Introduction
Standardized and validated criteria to define advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) or identify patient eligibility for device-aided therapy are needed. This study assessed the psychometric ...properties of clinical indicators of advanced PD and eligibility for device-aided therapy in a large population.
Methods
This retrospective analysis of the Adelphi Parkinson’s Disease Specific Programme collected data from device-aided therapy-naïve people with PD in G7 countries. We assessed the presence of 15 clinical indicators of advancing PD and seven indicators of eligibility for device-aided therapy in patients classified with advanced PD or as eligible for device-aided therapy by the treating physician. Accuracy was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and multivariable logistic regression models. Construct validity was examined via known-group comparisons of disease severity and burden among patients with and without each clinical indicator.
Results
Of 4714 PD patients, 14.9% were classified with advanced PD and 17.5% as eligible for device-aided therapy by physician judgment. The presence of each clinical indicator was 1.9- to 7.3-fold more likely in patients classified with advanced PD. Similarly, the presence of device-aided therapy eligibility indicators was 1.8- to 5.5-fold more likely in patients considered eligible for device-aided therapy. All indicators demonstrated high clinical screening accuracy for identifying advanced PD (AUC range 0.84–0.89) and patients eligible for device-aided therapy (AUC range 0.73–0.80). The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score, cognitive function, quality of life, and caregiver burden were significantly worse in indicator-positive patients.
Conclusion
Specific clinical indicators of advanced PD and eligibility for device-aided therapy demonstrated excellent psychometric properties in a large sample, and thus may provide an objective and reliable approach for patient identification and treatment optimization.
Plain Language Summary
Advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) refers to the stage of disease when motor complications are difficult to manage with standard therapy. Patients reaching this stage of the disease may benefit from a treatment change from pills to the so-called device-aided therapies. However, there is currently no unanimous definition of advanced PD, which makes it challenging to identify suitable candidates for device-aided therapies. There is urgent need to define specific features (or ‘clinical indicators’) to support healthcare professionals and patients in the identification of advanced PD as well as to define suitability for device-aided therapy. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of 15 clinical indicators and seven device-aided therapy eligibility criteria using information from a large database of 4714 patients in G7 countries. Physicians classified 14.9% of patients as having advanced PD and 17.5% were judged to be eligible for device-aided therapy. Each clinical indicator or device-aided therapy eligibility indicator was detected more frequently in patients classified as having advanced PD and in patients considered eligible for device-aided therapy, respectively. All indicators had high accuracy for identifying advanced PD and device-aided therapy-eligibility. These previously identified clinical indicators of advanced PD and device-aided therapy eligibility may provide an objective and reliable approach for patient screening and treatment optimization.
Introduction
A clinical trial in advanced Parkinson’s disease (APD) has established the superiority of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) in reducing total patient “off” time (OFF) and ...increasing total “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia (ON-woTD) over orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa tablets (IR–CL). However, temporal patterns of these improvements throughout the waking day have not been examined. In this analysis, time to ON-woTD after waking and patterns of motor-symptom control throughout the waking day were compared between CLES and IR–CL.
Methods
Post hoc analyses of APD patient-diary data from the phase 3 randomized controlled trial were used to compare changes in time to ON-woTD after waking, motor-symptom control throughout the waking day, occurrence of extreme fluctuations between OFF and “on” with troublesome dyskinesia, and motor-state transitions with CLES versus IR–CL from baseline to week 12.
Results
The sample included 33 CLES-treated and 30 IR–CL-treated patients. Among the CLES group, the percentage of patient days achieving ON-woTD within 30 min of waking was three times higher at week 12 versus baseline (33% vs. 11%,
p
= 0.0043); no significant change occurred with IR–CL. When the waking day was divided into four 4-h periods, CLES versus IR–CL treatment produced significantly greater reductions in OFF during three periods, and two periods had increased ON-woTD. Fewer CLES-treated patients had extreme fluctuations at week 12 (3% vs. 23%,
p
= 0.0224) compared to IR–CL-treated patients. From baseline to week 12, CLES-treated patients had greater reductions in the average number of motor-state transitions compared to IR–CL-treated patients (− 1.6,
p
= 0.0295).
Conclusion
CLES-treated patients experienced a more rapid onset of ON-woTD after waking and greater consistency of ON-woTD throughout their waking day than IR–CL-treated patients.
