Background
Postoperative complications frequently occur after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, such as mortality and reoperations. The aim of study was ...to identify the clinically most relevant complications after gastrectomy, using the population-attributable fraction (PAF).
Methods
Between 2011 and 2017, all patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. Postoperative outcomes (morbidity, mortality, recovery and hospitalization) were evaluated. The prevalence of postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic leakage and pneumonia) and of the study outcomes were calculated. The adjusted relative risk and Confidence Interval (CI) for each complication-outcome pair were calculated. Subsequently, the PAF was calculated, which represents the percentage of a given outcome occurring in the population, caused by individual complications, taking both the relative risk and the frequency in which a complication occurs into account.
Results
In total, 2176 patients were analyzed. Anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications had the greatest overall impact on postoperative mortality (PAF 29.2% 95% CI 19.3–39.1 and 21.6% 95% CI 10.5–32.7, respectively) and prolonged hospitalization (PAF 12.9% 95% CI 9.7–16.0 and 14.7% 95% CI 11.0–18.8, respectively). Anastomotic leakage had the greatest overall impact on re-interventions (PAF 25.1% 95% CI 20.5–29.7) and reoperations (PAF 30.3% 95% CI 24.3–36.3). Intra-abdominal abscesses had the largest impact on readmissions (PAF 7.0% 95% CI 3.2–10.9). Other complications only had a small effect on these outcomes.
Conclusion
Surgical improvement programs should focus on preventing or managing anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications, since these complications have the greatest overall impact on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy.
Over the last decades, the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer has evolved into a multidisciplinary process in which all players are essential for treatment to be successful. Medical ...oncologists and radiation oncologists have been increasingly involved since the implementation of neoadjuvant therapy, which has been shown to improve survival. Although esophagectomy is still considered the cornerstone of curative treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, it remains associated with considerable postoperative morbidity, despite promising results of minimally invasive techniques. In this light, both physical status and response to neoadjuvant therapy may be important factors for selecting patients who will benefit from surgery. Furthermore, it is important to optimize the entire perioperative trajectory: from the initial outpatient clinic visit to postoperative discharge. Enhanced recovery after surgery is increasingly recognized for esophagectomy and emphasizes perioperative aspects, such as nutrition, physiotherapy, and pain management. To date, several facets of esophageal cancer treatment remain topics of debate, such as the preferred neoadjuvant treatment, anastomotic technique, extent of lymphadenectomy, organization of postoperative care, and the role of surgery beyond locally advanced disease. Here, we describe the current and future perspectives in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer in the context of the available literature.
Thoracic laparoscopic robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was developed in 2003. RAMIE was shown to be safe and oncologically effective. The aim of this study was to assess the ...learning curve and the proctoring program for a newly introduced surgeon (surgeon 2).
The “learning curve” was defined as the number of operations that must be performed by a surgeon to achieve a steady level of performance. Measures of proficiency to describe the learning curve of the proctor and the newly introduced surgeon 2 included operating time, blood loss, and conversion rates and were analyzed using the cumulative sum method. Results of the newly introduced surgeon were compared with the proctor in the same period of time.
The proctor performed 232 of 312 procedures (74%) and surgeon 2 performed 80 of 312 procedures (26%). The proctor reached proficiency after 70 procedures in 55 months. The structured proctoring program for surgeon 2 started with 20 procedures as assisting table surgeon, followed by 5 observational and 15 supervised cases. Surgeon 2 performed at the same level as the proctor concerning operating time, blood loss, conversion rates, radicality, and complications. For surgeon 2, the learning phase of thoracic laparoscopic RAMIE was completed within 24 cases (15 supervised and 9 independent cases) in 13 months; a reduction of 66% in the number of operations and a reduction of 76% in time, compared with the proctor.
The learning phase of thoracic laparoscopic RAMIE consisted of 70 procedures in 55 months. A structured proctoring for RAMIE substantially reduced the number of procedures and time required to achieve proficiency.
OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to compare open esophagectomy (OE) with minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a population-based setting.
BACKGROUND:Randomized controlled trials and cohort ...studies have shown that MIE is associated with reduced pulmonary complications and shorter hospital stay as compared to OE.
METHODS:Patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the national Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. Hybrid, transhiatal, and emergency procedures were excluded. Patients who underwent OE were compared with those treated by MIE. Propensity score matching was used to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was postoperative pulmonary complications; secondary endpoints were morbidity, mortality, convalescence, and pathology.
RESULTS:Some 1727 patients were included. After propensity score matching the percentage of patients with 1 or more complications was 62.6% after OE (N = 433) and 60.2% after MIE (N = 433) (P = 0.468). Pulmonary complication rate did not differ between groups34.2% (OE) versus 35.6% (MIE) (P = 0.669). Anastomotic leak (15.5% vs 21.2%, P = 0.028) and reintervention rates (21.1% vs 28.2%, P = 0.017) were higher after MIE. Mortality was 3.0% in the OE group and 4.7% in the MIE group (P = 0.209). Median hospital stay was shorter after MIE (14 vs 13 days, P = 0.001). Percentages of R0 resections (93%) did not differ between groups. The median (range) lymph node count was 18 (2–53) (OE) versus 20 (2–52) (MIE) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS:This population-based study showed that mortality and pulmonary complications were similar for OE and MIE. Anastomotic leaks and reinterventions were more frequently observed after MIE. MIE was associated with a shorter hospital stay.
After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer, roughly half of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma and a quarter of those with adenocarcinoma have a pathological complete response ...of the primary tumour before surgery. Thus, the necessity of standard oesophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be reconsidered for patients who respond sufficiently to neoadjuvant treatment. In this study, we aimed to establish the accuracy of detection of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with different diagnostic approaches, and the optimal combination of diagnostic techniques for clinical response evaluations.
