Perioperative chemotherapy with 5‐fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) is a mainstay in the treatment of esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGA). Trastuzumab improved survival ...when added to chemotherapy in patients with HER‐2‐positive metastatic EGA. We investigated the combination of trastuzumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment in patients with locally advanced EGA. A multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of perioperative FLOT (24‐hours 5‐FU 2600 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/mg2, docetaxel 50 mg/m2, trastuzumab 6 mg/kg then 4 mg/kg d1, repeated d15 for four cycles preoperatively and postoperatively followed by 9 cycles of trastuzumab monotherapy) in patients with HER‐2 positive EGA. Patients had ≥cT2, any N, M0 EGA. The primary endpoint was the rate of centrally assessed pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints comprised disease‐free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, toxicity and surgical morbidity. Fifty‐six evaluable patients (median age 62 years) were included; n = 40 had tumors originating from the esophagogastric junction; T stage was (cT2/3/4/unknown): 4/42/8/2; n = 50 patients had cN+ disease. Main adverse events grades 3‐4: leukopenia (17.9%), neutropenia (46.6%) and diarrhea (17.0%). All patients underwent tumor resections. R0 resection rate was 92.9%. Eight patients had anastomotic leakage. One postoperative death occurred. pCR was found in 12 patients (21.4%) and a further n = 14 patients (25.0%) had near complete response. Median DFS was 42.5 months and the 3‐year OS rate was 82.1%. The primary endpoint of achieving a pCR >20% was reached. No unexpected safety issues were observed. Survival data are promising.
Total neoadjuvant therapy is a new paradigm for rectal cancer treatment. Optimal scheduling of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy remains to be established.
We conducted a ...multicenter, randomized, phase II trial using a pick-the-winner design on the basis of the hypothesis of an increased pathologic complete response (pCR) of 25% after total neoadjuvant therapy compared with standard 15% after preoperative CRT. Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer were assigned to group A for induction chemotherapy using three cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin before fluorouracil/oxaliplatin CRT (50.4 Gy) or to group B for consolidation chemotherapy after CRT. Secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, and surgical morbidity.
Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (156 in group A and 150 in group B). CRT-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity was lower (37%
27%) and compliance with CRT higher in group B (91%, 78%, and 76%
97%, 87%, and 93% received full-dose radiotherapy, concomitant fluorouracil, and concomitant oxaliplatin in groups A and B, respectively); 92% versus 85% completed all induction/consolidation chemotherapy cycles, respectively. The longer interval between completion of CRT and surgery in group B (median 90
45 days in group A) did not increase surgical morbidity. A pCR in the intention-to-treat population was achieved in 17% in group A and in 25% in group B. Thus, only group B (
< .001), but not group A (
= .210), fulfilled the predefined statistical hypothesis.
Up-front CRT followed by chemotherapy resulted in better compliance with CRT but worse compliance with chemotherapy compared with group A. Long-term follow-up will assess whether improved pCR in group B translates to better oncologic outcome.
In a basket trial that included patients with a variety of cancers, all of which contained a
BRAF
V600 mutation, the rate of response to vemurafenib was highly variable. The histologic context ...influences the response to BRAF inhibition.
BRAF
V600 mutations occur in approximately 50% of cutaneous melanomas and result in constitutive activation of downstream signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.
1
,
2
Vemurafenib (Zelboraf, F. Hoffmann–La Roche/Genentech) is a selective oral inhibitor of the
BRAF
V600 kinase and is associated with a response rate of approximately 50% and improved survival among patients with
BRAF
V600E mutation–positive metastatic melanoma.
3
Efforts by the Cancer Genome Atlas
4
and other initiatives to characterize the genetic landscape of most tumor types have identified
BRAF
V600 mutations in nonmelanoma cancers, including colorectal cancer,
5
,
6
non–small-cell lung cancer,
7
papillary thyroid cancer,
8
diffuse gliomas, . . .
Abstract Introduction Treatment options for patients with platinum refractory metastatic germ cell tumours (GCT) relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are ...limited and survival is poor. Antibodies directed against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are currently assessed within clinical trials. We present updated data on our experience with checkpoint inhibitors as a compassionate use off-label treatment attempt for highly-pretreated patients with GCT and provide an overview of the current literature on PD-L1 expression in this rare tumour entity. Patients and methods We analysed all patients with platinum refractory GCT treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institutions between 2015 and 2017. Data were retrieved retrospectively from the patient charts. Results Seven patients were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Four patients received single-dose treatment and died shortly afterwards due to tumour progression; the remaining three patients received treatment for at least 6 months. No significant treatment toxicity was observed. Long-term tumour response was achieved in two of the three patients, both of them highly positive for PD-L1 staining. Interpretation We consider checkpoint inhibition to be efficient in carefully selected patients with platinum refractory GCT. However, predictive markers associated with tumour response are not yet known and larger prospective clinical trials are warranted.
