Summary Background Nilotinib has shown greater efficacy than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in chronic phase after a ...minimum follow-up of 12 months. We present data from the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in clinical Trials–newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) study after a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Methods ENESTnd was a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised study. Adult patients were eligible if they had been diagnosed with chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML within the previous 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice a day, nilotinib 400 mg twice a day, or imatinib 400 mg once a day, all administered orally, by use of a computer-generated randomisation schedule, using permuted blocks, and stratified according to Sokal score. Efficacy results are reported for the intention-to-treat population. The primary endpoint was major molecular response at 12 months, defined as BCR–ABL transcript levels on the International Scale (BCR–ABLIS ) of 0·1% or less by real-time quantitative PCR in peripheral blood. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00471497. Findings 282 patients were randomly assigned to receive nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 281 to receive nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 283 to receive imatinib. By 24 months, significantly more patients had a major molecular response with nilotinib than with imatinib (201 71% with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 187 67% with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 124 44% with imatinib; p<0·0001 for both comparisons). Significantly more patients in the nilotinib groups achieved a complete molecular response (defined as a reduction of BCR–ABLIS levels to ≤0·0032%) at any time than did those in the imatinib group (74 26% with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 59 21% with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 29 10% with imatinib; p<0·0001 for nilotinib 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0·0004 for nilotinib 400 mg twice daily vs imatinib). There were fewer progressions to accelerated or blast phase on treatment, including clonal evolution, in the nilotinib groups than in the imatinib group (two with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, five with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 17 with imatinib; p=0·0003 for nilotinib 300 mg twice daily vs imatinib, p=0·0089 for nilotinib 400 mg twice daily vs imatinib). At 24 months, survival was comparable in all treatment groups, but fewer CML-related deaths had occurred in both the nilotinib groups than in the imatinib group (five with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and ten with imatinib). Overall, the only grade 3 or 4 non-haematological adverse events that occurred in at least 2·5% of patients were headache (eight 3% with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, four 1% with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and two <1% with imatinib) and rash (two <1%, seven 3%, and five 2%, respectively). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with imatinib than with either dose of nilotinib (33 12% with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, 30 11% with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and 59 21% with imatinib). Serious adverse events were reported in eight additional patients in the second year of the study (four with nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and one with imatinib). Interpretation Nilotinib continues to show better efficacy than imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase. These results support nilotinib as a first-line treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed disease. Funding Novartis.
The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) achieved a great leap forward with the development of imatinib, a BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor. Alterations in the chemical structure of the inhibitor have ...produced agents that are more potent in vitro. In these studies, two new second-generation BCR-ABL kinase inhibitors, nilotinib and dasatinib, are compared with imatinib; these new drugs produce more complete responses and do so faster than imatinib. Both also appear to reduce the rate of progression to accelerated-phase and blast-phase disease.
The use of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) improved outcomes for patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and established BCR-ABL–targeted therapy as the standard of care for this disease. In the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006343), imatinib was associated with a superior response rate and improved progression-free survival, as compared with the previous standard therapy, interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine.
1
–
3
Eight-year follow-up of IRIS revealed that responses to imatinib were durable and had an acceptable adverse-event profile, with an estimated rate of overall survival of 85%. . . .
This international phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with International Prognostic ...Scoring System lower-risk non-del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes ineligible for or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
In total, 239 patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to treatment with lenalidomide (n = 160) or placebo (n = 79) once per day (on 28-day cycles). The primary end point was the rate of RBC transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks. Secondary end points were RBC-TI ≥ 24 weeks, duration of RBC-TI, erythroid response, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety.
RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks was achieved in 26.9% and 2.5% of patients in the lenalidomide and placebo groups, respectively (P < .001). Ninety percent of patients achieving RBC-TI responded within 16 weeks of treatment. Median duration of RBC-TI with lenalidomide was 30.9 weeks (95% CI, 20.7 to 59.1). Transfusion reduction of ≥ 4 units packed RBCs, on the basis of a 112-day assessment, was 21.8% in the lenalidomide group and 0% in the placebo group. Higher response rates were observed in patients with lower baseline endogenous erythropoietin ≤ 500 mU/mL (34.0% v 15.5% for > 500 mU/mL). At week 12, mean changes in HRQoL scores from baseline did not differ significantly between treatment groups, which suggests that lenalidomide did not adversely affect HRQoL. Achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks was associated with significant improvements in HRQoL (P < .01). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.
