Introduction
Our aim was to translate, adapt and validate the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scale into the Latvian language and to evaluate this instrument (MG-ADL-L) in terms of ...construct validity and reliability.
Methods
We enrolled patients with a confirmed MG diagnosis, who could speak Latvian fluently. We performed translation and adaptation according to the cross-cultural adaptation guidelines for self-reported measures. The patients were evaluated by a physician according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification (MGFA) and using the Myasthenia Gravis Composite Score (MGCS). Patients were asked to complete the MG-ADL-L and the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQOL15) Internal consistency was evaluated based on Cronbach’s α, reproducibility—Cohen’s weighted kappa and construct validity—Spearman’s correlation between the MG-ADL-L and the MGQOL15 and MGCS. We used the Kruskal–Wallis H test to compare the MG-ADL-L score distribution between the MGFA groups.
Results
38 enrolled patients in the study. There was an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.76) and moderate to very good agreement between the test and retest scores (Cohen’s weighted kappa = 0.54 and 0.81). The MG-ADL-L showed a moderate positive correlation with the MGQOL15 (r = 0.5,
p
= 0.001) and the MGCS (r = 0.62,
p
< 0.001). There was a significant difference in MG-ADL-L scores between the MGFA groups (
p
= 0.007).
Discussion
The MG-ADL-L is a valid and reliable self-reported scale to assess and evaluate symptom severity and the impact of the disease on the lives of patients with MG.
There is an unmet need for objective disease-specific biomarkers in the heterogeneous autoimmune neuromuscular disorder myasthenia gravis (MG). This cross-sectional study identified a signature of 23 ...inflammatory serum proteins with proximity extension assay (PEA) that distinguishes acetylcholine receptor antibody seropositive (AChR+) MG patients from healthy controls (HCs). CCL28, TNFSF14, 4E-BP1, transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α), and ST1A1 ranked top biomarkers. TGF-β1 and osteoprotegerin (OPG) differed between early- and late-onset MG, whereas CXCL10, TNFSF14, CCL11, interleukin-17C (IL-17C), and TGF-α differed significantly with immunosuppressive treatment. MG patients with moderate to high disease severity had lower uPA. Previously defined MG-associated microRNAs, miR-150-5p, miR-30e-5p, and miR-21-5p, correlated inversely with ST1A1 and TNFSF14. The presented inflammatory proteins that distinguish AChR+ MG are promising serum biomarkers for validation in prospective studies to allow for molecular signatures for patient subgroup stratification and monitoring of treatment response.
Display omitted
•An inflammatory protein biomarker signature defined AChR+ MG patients from healthy controls•The top biomarkers of the 23 were CCL28, TNFSF14, 4E-BP1, TGF-α, and ST1A1•MG subgroup-specific (onset, immunosuppression, severity) biomarkers were identified•These findings allow prospective validation studies for patient subgroup stratification
Neuroscience; Molecular neuroscience
Background and purpose
Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT) is a hereditary, slowly progressive neuropathy. Currently, there are no effective pharmacological treatments or sensitive disease activity ...biomarkers available. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the change in plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) over time in a CMT cohort and analyse the association between CMT severity and NfL level.
Methods
Initially, 101 CMT patients and 64 controls were enrolled in the study. Repeated evaluation was performed in 73 patients and 28 controls at a 3‐year interval. Disease severity assessment included clinical evaluation with CMT Neuropathy Score version 2 (CMTNSv2). Plasma NfL concentration was measured using the Simoa (single molecule array) NfL assay.
Results
Plasma NfL concentration was increased in the CMT group compared with controls (p < 0.001). Overall NfL level increased over the 3‐year interval in both CMT (p = 0.012) and control (p = 0.001) groups. However, in 22 of 73 CMT patients and seven of 28 controls, the NfL level decreased from the baseline. Analysing the association between 3‐year change in plasma NfL and disease severity (CMTNSv2), there was no correlation in the CMT group (r = 0.228, p = 0.052) or different CMT subgroups.
Conclusions
Our study verifies increased plasma NfL concentrations in patients with CMT compared with controls. Longitudinal 3‐year data showed a variable change in NfL levels between CMT subtypes. There was no association between change in NfL over time and disease severity. These findings suggests that NfL is not a biomarker for CMT progression.
