMI ≥30. Between April 2000 and May 2014, 105 patients received a right‐lobe liver graft from donors with BMI ≥30, whereas 364 recipients were transplanted with grafts from donors with BMI <30. Liver steatosis >10% was excluded in all donors with BMI >30 by imaging and liver biopsies. None of the donors had any other comorbidity. Donors with BMI <30 versus ≥30 had similar postoperative complication rates (Dindo‐Clavien ≥3b: 2% vs. 3%; p = 0.71) and lengths of hospital stay (6 vs. 6 days; p = 0.13). Recipient graft function, assessed by posttransplant peak serum bilirubin and international normalized ratio was identical. Furthermore, no difference was observed in recipient complication rates (Dindo‐Clavien ≥3b: 25% vs. 20%; p = 0.3) or lengths of hospital stay between groups. We concluded that donors with BMI ≥30, in the absence of graft steatosis, are not contraindicated for LDLT.
Right lobe live liver donation can be performed safely in select obese patients in the absence of steatosis and donor comorbidities, which could open an interesting approach to further increase the donor pool.
Engraftment Syndrome (ES) maybe observed in patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplant (SCT). To investigate clinical criteria for ES diagnosis and analyse the risk factors for this ...complication, we reviewed all auto-SCT cases (Lymphoma and Myeloma) performed during the past 9 years at two tertiary care centres. We analysed all patients with a non-infectious fever, developed within 7 days of engraftment (first day of ANC of 500 on two consecutive days) in 178 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. A total of 46/178 (25.8%) patients developed non-infectious fever and one or more clinical signs of ES within 7 days of engraftment. In all, 29 (61%) fulfilled the Maiolino and 12 (26%) the Spitzer criteria. The incidence of engraftment syndrome using the Maiolino criteria in our study was 29 (15%), which compares well with Spanish study (13% using same criteria) and the original Maiolino study (20%). All patients with ES satisfactorily recovered and discharged with a median of 20 days from hospital. There was no significant difference in number of days of hospitalisation and days of antibiotics between the ES and non ES arms. All patients recovered without any morbidity and only 1 (2%) patient required readmission for fungal pneumonitis. 8 (17%) patients required ICU admission due to delay in initiation of steroids. None of the factors including number of chemotherapy cycles, conditioning regime, disease status, CD34 collection, growth factors and day of WBC engraftment except female (
p
= 0.064) were statistically significant (in univariate or multivariate analysis). Our study shows that engraftment syndrome is common in autologous transplant setting. Maiolino criteria to diagnose ES is more sensitive in our setting. If detected and treated early there is not much morbidity or mortality related to ES.
We report the outcome of live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients suffering from acute liver failure (ALF). From 2006 to 2013, all patients with ALF who received a LDLT (n = 7) at our ...institution were compared to all ALF patients receiving a deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT = 26). Groups were comparable regarding pretransplant ICU stay (DDLT: 1 0–7 vs. LDLT: 1 days 0–10; p = 0.38), mechanical ventilation support (DDLT: 69% vs. LDLT: 57%; p = 0.66), inotropic drug requirement (DDLT: 27% vs. LDLT: 43%; p = 0.64) and dialysis (DDLT: 2 vs. LDLT: 0 patients; p = 1). Median evaluation time for live donors was 24 h (18–72 h). LDLT versus DDLT had similar incidence of overall postoperative complications (31% vs. 43%; p = 0.66). No difference was detected between LDLT and DDLT patients regarding 1‐ (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%), 3‐ (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%), and 5‐ (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%) year graft and patient survival (p = 0.63). No severe donor complication (Dindo–Clavien ≥3 b) occurred after live liver donation. ALF is a severe disease with high mortality on liver transplant waiting lists worldwide. Therefore, LDLT is an attractive option since live donor work‐up can be expedited and liver transplantation can be performed within 24 h with excellent short‐ and long‐term outcomes.
The authors report that live donor liver transplantation can provide immediate access to liver transplantation in critically ill patients suffering from acute liver failure, with excellent donor and recipient outcomes. See editorial by Rosen and Emond on page 1455.
Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end‐stage autoimmune liver diseases. However, the underlying disease may recur in the graft in some 20% of cases. The aim of this study is to ...determine whether LT using living donor grafts from first‐degree relatives results in higher rates of recurrence than grafts from more distant/unrelated donors. Two hundred sixty‐three patients, who underwent a first LT in the Toronto liver transplant program between January 2000 and March 2015 for autoimmune liver diseases, and had at least 6 months of post‐LT follow‐up, were included in this study. Of these, 72 (27%) received a graft from a first‐degree living‐related donor, 56 (21%) from a distant/unrelated living donor, and 135 (51%) from a deceased donor for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (n = 138, 52%), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 69, 26%), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 44, 17%), and overlap syndromes (n = 12, 5%). Recurrence occurred in 52 (20%) patients. Recurrence rates for each autoimmune liver disease were not significantly different after first‐degree living‐related, living‐unrelated, or deceased‐donor LT. Similarly, time to recurrence, recurrence‐related graft failure, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different between groups. In conclusion, first‐degree living‐related donor LT for PSC, PBC, or AIH is not associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence.
Recurrence, recurrence‐related graft failure, graft survival, and patient survival are similar following living‐related, living nonrelated and deceased donor liver transplantation for autoimmune liver diseases.
Outcomes of living versus deceased donor liver transplantation in patients with chronic liver disease and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) was compared using a matched pair study design. Thirty patients ...with HRS receiving a live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and 90 HRS patients receiving a full graft deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) were compared. LDLT versus DDLT of patients with HRS was associated with decreased peak aspartate aminotransferase levels (339 ± 214 vs. 935 ± 1253 U/L; p = 0.0001), and similar 7‐day bilirubin (8.42 ± 7.89 vs. 6.95 ± 7.13 mg/dL; p = 0.35), and international normalized ratio levels (1.93 ± 0.62 vs. 1.78 ± 0.78; p = 0.314). LDLT vs. DDLT had a decreased intensive care unit (2 1–39 vs. 4 0–93 days; p = 0.004), and hospital stay (17 4–313 vs. 26 0–126 days; p = 0.016) and a similar incidence of overall postoperative complications (20% vs. 27%; p = 0.62). No difference was detected between LDLT and DDLT patients regarding graft survival at 1 (80% vs. 82%), at 3 (69% vs. 76%) and 5 years (65% vs. 76%) (p = 0.63), as well as patient survival at 1 (83% vs. 82%), 3 (72% vs. 77%) and 5 years (72% vs. 77%) (p = 0.93). The incidence of chronic kidney disease post‐LT (10% vs. 6%; p = 0.4) was similar between both groups. LDLT results in identical long‐term outcome when compared with DDLT in patients with HRS.
Using a matched case‐control study, the authors find that live donor liver transplantation when compared to deceased donation provides similar outcome in patients suffering from hepatorenal syndrome, and they discuss live donation as a strategy to provide immediate access to transplantation for this patient population.
PDF