Lenalidomide yields sustained RBC-TI in 26.9% of RBC transfusion-dependent patients with lower-risk non-del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes ineligible for or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Response to lenalidomide was associated with improved HRQoL. Treatment-emergent adverse event data were consistent with the known safety profile of lenalidomide.
Background: In pediatric patients with AML, the presence of FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation is indicative of high-risk disease and confers a worse prognosis and a greater chance of ...relapse. Midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor with potent activity against both mutated and non-mutated FLT3. In adult patients with FLT3-mutated AML, midostaurin in combination with chemotherapy has demonstrated good safety/tolerability and significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) compared with placebo + chemotherapy. We present here the design of an ongoing phase II study (NCT03591510) evaluating midostaurin combined with standard chemotherapy and as a single-agent post-consolidation therapy in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with FLT3-mutated AML, other than acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Study Design and Methods: This open-label, single-arm study is composed of 2 parts. For Part 1, the primary objective is to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of midostaurin in combination with chemotherapy, as determined by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. For Part 2, in which patients will receive the RP2D of midostaurin, the primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of midostaurin + chemotherapy as measured by the EFS rate at 24 mo (for regulatory purposes outside the US) or to assess the safety/tolerability of midostaurin + chemotherapy (for regulatory purposes within the US). Secondary objectives include safety/tolerability (outside US) and EFS at 24 mo (within US), other efficacy parameters (including OS, complete remission CR, CR with incomplete blood count recovery CRi, cumulative incidence of relapse, and minimal residual disease-negative status), and characterization of the pharmacokinetics of midostaurin.
Eligible patients are aged 3 mo to < 18 yr with expected survival of > 12 wk, have a Lansky or Karnofsky performance status of ≥ 60, and have previously untreated de novo AML with FLT3 mutation: ITD and/or mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain, with mutant/wild-type signal ratio cutoff of ≥ 0.05. Exclusion criteria include any concurrent malignancy, Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL1-positive AML, AML associated with Down syndrome, secondary AML, symptomatic leukemic central nervous system involvement, bone marrow failure syndrome, or prior treatment with a FLT3 inhibitor.
Patients are to receive 5 treatment blocks: 2 of standard induction (Blocks 1-2) and 3 of consolidation (Blocks 3-5) chemotherapy, each with sequential twice-daily (BID) oral midostaurin. In Part 1 of the study, midostaurin will be given at a starting dose of 30 mg/m2 BID; dose escalation and determination of RP2D will be facilitated by a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model guided by escalation with overdose control principle. In Part 2, midostaurin will be administered at the RP2D. Induction therapy will be the local standard chemotherapy regimen with midostaurin starting after 24 hr from identification of FLT3 abnormalities and continuing for 14 d for Block 1, and FLADx (fludarabine + high-dose cytarabine on D1-5, daunorubicin on D2, 4, 6) with sequential midostaurin on D8-21 for Block 2. Patients demonstrating CR or modified CRi will proceed to consolidation with the following chemotherapy regimens, each with sequential midostaurin on D8-21: HAM (high-dose cytarabine on D1-3, mitoxantrone on D3, 4) for Block 3, HA3E (high-dose cytarabine on D1-3, etoposide on D1-5) for Block 4, and HiDAC (high-dose cytarabine on D1-3) for Block 5. Patients must be in continued remission (CR or modified CRi) to receive each block of consolidation therapy. Patients who complete Block 5 and remain in remission will proceed to 12 × 28-d cycles of post-consolidation therapy with single-agent midostaurin. Patients may undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at any time at the investigator's discretion.
Overall, the aim is to recruit a minimum of 52 patients, including at least 49 at the RP2D dose. This study is currently enrolling patients at 13 centers in 7 countries (as of July 26, 2019), and a total of 37 centers in 14 countries are planned.
Reinhardt:Novartis: Other: Participation in Advisory Boards; Jazz: Other: Participation in Advisory Boards, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Zwaan:BMS: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Roche: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharma AG Basel: Employment, Equity Ownership. Niolat:Novartis Pharma: Employment. Ifrah:Novartis: Employment. Noel-Baron:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Locatelli:Miltenyi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BluebirdBio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Midostaurin is a kinase inhibitor approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of FLT3-mutated AML in adults; the study reported here is in pediatric patients with FLT3-mutated AML.
