We have recently described an increased lymphocytic infiltration rate in breast carcinoma tissue is a significant response predictor for anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). ...The aim of this study was to prospectively validate the tumor-associated lymphocyte infiltrate as predictive marker for response to anthracycline/taxane-based NACT.
The immunological infiltrate was prospectively evaluated in a total of 313 core biopsies from HER2 negative patients of the multicenter PREDICT study, a substudy of the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto study. Intratumoral lymphocytes (iTuLy), stromal lymphocytes (strLy) as well as lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) were evaluated by histopathological assessment. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates were analyzed and compared between the defined subgroups using the exact test of Fisher.
Patients with lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) had a significantly increased pCR rate of 36.6%, compared to non-LPBC patients (14.3%, p<0.001). LPBC and stromal lymphocytes were significantly independent predictors for pCR in multivariate analysis (LPBC: OR 2.7, p = 0.003, strLy: OR 1.2, p = 0.01). The amount of intratumoral lymphocytes was significantly predictive for pCR in univariate (OR 1.2, p = 0.01) but not in multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 1.2, p = 0.11).
Confirming previous investigations of our group, we have prospectively validated in an independent cohort that an increased immunological infiltrate in breast tumor tissue is predictive for response to anthracycline/taxane-based NACT. Patients with LPBC and increased stromal lymphocyte infiltration have significantly increased pCR rates. The lymphocytic infiltrate is a promising additional parameter for histopathological evaluation of breast cancer core biopsies.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow are observed in about 40% at primary diagnosis of breast cancer and predict poor survival. While anti-resorptive therapy with bisphosphonates was ...shown to eradicate minimal residue disease in the bone marrow, the effect of denosumab on DTCs, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, is largely unknown. The recent GeparX clinical trial reported that denosumab, applied as an add-on treatment to nab-paclitaxel based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), did not improve the patient's pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Herein, we analyzed the predictive value of DTCs for the response to NACT and interrogated whether neoadjuvant denosumab treatment may eradicate DTCs in the bone marrow.
A total of 167 patients from the GeparX trial were analyzed for DTCs at baseline by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. Initially DTC-positive patients were re-analyzed for DTCs after NACT ± denosumab.
At baseline, DTCs were observed in 43/167 patients (25.7%) in the total cohort, however their presence did not predict response to nab-paclitaxel based NACT (pCR rates: 37.1% in DTC-negative vs. 32.6% DTC-positive; p = 0.713). Regarding breast cancer subtypes, the presence of DTCs at baseline was numerically associated with response to NACT in TNBC patients (pCR rates: 40.0% in DTC-positive vs. 66.7% in DTC-negative patients; p = 0.16). Overall, denosumab treatment did not significantly increase the given DTC-eradication rate of NACT (NACT: 69.6% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 77.8% DTC-eradication; p = 0.726). In TNBC patients with pCR, a numerical but statistically non-significant increase of DTC-eradication after NACT + denosumab was observed (NACT: 75% DTC-eradication vs. NACT + denosumab: 100% DTC-eradication; p = 1.00).
This is the first study worldwide, demonstrating that neoadjuvant add-on denosumab over a short-term period of 24 months does not increase the DTC-eradication rate in breast cancer patients treated with NACT.
The aim of this survey was to increase the knowledge on the characteristics and health concerns of long-term survivors (LTS; survival > 5 years) after ovarian cancer in order to tailor follow-up ...care. This international survey was initiated by the NOGGO and was made available to members of ENGOT and GCIG. The survey is anonymous and consists of 68 questions regarding sociodemographic, medical (cancer) history, health concerns including distress, long-term side effects, and lifestyle. For this analysis, 1044 LTS from 14 countries were recruited. In total, 58% were diagnosed with FIGO stage III/IV ovarian cancer and 43.4% developed recurrent disease, while 26.0% were receiving cancer treatment at the time of filling in the survey. LTS who survived 5–10 years self-estimated their health status as being significantly worse than LTS who survived more than 10 years (p = 0.034), whereas distress also remained high 10 years after cancer diagnosis. Almost half of the cohort (46.1%) reported still having symptoms, which were mainly lymphedema (37.7%), fatigue (23.9%), pain (21.6%), polyneuropathy (16.9%), gastrointestinal problems (16.6%), and memory problems (15.5%). Almost all patients (94.2%) regularly received follow-up care. Specialized survivorship care with a focus on long-term side effects, lifestyle, and prevention should be offered beyond the typical five years of follow-up care.