The percentage of the planned dose received, however, was superior in the dose-escalation group in cycle 2 (median 100·0% IQR 95·2–100·0 vs 75·0% 50·0–100·0). ...with a slightly better toxicity ...profile and comparable dose exposure in cycle 2, a higher percentage of patients initiated cycle 3 in the dose-escalation group, thus making ReDOS a positive trial. ...it is—as is often the case with clinical trials including patients in the refractory treatment setting—questionable whether the study results obtained in ReDOS are transferable to most patients treated under routine clinical conditions. ReDOS took almost 25 months to achieve its recruitment goal of 116 evaluable patients in 39 centres, an average of 1·4 patients per centre per year. ...an obviously small subset of all patients was included in the ReDOS study that might not represent the majority of patients treated with regorafenib.
This multicenter, randomized phase II/III study evaluated the addition of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 inhibitor ramucirumab to FLOT as perioperative treatment for resectable ...esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received either FLOT alone (Arm A) or combined with ramucirumab followed by ramucirumab monotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was the pathological complete or subtotal response (pCR/pSR) rate. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both arms with a high rate of tumors signet‐ring cell component (A:47% B:43%). No between‐arm difference in pCR/pSR rate was seen (A:29% B:26%), therefore the transition to phase III was not pursued. Nevertheless, the combination was associated with a significantly increased R0‐resection rate compared with FLOT alone (A:82% B:96%; P = .009). In addition, the median disease‐free survival was numerically improved in Arm B (A:21 months B:32 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.218), while the median overall survival was similar in both treatment arms (A:45 months B:46 months, HR 0.94, P = 0.803). Patients with Siewert type I tumors receiving transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis showed an increased risk of serious postoperative complications after ramucirumab treatment, therefore recruitment of those patients was stopped after the first‐third of the study. Overall, surgical morbidity and mortality was comparable, whereas more non‐surgical grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed with the combination, especially anorexia (A:1% B:11%), hypertension (A:4% B:13%) and infections (A:19% B:33%). The combination of ramucirumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment shows efficacy signals, particularly in terms of R0 resection rates, for a study population with a high proportion of prognostically poor histological subtypes, and further evaluation in this subgroup seems warranted.
What's new?
Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) is associated with high mortality and is increasing in incidence worldwide. Standard therapy for EGA centers on FLOT, a combination of 5‐fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel. While FLOT can improve prognosis, patient outcome remains unsatisfactory. This report describes patient outcomes in the RAMSES trial, which evaluated the efficacy of perioperative FLOT in combination with VGFR‐targeting immune therapy with ramucirumab in resectable EGA. Perioperative therapy with combined ramucirumab and FLOT improved R0 resection rates and was associated with more favorable disease‐free survival. The findings warrant further evaluation of ramucirumab plus FLOT among patients with poor histological EGA subtypes.
Historical data indicate that surgical resection may benefit select patients with metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, randomized clinical trials are lacking. The current ...RENAISSANCE trial addresses the potential benefits of surgical intervention in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer with limited metastases.
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated phase III trial. Previously untreated patients with limited metastatic stage (retroperitoneal lymph node metastases only or a maximum of one incurable organ site that is potentially resectable or locally controllable with or without retroperitoneal lymph nodes) receive 4 cycles of FLOT chemotherapy alone or with trastuzumab if Her2+. Patients without disease progression after 4 cycles are randomized 1:1 to receive additional chemotherapy cycles or surgical resection of primary and metastases followed by subsequent chemotherapy. 271 patients are to be allocated to the trial, of which at least 176 patients will proceed to randomization. The primary endpoint is overall survival; main secondary endpoints are quality of life assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire, progression free survival and surgical morbidity and mortality. Recruitment has already started; currently (Feb 2017) 22 patients have been enrolled.
If the RENAISSANCE concept proves to be effective, this could potentially lead to a new standard of therapy. On the contrary, if the outcome is negative, patients with gastric or GEJ cancer and metastases will no longer be considered candidates for surgical intervention.
The article reports of a health care intervention on human participants and is registered on October 12, 2015 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02578368 ; EudraCT: 2014-002665-30.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Peripheral blood leukocytosis and neutrophilia reflect cancer inflammation and have been proposed as prognostic immunological biomarkers in various malignancies. However, previous studies were ...limited by their retrospective nature and small patient numbers. Baseline peripheral blood leukocytes, neutrophils, hemoglobin, platelets, lactate dehydrogenase and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics, and clinical outcome in 1236 patients with rectal cancer treated with 5‐FU‐based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone or with oxaliplatin followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy within the CAO/ARO/AIO‐04 randomized phase 3 trial. Multivariable analyses were performed using Cox regression models. After a median follow‐up of 50 months, baseline leukocytosis remained an independent adverse prognostic factor for disease‐free survival (DFS; HR 1.457; 95% CI 1.163–1.825; p = 0.001), distant metastasis (HR 1.696; 95% CI 1.266–2.273; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; HR 1.716; 95% CI 1.264–2.329; p = 0.001) in multivariable analysis. Similar significant findings were observed for neutrophilia and high CEA levels. Conversely, treatment‐induced leukopenia correlated with favorable DFS (p = 0.037), distant metastasis (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.012). Intriguingly, addition of oxaliplatin to 5‐FU CRT resulted in a significant DFS improvement only in patients with neutrophilia and leukocytosis (p = 0.028 and p = 0.002). Our findings have important clinical implications and provide high‐level evidence on the adverse prognostic role of leukocytes and neutrophils, and the impact of chemotherapy in the context of these biomarkers. These data could help guide patient stratification and should be further validated within prospective studies.