In the ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutation-negative acute myeloid leukemia (AML; NCT03512197) investigating the effect of adding ...midostaurin to standard chemotherapy, event-free survival (EFS) is the primary endpoint. EFS is a standard endpoint in clinical studies in AML. In a recent FDA submission, EFS was confirmed by an advisory committee to be clinically meaningful in AML (https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/OncologicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM570800.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2018). With the release of the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E9 draft addendum, we describe EFS in the estimand framework to address the scientific question of interest and illustrate the power of this concept to transparently define the relevant population, the variable of interest, and the management of relevant incidents that can occur in a clinical trial (“intercurrent events”).
The objective is to determine the benefit of adding midostaurin to the whole standard chemotherapy sequence, consisting of induction, consolidation therapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT; if applicable), and postconsolidation therapy, in patients with newly diagnosed AML without a FLT3 mutation. The main interest is the interventional effect of the whole treatment sequence and not the contribution of an individual part of it.
The study population includes all randomized patients following the treatment policy approach. Patients can be randomized only if there is confirmation from the central laboratory that there is no FLT3 mutation.
EFS is a composite endpoint defined as the time from randomization until death, relapse, or induction failure. Induction failure is defined as no achievement of remission until end of the induction period. The definition of induction failure also includes instances in which HSCT is conducted as salvage therapy in nonresponding patients. Per convention, the EFS event date of induction failure is set to the randomization date.
The option to receive HSCT can be an outcome of the treatment. Therefore, clinical benefit is assessed regardless of whether patients received HSCT. This treatment policy approach mandates collection of disease assessments after HSCT has been completed. In the same consideration, the option to receive consolidation and postconsolidation treatment is also an outcome of the induction treatment as only patients achieving remission with induction qualify to continue with consolidation and postconsolidation treatment. As such, the benefit is assessed regardless of treatment duration.
The analysis plan defines a supportive estimand to assess the treatment effect of midostaurin, excluding potential benefit from HSCT. Another supportive estimand assesses the effect of discontinuation of induction treatment due to toxicities. This approach addresses a hypothetical scenario in which patients did not receive HSCT, for instance, to estimate the midostaurin-only effect. However, the outcome of the treatment is not limited to the direct effect of an experimental compound but also includes which new treatment option the compound allows for the patients (eg, HSCT).
The estimand framework is an efficient tool to ensure consistency between the scientific question and the definition of the study objectives. It ensures transparency in unfavorable yet unavoidable situations in clinical trials (“intercurrent events”). It facilitates communication within the clinical team and with health authorities. The outcome of studies that are following the estimand framework can be interpreted in a consistent manner.
Bengoudifa:Novartis: Employment. Weber:Novartis: Employment. Gathmann:Novartis: Employment. Hoenekopp:Novartis: Employment. Berkowitz:Novartis: Employment.
In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL mutations contribute to resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We examined the occurrence of treatment-emergent mutations and their impact ...on response in patients from the ENESTnd phase 3 trial. At the 3-year data cutoff, mutations were detected in approximately twice as many patients (21) on imatinib 400 mg once daily as on nilotinib (11 patients each on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily and nilotinib 400 mg twice daily). The majority of mutations occurred in patients with intermediate or high Sokal scores. Most mutations (14 66.7%) emerging during imatinib treatment were imatinib-resistant and nilotinib-sensitive. Incidence of the T315I mutation was low (found in 3, 2, and 3 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and imatinib, respectively) and mostly occurred in patients with high Sokal scores. Of the patients with emergent mutations, 1 of 11, 2 of 11, and 7 of 21 patients on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, and imatinib, respectively, progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC) on treatment. Overall, nilotinib led to fewer treatment-emergent BCR-ABL mutations than imatinib and reduced rates of progression to AP/BC in patients with these mutations. (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00471497).
•Frontline nilotinib led to fewer, less diverse BCR-ABL mutations than imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.•Rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis were lower with nilotinib than imatinib in patients with emergent BCR-ABL mutations.
▪
Background: Somatic gene mutations occur in the majority of MDS pts; specific mutations and high mutation frequency have prognostic relevance (Papaemmanuil et al. Blood. 2013;122:3616-27). ...Evaluation of somatic mutations may support the diagnosis of MDS and guide treatment (Tx) selection. The phase 3 randomized MDS-005 study compared LEN and placebo (PBO) Tx in red blood cell transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) non-del(5q) lower-risk MDS pts ineligible for or refractory to ESAs. Deletions in chromosome 5q are associated with a high response rate to LEN in MDS pts; however, no mutations have been definitively associated with a predictable clinical response to LEN in non-del(5q) MDS.