Aim: To develop an immunomagnetic assay for the isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) followed by the analysis of a multimarker panel, which will enable the characterization of these malignant ...cells with high accuracy. Patients and Methods: Peripheral blood (PB) was collected from 32 metastatic breast cancer patients and 42 negative controls. The antibodies BM7 and VU1D9 were used for immunomagnetic tumor cell enrichment. A real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) approach for the markers KRT19, SCGB2A2, MUC1, EPCAM, BIRC5 and ERBB2 was used for CTC detection and characterization. Results: The positivity rates for each marker were as follows: 46.9% for KRT19, 25.0% for SCGB2A2, 28.1% for MUC1, 28.1% for EPCAM, 21.9% for BIRC5, and 15.6% for ERBB2. After the creation of individualized cutoffs, the sensitivity and specificity of the combined marker gene panel increased to 56.3% and 100%, respectively. Interestingly, 27.0% of the HER2-negative tumor patients showed ERBB2 mRNA-positive CTCs. Conclusions: The described technique can be used to measure CTCs with great accuracy. The use of a multimarker panel for the characterization of CTCs may provide real-time information and be of great value in therapy monitoring.
Background
The prospective phase 3 PlanB trial used the Oncotype DX
®
Recurrence Score
®
(RS) to define a genomically low-risk subset of clinically high-risk pN0-1 early breast cancer (EBC) patients ...for treatment with adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) alone. Here, we report five-year data evaluating the prognostic value of RS, Ki-67, and other traditional clinicopathological parameters.
Methods
A central tumour bank was prospectively established within PlanB. Following an early amendment, hormone receptor (HR)+ , pN0-1 RS ≤ 11 patients were recommended to omit chemotherapy. Patients with RS ≥ 12, pN2-3, or HR-negative/HER2-negative disease were randomised to anthracycline-containing or anthracycline-free chemotherapy. Primary endpoint: disease-free survival (DFS). PlanB Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01049425.
Findings
From 2009 to 2011, PlanB enrolled 3198 patients (central tumour bank, n = 3073) with the median age of 56 years, 41.1% pN+, and 32.5% grade 3 EBC. Chemotherapy was omitted in 348/404 (86.1%) eligible RS ≤ 11 patients. After 55 months of median follow-up, five-year DFS in ET-treated RS ≤ 11 patients was 94% (in both pN0 and pN1) versus 94% (RS 12–25) and 84% (RS > 25) in chemotherapy-treated patients (
p
< 0.001); five-year overall survival (OS) was 99 versus 97% and 93%, respectively (
p
< 0.001). Nodal status, central/local grade, tumour size, continuous Ki-67, progesterone receptor (PR), IHC4, and RS were univariate prognostic factors for DFS. In a multivariate analysis including all univariate prognostic markers, only pN2-3, central and local grade 3, tumour size >2 cm, and RS, but not IHC4 or Ki-67 were independent adverse factors. If RS was excluded, IHC4 or both Ki-67 and PR entered the model. The impact of RS was particularly pronounced in patients with intermediate Ki-67 (>10%, <40%) tumours.
Interpretation
The excellent five-year outcomes in clinically high-risk, genomically low-risk (RS ≤ 11) pN0-1 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy support using RS with standardised pathology for treatment decisions in HR+ HER2-negative EBC. Ki-67 has the potential to support patient selection for genomic testing.
State-of-the art therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer suitable for platinum-based re-treatment includes bevacizumab-containing combinations (eg, bevacizumab combined with carboplatin–paclitaxel or ...carboplatin–gemcitabine) or the most active non-bevacizumab regimen: carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The aim of this head-to-head trial was to compare a standard bevacizumab-containing regimen versus carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with bevacizumab.
This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, was done in 159 academic centres in Germany, France, Australia, Austria, and the UK. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma with first disease recurrence more than 6 months after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Patients were stratified by platinum-free interval, residual tumour, previous antiangiogenic therapy, and study group language, and were centrally randomly assigned 1:1 using randomly permuted blocks of size two, four, or six to receive six intravenous cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1) plus carboplatin (area under the concentration curve AUC 4, day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks or six cycles of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) plus carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m2, day 1) every 4 weeks, both followed by maintenance bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks in both groups) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. There was no masking in this open-label trial. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy data were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01837251.
