Summary Background First-line chemotherapy for patients with cisplatin-ineligible locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is associated with short response duration, poor survival, and ...high toxicity. This study assessed atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 PD-L1) as treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer in cisplatin-ineligible patients. Methods For this single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study, in 47 academic medical centres and community oncology practices in seven countries in North America and Europe, we recruited previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who were cisplatin ineligible. Patients were given 1200 mg intravenous atezolizumab every 21 days until progression. The primary endpoint was independently confirmed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (central review), assessed in prespecified subgroups based on PD-L1 expression and in all patients. All participants who received one or more doses of atezolizumab were included in the primary and safety analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02108652. Findings Between June 9, 2014, and March 30, 2015, we enrolled 123 patients, of whom 119 received one or more doses of atezolizumab. At 17·2 months' median follow-up, the objective response rate was 23% (95% CI 16 to 31), the complete response rate was 9% (n=11), and 19 of 27 responses were ongoing. Median response duration was not reached. Responses occurred across all PD-L1 and poor prognostic factor subgroups. Median progression-free survival was 2·7 months (2·1 to 4·2). Median overall survival was 15·9 months (10·4 to not estimable). Tumour mutation load was associated with response. Treatment-related adverse events that occurred in 10% or more of patients were fatigue (36 30% patients), diarrhoea (14 12% patients), and pruritus (13 11% patients). One treatment-related death (sepsis) occurred. Nine (8%) patients had an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Immune-mediated events occurred in 14 (12%) patients. Interpretation Atezolizumab showed encouraging durable response rates, survival, and tolerability, supporting its therapeutic use in untreated metastatic urothelial cancer. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech.
Summary Background Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have few treatment options after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. In this trial, we assessed treatment with atezolizumab, an ...engineered humanised immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), in this patient population. Methods For this multicentre, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial, patients (aged ≥18 years) with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease had progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled from 70 major academic medical centres and community oncology practices in Europe and North America. Key inclusion criteria for enrolment were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, measurable disease defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), adequate haematological and end-organ function, and no autoimmune disease or active infections. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour specimens with sufficient viable tumour content were needed from all patients before enrolment. Patients received treatment with intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg, given every 3 weeks). PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) was assessed prospectively by immunohistochemistry. The co-primary endpoints were the independent review facility-assessed objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 and the investigator-assessed objective response rate according to immune-modified RECIST, analysed by intention to treat. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to assess whether the objective response rate was significantly higher than the historical control rate of 10% at an α level of 0·05. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02108652. Findings Between May 13, 2014, and Nov 19, 2014, 486 patients were screened and 315 patients were enrolled into the study. Of these patients, 310 received atezolizumab treatment (five enrolled patients later did not meet eligibility criteria and were not dosed with study drug). The PD-L1 expression status on infiltrating immune cells (ICs) in the tumour microenvironment was defined by the percentage of PD-L1-positive immune cells: IC0 (<1%), IC1 (≥1% but <5%), and IC2/3 (≥5%). The primary analysis (data cutoff May 5, 2015) showed that compared with a historical control overall response rate of 10%, treatment with atezolizumab resulted in a significantly improved RECIST v1.1 objective response rate for each prespecified immune cell group (IC2/3: 27% 95% CI 19–37, p<0·0001; IC1/2/3: 18% 13–24, p=0·0004) and in all patients (15% 11–20, p=0·0058). With longer follow-up (data cutoff Sept 14, 2015), by independent review, objective response rates were 26% (95% CI 18–36) in the IC2/3 group, 18% (13–24) in the IC1/2/3 group, and 15% (11–19) overall in all 310 patients. With a median follow-up of 11·7 months (95% CI 11·4–12·2), ongoing responses were recorded in 38 (84%) of 45 responders. Exploratory analyses showed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subtypes and mutation load to be independently predictive for response to atezolizumab. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events, of which fatigue was the most common (five patients 2%), occurred in 50 (16%) of 310 treated patients. Grade 3–4 immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 15 (5%) of 310 treated patients, with pneumonitis, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, rash, and dyspnoea being the most common. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. Interpretation Atezolizumab showed durable activity and good tolerability in this patient population. Increased levels of PD-L1 expression on immune cells were associated with increased response. This report is the first to show the association of TCGA subtypes with response to immune checkpoint inhibition and to show the importance of mutation load as a biomarker of response to this class of agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Current data on systemic therapy in geriatric populations with genitourinary malignancies are largely derived from retrospective analyses of prospectively conducted trials or retrospective reviews. ...Although extrapolation of these data to real-world patients should be cautious, patients aged 65 years or older with good functional status and minimal comorbidities seem to enjoy similar survival benefit from therapy as their younger counterparts. Chronologic age alone should generally not be used to guide management decisions. Comprehensive geriatric assessment tools and prospective studies in older adults integrating comprehensive geriatric assessment can shed light on the optimal management of urologic malignancies in this population.