Aim:To investigate the relationship between somatic gene mutations detected by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and response and overall survival (OS) in lower-risk non-del(5q) MDS pts treated with LEN in the MDS-005 study.
Methods: Eligible pts were: RBC-TD (≥ 2 units packed RBCs/28 days 112 days immediately prior to randomization) with International Prognostic Scoring System defined Low-/Intermediate-1-risk non-del(5q) MDS; ineligible for ESA Tx (serum erythropoietin > 500 mU/mL); or unresponsive or refractory to ESAs (RBC-TD despite ESA Tx with adequate dose and duration). 239 pts were randomized 2:1 to oral LEN 10 mg once daily (5 mg for pts with creatinine clearance 40-60 mL/min) or PBO. DNA was isolated from bone marrow mononuclear cells or whole blood collected at screening from a subset of pts who gave informed consent for this exploratory biomarker analysis and had adequate tissue for analysis. Targeted NGS of 56 genes was performed at Munich Leukemia Laboratory; average sequencing coverage was 2,000-5,000-foldand the variant allele frequency detection cutoff was 3%. Target regions varied by gene, including all exons to hotspots. For association tests, mutant variants (heterozygous or homozygous) were scored as 1 (mutant) or 0 (wildtype) for gene-level analyses. A Fisher exact test was used to test association of mutation status with response. Median OS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were determined by a non-stratified Cox proportional hazards model. A log-rank test was used to test treatment effect with OS for single gene mutation status.
Results: The biomarker cohort included 198 of 239 pts (83%; LEN n = 130, PBO n = 68). At least 1 mutation was detected in 30/56 (54%) genes and 173/198 (87%) pts. The most frequently mutated genes were SF3B1 (59%), TET2 (33%), ASXL1 (23%), and DNMT3A (14%); the most frequent co-mutations were SF3B1/TET2 (23%), SF3B1/DNMT3A (10%), SF3B1/ASXL1 (10%), and TET2/ASXL1 (9%) (Figure). Of 116 pts with SF3B1 mutations, 115 (99%) had ≥ 5% ring sideroblasts. The 56-day RBC transfusion-independence (RBC-TI) response rate was significantly lower in LEN-treated ASXL1 mutant pts vs wildtype pts (10% vs 32%, respectively; P = 0.031). At 168 days, the RBC-TI response rate was still lower in LEN-treated ASXL1 mutant pts vs wildtype pts (7% vs 22%); however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.101). LEN-treated DNMT3A mutant pts had a higher 56-day RBC-TI response rate vs wildtype pts (44% vs 25%); however, this difference did not reach significance (P = 0.133) due to the small sample size. RBC-TI response rate with LEN was similar regardless of total number of mutations per pt. Higher numbers of mutations were significantly associated (P = 0.0005) with worse median OS. Mutation in any of the genes associated with a negative prognosis reported by Bejar et al. (N Engl J Med. 2011;346:2496-506) was also significantly associated (P = 0.0003) with worse median OS.However, OS was not significantly different in LEN- vs PBO-treated pts based on any single gene mutation status.
Conclusions: In this group of lower-risk RBC-TD non-del(5q) MDS pts, somatic mutations in genes recurrently mutated in myeloid cancers were detected in 87% of pts. SF3B1 mutations (alone or in combination) were most frequent and not associated with response to LEN. ASXL1 mutant pts had a significantly lower LEN response rate vs wildtype pts, whereas DNMT3A mutant pts had a trend for improved LEN response. Median OS was influenced by mutations, but not significantly modified by LEN. Determining predictive clinical markers for Tx response in non-del(5q) MDS pts remains challenging; nevertheless, there is a significant need to identify pt subsets who may be responsive to LEN Tx.
Display omitted
Santini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Other: advisory board; Onconova: Other: advisory board; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Other: advisory board. Fenaux:Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Astex, Teva: Research Funding; Celgene, Novartis, Teva: Honoraria. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Platzbecker:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zhong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mavrommatis:Discitis DX: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beach:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hoenekopp:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. MacBeth:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.
▪
Introduction: Anemia represents the main therapeutic challenge in pts with lower-risk MDS (Fenaux P, Adès L. Blood. 2013;121:4280-6). Prospective studies evaluating LEN for the treatment of red ...blood cell transfusion-dependent pts showed significant clinical activity in both non-del(5q) and del(5q) International Prognostic Scoring System-defined lower-risk MDS (Raza A, et al. Blood. 2008;111:86-93; Santini V, et al. Blood. 2014;124:abstract 409; List A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456-65; Fenaux P, et al. Blood. 2011;118:3765-76). Hematologic adverse events (AEs) are common, but manageable, with LEN treatment (Giagounidis A, et al. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:345-52). However, there has been no direct comparison of safety profiles in non-del(5q) and del(5q) pts. This pooled analysis compared the incidence of AEs in LEN-treated lower-risk MDS pts with or without del(5q).