What's new?
Cancer often causes an inflammatory response, recruiting leukocytes and neutrophils to the tumor site where they hinder anti‐cancer treatments. Here, the authors asked how leukocytosis and neutrophilia affect outcomes in rectal cancer. Unlike previous studies, which have been retrospective, this study examined a large cohort of patients within a phase 3 clinical trial. They found that baseline leukocytosis and neutrophilia independently predicted poor outcomes, including distant metastasis and shorter survival. Treatment‐induced leukopenia, meanwhile, correlated with better outcomes. Adding oxaliplatin to standard chemoradiation improved disease‐free survival only in those patients with leukocytosis & neutrophilia. These findings could lead to improved personalized treatments.
Summary Background Fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy is regarded as a standard perioperative treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer. We investigated the efficacy and safety of substituting ...fluorouracil with the oral prodrug capecitabine. Methods This randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial began in March, 2002, as an adjuvant trial comparing capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy, in patients aged 18 years or older with pathological stage II–III locally advanced rectal cancer from 35 German institutions. Patients in the capecitabine group were scheduled to receive two cycles of capecitabine (2500 mg/m2 days 1–14, repeated day 22), followed by chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus capecitabine 1650 mg/m2 days 1–38), then three cycles of capecitabine. Patients in the fluorouracil group received two cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 days 1–5, repeated day 29), followed by chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil 225 mg/m2 daily), then two cycles of bolus fluorouracil. The protocol was amended in March, 2005, to allow a neoadjuvant cohort in which patients in the capecitabine group received chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus capecitabine 1650 mg/m2 daily) followed by radical surgery and five cycles of capecitabine (2500 mg/m2 per day for 14 days) and patients in the fluorouracil group received chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 days 1–5 and 29–33) followed by radical surgery and four cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 for 5 days). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment group in a 1:1 ratio using permuted blocks, with stratification by centre and tumour stage. The primary endpoint was overall survival; analyses were done based on all patients with post-randomisation data. Non-inferiority of capecitabine in terms of 5-year overall survival was tested with a 12·5% margin. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01500993. Findings Between March, 2002, and December, 2007, 401 patients were randomly allocated; 392 patients were evaluable (197 in the capecitabine group, 195 in the fluorouracil group), with a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR 41–72). 5-year overall survival in the capecitabine group was non-inferior to that in the fluorouracil group (76% 95% CI 67–82 vs 67% 58–74; p=0·0004; post-hoc test for superiority p=0·05). 3-year disease-free survival was 75% (95% CI 68–81) in the capecitabine group and 67% (59–73) in the fluorouracil group (p=0·07). Similar numbers of patients had local recurrences in each group (12 6% in the capecitabine group vs 14 7% in the fluorouracil group, p=0·67), but fewer patients developed distant metastases in the capecitabine group (37 19% vs 54 28%; p=0·04). Diarrhoea was the most common adverse event in both groups (any grade: 104 53% patients in the capecitabine group vs 85 44% in the fluorouracil group; grade 3–4: 17 9% vs four 2%). Patients in the capecitabine group had more hand-foot skin reactions (62 31% any grade, four 2% grade 3–4 vs three 2% any grade, no grade 3–4), fatigue (55 28% any grade, no grade 3–4 vs 29 15%, two 1% grade 3–4), and proctitis (31 16% any grade, one <1% grade 3–4 vs ten 5%, one <1% grade 3–4) than did those in the fluorouracil group, whereas leucopenia was more frequent with fluorouracil than with capecitabine (68 35% any grade, 16 8% grade 3–4 vs 50 25% any grade, three 2% grade 3–4). Interpretation Capecitabine could replace fluorouracil in adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Funding Roche Pharma AG (Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany).
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major contributor to cancer-associated morbidity worldwide and over one-third of CRC is located in the rectum. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgical ...resection is commonly applied to treat locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this review, we summarize current and novel concepts of neoadjuvant therapy for LARC such as total neoadjuvant therapy and describe how these developments impact treatment response. Moreover, as response to nCRT is highly divergent in rectal cancers, we discuss the role of potential predictive biomarkers. We review recent advances in biomarker discovery, from a clinical as well as a histopathological and molecular perspective. Furthermore, the role of emerging predictive biomarkers derived from the tumor environment such as immune cell composition and gut microbiome is presented. Finally, we describe how different tumor models such as patient-derived cancer organoids are used to identify novel predictive biomarkers for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in rectal cancer.
PDF
