Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous disease arising from a complex interaction between host‐specific genetic background and multiple risk factors. Globally, CCA incidence rates exhibit ...geographical variation, with much higher incidence in parts of the Eastern world compared to the West. These differences are likely to reflect differences in geographical risk factors as well as genetic determinants. Of note, over the past few decades, the incidence rates of CCA appear to change and subtypes of CCA appear to show distinct epidemiological trends. These trends need to be interpreted with caution given the issues of diagnosis, recording and coding of subtypes of CCA. Epidemiological evidences suggest that in general population some risk factors are less frequent but associated with a higher CCA risk, while others are more common but associated with a lower risk. Moreover, while some risk factors are shared by intrahepatic and both extrahepatic forms, others seem more specific for one of the two forms. Currently some pathological conditions have been clearly associated with CCA development, and other conditions are emerging; however, while their impact in increasing CCA risk as single etiological factors has been provided in many studies, less is known when two or more risk factors co‐occur in the same patient. Moreover, despite the advancements in the knowledge of CCA aetiology, in Western countries about 50% of cases are still diagnosed without any identifiable risk factor. It is therefore conceivable that other still undefined etiologic factors are responsible for the recent increase of CCA (especially iCCA) incidence worldwide.
Display omitted
•Choledochal cysts were found to be most strongly associated with both iCCA and eCCA.•Cirrhosis was a significant CCA risk, with a stronger association with iCCA than ...eCCA.•Choledocholithiasis had a stronger association with eCCA than iCCA.•In Eastern countries, cirrhosis and HBV conferred a greater risk of iCCA than in Western countries.•Rising global incidence of iCCA may be linked to increases in T2DM, cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease and cholelithiasis.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) carries a poor prognosis, is increasing in incidence and its causes are poorly understood. Although some risk factors are known, they vary globally and collectively account for a minority of cases. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of risk factors for intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA), from Eastern and Western world studies.
A literature search of case-control studies was performed to identify potential risk factors for iCCA and eCCA. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias, and meta-regression was used to select risk factors for comparison between Eastern and Western studies.
A total of 13 risk factors were selected from 25 case-control studies in 7 geographically diverse countries. The strongest risk factors for both iCCA and eCCA were biliary cysts and stones, cirrhosis, hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Choledochal cysts conferred the greatest risk of both iCCA and eCCA with pooled ORs of 26.71 (95% CI 15.80–45.16) and 34.94 (24.36–50.12), respectively. No significant associations were found between hypertension and obesity for either iCCA or eCCA. Comparing Eastern and Western populations, there was a difference for the association of hepatitis B with iCCA (coefficient = −0.15195; 95% CI −0.278 to −0.025; p = 0.022).
This is the most comprehensive meta-analysis of CCA risk factors to date. Some risk factors, such as diabetes, although less strong, are increasing globally and may be contributing to rising rates of this cancer.
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a cancer arising in the bile ducts inside (intrahepatic CCA) and connected to the liver (extrahepatic CCA). It is a very aggressive cancer: 95% of patients die within 5 years. CCA rates are increasing globally, but the causes of CCA are poorly understood. The few risk factors that are known account for only a minority of cases. In this study, we found that the strongest risk factors for both intrahepatic and extrahepatic CCA are cysts and stones in the bile ducts, cirrhosis, and hepatitis B and C viruses. Some risk factors for CCA, such as diabetes, although less strong, are increasing globally and may be contributing to rising rates of CCA.
Cholangiocarcinomas are cancers arising from bile ducts, either found within the liver (intrahepatic) or outside the liver (extrahepatic). In Western countries, deaths due to intrahepatic cancers are ...rising at a higher rate than deaths due to extrahepatic cancers. This may be due to rising cases of liver disease and misclassification of the different cancer types.