Methods: This retrospective analysis of pooled data from 7 prospective clinical trials compared the incidence of AEs in LEN-treated lower-risk MDS pts with or without del(5q). The non-del(5q) group included 416 pts from 4 studies: MDS-005 (n = 160), MDS-002 (n = 215), MDS-001 (n = 24), and PK-002 (n = 17). The del(5q) group included 243 pts from 5 studies: MDS-003 (n = 148), MDS-004 (n = 69), MDS-007 (n = 11), MDS-001 (n = 8), and PK-002 (n = 7). A TEAE was defined as an AE that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of LEN through to 28 days after the last dose of LEN. Pts received the recommended starting dose of 10 mg LEN for ≥ 1 cycle; in study MDS-005, pts with impaired creatinine clearance (CrCl; ≥ 40 to < 60 mL/min) had a LEN 5 mg starting dose in order to achieve a similar area under the curve as pts with normal CrCl who were receiving LEN 10 mg.
Results: Among the LEN-treated lower-risk MDS pts with or without del(5q) in this pooled analysis, the most commonly reported TEAEs (any grade) occurring in ≥ 5% of pts were hematologic: neutropenia 49.3% vs 73.7% for non-del(5q) vs del(5q), respectively, thrombocytopenia (37.3% vs 64.2%), and anemia (16.8% vs 20.2%). Overall, 84.6% of non-del(5q) pts and 96.3% of del(5q) pts experienced grade 3-4 hematologic TEAEs, including neutropenia 45.2% vs 72.0% for non-del(5q) and del(5q), respectively, thrombocytopenia (31.3% vs 52.7%), and anemia (11.8% vs 12.8%) (Table). Non-hematologic TEAEs were similar for both non-del(5q) and del(5q) pts, except deep-vein thrombosis (1.2% vs 4.9%, respectively) and hypertension (0.2% vs 3.7%). Acute myeloid leukemia was reported as a TEAE in 3 non-del(5q) and 9 del(5q) pts. Bleeding events (any grade) occurring concurrently with grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were observed in 20.7% of non-del(5q) and 24.4% of del(5q) pts. Infection (any grade) occurring concurrently with grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 33.6% of non-del(5q) and 54.0% of del(5q) pts. Analysis of grade 3-4 hematologic TEAEs for pts receiving long-term (> 12 months) LEN treatment by time of onset (0 to 6, > 6 to 12, and > 12 to 18 months) showed that onset rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia during the first 6 months were higher versus rates at > 6 to 12 months for non-del(5q) (42.9% vs 19.5%, respectively) and del(5q) pts (65.4% vs 21.3%). Rates decreased similarly for thrombocytopenia in non-del(5q) (13.0% vs 5.2%) and del(5q) pts (40.4% vs 6.6%). At > 12 to 18 months, onset rates of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia for non-del(5q) pts were 15.6% and 9.1%, respectively; rates for del(5q) pts during this period were 23.5% and 4.4%.
Grade 3-4 TEAEs resulted in discontinuation of LEN in 27.4% of non-del(5q) and 20.6% of del(5q) pts (Table); however, the criteria for discontinuation differed between studies.
Conclusions: In this analysis of pooled data from 7 studies, the safety profiles of LEN-treated lower-risk MDS pts were similar between non-del(5q) and del(5q) pts. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common TEAEs in both groups; however, the frequency of these TEAEs was lower in non-del(5q) pts. Among non-del(5q) and del(5q) pts receiving long-term treatment with LEN, onset rates of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were lower at > 6 to 12 months versus the first 6 months of treatment. In summary, TEAEs in lower-risk MDS pts with or without del(5q) treated with LEN 10 mg for ≥ 1 cycle are predictable, well characterized, and clinically manageable.
Display omitted
Almeida:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Meyer Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide used to treat MDS patients without del(5q). Santini:celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Onconova: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vey:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Hellström-Lindberg:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Mufti:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Skikne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hoenekopp:Celgene International: Employment, Equity Ownership. Séguy:Celgene International: Employment. Zhong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:CELGENE: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria, Research Funding; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Research Funding.