Urethral cancer Grivas, Petros D; Davenport, Matthew; Montie, James E ...
Hematology/oncology clinics of North America,
12/2012, Letnik:
26, Številka:
6
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Urethral carcinoma is a rare tumor with predominantly poor survival. Both the disease and its treatment can affect both sexual and urinary function. The natural history of urethral carcinoma varies, ...therefore the appropriate application of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy remain unknown. Management of this disease remains driven by individual clinician experience and data derived from small case series. This article discusses the histology and anatomy of the male and female urethra, as well as their natural history. In addition, the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and future directions of management of cancer arising in the urethra are addressed.
We conducted a prospective pilot study to evaluate safety and feasibility of TraceIT, a resorbable radiopaque hydrogel, to improve image guidance for bladder cancer radiation therapy (RT).
Patients ...with muscle invasive bladder cancer receiving definitive RT were eligible. TraceIT was injected intravesically around the tumor bed during maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor. The primary endpoint was the difference between radiation treatment planning margin on daily cone beam computed tomography based on alignment to TraceIT versus standard-of-care pelvic bone anatomy. The Van Herk margin formula was used to determine the optimal planning target volume margin. TraceIT visibility, recurrence rates, and survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.
The trial was fully accrued and 15 patients were analyzed. TraceIT was injected in 4 sites/patient (range, 4-6). Overall, 94% (95% confidence interval CI, 90%-98%) of injection sites were radiographically visible at RT initiation versus 71% (95% CI, 62%-81%) at RT completion. The median duration of radiographic visibility for injection sites was 106 days (95% CI, 104-113). Most patients were treated with a standard split-course approach with initial pelvic radiation fields, then midcourse repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by bladder tumor bed boost fields, and 14/15 received concurrent chemotherapy. Alignment to fiducials could allow for reduced planning target volume margins (0.67 vs 1.56 cm) for the initial phase of RT, but not for the boost (1.01 vs 0.96 cm). This allowed for improved target coverage (D95% 80%-83% to 91%-94%) for 2 patients retrospectively planned with both volumetric-modulated arc therapy and 3-dimensional conformal RT. At median follow-up of 22 months, no acute or late complications attributable to TraceIT placement occurred. No patients required salvage cystectomy.
TraceIT intravesical fiducial placement is safe and feasible and may facilitate tumor bed delineation and targeting in patients undergoing RT for localized muscle invasive bladder cancer. Improved image guided treatment may facilitate strategies to improve local control and minimize toxicity.