The preSANO trial was a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic cohort study at six centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had histologically proven, resectable, squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction, and were eligible for potential curative therapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (five weekly cycles of carboplatin area under the curve 2 mg/mL per min plus paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 of body-surface area combined with 41·4 Gy radiotherapy in 23 fractions) followed by oesophagectomy. 4–6 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients had oesophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography with measurement of maximum tumour thickness. Patients with histologically proven locoregional residual disease or no-pass during endoscopy and without distant metastases underwent immediate surgical resection. In the remaining patients a second clinical response evaluation was done (PET–CT, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies, endoscopic ultrasonography with measurement of maximum tumour thickness, and fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes), followed by surgery 12–14 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the correlation between clinical response during clinical response evaluations and the final pathological response in resection specimens, as shown by the proportion of tumour regression grade (TRG) 3 or 4 (>10% residual carcinoma in the resection specimen) residual tumours that was missed during clinical response evaluations. This study was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR4834), and has been completed.
Between July 22, 2013, and Dec 28, 2016, 219 patients were included, 207 of whom were included in the analyses. Eight of 26 TRG3 or TRG4 tumours (31% 95% CI 17–50) were missed by endoscopy with regular biopsies and fine-needle aspiration. Four of 41 TRG3 or TRG4 tumours (10% 95% CI 4–23) were missed with bite-on-bite biopsies and fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopic ultrasonography with maximum tumour thickness measurement missed TRG3 or TRG4 residual tumours in 11 of 39 patients (28% 95% CI 17–44). PET–CT missed six of 41 TRG3 or TRG4 tumours (15% 95% CI 7–28). PET–CT detected interval distant histologically proven metastases in 18 (9%) of 190 patients (one squamous cell carcinoma, 17 adenocarcinomas).
After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer, clinical response evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography, bite-on-bite biopsies, and fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes was adequate for detection of locoregional residual disease, with PET–CT for detection of interval metastases. Active surveillance with this combination of diagnostic modalities is now being assessed in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial (SANO trial; Netherlands Trial Register NTR6803).
Dutch Cancer Society.
Background Anastomotic leakage is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. Calcification of the arteries supplying the gastric tube has been identified as a risk factor ...for leakage of the cervical anastomosis, but its potential contribution to the risk of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage has not been elucidated. This study evaluated the relationship between calcification and the occurrence of leakage of the intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer at 2 institutions were analyzed. Diagnostic computed tomography images were used to detect calcification of the arteries supplying the gastric tube (eg, aorta, celiac axis). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between vascular calcification and anastomotic leakage. Results Of 167 included patients, anastomotic leakage occurred in 40 (24%). In univariable analysis, leakage was most frequently observed in patients with calcification of the aorta (major calcification: 37% leakage 16 of 43; minor calcification: 32% 18 of 56; no calcification: 9% 6 of 70, p < 0.001). Calcification of other studied arteries was not significantly associated with leakage. A significant association with leakage remained for minor (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 16.5) and major (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 26.4) aortic calcifications in multivariable analysis. Conclusions Atherosclerotic calcification of the aorta is an independent risk factor for leakage of the intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. The calcification scoring system may aid in patient selection and lead to earlier diagnosis of this potentially fatal complication.
Background and Aims Accurate determination of residual cancer status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer could assist in selecting the optimal treatment strategy. The aim ...of this study was to review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy and EUS after nCRT for detecting residual cancer at the primary tumor site (ypT+) and regional lymph nodes (ypN+) as opposed to a pathologic complete response (ypT0 and ypN0). Methods PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched. The analysis included diagnostic studies reporting on the accuracy of endoscopic biopsy or EUS in detecting residual cancer versus complete response after nCRT for esophageal cancer with histopathology as the reference standard. Bivariate random-effects models were used to estimate pooled sensitivities and specificities and examine sources of heterogeneity. Results Twenty-three studies comprising 12 endoscopic biopsy studies (1281 patients), 11 EUS studies reporting on ypT status (593 patients), and 10 EUS studies reporting on ypN status (602 patients), were included. Pooled estimates for sensitivity of endoscopic biopsy after nCRT for predicting ypT+ were 34.5% (95% confidence interval CI, 26.0%-44.1%) and for specificity 91.0% (95% CI, 85.6%-94.5%). Pooled estimates for sensitivity of EUS after nCRT were 96.4% (95% CI, 91.7%-98.5%) and for specificity were 10.9% (95% CI, 3.5%-29.0%) for detecting ypT+, and 62.0% (95% CI, 46.0%-75.7%) and 56.7% (95% CI, 41.8%-70.5%) for detecting ypN+, respectively. Conclusions Endoscopic biopsy after nCRT is a specific but not sensitive method for detecting residual esophageal cancer. Although EUS after nCRT yields a high sensitivity, only a limited number of patients will have negative findings at EUS with still a substantial false-negative rate. Furthermore, EUS provides only moderate accuracy for detecting residual lymph node involvement. Based on these findings, these endoscopic modalities cannot be used to withhold surgical treatment in test-negative patients after nCRT. (Clinical trial registration number: CRD42015016527.)
Despite improvements in operative strategies for esophageal resection, anastomotic leaks, fistula, postoperative pulmonary complications, and chylothorax can occur. Our review seeks to identify ...potential risk factors, modalities for early diagnosis, and novel interventions that may ameliorate the potential adverse effects of these surgical complications following esophagectomy.
Surgical complications, such as anastomotic leaks, fistulas, postoperative pulmonary complications, and chylothoraxes, can occur following esophagectomy. This review seeks to identify potential risk factors, modalities for early diagnosis, and novel interventions that may ameliorate the potential adverse effects of these complications.
PDF