Cholangiocarcinoma is a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumours with features of cholangiocyte differentiation: cholangiocarcinomas are categorized according to anatomical location as ...intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), or distal (dCCA). Each subtype has a distinct epidemiology, biology, prognosis, and strategy for clinical management. The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma, particularly iCCA, has increased globally over the past few decades. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of potentially curative treatment for all three disease subtypes, whereas liver transplantation after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is restricted to a subset of patients with early stage pCCA. For patients with advanced-stage or unresectable disease, locoregional and systemic chemotherapeutics are the primary treatment options. Improvements in external-beam radiation therapy have facilitated the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, advances in comprehensive whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing have defined the genetic landscape of each cholangiocarcinoma subtype. Accordingly, promising molecular targets for precision medicine have been identified, and are being evaluated in clinical trials, including those exploring immunotherapy. Biomarker-driven trials, in which patients are stratified according to anatomical cholangiocarcinoma subtype and genetic aberrations, will be essential in the development of targeted therapies. Targeting the rich tumour stroma of cholangiocarcinoma in conjunction with targeted therapies might also be useful. Herein, we review the evolving developments in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the commonest primary malignant cancer of the liver in the world. Given that the burden of chronic liver disease is expected to rise owing to increasing rates of ...alcoholism, hepatitis B and C prevalence and obesity-related fatty liver disease, it is expected that the incidence of HCC will also increase in the foreseeable future. This article summarizes the international epidemiology, the risk factors and the pathogenesis of HCC, including the roles of viral hepatitis, toxins, such as alcohol and aflatoxin, and insulin resistance.
Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma Qurashi, Maria; Vithayathil, Mathew; Khan, Shahid A.
European journal of surgical oncology,
09/2023
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a heterogenous set of malignancies arising from the biliary tract. Classification of CCA subdivides tumours into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), with ...eCCA further categorised as perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) lesions. Tumour subtypes show distinct epidemiological, genetic and clinical characteristics. Global incidence and mortality are rising, with the highest rates seen in Asian populations compared to the West. There has been a divergence in recent mortality trends observed between CCA subtypes, with rising rates of iCCA seen compared with eCCA. There are several drivers for these differing trends, including specific risk factors, misclassification of CCA subtypes and variation in diagnosis and surveillance. Risk factors for CCA can be divided into hepatobiliary, extra-hepatic and environmental, with hepatobiliary diseases conferring the largest risk. Surgery represents the only curative treatment for CCA, but can only be offered to early-stage candidates who are otherwise fit; the majority of patients are therefore treated with chemotherapy and, recently, immunotherapy. Due to late-stage presentation of disease, prognosis is poor, with 5-year survival <20%.
Epidemiology of HPB malignancy in the elderly Pericleous, Marinos; Khan, Shahid A.
European journal of surgical oncology,
March 2021, 2021-Mar, 2021-03-00, 20210301, Letnik:
47, Številka:
3
Journal Article
Recenzirano
The incidence of hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers is increasing worldwide. Despite improvements in cancer surveillance and earlier access to therapy, these cancers still have poor survival rates, ...especially in elderly patients. There are several challenges in elucidating the epidemiology of these malignancies especially in view of the heterogeneous exposure to recognised risk factors and the coding systems used. Early diagnosis, crucial to improved survival, remains challenging as many patients present sporadically. Furthermore, the indolent nature of these tumours means they tend to present late, when curative treatments are no longer an option. Importantly, even when patients are diagnosed early and treated with curative intent, recurrence rates remain high. HPB cancers display a heterogenous molecular profile resulting in poorly effective systemic therapies in patients for whom curative treatments cannot be considered. Globally, people now live longer, and it is predicted that the population of individuals older than 85 will double by 2033. With increasing age comes increased cancer risk. There is a plethora of recognised challenges in elderly patients presenting with cancer and this is no different with HPB cancers. Complex co-morbidities including chronic disease, polypharmacy, cognitive decline and increasing psychosocial needs confer an extra layer of complexity in the management of this elderly sub population. The frailty that usually accompanies advancing age often means that patients take longer to recover and develop more complications after cancer therapies. In this article, we review the epidemiology of malignant HPB tumours with a focus on the elderly.