Abstract only
e17014
Background: Small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is a rare histologic variant associated with poor oncologic outcomes and propensity for metastasis, however, there remains a paucity ...of data regarding the role of chemoradiation. We review our institutional experience of patients with small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) treated with radical cystectomy (RC) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for pts with SCBC treated with RC or CCRT and compared them to pts with conventional urothelial carcinoma (CUC) treated with RC. Clinicopathologic data and outcomes were captured and compared between treatment groups. Overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated utilizing the Kaplan Meier method. T test, χ2 test and log-rank test were used for group comparisons. Factors significant in the univariate analysis for OS were included in multivariable Cox models. Results: We identified 38 consecutive pts with SCBC, of whom 24 (63%) had SC predominant ( > 50%) histology. At presentation, 31 (82%) had muscle invasion, 8 (22%) had nodal involvement, and 7 (18%) had distant metastasis. Twenty-eight (73%) pts proceeded to definitive therapy, with RC in 20 (53%) and CCRT in 8 (21%). Among pts treated with CCRT, 4 (50%) had complete response on cystoscopy, 2 (25%) had residual disease with 1 (12.5%) proceeding to salvage cystectomy, and 2 (25%) progressed with metastasis. Among pts treated with RC, 15 (75%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with platinum/etoposide, of whom 3 (20%) experienced a pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0N0), 3 (20%) had residual UC but no SCBC, and 9 (60%) had residual SCBC. Median OS was comparable between RC and CCRT groups (30.4 vs. 26.2 months, p = 0.633). Compared to pts with CUC treated with RC (n = 457), those with SCBC treated with RC had similar clinical stage, rates of carcinoma in situ, lymphovascular invasion, and positive surgical margins (all p > 0.05). Median OS and RFS were inferior for SCBC treated with RC (30.4 vs 109.7 months, p = .001; 13.1 vs 86.1 months, p = .002). On multivariable analysis among pts treated with RC, SCBC was significantly associated with shorter OS adjusting for pT and pN stage, performance status, and age. Conclusions: Pts with SCBC undergoing RC had significantly worse oncologic outcomes compared to pts with CUC, however RC and CCRT had comparable outcomes in pts with SCBC. The pCR rate to NAC was unexpectedly low. Larger sample size, assessment of other confounders and longer follow-up are needed for validation.
Abstract only
371
Background: Although the genomic landscape of LTUC is well studied, less is known about UTUC, including in the metastatic sites. We compared genomic features of metastatic UTUC and ...LTUC. Methods: We performed whole exome sequencing on 7 rapid autopsy patients with metastatic UC, with matched primary and metastatic tumor samples (N = 37). Single nucleotide variants (SNV) were identified using Mutect and Strelka. Focused analyses were performed on mutations with known significance in UC as well as mutations predicted to have functional impact using 11 mutation assessors. Genome scale copy number aberrations (CNA) were estimated using Sequenza (normalized for ploidy) to derive gene definition restricted copy number estimation outcomes. Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) was used to visualize how copy number and mutation-derived genomic distances differed between LTUC and UTUC. Results: Three pts with UTUC (3 primary samples, 13 metastases) and four pts with LTUC (4 primary samples, 17 metastases) were examined. The majority of patients were male (5) and received cisplatin-based therapy (5). We found that SNV burden (mean mutation per megabase) was significantly higher in LTUC vs. UTUC overall (6.6 vs. 3.8, p = 0.001) and when stratified by primaries (6.1 vs. 2.9, p = 0.047); or metastases (6.7 vs. 4.1, p = 0.001). Mutational signature analysis revealed higher proportion of APOBEC signature in all LTUC vs. UTUC tumors. Both inter- and intra-individual genomic distances between primary and metastatic tissues were substantially larger in UTUC than LTUC, suggesting a wider spectrum of mutations at the level of individual nucleotides and chromosomal structure. Interestingly, Gene definition-restricted CNA analysis revealed MDM2 amplification exclusively in UTUC tumors which was associated with shallow p53 deletion. Conclusions: Metastatic UTUC appears to have a lower overall mutational burden but greater genomic variability compared to LTUC. Our relatively small dataset suggests that metastatic UTUC displays a greater spectrum of mutational divergence from LTUC which may partially explain differences in clinical behavior.
PDF