Between Aug 1, 2013, and July 31, 2015, 682 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 345 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–bevacizumab (experimental group) and 337 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin–gemcitabine–bevacizumab (standard group). Median follow-up for progression-free survival at data cutoff (July 10, 2018) was 12·4 months (IQR 8·3–21·7) in the experimental group and 11·3 months (8·0–18·4) in the standard group. Median progression-free survival was 13·3 months (95% CI 11·7–14·2) in the experimental group versus 11·6 months (11·0–12·7) in the standard group (hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·68–0·96; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (88 27% of 332 patients in the experimental group vs 67 20% of 329 patients in the standard group) and neutropenia (40 12% vs 73 22%). Serious adverse events occurred in 33 (10%) of 332 patients in the experimental group and 28 (9%) of 329 in the standard group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the experimental group (<1%; large intestine perforation) and two patients in the standard group (1%; one case each of osmotic demyelination syndrome and intracranial haemorrhage).
Carboplatin–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–bevacizumab is a new standard treatment option for platinum-eligible recurrent ovarian cancer.
F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Antiangiogenic therapy has known activity in ovarian cancer. The investigator-initiated randomised phase 2 TRIAS trial assessed the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib combined with topotecan and ...continued as maintenance therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.
We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial at 20 sites in Germany. Patients (≥18 years) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer previously treated with two or fewer chemotherapy lines for recurrent disease were stratified (first vs later relapse) in block sizes of four and randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-generated response system to topotecan (1·25 mg/m2 on days 1–5) plus either oral sorafenib 400 mg or placebo twice daily on days 6–15, repeated every 21 days for six cycles, followed by daily maintenance sorafenib or placebo for up to 1 year in patients without progression. Investigators and patients were masked to allocation of sorafenib or placebo; topotecan treatment was open label. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01047891.
Between Jan 18, 2010, and Sept 19, 2013, 185 patients were enrolled, 174 of whom were randomly assigned: 85 to sorafenib and 89 to placebo. Two patients in the sorafenib group had serious adverse events before treatment and were excluded from analyses. 83 patients in the sorafenib group and 89 in the placebo group started treatment. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with sorafenib versus placebo (hazard ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·43–0·83; p=0·0018). Median progression-free survival was 6·7 months (95% CI 5·8–7·6) with sorafenib versus 4·4 months (3·7–5·0) with placebo. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were leucopenia (57 69% of 83 patients in the sorafenib group vs 47 53% of 89 in the placebo group), neutropenia (46 55% vs 48 54%), and thrombocytopenia (23 28% vs 20 22%). Serious adverse events occurred in 49 (59%) of 83 sorafenib-treated patients and 45 (51%) of 89 placebo-treated patients. Of these, events were fatal in four patients (5%) in the sorafenib group (dyspnoea and poor general condition, septic shock, ascites and dyspnoea, and sigma perforation) and seven (8%) in the placebo group (pulmonary embolism in two patients, disease progression in two patients, and one case each of sepsis with fever, pleural effusion, and tumour cachexia). Sorafenib was associated with increased incidences of grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (three 13% vs 0 patients) and grade 2 alopecia (24 29% vs 12 13%).
Sorafenib, when given orally in combination with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy, showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. These encouraging results support the crucial role of antiangiogenesis as the treatment backbone in combination with chemotherapy, making this approach attractive for further assessment with other targeted strategies.
Bayer, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline.
Background
Invasive lobular breast cancer (BC) is the second most common BC subtype. Prognostic parameters (tumor classification, lymph node status, histologic grade, Oncotype DX recurrence score RS, ...progesterone receptor status, and Ki67 index) were retrospectively studied in a large, prospective clinical trial encompassing 2585 patients who had hormone receptor‐positive early BC (the West German Study Group PlanB trial).
Methods
BCs were centrally reviewed and classified as lobular (n = 353; 14%) or nonlobular (n = 2232; 86%). The median follow‐up was 60 months. Five‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) estimates were obtained using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Prognostic parameters were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models.
Results
Lobular BC was associated with higher tumor classification, higher lymph node status, lower histologic grade, lower Ki67 index, and low or intermediate RS. The prevalence of high RS (RS range, 26‐100) was 3‐fold lower in patients who had lobular BC compared with those who had nonlobular BC (8% vs 24%; P < .001). However, 5‐year DFS estimates for lobular and nonlobular BC were similar (92.1% and 92.3%, respectively; P = .673). In multivariate analyses, prognostic parameters for DFS in lobular BC included grade 3 (hazard ratio, 5.06; 95% CI, 1.91‐13.39) and a pathologic lymph node status (pN) of pN3 (hazard ratio, 12.16; 95% CI, 3.87‐38.24), but not RS. By contrast, prognostic parameters in nonlobular BC included grade 3 (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.11‐2.44), pN3 (hazard ratio, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.60‐8.46), and high RS (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.69‐3.68).