Plain Language Summary
In advanced Parkinson’s disease, patients’ motor-symptom states (such as “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia good “on” time and “off” time), and the timing at which they occur, can impact patients’ quality of life and ability to complete activities of daily living. Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension is administered continuously into the jejunum, potentially reducing some of the motor-state variation that is common with orally administered carbidopa/levodopa, including delayed “on” time after waking and transitions between “off” and “on” throughout the day. In post hoc analyses of clinical trial data, patterns of motor-states across the waking day were compared between carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension and orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa at week 12. Outcomes included time to good “on” after waking; occurrence of extreme fluctuations between “off” time and “on” time with troublesome dyskinesia; time in each motor-state during 4-h intervals across the day; and frequency of motor-state transitions. Three times as many carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension-treated patients achieved good “on” within 30 min of waking after 12 weeks versus baseline, whereas no significant change was observed for the orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa group. Compared to orally administered immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa-treated patients, fewer carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension-treated patients experienced extreme fluctuations, had greater reductions in motor-state transitions, and greater reductions in duration of “off” during three of the four intervals in the day. These findings provide a first look at the impact of carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension on motor-state patterns throughout the day, and suggest that carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension provides more consistent motor-symptom control and predictable benefit throughout the day than orally administered carbidopa/levodopa.
Quantify the value of functional status (FS) improvements consistent in magnitude with improvements due to levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment, among the advanced Parkinson's disease ...(APD) population.
The Health Economic Medical Innovation Simulation (THEMIS), a microsimulation that estimates future health conditions and medical spending, was used to quantify the health and cost burden of disability among the APD population, and the value of quality-adjusted life-years gained from FS improvement due to LCIG treatment compared to standard of care (SoC). A US-representative Parkinson's disease (PD)-comparable cohort was constructed in THEMIS based on observed PD patient characteristics in a nationally representative dataset. APD was defined from the literature and clinical expert input. The PD and APD cohorts were followed from 2010 over their remaining lifetimes. All individuals were ages 65 and over at the start of the simulation. To estimate the value of FS improvement due to LCIG treatment, decreases in activities of daily living (ADL) limitations caused by LCIG treatment were calculated using data from a randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial and applied to the APD population in THEMIS.
Total burden of disability associated with APD was $17.7 billion (B). From clinical trial data, LCIG treatment versus SoC lowers the odds of difficulties in walking, dressing, and bathing by 76%, 42% and 39%, respectively. Among the APD population, these reductions generated $2.6B in value to patients and cost savings to payers. The added value was 15% of the burden of disability associated with APD and offsets 15% of the cost of LCIG treatment.
FS improvements, consistent with improvements due to LCIG treatment, in the APD population created health benefits and reduced healthcare costs in the US.
Studies have consistently evidenced the positive clinical, economic, and humanistic benefits of pharmacist‐directed patient care in a variety of settings. Given the vast differences in clinical ...outcomes associated with evaluated clinical pharmacy services (CPS), more detail as to the nature of the CPS is needed to better understand observed differences in economic outcomes. With the growing trend of outpatient pharmacy services, these economic evaluations serve as viable decision‐making tools in choosing the most effective and cost‐effective pharmacy programs. We previously conducted three systematic reviews to evaluate the economic impact of CPS from 1988 to 2005. In this systematic review, our objectives were to describe and evaluate the quality of economic evaluations of CPS published between 2006 and 2010, with the goal of informing administrators and practitioners as to their cost‐effectiveness. We searched the scientific literature by using the Medline, International Pharmaceutical s, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases to identify studies describing CPS published from 2006 to 2010. Studies meeting our inclusion criteria (original research articles that evaluated CPS and described economic and clinical outcomes) were reviewed by two investigators. Methodology used, economic evaluation type, CPS setting and type, and clinical and economic outcome results were extracted. Results were informally compared with previous systematic reviews. Of 3587 potential studies identified, 25 met inclusion criteria. Common CPS settings were hospital (36%), community (32%), and clinic or hospital‐based ambulatory practices (28%). CPS types were disease state management (48%), general pharmacotherapeutic monitoring (24%), target drug programs (8%), and patient education (4%). Two studies (8%) listed CPS as medication therapy management. Costs were evaluated in 24 studies (96%) and sufficiently described in 13 (52%). Clinical or humanistic outcomes were evaluated in 20 studies (80%) and were sufficiently described in 18 (72%). Control groups were included in 16 (70%) of 23 studies not involving modeling. Study assumptions and limitations were stated and justified in eight studies (32%). Conclusions and recommendations were considered justified and based on results in 24 studies (96%). Eighteen studies (72%) involved full economic evaluation. The mean ± SD study quality score for full economic evaluations (18 studies) was 60.4 ± 22.3 of a possible 100 points. Benefit‐cost ratios from three studies ranged from 1.05:1 to 25.95:1, and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios of five studies were calculated and reported. Fewer studies documented the economic impact of CPS from 2006–2010 than from 2001–2005, although a higher proportion involved controlled designs and were full economic evaluations. Evaluations of ambulatory practices were increasingly common. CPS were generally considered cost‐effective or provided a good benefit‐cost ratio.
PDF