This paper reports on an effective mutual coupling suppression technique in which a metamaterial superstrate is placed in between the elements of densely packed microstrip phased array. Modified ...complementary split ring resonators are printed on the decoupling superstrate slab which caters for both surface and space wave effects. A detailed analysis of this proposed scheme is carried out on a low as well as on a high-permittivity substrate. Coupling suppression of 27 and 11 dB is achieved experimentally on the low- and high-permittivity substrates, respectively, with an element separation of λ o /8. The design is compact and easy to realize and it removes drawback of poor front-to-back ratio previously reported in other decoupling techniques. In addition to high-coupling suppression, the decoupling slab can be added or removed in real time which makes this technique versatile for various applications having stringent performance requirements.
Background & Aims Cholangiocarcinomas (CC) can be sub-divided into intrahepatic (IHCC) or extrahepatic (EHCC). Hilar or ‘Klatskin’ tumours are anatomically extrahepatic. Most international studies, ...also from the UK, report increasing IHCC and decreasing EHCC incidence. The second edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-2) assigned ‘Klatskin’ tumours a unique histology code (8162/3), but this was cross-referenced to the topography code for intrahepatic (IHBD) rather than extrahepatic bile duct tumours (EHBD). Under the third ICD-O edition, ‘Klatskin’ tumours are cross-referenced to either IHBD or EHBD. New editions of the ICD-O classification are adopted at different time points by different countries. We investigated the impact of changing ICD-O classifications and the potential misclassification of hilar/’Klatskin’ tumours on bile duct tumour and CC incidence rates in England and Wales and the US. We also examined whether coding practices by cancer registries in England and Wales could be influencing these rates. Methods We analysed age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) in England and Wales for IHBD and EHBD tumours between 1990 and 2008, then transferred all ‘Klatskin’ tumours from IHBD to EHBD and reanalysed rates from 1995, when ICD-O-2 was introduced in the UK. We also compared trends in IHBD, EHBD, and ‘Klatskin’ tumours in England and Wales with those in the USSEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) database. Coding practice at Cancer registry level in England and Wales was investigated via a questionnaire completed by all national cancer registries. Results In England and Wales, 1990–2008, ASIR of IHBD cancers rose (0.43–1.84/100,000 population in males; 0.27–1.51 in females) but fell for EHBD (0.78–0.51/100,000 population in males; 0.62–0.39 in females). After transferring all ‘Klatskin’ tumours from IHBD to EHBD, there remained a marked increase in ASIR of IHBD cancers and a decrease in ASIR for EHBD, as only 1% of CC were reportedly ‘Klatskin’. The US SEER data showed that ASIR for IHBD gradually rose from 0.59/100,000 population in 1990 to 0.91 in 2001, then sharply fell before plateauing at 0.60 by 2007. ASIR for EHBD remained relatively stable at around 0.80/100,000 population until 2001, then began increasing, to 0.97 by 2007. Annually, between 1995 and 2008, the vast majority of ‘Klatskin’ tumours in England and Wales were coded as IHBD. This was also the case in the SEER data until 2001, when the situation was reversed and subsequently most ‘Klatskin’ tumours were coded as EHBD. US trends coincide with a switch from ICD-O2 to ICD-O-3 in 2001. In the UK, the switch to ICD-O-3 only occurred in 2008. On questioning, cancer registries in England and Wales stated they would not code a CC described as ‘hilar’ with the designated ‘Klatskin’ histology code. If the tumour site is unspecified, most registries classify CC as intrahepatic. Conclusions Changes in ICD-classification may be influencing observed changes in IHBD and EHBD incidence rates. Coding misclassification is likely to have been skewing CC registration to an intrahepatic site, thereby contributing to the previously reported rise in intrahepatic tumours.