Conclusions
Lobular BC is associated with low and intermediate RS, although 5‐year DFS is similar to that of nonlobular BC. The effect of the RS in lobular BC appears to be distinct from that in nonlobular BC. For risk assessment, the RS needs to be complemented by clinicopathologic parameters for therapy decision making.
The prognostic impact of the Oncotype DX recurrence score in lobular breast cancer is distinct from that in nonlobular breast cancer. Correct histologic classification is a prerequisite for the adequate clinical utilization of prognostic gene expression profiles.
Several de-escalation neoadjuvant strategies have been investigated to reduce the use of chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer using pathological complete response as a surrogate ...endpoint; there are few survival data from these trials. Here, we report 5-year survival data in the WSG-ADAPT-HER2+/HR– trial and address the effect of pathological complete response, early therapy response, and molecular subtype.
WSG-ASAPT-HER2+/HR–, a part of the ADAPT umbrella trial performed in patients with different subtypes of early breast cancer, was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 40 Breast Cancer Centres in Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed, unilateral, primary invasive, non-inflammatory early breast cancer, hormone receptor-negative and HER2-positive status, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 or a Karnofsky performance status of at least 80%. Patients were randomly assigned (5:2, block size 21, stratified by centre and clinical nodal status) to 12 weeks of either trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg every 3 weeks) or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 weekly); all drugs were administered intravenously. The primary objective of the trial was to compare the number of patients with a pathological complete response at surgery (ie, no invasive tumour cells in breast and lymph nodes ypT0/is ypN0, the primary endpoint) in early responders (ie, low cellularity or Ki67 decrease ≥30% after 3 weeks) in the trastuzumab plus pertuzumab group versus all patients (irrespective of an early response) in the trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus paclitaxel group. Non-inferiority was defined as a pathological complete response no worse than 23% lower in the early-responder proportion of patients in the trastuzumab plus pertuzumab group than in the entire trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus paclitaxel group. The primary endpoint has been reported previously. Additionally, the primary objective of the ADAPT umbrella trial was the evaluation of the effect of pathological complete response on invasive disease-free survival. At investigator's discretion, further chemotherapy could be omitted in patients with a pathological complete response. Secondary survival endpoints were 5-year invasive disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival. The effect of pathological complete response on survival was estimated by Cox regression analysis. All analyses are reported in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01817452, and is closed to recruitment.
Between March 3, 2014, and Oct 6, 2015, 134 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to treatment, 92 to trastuzumab plus pertuzumab and 42 to trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus paclitaxel. Median follow-up in survivors was 59·9 months (IQR 53·4–61·4). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in invasive disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival. In the trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus paclitaxel group and in the trastuzumab plus pertuzumab group, the proportions of patients achieving 5-year survival respectively were 98% (95% CI 84–100) and 87% (78–93) for invasive disease-free survival (hazard ratio HR 0·32, 95% CI 0·07–1·49; p=0·15); 98% (95% CI 84–100) and 89% (79–94) for relapse-free survival (HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·09–1·91; p=0·25); 100% (95% CI not estimable) and 95% (88–98) for locoregional relapse-free survival (HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·05–3·75; p=0·43); 98% (95% CI 84–100) and 92% (83–96) for distant disease-free survival (HR 0·35, 95% CI 0·04–3·12; p=0·36), and 98% (95% CI 84–100) and 94% (86–97) for overall survival (HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·05–3·63; p=0·43). Pathological complete response was associated with improved invasive disease-free survival (HR 0·14, 95% CI 0·03–0·64; p=0·011). Two invasive disease-free survival events occurred after a pathological complete response (one in each treatment group).
The WSG-ADAPT-HER2+/HR– trial showed good survival rates in patients with a pathological complete response after de-escalated 12-week trastuzumab plus pertuzumab with or without weekly paclitaxel. Omission of further chemotherapy did not affect invasive disease-free survival in patients with a pathological complete response. 12 weeks of weekly paclitaxel plus dual HER2 blockade could be an efficacious de-escalated neoadjuvant regimen in patients with hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive early breast cancer with high pathological complete response rates and good 5-year outcomes. Further trials of this approach are ongoing.
Roche, Bayer.
For the German translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
PDF