▪
Background: Treatment options for RBC-TD pts with lower-risk MDS without del(5q) who are unresponsive or refractory to ESAs are very limited. In a previous phase 2 study, MDS-002 (CC-5013-MDS-002), ...LEN was associated with achievement of RBC-transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 56 days in 26% of pts with IPSS Low/Int-1-risk MDS without del(5q) (Raza et al. Blood 2008;111:86-93). This international phase 3 study (CC-5013-MDS-005) compared the efficacy and safety of LEN versus PBO in RBC-TD pts with IPSS Low/Int-1-risk MDS without del(5q) unresponsive or refractory to ESAs.
Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 study included RBC-TD pts (≥ 2 units packed RBCs pRBCs/28 days in the 112 days immediately prior to randomization) with IPSS Low/Int-1-risk MDS without del(5q), who were unresponsive or refractory to ESAs (RBC-TD despite ESA treatment with adequate dose and duration, or serum erythropoietin EPO > 500 mU/mL). Pts were randomized 2:1 to oral LEN 10 mg once daily (5 mg for pts with creatinine clearance 40–60 mL/min) or PBO. Pts with RBC-TI ≥ 56 days or erythroid response by Day 168 continued double-blind treatment until erythroid relapse, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was RBC-TI ≥ 56 days (defined as absence of any RBC transfusions during any 56 consecutive days). Secondary endpoints included time to RBC-TI, duration of RBC-TI, RBC-TI ≥ 168 days, progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML; WHO criteria), overall survival (OS), and safety. Baseline bone marrow gene expression profiles were evaluated according to the Ebert signature (PloS Med 2008;5:e35) identified as predictive of LEN response. Clinical trial identifier: CT01029262.
Results: The intent-to-treat population comprises 239 pts (LEN, n = 160; PBO, n = 79). Baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups; median age 71 years (range 43–87), 67.8% male, and median time from diagnosis 2.6 years (range 0.1–29.6). Pts received a median of 3.0 pRBC units/28 days (range 1.5–9.8) and 83.7% received prior therapy, including ESAs (78.7%). Significantly more LEN pts achieved RBC-TI ≥ 56 days versus PBO (26.9% vs 2.5%; P < 0.001; Table). The majority (90%) of pts with RBC-TI ≥ 56 days responded within 16 weeks of treatment. Median duration of RBC-TI ≥ 56 days was 8.2 months (range 5.2–17.8). Baseline factors significantly associated with achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 56 days with LEN were: prior ESAs (vs no ESAs; P = 0.005), serum EPO ≤ 500 mU/mL (vs > 500 mU/mL; P = 0.015), < 4 pRBC units/28 days (vs ≥ 4 pRBC units/28 days; P = 0.036), and female sex (vs male; P = 0.035). RBC-TI ≥ 168 days was achieved in 17.5% and 0% of pts in the LEN and PBO groups, respectively. The incidence of AML progression (per 100 person-years) was 1.91 (95% CI 0.80–4.59) and 2.46 (95% CI 0.79–7.64) for LEN and PBO pts, respectively, with median follow-up 1.6 and 1.3 years. Death on treatment occurred in 2.5% of pts on either LEN or PBO. The follow-up period was insufficient to permit OS comparison between the 2 groups. Myelosuppression was the main adverse event (AE); in the LEN versus PBO groups, respectively, grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 61.9% versus 11.4% of pts, and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 35.6% versus 3.8% of pts. Discontinuations due to AEs were reported in 31.9% LEN and 11.4% PBO pts; among the 51 LEN pts who discontinued due to AEs, 14 discontinuations were due to thrombocytopenia and 8 due to neutropenia. In the subset of pts evaluated for the Ebert signature (n = 203), the predictive power of the signature was not confirmed.
Conclusions: LEN therapy was associated with a significant achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 56 days in 26.9% of pts with a median duration of RBC-TI of 8.2 months; 90% of pts responded within 16 weeks of treatment. These data were consistent with response rates seen in the MDS-002 trial. The overall safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of LEN and these data suggest LEN can be safely and effectively used in this patient population.
Display omitted
Santini:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Trial of Lenalidomide in non-del5q MDS. Almeida:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey:Celgene: Honoraria. Mufti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Buckstein:Celgene: Research Funding. Mittelman:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Shpilberg:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. del Canizo:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gattermann:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ozawa:Celgene: Consultancy, not specified Other. Zhong:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Séguy:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hoenekopp:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beach:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.
PDF
